PMI-PBA Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, one of the best strategies to define appropriate acceptance criteria is to clearly define the performance measures and targets for the solution, such as accuracy, reliability, availability, efficiency, etc. These measures and targets help to evaluate how well the solution meets the stakeholder needs and expectations, and how it contributes to the business value. In this case, since the operations manager is concerned about the accuracy of the new measurement system, a good strategy would be to clearly define the maximum acceptable error rate for the new system, which would indicate how accurate the system should be in order to be accepted by the stakeholder. Quantifying the risks associated with measurement errors, asking for a formal acceptance of requirements documents, or planning a training session for the new system are not effective strategies to define appropriate acceptance criteria, as they do not specify how the performance of the solution will be measured or evaluated. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 316-317.

 Team peer review is a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Team peer review is a technique that involves having a group of peers or experts examine and evaluate the requirements for quality, completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability. Team peer review can help to identify any ambiguous or unverifiable requirements that may cause confusion, misunderstanding, or errors in the project. Team peer review can also provide feedback and suggestions for improvement or resolution of any issues or defects in the requirements. Fishbone analysis is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Fishbone analysis is a technique that is used to identify the root causes of a problem or an effect by analyzing its contributing factors and their relationships. Fishbone analysis can help to understand why a problem exists or why an effect occurs, but it does not directly examine or evaluate the quality of the requirements. Resource checklist is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Resource checklist is a tool that is used to identify and document the resources needed to perform business analysis activities, such as people, tools, facilities, equipment, etc. Resource checklist can help to plan and manage the resources required for business analysis work, but it does not assess or verify the quality of the requirements. Traceability matrix is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Traceability matrix is a tool that is used to track and document the relationships and dependencies among requirements and other project elements, such as design, test cases, risks, issues, etc. Traceability matrix can help to monitor and control changes to requirements and ensure alignment with project objectives and stakeholder needs, but it does not measure or validate the quality of the requirements. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 162-163; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

 A traceability matrix is a document that links requirements to their sources and traces them throughout the project life cycle. It helps to track changes in requirements, assess their impact, and ensure that they are met by the project deliverables. A traceability matrix is a useful tool for document control, as it records the version history of each requirement and the rationale for any changes. A statement of work, a project plan, and a problem or opportunity statement are not methods of document control, but rather documents that describe the project scope, objectives, activities, and justification. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9 1; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121 2

A requirements traceability matrix (RTM) is a tool that helps to map and track the user requirements with the test cases, and to ensure that the requirements are met by the solution. A RTM can also include other attributes or characteristics of the requirements, such as priority, risk, complexity, source, owner, etc. One of these attributes can be the system and architectural stability, which reflects the degree of reliability, robustness, and resilience of the system and its architecture. By including this attribute in the RTM, the business analyst can ensure that the requirement meets the acceptance criteria for system and architectural stability, and that the test cases can verify and validate this attribute. A RTM can also help to identify any gaps, inconsistencies, or conflicts between the requirements and the test cases, and to manage any changes or issues that may arise during the development process. References: = 1, 2

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a critical design review is a formal review that occurs after the completion of the design phase of a project. The purpose of a critical design review is to verify that the design specification meets the requirements and that the solution is feasible, cost-effective, and acceptable to the customer. A critical design review can help to establish an approved requirements baseline, which is a set of agreed-upon requirements that serves as a reference for further development and testing activities. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com