PMP Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

The first step the project manager should take to gather customer requirements for an information security project is to conduct a stakeholder analysis. A stakeholder analysis is a technique that helps identify the key stakeholders, their needs, expectations, interests, and influence on the project. By conducting a stakeholder analysis, the project manager can understand how regional policies may affect the customer requirements, such as legal, regulatory, cultural, or ethical factors. A stakeholder analysis can also help the project manager prioritize the requirements and plan the communication and engagement strategies with the stakeholders. References: = PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, pages 513-515; A 6-step guide to requirements gathering for project success, Step 1: Assign roles.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should plan, manage, and monitor the communication activities throughout the project life cycle. The project manager should also consider the stakeholder needs, preferences, and expectations when choosing the communication methods, tools, and technologies. The project manager should also update the communications management plan as needed to reflect any changes in the communication requirements or approach. Therefore, the project manager should update the communications management plan based on the product owner’s preferences and distribute it to the team. This will ensure that the communication is effective, timely, and consistent among the project stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 361-362, 368-369.

Project documentation is the process of creating, organizing, and maintaining the written information that describes the processes, plans, and activities involved in a project. Project documentation includes documents such as the project charter, the project management plan, the work breakdown structure, the risk register, the issue log, and the status reports. Project documentation serves several purposes, such as project planning, communication, monitoring, control, and evaluation. According to the Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials1, project documentation should be:

Accurate: The project documents should reflect the true and current state of the project, and avoid any errors, inconsistencies, or ambiguities.

Complete: The project documents should cover all the relevant and necessary aspects of the project, and avoid any gaps, omissions, or redundancies.

Consistent: The project documents should follow the same format, style, terminology, and standards, and avoid any conflicts, contradictions, or variations.

Up to date: The project documents should be updated regularly and timely, and avoid any outdated, obsolete, or irrelevant information.

In this scenario, the project schedule is falling behind and the project manager observes that the project team seems to be spending the majority of their time writing documentation instead of performing project tasks. This indicates that the project documentation process is not efficient, effective, or aligned with the project goals and priorities. The project team may be creating unnecessary, excessive, or irrelevant documents, or may be struggling to keep up with the changes and updates in the project. This could affect the project performance, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction.

Therefore, the best option for the project manager is to review and adapt the appropriate project artifacts. This means that the project manager should:

Review the existing project documents and assess their accuracy, completeness, consistency, and currency.

Identify and eliminate any project documents that are not required, useful, or valuable for the project.

Simplify and streamline the project documentation process and reduce the complexity and volume of the project documents.

Adapt the project documentation process and the project documents to the changing needs and expectations of the project and the stakeholders.

Communicate and collaborate with the project team and the stakeholders on the project documentation process and the project documents.

By reviewing and adapting the appropriate project artifacts, the project manager can ensure that the project documentation process and the project documents are fit for purpose, and that they support and facilitate the project tasks, rather than hinder or distract them.

The other options are not the best choices, because:

Assign a team member to handle the documentation activities: This option implies that the project manager is delegating the responsibility and accountability of the project documentation process and the project documents to a single team member, rather than involving and engaging the whole project team and the stakeholders. This could create a bottleneck, a dependency, or a risk in the project documentation process, and reduce the quality and reliability of the project documents.

Coach the project team to complete the project documentation activities: This option implies that the project manager is providing guidance and support to the project team on how to perform the project documentation activities, rather than addressing the root cause of the problem, which is the inefficiency, ineffectiveness, or misalignment of the project documentation process and the project documents. This could create a false sense of security, a complacency, or a resistance in the project team, and prevent them from improving and adapting the project documentation process and the project documents.

Save all documentation activities until the end of the project: This option implies that the project manager is postponing or ignoring the project documentation activities, rather than recognizing and fulfilling their importance and value for the project. This could create a backlog, a chaos, or a disaster in the project documentation process, and compromise the project performance, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction.

A sprint retrospective is a scrum event in which the team reflects on the past sprint and identifies areas for improvement and action items for the next sprint. A sprint retrospective helps the team to continuously improve, inspect and adapt, and grow as a team and as individuals. A sprint retrospective also provides a safe space for the team to communicate openly and honestly about the issues and conflicts they faced during the sprint, and to find ways to resolve them and prevent them from happening again. A sprint retrospective is not a performance evaluation or a blame game, but a constructive and collaborative way to increase the team’s motivation and engagement with the project. References:

What is a Sprint Retrospective? | Scrum.org

The Sprint Retrospective - What It Is & Tips for Making the Most of Your Meeting