PMI-PBA Questions and Answers

 Team peer review is a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Team peer review is a technique that involves having a group of peers or experts examine and evaluate the requirements for quality, completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability. Team peer review can help to identify any ambiguous or unverifiable requirements that may cause confusion, misunderstanding, or errors in the project. Team peer review can also provide feedback and suggestions for improvement or resolution of any issues or defects in the requirements. Fishbone analysis is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Fishbone analysis is a technique that is used to identify the root causes of a problem or an effect by analyzing its contributing factors and their relationships. Fishbone analysis can help to understand why a problem exists or why an effect occurs, but it does not directly examine or evaluate the quality of the requirements. Resource checklist is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Resource checklist is a tool that is used to identify and document the resources needed to perform business analysis activities, such as people, tools, facilities, equipment, etc. Resource checklist can help to plan and manage the resources required for business analysis work, but it does not assess or verify the quality of the requirements. Traceability matrix is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Traceability matrix is a tool that is used to track and document the relationships and dependencies among requirements and other project elements, such as design, test cases, risks, issues, etc. Traceability matrix can help to monitor and control changes to requirements and ensure alignment with project objectives and stakeholder needs, but it does not measure or validate the quality of the requirements. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 162-163; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, one of the best strategies to define appropriate acceptance criteria is to clearly define the performance measures and targets for the solution, such as accuracy, reliability, availability, efficiency, etc. These measures and targets help to evaluate how well the solution meets the stakeholder needs and expectations, and how it contributes to the business value. In this case, since the operations manager is concerned about the accuracy of the new measurement system, a good strategy would be to clearly define the maximum acceptable error rate for the new system, which would indicate how accurate the system should be in order to be accepted by the stakeholder. Quantifying the risks associated with measurement errors, asking for a formal acceptance of requirements documents, or planning a training session for the new system are not effective strategies to define appropriate acceptance criteria, as they do not specify how the performance of the solution will be measured or evaluated. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 316-317.

The business analyst could use the expected vs. actual results technique to iteratively validate the solution. This technique involves comparing the expected results or outcomes of the solution with the actual results or outcomes that are observed or measured after the solution is implemented. This technique helps to verify that the solution meets the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and to identify any gaps, issues, or defects that need to be resolved or corrected. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 25; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 141.

Context diagrams are a technique that can be used to determine if requirements align to the product’s objectives. Context diagrams are a technique that involves creating a visual representation of the product and its interactions with its environment, such as other systems, processes, or stakeholders. Context diagrams can help to define and clarify the scope, boundaries, and interfaces of the product. Context diagrams can also help to verify that the requirements are consistent and compatible with the product’s objectives and value proposition. Five Whys is not a technique that can be used to determine if requirements align to the product’s objectives. Five Whys is a technique that involves asking a series of why questions to identify the root cause of a problem or an effect. Five Whys can help to understand and resolve the underlying issues or needs that drive the requirements, but it does not directly compare or evaluate the requirements against the product’s objectives. Activity network diagrams are not a technique that can be used to determine if requirements align to the product’s objectives. Activity network diagrams are a tool that involves creating a graphical representation of the sequence and dependencies of the activities or tasks in a project or a process. Activity network diagrams can help to plan and manage the schedule, resources, and risks of a project or a process, but they do not depict or assess the requirements or the product’s objectives. Business use cases are not a technique that can be used to determine if requirements align to the product’s objectives. Business use cases are a tool that involves describing and documenting how a stakeholder interacts with a system or a solution to achieve a specific goal or outcome. Business use cases can help to specify and communicate the functionality and behavior of a system or a solution, but they do not measure or validate the requirements or the product’s objectives. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 78-79; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 16.

The requirements sign-off is a process that involves obtaining the formal approval and acceptance of the requirements from the customer and other stakeholders. The requirements sign-off confirms that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they meet the customer’s needs and expectations. The requirements sign-off also establishes a baseline for the development and testing of the solution, and serves as a reference point for managing changes and resolving issues. The business analyst should first facilitate the requirements sign-off with the customer before the developers start development, to ensure that the requirements are agreed upon and validated by all parties, and to avoid rework, delays, and conflicts later in the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

 An organizational chart is a tool that helps to visualize the structure and hierarchy of an organization, as well as the roles and responsibilities of its members. It can also show the relationships and interactions between different units, departments, or teams within the organization. An organizational chart can help the business analyst to identify the missing project stakeholders by showing who are involved in or affected by the online ordering system, such as the purchasing department. A business case is a tool that helps to justify the need and value of a project or initiative, as well as the costs and benefits associated with it. It does not provide information about the project stakeholders. A business analysis plan is a tool that helps to define the scope, approach, activities, deliverables, and schedule of the business analysis work. It does not provide information about the project stakeholders. A business analyst communication plan is a tool that helps to determine the communication needs, methods, frequency, and channels for the business analysis work. It does not provide information about the project stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, Organizational Chart - What is an Organization Chart? Definition, Types, Tips, Tutorial, and Examples

The best approach to resolve this issue is to suggest re-estimating the requirement and following the change control process. This would allow the project team to assess the impact of the change request, evaluate the feasibility and cost of the modification, and obtain the approval of the stakeholders before implementing the change. A change control process is a method used to manage change requests for projects and big initiatives. It’s part of a change management plan, which defines the roles for managing change within a team or company1. Meeting with the customer and apologizing for misunderstanding the business’s need is not sufficient, as it does not address the root cause of the problem or propose a solution. Providing the stakeholder with a copy of the approved requirements baseline and moving forward without making a change is not acceptable, as it ignores the stakeholder’s feedback and dissatisfaction. Requiring development resources to work overtime to modify the deliverable to satisfy the stakeholder is not advisable, as it may compromise the quality of the work, increase the project cost and risk, and demoralize the team. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline2, PMI Guide to Business Analysis3, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, What Is a Change Control Process? (with Example Change Log)

A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to their sources, objectives, and deliverables. It helps to track the status, changes, and verification of each requirement throughout the project life cycle. If the requirements traceability matrix was not updated with the change, it could result in a key requirement being missed or overlooked in the implementation. The other options are not likely to cause this problem. The requirements management plan is a document that describes how the requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed. The scope management plan is a document that describes how the project scope will be defined, controlled, and verified. The schedule management plan is a document that describes how the project schedule will be developed, monitored, and controlled. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39; 6.

The requirements approval process is documented as a measure of effective decision making that allows the business analyst to finalize the process for requirement approval. The requirements approval process defines the roles, responsibilities, criteria, methods, and tools for approving the requirements and ensuring that they meet the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements approval process should be agreed upon by the stakeholders and the business analyst before the requirements are elicited, analyzed, and validated. The requirements verification process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for ensuring that the requirements are complete, correct, consistent, and clear. The requirements elicitation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a set of activities for discovering, gathering, and understanding the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements validation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for confirming that the requirements align with the business objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 113-114 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 17 2.

The workflow trigger that the business analyst should incorporate is any change to the requirements matrix. This trigger would ensure that the appropriate stakeholders are notified of any updates, additions, deletions, or modifications to the requirements that affect the business analysis repository. Changes to test cases traced to requirements, change through project life cycle, and changes to stakeholder memberships are not relevant triggers for the notification workflow, as they do not directly affect the requirements matrix. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide

 The business analyst would use brainstorming to identify stakeholders. Brainstorming is a technique that involves generating ideas or solutions through a group discussion or a creative thinking process. Brainstorming can help the business analyst to identify potential stakeholders who have an interest, influence, or impact on the project or the solution, and to solicit their input and feedback on the project requirements and expectations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 38.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, user acceptance testing is a technique that involves verifying and validating that the solution meets the business requirements and satisfies the stakeholder needs and expectations. User acceptance testing is usually performed by the end users or their representatives, who evaluate the solution against predefined acceptance criteria and provide feedback on its functionality, usability, performance, quality, etc. User acceptance testing can help to determine whether a solution satisfies business requirements, as it can demonstrate that the solution delivers the intended business value and benefits, and that it meets or exceeds the stakeholder satisfaction. By reviewing the results of user acceptance testing, a business analyst can assess how well the solution meets business requirements, and identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed or resolved. Evaluating the solution against the project charter, conducting a brainstorming session with end users, or reviewing the traceability matrix are other ways to analyze and validate requirements, but they do not necessarily determine whether a solution satisfies business requirements, as they do not involve testing or evaluating the solution in real or simulated conditions. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 317-318.

Verification is the process of ensuring that the requirements meet a quality checklist and conform to the specified standards, rules, and criteria. Verification can help the business analyst to ensure that all requirements meet a quality checklist before the development and testing phase by checking the completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability of each requirement. Verification can also help to identify and resolve any defects, errors, or ambiguities in the requirements. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 A survey is a technique to collect information, opinions, or feedback from a large number of stakeholders, such as customers or users. A survey can help to measure the current level of customer satisfaction and loyalty, and to identify the needs and expectations of the customers for the tool. A survey can provide a basis for analyzing vendor products by comparing their features, benefits, and costs with the customer requirements. The other options are not suitable for this purpose. A storyboard is a technique to visualize the user interface or user experience of a solution using sketches or mockups. A project charter is a document that authorizes the project and defines its objectives, scope, and stakeholders. A business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project based on its expected benefits, costs, and risks. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 50.

Requirements are statements of the needs, expectations, or conditions that must be met by a solution. Requirements should be clear, complete, consistent, and testable, so that they can be understood, verified, and validated by the stakeholders. If the requirements are not ready for peer review, it means that they have not met these quality criteria, and that they need to be refined or revised. One possible cause of this situation is that the requirements do not provide all of the information needed to define the work, such as the scope, objectives, deliverables, assumptions, constraints, risks, dependencies, etc. This would make it difficult for the peer reviewers to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and alignment of the requirements with the business needs and goals. The other options are not likely to cause this problem. Some requirements having not yet been discussed in a work group session is not a reason to delay the peer review, as long as the requirements have been elicited from the relevant sources and documented properly. The requirements’ reference codes not tracing to the attribute numbers in the work breakdown structure is a minor issue that can be easily fixed by updating the reference codes or the work breakdown structure. The requirements documents having not yet received sign-off from the sponsor is not a prerequisite for peer review, as sign-off is usually obtained after the peer review and validation process. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

Competitive analysis is a technique to compare the strengths and weaknesses of similar products or services offered by competitors in the same market. Competitive analysis can help to identify opportunities, threats, and gaps in the market, and to develop strategies to increase sales and customer satisfaction. Competitive analysis can be used to identify solutions for the startup company that sells organic vegetable and fruit smoothies by comparing their best-selling juice with similar products offered by competitors. The other techniques are not suitable for this purpose. Benchmarking is a technique to compare the performance of a product, service, or process with a standard or best practice. Trend analysis is a technique to analyze historical data or patterns to forecast future outcomes or behaviors. Focus group is a technique to elicit opinions, preferences, or feedback from a representative group of customers or users. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 51.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, the business analyst should recommend the option with the highest functionality score and the lowest cost score. In this case, option A, 1, Custom solution, has the highest functionality score of 10 and the lowest cost score of 1. Therefore, it should be recommended. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

 The business analyst must perform a cost-benefit analysis in order to complete the business case and arrive at a solid recommendation. A cost-benefit analysis is a technique that compares the costs and benefits of different options or alternatives for solving a business problem or achieving a business opportunity. A cost-benefit analysis helps to evaluate the return on investment (ROI), the net present value (NPV), and the payback period of each option, and to select the most optimal one based on the business value and the strategic alignment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 40.

A requirements baseline is a set of approved requirements that serves as the basis for further development and validation. A requirements baseline approval form is a document that records the formal acceptance of the requirements baseline by the customer and other stakeholders. Creating a requirements baseline approval form for the customer to review and approve is the best action to take to establish an approved requirements baseline with the customer. The other actions are not sufficient or appropriate for this purpose. A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to their sources, objectives, and deliverables, but it does not record the approval of the requirements. Requesting that the customer create a baseline of the requirements in the contract specification is not a proactive or collaborative approach. Performing a variance analysis on the design specification and reporting the results to the customer is not relevant to establishing an approved requirements baseline. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

The business analyst should explain the value of requirements traceability to the project sponsor. Requirements traceability is the process of tracking and documenting the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the project deliverables, and the business objectives. Requirements traceability helps to ensure the quality, completeness, and alignment of the requirements, and to manage the changes, risks, and issues that may arise during the project. Requirements traceability also helps to measure the performance and the value of the solution, and to facilitate the verification and validation of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system or a process to achieve a specific goal. A use case can help to prevent problems from occurring in the implementation of a new application, as it can capture the functional requirements and the expected behavior of the system or the process, as well as the exceptions and alternative flows. A use case can also help to design and execute test cases that cover all the possible scenarios and outcomes. In this case, a use case could have prevented the problem of a worker using a field that was not supposed to be used, as it could have specified the valid inputs and outputs for the report, and the actions and responses of the system or the process. Prototyping, diagrams, and document analysis are other techniques that can help to analyze and communicate requirements, but they do not necessarily prevent problems from occurring in the implementation of a new application, as they do not describe the interactions and outcomes of the system or the process in detail. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 165-166.

The business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project or program. It describes the business problem or opportunity, the benefits and costs of the proposed solution, and the risks and assumptions involved. The business case also includes the intangible costs and benefits associated with the change, such as the disruption and short-term loss of productivity that the client anticipates. The business analyst can use the business case to communicate the value proposition of the project or program to the stakeholders and decision makers. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 4.

Version control is a technique that helps to manage changes to requirements and ensure that only authorized changes are made. It also helps to maintain a history of requirements changes, which records the date, reason, and impact of each change. Tracking the status of each requirement helps to monitor the progress and completion of requirements throughout the project life cycle. These practices help to ensure the integrity of requirements and avoid confusion, inconsistency, or ambiguity. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 8; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 38.

A review is a technique that involves examining a work product, such as requirements, to identify errors, omissions, inconsistencies, or ambiguities. A review can be formal or informal, depending on the level of rigor and documentation required. A review can be conducted by the business analyst alone or with other stakeholders, such as the project manager, the sponsor, the subject matter experts, or the end users. A review can be done through various methods, such as reading, walkthroughs, inspections, or peer reviews. The purpose of a review is to ensure that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they meet the quality standards and expectations of the stakeholders. By conducting a review, the business analyst can obtain approval from the stakeholders and confirm their agreement and commitment to the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

 Interface analysis is a technique that should be used to analyze input to and output from the product for a large, highly complex project with significant risk. Interface analysis is a technique that involves identifying and specifying how different components of a product interact with each other or with external systems or users. Interface analysis can help to define and document the data flows, formats, protocols, rules, and behaviors of each interface. Interface analysis can also help to identify and mitigate any risks or issues related to compatibility, integration, interoperability, or usability of the product. System analysis is not a technique that should be used to analyze input to and output from the product for a large, highly complex project with significant risk. System analysis is a broad term that refers to various activities and techniques for studying, designing, developing, testing, or maintaining a system. System analysis can include interface analysis as one of its aspects, but it is not a specific technique for analyzing input to and output from the product. Dependency analysis is not a technique that should be used to analyze input to and output from the product for a large, highly complex project with significant risk. Dependency analysis is a technique that involves identifying and evaluating how different elements of a project or a product depend on each other or on external factors. Dependency analysis can help to determine the impact of changes, prioritize tasks, allocate resources, or manage risks. Dependency analysis can include interface analysis as one of its aspects, but it is not a specific technique for analyzing input to and output from the product. Risk analysis is not a technique that should be used to analyze input to and output from the product for a large, highly complex project with significant risk. Risk analysis is a technique that involves identifying and assessing potential threats or uncertainties that may affect a project or a product. Risk analysis can help to quantify or qualify risks, prioritize risks, plan responses, or monitor risks. Risk analysis can include interface analysis as one of its aspects, but it is not a specific technique for analyzing input to and output from the product. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 78-79; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 16-17.

Problem tracking is a technique that helps the business analyst to manage and resolve issues identified by stakeholders with requirements. It involves creating a clear and concise record of each issue with its description, impact, priority, data, owner, status, and any other relevant information. It also involves tracking and managing the recorded issues until they are resolved. Problem tracking helps to ensure that issues are not neglected or abandoned, and that they are addressed in a timely and effective manner. Problem tracking also exposes the root causes of issues and helps to prevent recurrence of similar problems in the future. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, an impact analysis is a technique that is used to assess the effects and implications of a change request on the requirements, scope, schedule, cost, quality, and other aspects of a project or product. An impact analysis can help to determine the feasibility, desirability, and priority of the change request, as well as to identify the risks, issues, and dependencies associated with the change. An impact analysis can also help to communicate the impact of the change to the stakeholders, and to support the decision-making process for approving or rejecting the change request. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

 Phased baselining is an approach that involves dividing the requirements into smaller subsets or increments that can be approved, developed, and delivered separately. Phased baselining can help to cope with the requirements’ volatility, as it allows the business analyst and the stakeholders to accommodate changes and feedback in each increment, and to adjust the scope and priorities of the subsequent increments accordingly. Phased baselining can also reduce the risk and uncertainty of the project, as it enables early validation and verification of the solution, and provides more flexibility and adaptability to the changing business environment and regulations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

 A properly written requirement statement should be clear, concise, consistent, complete, and testable. It should specify what the product or service should do, not how it should do it. It should also avoid using ambiguous or vague words that could be interpreted differently by different stakeholders. Among the four options, only option C meets these criteria. Option C is a properly written requirement statement because it clearly and precisely defines the attribute of the pot (the colors) and the possible values for that attribute (yellow, red, brown, blue). It is also consistent with the standard terminology and format for requirement statements, and it is complete and testable, as it can be verified by inspection or measurement. Option A is not a properly written requirement statement because it uses ambiguous and vague words such as “lightweight” and “heat up quickly”. These words do not specify the exact or measurable criteria for the pot’s weight and heating time, and they could mean different things to different stakeholders. Option B is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the conditions or constraints for the pot’s usability in the oven or on the stove. For example, it does not state the maximum temperature or duration that the pot can withstand, or the type of oven or stove that the pot can be used on. Option D is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the requirement for the pot itself, but rather for the company brand. The company brand is not a feature or function of the pot, but rather a marketing or branding strategy. The requirement statement should focus on the pot’s characteristics and capabilities, not on the company’s image or reputation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, How To Write Good Requirements (With Example) - TestLodge Blog

 Solution scope is the set of features and functions that define the boundaries of the solution and align with the business requirements. Solution scope describes what will be included in and excluded from the new system, and helps to manage stakeholder expectations and avoid scope creep. The business analyst has defined the solution scope by working with project team members to define what will be included in and excluded from the new system. The other options are not correct. Solution design is the process of creating a detailed specification of how the solution will meet the requirements. Business requirements are the higher-level needs or goals of the organization or stakeholders that justify the project. Business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project based on its expected benefits, costs, and risks. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

Business rules are statements that define or constrain some aspect of the business, such as policies, standards, procedures, regulations, or constraints. Business rules can be uncovered by asking about the reasons for choosing a particular course of action when modeling processes or analyzing tasks. By asking why a certain decision is made, what criteria are used, what conditions are applied, or what consequences are expected, the business analyst can elicit the business rules that govern the behavior or outcome of the process or task. Asking about tasks that overlap with each other, work that may be performed out of sequence, or task transitions that hinder organizational performance may help to identify issues or opportunities for improvement in the process or task, but they may not reveal the business rules that underlie them. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

 Documenting the source of each requirement in the requirements traceability matrix allows for easy identification of the requestor and facilitates communication with stakeholders. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

The business need is the reason why the project is initiated and the problem or opportunity that the project aims to address. The business need defines the key business drivers and the desired outcomes of the project. By asking what the business need is, the business analyst can understand the value proposition of the project and prioritize the requirements that align with the business objectives and deliver the most benefits to the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 23.

 Prototyping is a tool or technique that could have been used by the business analyst to avoid the situation of unclear and conflicting requirements. Prototyping is the process of creating a simplified and partial version of the product or system that can be used to elicit, validate, and refine the requirements. Prototyping can help the business analyst and the stakeholders to visualize the solution, to identify and resolve any issues or gaps, and to reach a common understanding and agreement on the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 94.

A configuration management system is a standardized, effective, and efficient way to manage changes to project documentation. A configuration management system is a set of tools and processes that help to track, control, and update the configuration items (CIs) of a project, such as documents, requirements, designs, code, tests, etc. A configuration management system helps to ensure that the project documentation is consistent, accurate, and up-to-date throughout the project life cycle. It also helps to maintain the traceability and auditability of the changes made to the project documentation. A configuration management system typically includes the following components:

• A configuration management plan that defines the scope, roles, responsibilities, policies, procedures, and standards for configuration management.
• A configuration management database (CMDB) that stores the information about the CIs, their attributes, relationships, versions, baselines, and changes.
• A configuration identification process that assigns unique identifiers and names to the CIs and their versions.
• A configuration control process that evaluates, approves, and implements changes to the CIs and their versions.
• A configuration status accounting process that records and reports the status and history of the CIs and their versions.
• A configuration verification and audit process that verifies and validates the CIs and their versions against the requirements and specifications.

References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 13.

A modeling tool integrated into a version control feature that ensures that team knowledge is captured is a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding. A modeling tool is a tool that allows the business analyst to create visual representations of the product needs, such as diagrams, charts, graphs, or mockups. These models can help the stakeholders to comprehend and verify the requirements more easily than textual descriptions. A version control feature is a tool that allows the business analyst to track and manage changes to the models and ensure that they are consistent and accurate. A version control feature also enables collaboration and knowledge sharing among the team members and stakeholders. A requirements management tool that documents requirements and their properties and relationships is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it does not provide visual or graphical representations of the product needs. A document management system and a relationship matrix that groups all related documents is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it does not create or display models of the product needs. A workflow management tool that documents the flow of information is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it only focuses on one aspect of the product needs and does not capture other dimensions such as functionality, quality, or value. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 77-78; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 16.

Root cause analysis is a technique that involves identifying and analyzing the underlying causes of a problem or an issue. Root cause analysis can help the business analyst to determine how the selection criteria requirement was missed, and to prevent similar errors from occurring in the future. Root cause analysis can be done using various tools, such as fishbone diagram and the Five Whys. A fishbone diagram is a graphical tool that organizes the possible causes of a problem into categories, such as people, process, technology, environment, etc. A fishbone diagram can help the business analyst to visualize the relationships between the causes and the effects, and to identify the most likely root causes. The Five Whys is a questioning technique that involves asking “why” repeatedly until the root cause of a problem is revealed. The Five Whys can help the business analyst to drill down into the details of the problem, and to uncover the underlying factors and assumptions that led to the missed requirement. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 101.

Power/interest grid is a technique that involves plotting the stakeholders on a matrix based on their level of power and interest in the project. Power/interest grid can help the business analyst to identify and categorize the stakeholders during the initial phase of a project by showing how influential and engaged each stakeholder is. Power/interest grid can also help to determine the appropriate communication and engagement strategy for each stakeholder group. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 61.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a prototype is a tool that can be used to elicit, analyze, and validate requirements. A prototype is a representation of a solution that allows stakeholders to interact with it and provide feedback. By developing a prototype, the business analyst can gather functional requirements from the end user and ensure that the new interface supports their core business processes. A prototype can also help to reduce ambiguity, resolve conflicts, and increase stakeholder satisfaction. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

The first thing the business analyst should do immediately after the discussion with the project manager is to schedule time with the process owners. The process owners are the people or groups responsible for a specific business process or procedure that is affected by the project5. The business analyst needs to understand the current state of the processes, the pain points and opportunities, the requirements and expectations, and the impact of the project on the processes. By meeting with the process owners, the business analyst can establish a relationship, gather relevant information, and ensure alignment and collaboration. Putting the information into a project plan is premature, as the business analyst needs to conduct more analysis and planning before creating a project plan. Developing an issues log is not necessary, as there are no issues identified at this stage. Assessing the risks for the project is important, but it is not the immediate action, as the business analyst needs to understand the scope and objectives of the project first. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline2, PMI Guide to Business Analysis3, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, What is a Process Owner? Definition & Responsibilities

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a Pareto analysis is a tool that helps to prioritize problems or causes based on their frequency or impact. It is based on the Pareto principle, which states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. A Pareto analysis can help to identify the high-priority changes needed to improve a service by showing which problems or causes account for most of the complaints or dissatisfaction. A work breakdown structure analysis, a flowchart, and a cause-and-effect diagram are other tools that can help to analyze a service, but they do not necessarily help to prioritize the changes needed to improve it. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 145-146.

 A product scope is a description of the features, functions, and characteristics of a product that meets the needs and expectations of the stakeholders. It defines what the product is and what it is not, and provides the basis for planning, developing, testing, and delivering the product. A product scope should align with the company’s objectives, which are the desired outcomes or results that the company wants to achieve through its products, services, and projects. Aligning the product scope with the company’s objectives helps to ensure that the product delivers value to the customers and the business, supports the company’s vision and mission, and contributes to the company’s strategic goals12.

To collaborate on a product scope that aligns with the company’s objectives, the business analyst should follow these steps12:

• Identify and engage the relevant stakeholders, such as the human resources, engineering, and marketing departments, as well as the product sponsor, the customers, and the end users. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the product, and who can provide input, feedback, and approval for the product scope.
• Elicit and analyze the business needs, requirements, and expectations of the stakeholders, using various techniques, such as interviews, surveys, workshops, observation, prototyping, and brainstorming. Business needs are the problems or opportunities that the product aims to address or exploit, and that justify the investment in the product. Requirements are the specifications or conditions that the product must meet or satisfy to fulfill the business needs. Expectations are the desires or wishes that the stakeholders have for the product, which may or may not be realistic or feasible.
• Validate and prioritize the business needs, requirements, and expectations, based on their value, urgency, risk, dependency, and alignment with the company’s objectives. Validation is the process of ensuring that the business needs, requirements, and expectations are clear, complete, correct, consistent, and feasible. Prioritization is the process of ranking the business needs, requirements, and expectations according to their relative importance and impact on the product scope and the company’s objectives.
• Define and document the product scope, using various tools, such as a product vision statement, a product scope statement, a product backlog, a product roadmap, and a product breakdown structure. A product vision statement is a brief and compelling description of the purpose, value proposition, and target market of the product. A product scope statement is a detailed and formal description of the product scope, including the product objectives, deliverables, features, functions, boundaries, assumptions, constraints, and acceptance criteria. A product backlog is a list of the product requirements, features, and enhancements that are prioritized and refined for development. A product roadmap is a high-level and strategic plan that shows the direction, timeline, and milestones of the product development. A product breakdown structure is a hierarchical and graphical representation of the product components and their relationships.
• Communicate and manage the product scope, using various techniques, such as reviews, walkthroughs, inspections, audits, and change control. Communication is the process of sharing and exchanging the product scope information with the stakeholders, and ensuring that they understand and agree on the product scope. Management is the process of monitoring and controlling the product scope, and ensuring that it is delivered according to the plan and the company’s objectives. Change control is the process of evaluating, approving, and implementing any changes to the product scope, and ensuring that they are aligned with the company’s objectives.

Voting on the product’s highest-value business needs is not the best option, because it may not consider the perspectives and preferences of all the stakeholders, and it may not reflect the company’s objectives. Negotiating to best meet each department’s objectives is not the best option, because it may result in compromises or trade-offs that may not benefit the product or the company as a whole, and it may not align with the company’s objectives. Delegating the decision to be made by the product sponsor is not the best option, because it may not involve the participation and collaboration of the other stakeholders, and it may not align with the company’s objectives. References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 133-134

The business analyst should use a traceability matrix to help communicate the status of the requirements. A traceability matrix is a document that shows the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, and tracks their changes, verification, and validation throughout the project life cycle. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst and the project manager to monitor the progress and quality of the requirements, and to identify any gaps, issues, or risks. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

The rationale for each requirement is the justification or explanation of why the requirement is needed and how it supports the business objectives. It should include the reasons and assumptions behind the requirement, as well as any constraints or dependencies that affect it. The product vision and operational relationships are part of the business case, not the rationale. The stakeholder impact and design decisions are part of the analysis and solution evaluation, not the rationale. The functional relationships and work breakdown structure code are part of the solution scope and architecture, not the rationale. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 113.

Validating the requirements is a key activity to reduce the risk of rework, especially for a project with a tight timeline and a lean budget. Validating the requirements means ensuring that they are aligned with the business needs, objectives, and expectations of the stakeholders, and that they are clear, complete, consistent, feasible, and testable. Validating the requirements can help the business analyst and the project team to identify and resolve any errors, gaps, conflicts, or ambiguities in the requirements before they are implemented, and to avoid any unnecessary changes or rework later in the project lifecycle. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

 The technical staff and testing team from Company A are responsible for writing and coding the requirements and testing the new functionality. Responsible means that the person or group is assigned to perform the work or activity. The responsible role is often indicated by the letter R in a RACI matrix, which is a tool for identifying roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2.3; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 2.

One benefit of documenting the change control process is that stakeholders know how to request changes. The change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or requirements are identified, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. Documenting the change control process helps to establish clear and consistent guidelines and procedures for managing changes and ensuring that they are aligned with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. Documenting the change control process also helps to inform the stakeholders about how to request changes, what information and justification are required, who is responsible for reviewing and approving changes, and what criteria and methods are used for assessing the impact and value of changes. Stakeholders are not shielded from how changes are assessed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they are excluded or unaware of the change evaluation and decision making process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to increase transparency, collaboration, and communication among the stakeholders regarding changes. Stakeholders do not have a schedule of changes to be deployed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a predetermined or fixed plan of when and how changes will be implemented. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to ensure that changes are implemented in a timely and effective manner based on their priority, feasibility, and dependency. Stakeholders do not understand the difficulty of managing requirements by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a negative or pessimistic view of the requirements management process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to improve the quality and stability of the requirements and reduce ambiguity, confusion, or conflicts among the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 163-164; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 20.

 A change control process is a process that could help manage the situation of scope creep. Scope creep refers to the problem experienced on many projects when the size or complexity of the original product description grows. Scope creep can have negative impacts on the project schedule, budget, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction. A change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, requirements, deliverables, or other configuration items are requested, evaluated, approved, implemented, and monitored. A change control process can help the business analyst and the project team to manage the expectations of the stakeholders, to assess the impact and feasibility of the changes, to prioritize and implement the changes, and to communicate the changes to the relevant parties. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

When a change request is received, the business analyst is responsible for analyzing the impact on business and underlying systems. The business analyst should assess how the change request will affect the business needs, objectives, and value, as well as the existing or planned systems, processes, and functions. The business analyst should also evaluate the feasibility, priority, and urgency of the change request, and provide recommendations and alternatives to the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 132.

The business analyst should communicate that the status of this requirement has changed to the relevant stakeholders, such as the project manager, the sponsor, the development team, and the quality assurance team. Communication is an essential skill for business analysts, as it helps to ensure that everyone involved in the project is aware of the current state of the requirements, the rationale behind any changes, and the impact of those changes on the project scope, schedule, budget, quality, and risks. Communication also helps to manage stakeholder expectations and avoid confusion or conflicts. Bringing the subsequent project to the change control board (CCB) is not necessary at this stage, as the requirement has been deferred and not added to another project. Asking the stakeholders to review the requirement before any other action is taken is not effective, as the requirement cannot be implemented until the needed information is available. Marking the requirement as complete so that it is not forgotten is incorrect, as it does not reflect the true status of the requirement and may cause errors or inconsistencies in the requirements documentation and traceability. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 77.

A review of the solution prototype would be the most viable technique to use in this scenario for validating requirements through in-person sessions. A solution prototype is a simplified version of part or all of a solution that can be used to elicit feedback from stakeholders. A review of a solution prototype involves presenting or demonstrating it to stakeholders and asking them questions to assess their satisfaction, understanding, agreement, or concerns. A review of a solution prototype can help to validate that the solution meets the stakeholder requirements and delivers value to them. A brainstorming session is a technique for generating ideas or solutions by encouraging free and creative thinking from participants. A brainstorming session can help to elicit or analyze requirements but not validate them. A use-case development session is a technique for creating use cases that describe how actors interact with a system to achieve their goals. A use-case development session can help to elicit or specify requirements but not validate them. A review of the previous version is a technique for examining an existing solution or product to identify its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, or threats. A review of the previous version can help to elicit or analyze requirements but not validate them. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 76.

Customer metrics on the existing system are an input into solution evaluation and decision making in this context, as they provide a baseline for measuring the performance and value of the new solution. The business analyst can use these metrics to compare the existing system with the new solution and assess how well the new solution meets the customer needs and expectations. A cost-benefit analysis of the existing system is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it does not reflect the customer perspective or satisfaction with the system. Technical readiness of the development team is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it does not relate to the quality or effectiveness of the new solution. A new solution design specification is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it describes how the new solution will be built, not how it will perform or deliver value. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 176-177; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 20.

 One of the first steps of a project is to identify the stakeholders and their interests. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the project or its outcome. Identifying the stakeholders and their interests helps to understand their needs, expectations, roles, responsibilities, and communication preferences. It also helps to manage their involvement and engagement throughout the project life cycle, and to address any potential conflicts or issues that may arise. The other options are not the first steps of a project. Identifying the classes of users and their requirements is part of the requirements elicitation process, which occurs after the project initiation phase. Aligning the sponsor expectations along the project goals is part of the project charter development, which is also done after the project initiation phase. Evaluating the sources for requirements and prioritizing them is part of the requirements analysis process, which occurs after the requirements elicitation process. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 10; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 50; 3.

 A version control system is a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A version control system is a tool that allows the business analyst to manage and record changes to the requirements documentation throughout the project lifecycle. A version control system can help to ensure that the requirements documentation is consistent, accurate, and up-to-date. A version control system can also help to facilitate collaboration and communication among the team members and stakeholders who work on or use the requirements documentation. A version control system can also help to identify and resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise from concurrent or conflicting changes to the requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is a technique that involves grouping similar or related ideas, issues, or data into categories based on their affinity or similarity. An affinity diagram can help to organize and analyze complex or diverse information, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A data dictionary is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A data dictionary is a tool that defines and describes the data elements and their attributes that are used or produced by a system or a solution. A data dictionary can help to standardize and clarify the meaning and usage of data elements, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is a tool that documents and organizes the business rules that govern or constrain a system or a solution. A business rules matrix can help to specify and communicate the logic and behavior of a system or a solution, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.