JN0-664 Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

This configuration applies to IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) and is designed to control multicast group memberships on the interface ge-0/0/0.0.

Breaking Down the Configuration

1️⃣ Policy-Statement: block-igmp

policy-statement block-igmp {

term 1 {

from {

route-filter 224.7.7.7/32 exact;

source-address-filter 192.168.100.10/32 exact;

}

then reject;

}

}

This policy blocks IGMP joins for group 224.7.7.7 only if the source IP is 192.168.100.10.

If both conditions match, the request is rejected.

2️⃣ IGMP Configuration on Interface ge-0/0/0.0

[edit protocols igmp]

user@router# show

interface ge-0/0/0.0 {

group-policy block-igmp;

group-limit 25;

}

group-policy block-igmp applies the policy statement block-igmp, meaning IGMP join requests are evaluated based on this policy.

group-limit 25 means the interface allows up to 25 multicast groups.

Evaluating the Answer Choices

✅ A. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are rejected if the source address is 192.168.100.10.

Correct, because:

The policy specifically matches group 224.7.7.7 and source IP 192.168.100.10.

If both conditions are met, the join is rejected.

❌ B. Joins for any group are accepted if the group count value is less than 25.

Incorrect, because:

The group-limit (25) applies to the total number of IGMP groups but does not override explicit policy rules.

Even if there are fewer than 25 groups, a join request can still be rejected by the policy statement.

❌ C. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are always rejected, regardless of the group count.

Incorrect, because:

The policy only blocks joins from the specific source 192.168.100.10.

Joins from other sources to 224.7.7.7 are allowed.

❌ D. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are accepted if the group count is less than 25.

Incorrect, because:

Joins for 224.7.7.7 from source 192.168.100.10 will always be rejected, even if the group count is below 25.

The group-limit does not override the rejection policy.

"Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are rejected if the source address is 192.168.100.10."

???? Official Juniper Documentation Reference:

???? Junos IGMP Policy Configuration Guide

"A group-policy statement allows filtering IGMP joins based on multicast group address and source IP."

IS-IS is an interior gateway protocol that uses link-state routing to exchange routing information among routers within a single autonomous system. IS-IS uses two types of addresses to identify routers and areas: system ID and area address. The system ID is a unique identifier for each router in an IS-IS domain. The system ID is 6 octets long and can be derived from the MAC address or manually configured. The area address is a variable-length identifier for each area in an IS-IS domain. The area address can be 1 to 13 octets long and is composed of high-order octets of the address. An IS-IS instance may be assigned multiple area addresses, which are considered synonymous. Multiple synonymous area addresses are useful when merging or splitting areas in the domain1. In this question, we have a network based on IS-IS with four routers (R1_1, R1_2, R2_1, and R2_2) belonging to area 0001. The area address for area 0001 is 49.0001. The NSEL byte for area 0001 is the last octet of the address, which is 01. The NSEL byte stands for Network Service Access Point Selector (NSAP Selector) and indicates the type of service requested from the network layer2. Therefore, the correct statement in this scenario is that the NSEL byte for area 0001 is 01.

Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) is a link-state routing protocol designed to move information efficiently within a computer network, a group of physically connected computers or similar devices. It operates in two levels, Level 1 (L1) and Level 2 (L2), and supports hierarchical routing within a multi-area network.

Let's analyze each statement to determine its correctness in the context of IS-IS multi-area networks.

1. **Statement A: Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**

- This statement is correct. L1 PDUs (Protocol Data Units) are flooded within the L1 area and also to the L2 routers that are present in the same area. These L2 routers act as the boundary routers that connect the local L1 area to other L1 areas via L2.

2. **Statement B: External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers in other areas.**

- This statement is correct. L2 PDUs are flooded throughout the entire L2 backbone, which includes all L2 routers in different areas. This ensures that inter-area routing information is shared across the network.

3. **Statement C: Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to all L1 routers in other areas.**

- This statement is incorrect. Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded within the local L1 area. They do not cross L1 area boundaries; inter-area communication is handled by L2 routers.

4. **Statement D: Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L1 routers.**

- This statement is correct. Internal L1 PDUs are indeed only flooded within their local L1 area, and do not go beyond it.

5. **Statement E: External L2 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**

- This statement is incorrect. External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers throughout the IS-IS network, not just to those in the local area. This allows L2 routers to maintain a complete map of the network's topology.

**Conclusion**:

Given the analysis, the correct answers are:

**A. Internal L1 PDUs are flooded to the local area's L2 routers.**

**B. External L2 PDUs are flooded to all L2 routers in other areas.**

**D. Internal L1 PDUs are only flooded to the local area's L1 routers.**

**References**:

- Juniper Networks Documentation on IS-IS: [IS-IS Overview](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/is-is-routing-overview.html)

- RFC 1195, Use of OSI IS-IS for Routing in TCP/IP and Dual Environments: [RFC 1195](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1195) which details the operation of IS-IS in multi-area networks.