ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Question Includes: Single Choice Questions: 120,
Question:
What is a significant drawback of using judgment-based sampling in audits?
Scenario 3:
ArBank is a financial institution located in Brussels, Belgium, which offers a diverse range of banking and investment servicesto its clients. To ensure the continual improvement of its operations, ArBank has implemented a quality management system QMS based
on ISO 9001 and an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on the requirements of ISO/IEC 42001.
Audrey, an experienced auditor, led an internal audit focused on the AIMS within ArBank. She assessed the chatbots integrated into thebank's website and mobile app, analyzing communications using big data technology to identify potential noncompliance, fraud, orunethical conduct. Instead of relying solely on the information provided by the chatbots, Audrey sought out evidence that would eitherconfirm or challenge the validity of the data, ensuring her conclusions were based on reliable and accurate information. Her review ofselected chatbot interactions confirmed they met their intended purpose.
For the specific context of ArBank's operations, Audrey utilized an Al system to assess the efficiency of the bank's digital infrastructure,focusing on tasks critical to the Finance Department. This Al system was able to analyze the functionality of chatbots integrated intoArBank's website and mobile app to determine if it adheres to ISO/IEC 42001 requirements and internal policies governing customerservice in the banking sector.
In addition, Audrey conducted a deeper assessment of the bank’s AIMS. Her evaluation included observing different stages of the AIMSlife cycle, from development to deployment, to ensure that roles and responsibilities were clearly defined and aligned with ArBank’soperational goals. She also evaluated the tools used to monitor and measure the performance of the AIMS.
Audrey continued the audit process by auditing ArBank's outsourced operations. Upon checking the contractual agreements between thetwo parties, Audrey decided that there was no need to gather audit evidence regarding the contractual agreement. She reviewed thecompany's processes for monitoring the quality of outsourced operations, determined whether appropriate governance processes are inplace with regard to the engagement of outsourced persons or organizations, and reviewed and evaluated the company's plans in case ofexpected or unexpected termination of the outsourcing agreement.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Which audit principle did Audrey demonstrate while assessing the chatbots?
Which core element emphasizes that AI systems should be designed to avoid bias and ensure fair treatment for all individuals?
Scenario 5 (continued):
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by usingadvanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure
that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS basedon ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS’s effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leaderdespite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills
and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team ofseven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whetherphysical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition hadbeen defined, the certification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives anddocumented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the auditactivities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks andopportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initialcontact. The initial contact aimed to confirm thecommunication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, andsummarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. Duringthis first meeting, Robertemphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides orinterpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issuesand finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia’s operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-relateddata governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. He discussed this need with Aizoia's management,proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al data governancepractices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the auditbased on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 5, did the certification body provide all the necessary information to conduct the audit to the audit team leader?
Question:
Based on ISO/IEC 42001, which of the following is NOT one of the factors that an organization must consider when determining the risks and opportunities related to an AI system?
Customers Passed
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor
Average Score In Real
Exam At Testing Centre
Questions came word by
word from this dump
DumpsTool Practice Questions provide you with the ultimate pathway to achieve your targeted PECB Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor IT certification. The innovative questions with their interactive and to the point content make your learning of the syllabus far easier than you could ever imagine.
DumpsTool Practice Questions are information-packed and prove to be the best supportive study material for all exam candidates. They have been designed especially keeping in view your actual exam requirements. Hence they prove to be the best individual support and guidance to ace exam in first go!
PECB AI management system (AIMS) ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF file of Practice Questions is easily downloadable on all devices and systems. This you can continue your studies as per your convenience and preferred schedule. Where as testing engine can be downloaded and install to any windows based machine.
DumpsTool Practice Questions ensure your exam success with 100% money back guarantee. There virtually no possibility of losing PECB AI management system (AIMS) ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam, if you grasp the information contained in the questions.
DumpsTool professional guidance is always available to its worthy clients on all issues related to exam and DumpsTool products. Feel free to contact us at your own preferred time. Your queries will be responded with prompt response.
DumpsTool tires its level best to entertain its clients with the most affordable products. They are never a burden on your budget. The prices are far less than the vendor tutorials, online coaching and study material. With their lower price, the advantage of DumpsTool ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Practice Questions is enormous and unmatched!
DumpsTool products focus each and every aspect of the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor certification exam. You’ll find them absolutely relevant to your needs.
DumpsTool’s products are absolutely exam-oriented. They contain ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study material that is Q&As based and comprises only the information that can be asked in actual exam. The information is abridged and up to the task, devoid of all irrelevant and unnecessary detail. This outstanding content is easy to learn and memorize.
DumpsTool offers a variety of products to its clients to cater to their individual needs. DumpsTool Study Guides, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps, Practice Questions answers in pdf and Testing Engine are the products that have been created by the best industry professionals.
The money back guarantee is the best proof of our most relevant and rewarding products. DumpsTool’s claim is the 100% success of its clients. If they don’t succeed, they can take back their money.
DumpsTool ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Testing Engine delivers you practice tests that have been made to introduce you to the real exam format. Taking these tests also helps you to revise the syllabus and maximize your success prospects.
Yes. DumpsTool’s concentration is to provide you with the state of the art products at affordable prices. Round the year, special packages and discounted prices are also introduced.