CISA Questions and Answers

 The advantage of using agile software development methodology over the waterfall methodology is that it allows for quicker deliverables. Agile software development is an iterative and incremental approach that emphasizes customer feedback, collaboration, and adaptation. Agile software development delivers working software in short cycles, called sprints, that typically last from two to four weeks. This enables the development team to respond to changing requirements, deliver value faster, and improve quality. Waterfall software development is a linear and sequential approach that follows a predefined set of phases, such as planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Waterfall software development requires a clear and stable definition of the project scope, deliverables, and expectations before starting the development process. Waterfall software development can be slow, rigid, and costly, especially if changes occur during the later stages of the project. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Information Systems Acquisition, Development & Implementation, Section 3.1: Project Management Practices

 The IS quality assurance (QA) group is responsible for ensuring that program changes adhere to established standards. Program changes are modifications made to software applications or systems to fix errors, improve performance, add functionality, or meet changing requirements. Program changes should follow established standards for documentation, authorization, testing, implementation, and review. The IS QA group is responsible for verifying that program changes comply with these standards and meet the expected quality criteria. Designing procedures to protect dataagainst accidental disclosure; ensuring that the output received from system processing is complete; and monitoring the execution of computer processing tasks are not responsibilities of the IS QA group. References: [ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition], page 304.

The first thing that an IS auditor should do when a follow-up audit reveals some management action plans have not been initiated is to escalate the lack of plan completion to executive management. This is because the failure to implement the agreed management action plans may indicate that the management is not taking the audit findings and recommendations seriously, or that they are accepting too much risk by not addressing the identified issues. Escalating the lack of plan completion to executive management can help to raise awareness and accountability, as well as to seek support and intervention to ensure that the management action plans are executed in a timely and effective manner12.

Confirming whether the identified risks are still valid is not the first thing to do, although it may be a useful step to reassess the current situation and the potential impact of not implementing the management action plans. However,confirming the validity of the risks does not address the root causeof why the management action plans have not been initiated, nor does it provide any assurance or remediation for the unresolved issues34.

Providing a report to the audit committee is not the first thing to do, although it may be a necessary step to communicate and document the results of the follow-up audit. However, providing a report to the audit committee does not guarantee that the management action plans will be initiated, nor does it resolve any conflicts or challenges that may prevent the management from implementing them34.

Requesting an additional action plan review to confirm the findings is not the first thing to do, although it may be a prudent step to verify and validate the accuracy and completeness of the follow-up audit. However, requesting an additional review may delay or defer the implementation of the management action plans, as well as consume more internalaudit resources and time

Due professional care is the obligation of an IS auditor to exercise the appropriate level of skill, competence, and diligence in performing an audit. It also requires the IS auditor to comply with the relevant standards, guidelines, and ethical principles of the profession. Completing an engagement by email only may compromise due professional care, as it may limit the IS auditor’s ability to obtain sufficient and appropriate evidence, to communicate effectively with the auditee and other stakeholders, and to perform adequate quality assurance and review procedures. The other options are not as relevant as due professional care, as they relate to specific aspects of an audit, such as proficiency (the knowledge and skills of the IS auditor), sufficient evidence (the quantity and quality of the audit evidence), and reporting (the presentation and communication of the audit results). References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Domain 1: The Process of Auditing Information Systems, Section 1.2 ISACA IT Audit and Assurance Standards

An IS auditor reviewing the threat assessment for a data center would be most concerned if all identified threats relate to external entities. This indicates that the threat assessment is incomplete and biased, as it ignores the potential threats from internal sources, such as employees, contractors, vendors, or authorized visitors. Internal threats can pose significant risks to the data center, as they may have access to sensitive information, systems, or facilities, and may exploit their privileges for malicious or fraudulent purposes. According to a study by IBM, 60% of cyberattacks in 2015 were carried out by insiders1

Some of the identified threats are unlikely to occur is not a cause for concern, as it shows that the threat assessment is comprehensive and realistic, and considers all possible scenarios, regardless of their probability. A threat assessment should not exclude any potential threats based on subjective judgments or assumptions, as they may still have a high impact if they materialize.

The exercise was completed by local management is not a cause for concern, as it shows that the threat assessment is conducted by the people who are most familiar with the data center’s operations, environment, and risks. Local management may have more relevant and accurate information and insights than external parties, and may be more invested in the outcome of the threat assessment.

Neighboring organizations’ operations have been included is not a cause for concern, as it shows that the threat assessment is holistic and contextual, and considers the interdependencies and influences of external factors on the data center’s security. Neighboring organizations’ operations may pose direct or indirect threats to the data center, such as physical damage, network interference, or shared vulnerabilities.

The effectiveness of a security awareness training program is best indicated by a reduction in unintentional violations. When employees are well-trained and aware of security practices, they are less likely to inadvertently violate security policies or make mistakes that could lead to breaches. While other factors (such as third-party social engineering tests, employee satisfaction, and completion rates) provide valuable insights, the ultimate goal of security awareness training is to minimize unintentional errors and improve overall security posture12. References: 1(https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2023/volume-2/considerations-for-developing-cybersecurity-awareness-training) 2(https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2023/security-awareness-training-a-critical-success-factor-for-organizations)

Evidence collection is the process of identifying, acquiring, preserving, and documenting digital evidence from various sources, such as computers, networks, mobile devices, or cloud services, that can be used to support the investigation and prosecution of cybercrimes. Evidence collection is an IS auditor’s primary focus when evaluating the response process for cybercrimes, because it determines the quality and validity of the evidence that can be used to prove or disprove the facts of the case, identify the perpetrators, and recover the losses. Evidence collection should follow the standards and best practices for digital forensics, such as ISO/IEC 270371, which provide guidelines for ensuring the integrity, authenticity, reliability, and admissibility of the evidence2.

The other possible options are:

A. Communication with law enforcement: This is the process of reporting, cooperating, and coordinating with law enforcement agencies that have the jurisdiction and authority to investigate and prosecute cybercrimes. Communication with law enforcement is an important aspect of the response process for cybercrimes, but it is not an IS auditor’s primary focus when evaluating it. Communication with law enforcement depends on the legal and regulatory requirements, the nature and severity of the incident, and the organizational policies and procedures. Communication with law enforcement should be done after evidence collection, to avoid compromising or contaminating the evidence3.

B. Notification to regulators: This is the process of informing and updating the relevant regulatory bodies or authorities that oversee or supervise the organization’s activities or industry sector about the cybercrime incident. Notification to regulators is an important aspect of the response process for cybercrimes, but it is not an IS auditor’s primary focus when evaluating it. Notification to regulators depends on the legal and regulatory requirements, the nature and impact of the incident, and the organizational policies and procedures. Notification to regulators should be doneafter evidence collection, to avoid disclosing sensitiveor confidential information4.

C. Root cause analysis: This is the process of identifying and analyzing the underlying factors or causes that led to or contributed to the cybercrime incident. Root cause analysis is an important aspect of the response process for cybercrimes, but it is not an IS auditor’s primary focus when evaluating it. Root cause analysis helps to prevent or mitigate future incidents, improve security controls and processes, and learn from mistakes. Root cause analysis should be done after evidence collection, to avoid interfering with or affecting theinvestigation5.

The greatest concern for an IS auditor when auditing an organization’s IT strategy development process is that information security was not included as a key objective in the IT strategic plan. Information security is a vital component of IT strategy, as it ensures the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information assets, and supports the business objectives and regulatory compliance. The other options are not as significant as the lack of information security in the IT strategic plan. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1, Section 1.31

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Wireless security relies onstrong encryptionto prevent unauthorized access and data interception.

Option A (Correct):WPA3is thelatest and most secureWi-Fi encryption standard, offeringstronger protectionagainst brute-force attacks and improvingkey management.

Option B (Incorrect):DES is outdatedand vulnerable tomodern attacks, making it unsuitable for wireless security.

Option C (Incorrect):WEP is highly insecuredue toweak encryptionand can be cracked inminutesusing basic tools.

Option D (Incorrect):SSL secures web traffic, notwireless networks.

 The decision to accept an IT control risk related to data quality should be the responsibility of the business owner. The business owner is the person who has the authority and accountability for the business process that relies on the data quality. The business owner should understand the impact of data quality issues on the business objectives, performance, and compliance. The business owner should also be involved in defining the data quality requirements, assessing the data quality risks, and implementing the data quality controls or mitigation strategies.

A data loss prevention (DLP) tool implemented in monitor mode only observes and logs potential data leakage but does not actively prevent it. This leaves the organization vulnerable to data breaches, making it the most critical concern in a pre-implementation review.

Crawlers for Sensitive Data (Option B):While crawlers may pose a performance impact, they are essential for discovering sensitive data.

Deep Packet Inspection (Option C):Though it introduces privacy considerations, it is a standard DLP functionality for inspecting data in transit.

Encryption Key Management (Option D):While important for security, improper management does not immediately prevent DLP functionality.

 The business process owner is the most important stakeholder to involve in the review of the processes that prevent fraud within a business expense claim system. This is because the business process owner is responsible for defining, implementing, and monitoring the business rules and policies that govern the expense claim process. The business process owner also has the authority and accountability to approve or reject expense claims, as well as to investigate and report any suspicious or fraudulent activities. The business process owner can provide valuable insights and feedback to the IS auditor on the effectiveness and efficiency of the current processes, aswell as the potential risks and controls that need to be addressed12.

The information security manager is not the most important stakeholder because their role is mainly focused on ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information systems and data that support the expense claim process. The information security manager can help the IS auditor with assessing the technical aspects of the system, such as access controls, encryption, logging, and backup, but they may not have sufficient knowledge or authority over the business rules and policies that prevent fraud1.

The quality assurance (QA) manager is not the most important stakeholder because their role is mainly focused on ensuring the quality and reliability of the software applications and systems that support the expense claim process. The QA manager can help the IS auditor with testing and verifying the functionality and performanceof the system, but they may not have sufficient knowledge or authority over the business rules and policies that prevent fraud1.

The business department executive is not the most important stakeholder because their role is mainly focused on overseeing the strategic objectives and financial performance of the business department that uses the expense claim system. The business department executive can help the IS auditor with understanding the business context and needs of the expense claim process, but they may not have sufficient knowledge or authority over the operational details and controls that prevent fraud

 Leveraging an IT governance framework is the best way to enable alignment of IT with business objectives, as it provides a set of principles, standards, processes, and practices that guide the effective delivery of IT services that support the organization’s strategy and goals. Benchmarking against peer organizations, developing key performance indicators (KPIs), and completing an IT risk assessment are useful activities that can help measure and improve the performance and value of IT, but they are not sufficient to ensure alignment without a governance framework. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: Information Systems Auditing Process, Section 1.2: IT Governance

 Ongoing monitoring of the audit activities is the most important activity to include as part of the quality assurance (QA) program requirements for an internal audit department. An IS auditor should perform regular reviews and evaluations of the audit processes, methods, standards, and outcomes to ensure that they comply with the QA program objectives and criteria. This will help to maintain and improve the quality and consistency of the audit services and deliverables. The other options are less important activities to include as part of the QA program requirements, as they may involve long-term resource planning, user satisfaction reports, or feedback from internal audit staff. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 2, Section2.61

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 224

Information systems governance is the set of policies, processes, structures, and practices that ensure the alignment of IT with business objectives, the delivery of value from IT investments, the management of IT risks, and the optimization of IT resources1. Information systems governance is a strategic and high-level function that covers the entire organization and its IT portfolio. Therefore, an IS auditor should review the aspects of information systems governance that are relevant to the organization’s vision, mission, goals, and strategies.

One of the aspects that an IS auditor should review when evaluating information systems governance for a large organization is the approval processes for new system implementations. This is because new system implementations are significant IT investments that require careful planning, analysis, design,development, testing, deployment, and evaluation to ensure that they meet the business requirements, deliver the expected benefits, comply with the relevant standards and regulations, and minimize the potential risks2. The approval processes fornew system implementations should involve the appropriate stakeholders, such as senior management, business owners, IT managers,project managers, users, and auditors, who have the authority and responsibility to approve or reject the proposed system implementations based on predefined criteria and metrics3. The approval processes for new system implementations should also be documented, transparent, consistent, and timely to ensure accountability and traceability4. Therefore, an IS auditor should review the approval processes for new system implementations to assess whether they are aligned with the information systems governance framework and objectives.

The other possible options are:

Procedures for adding a new user to the invoice processing system: This is an operational task that involves granting access rights and permissions to a specific user for a specific system based on the principle of least privilege. This is not a strategic or high-level function that falls under information systems governance. Therefore, an IS auditor should not review this aspect when evaluating information systems governance for a large organization.

Approval processes for updating the corporate website: This is a tactical task that involves making changes or enhancements to the content or design of the corporate website based on the business needs and feedback. This is not a strategic or high-level function that falls under information systems governance. Therefore, an IS auditor should not review this aspect when evaluating information systems governance for a large organization.

Procedures for regression testing system changes: This is a technical task that involves verifying that existing system functionalities are not adversely affected by new system changes or updates. This is not a strategic or high-level function that falls under information systems governance. Therefore, an IS auditor should not review this aspect when evaluating information systems governance for a large organization. References: 1: What is IT Governance? - Definition from Techopedia 2: System Implementation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics 3: Project Approval Process - Project Management Knowledge 4: 5 Best Practices For A Successful Project Approval Process | Kissflow Project : Principle of Least Privilege (POLP) | Imperva : How to Update Your Website Content - 7 Step Guide | HostGator Blog : What Is Regression Testing? Definition & Best Practices | BrowserStack

Full disk encryption (FDE) is a means of protecting information by encrypting all of thedata on a disk, including temporary files, programs, and system files1. FDE is best suited for addressing the risk scenario of physical theft of media on which information is stored, as it prevents unauthorized access to the data even if the device is lost or stolen2. FDE does not prevent data leakage as a result of employees leaving to work for competitors, as they may still have access to the data while using the device or copy the data to another device before leaving. FDE does not prevent noncompliance fines related to storage of regulated information, as it does not ensure that the data is stored in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations. FDE does not prevent unauthorized logical access to information through an application interface, as it does not control the access rights and permissions of users and applications. *References: According to the ISACA IT Audit and Assurance Standards, Guidelines and Tools and Techniques for IS Audit and Assurance Professionals, section 2402 Planning, “The IS audit and assurance professional should identify and assess risk relevant to the area under review.” 3 Oneof the risk factors to consider is “the sensitivity of information processed, stored or transmitted by the system” 3. FDE is one of the possible controls to mitigate the risk of unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information due to physical theft of media.

 Implementing an email containerization solution on personal devices is the best recommendation for an IS auditor, because it allows the organization to separate and secure the email data from the rest of the device data. Email containerization creates a virtual environment that encrypts andisolates the email data, preventing unauthorized access, leakage, or loss of sensitive information12. Requiring passwords or antivirus protection on personal devices may not be sufficient or enforceable, while prohibiting employees from storing companyemail onpersonal devices may not be feasible or practical. References: 1: CISA Review Manual (DigitalVersion), Chapter 5, Section 5.4.3 2: CISA Online Review Course, Module 5, Lesson 4

Attribute sampling is a method of audit sampling that is used to test the effectiveness of controls by measuring the rate of deviation from a prescribed procedure or attribute. Attribute sampling is suitable for testing compliance with the data center’s physical access log system, as the auditor can compare the identification document numbers and photos of the visitors with the records in the system and determine whether there are any discrepancies or errors. Attribute sampling can also provide an estimate of the deviation rate in the population and allow the auditor to draw a conclusion about the operating effectiveness of the control.

Variable sampling, on the other hand, is a method of audit sampling that is used to estimate the amount or value of a population by measuring a characteristic of interest, such as monetary value, quantity, or size. Variable sampling is not appropriate for testing compliance with the data center’s physical access log system, as the auditor is not interested in estimating the value of the population, but rather in testing whether the system is operating as intended.

Quota sampling and haphazard sampling are both examples of non-statistical sampling methods that do not use probability theory to select a sample. Quota sampling involves selecting a sample based on certain criteria or quotas, such as age, gender, or location. Haphazard sampling involves selecting a sample without any specific plan or method. Both methods are not suitable for testing compliance with the data center’s physical access log system, as they do not ensure that the sample is representative of the population and do not allow the auditor to measure the sampling risk or project the results to the population.

Therefore, attribute sampling is the most useful sampling method for an IS auditor conducting compliance testing for the effectiveness of the data center’s physical access log system.

 A digital signature is a cryptographic technique that verifies the authenticity and integrity of a message or document, by using a hash function and an asymmetric encryption algorithm. A hash function is a mathematical function that transforms any input data into a fixed-length output value called a digest, which is unique for each input. An asymmetric encryption algorithm uses two keys: a public key and a private key. The public key can be shared with anyone, while the private key must be kept secret by the owner. To create a digital signature, the sender first applies a hash function to the plaintext message to generate a digest. Then, the sender encrypts the digest with their private key to produce the digital signature. To verify the digital signature, the receiver decrypts the digital signature with the sender’s public key to obtain the digest. Then, the receiver applies the same hash function to the plaintext message to generate another digest. If the two digests match, it means that the message has not been altered and that it came from the sender. The security of a digital signature depends on the secrecy of the sender’s private key. If an attacker obtains the sender’s private key, they can create fake digital signatures for any message they want, thus compromising the control provided by the digital signature. Reversing the hash function using the digest is not possible, as hash functions are designed to be one-way functions that cannot be inverted. Altering the plaintext message will result in a different digest after applying the hash function, which will not match with the decrypted digest from the digital signature, thus invalidating the digital signature. Deciphering the receiver’s public key is not relevant, as public keys are meant to be publicly available and do not affect the security of digital signatures. 

The primary reason for an IS audit manager to review the work performed by a senior IS auditor prior to presentation of a report is to ensure the conclusions are adequately supported. The IS audit manager is responsible for overseeing and supervising the audit process, ensuring the quality and consistency of the audit work, and approving the audit report and recommendations. The IS audit manager should review the work performed by the senior IS auditor to verify that the audit objectives, scope, and criteria have been met, that the audit evidence is sufficient, reliable, and relevant, and that the audit conclusions are logical, objective, and based on the audit evidence. The IS audit manager should also ensure that the audit report is clear, concise, accurate, and complete, and that it communicates the audit findings, conclusions, and recommendations effectively to the intended audience. The other options are not the primary reason for an IS audit manager to reviewthe work performed by a seniorIS auditor prior to presentation of a report, because they either relate to specific aspects or stages of the audit work rather than the overall outcome, or they are part of the senior IS auditor’s responsibility rather thanthe IS audit manager’s. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)1, Chapter 2, Section 2.2.5

The main purpose of an IDS is to detect and report malicious or suspicious activity on a network or a host. If an IDS fails to identify actual attacks, it means that the IDS is not functioning properly or effectively, and it exposes the organization to serious security risks and potential damage. This is the most concerning scenario for an IS auditor, as it indicates a major deficiency in the IDS performance and configuration.

ReferencesWhat is an intrusion detection system (IDS)?What is Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)?How does it Work?When reviewing an intrusion detection system (IDS), an IS auditor …Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)—An Overview with a Generalized …An overview of issues in testing intrusion detection systems - NISTA Review of Intrusion Detection Systems and Their …

A database conflict occurs when the same data is modified at two separate servers, such as a customer database and a remote call center database, and the changes are not consistent with each other. For example, if a customer updates their phone number at the customer database, and a call center agent updates the same customer’s address at the remote call center database, there is a conflict between the two updates. Database conflicts can cause data inconsistency, corruption, or loss if they are not detected and resolved properly.

Two-way replication is a process of synchronizing data between two databases, so that any changes made in one database are reflected in the other database, and vice versa. Two-way replication can improve data availability, performance, and scalability, but it also increases the risk of database conflicts. Therefore, when assessing a proposed project for the two-way replication of a customer database with a remote call center, the IS auditor should ensure that database conflicts are managed during replication. This means that the project should have a clear and effective strategy for:

Preventing or minimizing database conflicts by using techniques such as locking, timestamping, or partitioning.

Detecting or identifying database conflicts by using tools such as triggers, logs, or alerts.

Resolving or handling database conflicts by using methods such as priority-based, rule-based, or user-based resolution.

The other possible options are:

B. end users are trained in the replication process: This is not a relevant or important factor for the IS auditor to ensure when assessing a proposed project for the two-way replication of a customer database with a remote call center. End users are not directly involved in the replication process, and they do not need to have detailed knowledge or skills about how replication works. The replication process should be transparent and seamless to the end users, and they should only interact with the data through their applications or interfaces.

C. the source database is backed up on both sites: This is not a sufficient or necessary factor for the IS auditor to ensure when assessing a proposed project for the two-way replication of a customer database with a remote call center. Backing up the source database on both sites can provide some level of data protection and recovery, but it does not address the issue of database conflicts that can occur during replication. Moreover, backing up the source database on both sites may not be feasible or efficient, as it may consume more storage space and network bandwidth, and introduce more complexity and overhead to the replication process.

D. user rights are identical on both databases: This is not a critical or relevant factor for the IS auditor to ensure when assessing a proposed project for the two-way replication of a customer database with a remote call center. User rights are the permissions or privileges that users have to access or modify data in a database. User rights do not directly affect the occurrence or resolution of database conflicts during replication. User rights may vary depending on the role or function of the users in different databases, and they should be defined and enforced according to the security policies and requirements of each database.

The stakeholder’s role in automating data extraction and validation is to indicate which data elements are necessary to make informed decisions. The stakeholder is the person who has a vested interest in the outcome of the data analytics process and can provide the business context and requirements for the analysis. The stakeholder can help the data analyst to identify the relevant data sources, the key performance indicators (KPIs), and the expected results of the analysis.

References

What Is the Data Analysis Process? 5 Key Steps to Follow - G2

What’s the Best Approach to Data Analytics? - Harvard Business Review

Weekly challenge 1 - GitHub: Let’s build from here

The observation that should be of most concern to the auditor when reviewing security controls related to collaboration tools for a business unit responsible for intellectual property and patents is that employees can share files with users outside the company through collaboration tools. Collaboration tools are software or hardware devices that enable users to communicate, cooperate, and coordinate with each other on a common task or project. Collaboration tools can facilitate information sharing and knowledge exchange among users, but they can also pose security risks if not properly controlled or managed. Employees can share files with users outside the company through collaboration tools, as this can compromise the security and confidentiality of intellectual property and patents, which are valuable and sensitive assets of the organization. Employees may share files with unauthorized or untrusted users who may misuse or disclose the intellectual property and patents, either intentionally or unintentionally. This can cause harm or damage to the organization, such as loss of competitive advantage, reputation, revenue, or legal rights. Training was not provided to the department that handles intellectual property and patents is a possible observation that could indicate a security issue related to collaboration tools for a business unit responsible for intellectual property and patents, but it is not the most concerning one. Training is anactivity that educates and instructs users on how to use collaboration tools effectively and securely, such as how to access, share, store, and protect information using collaboration tools. Training was not provided to the department that handles intellectual property and patents, as this can affect the awareness and competence of users on collaboration tools, and increase the likelihood of errors or mistakes that may compromise the security or quality of information. However, this observation may not be directly related to collaboration tools, as it may apply to any information system or resource used by the department. Logging and monitoring for content filtering is not enabled is a possible observation that could indicate a security issue related to collaboration tools for a business unit responsible for intellectual property and patents, but it is not the most concerning one. Logging and monitoring are processes that record and analyze the events or activities that occur on an information system or network, such as user actions, system operations, data changes, errors, alerts, etc. Content filtering is a technique that blocks or allows access to certain types of information based on predefined criteria or rules, such as keywords, categories, sources, etc. Logging and monitoring for content filtering is not enabled, as this can affect the auditability, accountability, and visibility of collaboration tools, and prevent detection or investigation of security incidents or violations related to information sharing using collaboration tools. However, this observation may not be specific to collaboration tools, as it may affect any information system or network that uses content filtering. The collaboration tool is hosted and can only be accessed via an Internet browser is a possible observation that could indicate a security issue related to collaboration tools for a business unit responsible for intellectual property and patents, but it is not the most concerning one. A hosted collaboration tool is a type of cloud-based service that provides collaboration functionality over the Internet without requiring installation or maintenance on local devices. An Internet browser is a software application that enables users to access and interact with web-based content or services. The collaboration tool is hosted and can only be accessed via an Internet browser, as this can affect the availability and reliability of collaboration tools, and introduce security or privacy risks for information sharing using collaboration tools. However, this observation may not be unique to collaboration tools, as it may apply to any cloud-based service that uses an Internet browser. 

When auditing the alignment of IT to the business strategy, it is most important for the IS auditor to evaluate deliverables of new IT initiatives against planned business services. This can help the IS auditor to assess whether the IT initiatives are meeting the business needs and expectations, delivering value and benefits, and supporting the business objectives and goals. Comparing the organization’s strategic plan against industry best practice is a possible technique for auditing the alignment of IT to the business strategy, but it is not the most important thing for the IS auditor to do, as industry best practice may not be applicable or relevant to the specific context or situation of the organization. Interviewing senior managers for their opinion of the IT function is a possible technique for auditing the alignment of IT to the business strategy, but it is not the most important thing for the IS auditor to do, as senior managers’ opinions may be subjective or biased, and may not reflect the actual performance or outcomes of the IT function. Ensuring an IT steering committee is appointed to monitor new IT projects is a possible control for ensuring the alignment of IT to the business strategy, but it is not the most important thing for the IS auditor to do, as an IT steering committee may not be effective or efficient in monitoring new IT projects, and may not have sufficient authority or influence over the IT function. 

The best way for the auditor to address this issue is to verify management has approved a policy exception to accept the risk. A policy exception is a formal authorization that allows a deviation from the established policy requirements for a specific situation or period of time. A policy exception should be based on a risk assessment that evaluates the impact and likelihood of the potential threats and vulnerabilities, as well as the cost and benefit of the alternative controls. A policy exception should also be documented, approved, and monitored by management.

Recommending the application be patched to meet requirements is not the best way for the auditor to address this issue. Patching the application may not be feasible, cost-effective, or timely, given that the application will be decommissioned in three months. Patching the application may also introduce new risks or errors that could affect the functionality or performance of the application.

Informing the IT director of the policy noncompliance is not the best way for the auditor to address this issue. Informing the IT director of the policy noncompliance may not resolve the issue or mitigate the risk, especially if the IT director is already aware of the situation and has decided to accept it. Informing the IT director of the policy noncompliance may also create unnecessary conflict or tension between the auditor and the auditee.

Taking no action since the application will be decommissioned in three months is not the best way for the auditor to address this issue. Taking no action may expose the organization to significant risks or consequences, such as data breaches, regulatory fines, or reputational damage, if the application is compromised or exploited by malicious actors. Taking no action may also violate the auditor’s professional standards and responsibilities, such as due care, objectivity, and reporting.

Controls related to authorized modifications to production programs are best tested by tracing modifications from the original request for change forward to the executable program, as this ensures that the change management process was followed and that the modifications were approved, documented, tested, and implemented correctly. Tracing modifications from the executable program back to the original request for change may not reveal any unauthorized or undocumented changes that occurred during the process. Testing only the authorizations to implement the new program or reviewing only the actual lines of source code changed in the program are not sufficient to test the controls related to authorized modifications, as they do not cover the entire change management process. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Information Systems Operations, Maintenance and Service Management, Section 4.2: Change Management

A recovery point objective (RPO) is the maximum acceptable amount of data loss after an unplanned data-loss incident, expressed as an amount of time. This is generally thought of as the point in time before the event at which data can be successfully recovered– that is, the time elapsed since the most recent reliable backup1. RPOs are important to consider when reviewing an organization’s defined data backup and restoration procedures, because they determine how frequently the organization needs to perform backups, and how much data it can afford to lose in case of a disaster. RPOs are usually defined based on the business impact and criticality of the data, as well as the compliance and regulatory requirements. For example, a financial institution may have a very low RPO (such as a few minutes or seconds) for its transactional data, while a research institute may have a higher RPO (such as a few hours or days) for its experimental data.

The other possible options are:

A. Business continuity plan (BCP): A BCP is a document that outlines how an organization will continue to operate or resume its critical functions and processes in the event of a disruption or disaster. A BCP includes various elements, such as risk assessment, business impact analysis, recovery strategies, roles and responsibilities, communication plan, and testing and maintenance. A BCP is related to an organization’s defined data backup and restoration procedures, but it is not the most important factor to consider when reviewing them. A BCP defines the recovery objectives and strategies for the entire organization, while the data backup and restoration procedures are more specific and technical in nature.

C. Mean time to restore (MTTR): MTTR is a metric that measures the average time it takes to restore a system or service after a failure or outage. MTTR is an indicator of the efficiency and effectiveness of an organization’s recovery process, as well as the availability and reliability of its systems or services. MTTR is related to an organization’s defined data backup and restoration procedures, but it is not the most important factor to consider when reviewing them. MTTR reflects the actual performance of the recovery process, while the data backup and restoration procedures define the expected steps and actions for the recovery process.

D. Mean time between failures (MTBF): MTBF is a metric that measures the average time between failures or outages of a system or service. MTBF is an indicator of the quality and durability of an organization’s systems or services, as well as their susceptibility to failures or outages. MTBF is related to an organization’s defined data backup and restoration procedures, but it is not the most important factor to consider when reviewing them. MTBF reflects the potential frequency of failures or outages, while the data backup and restoration procedures define the contingency plans for failures or outages.

 Resilience is the ability of an organization to continue to operate effectively during or after a disruptive event. A business impact analysis (BIA) is a key process to identify the critical systems and processes that support the organization’s objectives and determine the impact of their disruption. Without a BIA, the organization may not be able to prioritize the recovery of the most important systems and processes, which poses the greatest risk to its resilience. The other options are not as significant as a BIA, as they relate to data quality, system monitoring, and user acceptance testing, which are important but not essential for resilience. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Domain 4: Information Systems Operations and Business Resilience, Section 4.2 Business Continuity Planning1

 The best option to support the organization’s objectives of protecting data confidentiality while transporting data is encryption. Encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable form using a secret key or algorithm, so that only authorized parties can access the original data. Encryption protects the confidentiality of data in transit by preventing unauthorized interception,modification, or disclosure of the data. Encryption can also help comply with data privacy and security regulations, such as the GDPR and HIPAA.

The other options are not as effective as encryption in protecting data confidentiality while transporting data. Cryptographic hashes are mathematical functions that generate a fixed-length output from an input, but they do not encrypt the data. Hashes are used to verify the integrity and authenticity of data, but they do not prevent unauthorized access to the data. Virtual local area network (VLAN) is a logical grouping of network devices that share the same broadcast domain, but they do not encrypt the data. VLANs can improve network performance and security by isolating traffic, but they do not protect the data from being intercepted or modified by external attackers. Dedicated lines are physical connections that provide exclusive access to a network or service, but they do not encrypt the data. Dedicated lines can offer higher bandwidth and reliability, but they do not guarantee the confidentiality of the data from being compromised by physical tampering or eavesdropping.

The IS auditor’s best course of action when preparing the final report is to include the position supported by senior management in the final engagement report. The IS auditor should communicate the audit findings and recommendations to senior management and obtain their feedback and approval before issuing the final report. If there is a disagreement between the auditee and the IS auditor regarding a recommendation for corrective action, the IS auditor should present both sides of the argument and the supporting evidence, and seek senior management’s opinion and decision. The IS auditor should respect and follow senior management’s position, and include it in the final engagement report, along with the auditee’s comments if applicable. The other options arenot the best course of action, because they either do not resolve the disagreement, do notreflect senior management’s authority, or do not report the audit results accurately and completely. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)1, Chapter 2, Section 2.2.5

 Requiring written authorization for all payment transactions is the IS auditor’s best recommendation for a compensating control in an environment where segregation of duties (SoD) cannot be enforced in an accounts payable system. SoD is a principle that requires different individuals or functions to perform different tasks or roles in a business process, such as initiating, approving, recording and reconciling transactions. SoD reduces the risk of errors, fraud and misuse of resources by preventing any single person or function from having excessive or conflicting authority or responsibility. A compensating control is a control that mitigates or reduces the risk associated with the absence or weakness of another control. Requiring written authorization for all payment transactions is a compensating control that provides an independent verification and approval of each transaction before it is processed by the accounts payable system. This control can help to detect and prevent unauthorized, duplicate or erroneous payments, and to ensure compliance with policies and procedures. The other options are not as effective as option A, as they do not provide an independent verification or approval of payment transactions. Restricting payment authorization to senior staff members is a control that limits the number of people who can authorize payments, but it does not prevent them from initiating or processing payments themselves, which could violate SoD. Reconciling payment transactions with invoices is a control that verifies that the payments match the invoices, but it does not prevent unauthorized, duplicate or erroneous payments from being processed by the accounts payable system. Reviewing payment transaction history is a control that monitors and analyzes thepayment transactions after they have been processed by the accounts payable system, but it does not prevent unauthorized, duplicate or erroneous payments from occurring in the first place. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) , Chapter 5: Protection of Information Assets, Section 5.2: Logical Access.

A change log is a record of all changes made to a system or application, including the date, time, description, and approval of each change. A change log can help an IS auditor to trace the source and authorization of a modification to a system’s security settings. A system event correlation report is a tool that analyzes data from multiple sources to identify patterns and anomalies that indicate potential security incidents. A database log is a record of all transactions and activities performed on a database, such as queries, updates, and backups. A security incident and event management (SIEM) report is a tool that collects, analyzes, and reports on data from various sources to detect and respond to security incidents. 

 The answer B is correct because data minimization is the most important design consideration to mitigate the risk of exposing data through application programming interface (API) queries. An API is a set of rules and protocols that allows different software components or systems to communicate and exchange data. API queries are requests sent by users or applications to an API to retrieve or manipulate data. For example, a user may query an API to get information about a product, a service, or a location.

Data minimization is the principle of collecting, processing, and storing only the minimum amount of data that are necessary for a specific purpose. Data minimization can help to reduce the risk of exposing data through API queries by limiting the amount and type of data that are available or accessible through the API. Data minimization can also help to protect the privacy and security of the data subjects and the data providers, as well as to comply with the relevant laws and regulations.

Some of the benefits of data minimization for API design are:

Privacy: Data minimization can enhance the privacy of the data subjects by ensuring that only the data that are relevant and essential for the API purpose are collected and processed. This can prevent unnecessary or excessive collection or disclosure of personal or sensitive data, such as names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, etc. Data minimization can also help to comply with the privacy laws and regulations that require data protection by design and by default, such as GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) or CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act).

Security: Data minimization can improve the security of the data providers by reducing the attack surface and the potential damage of a data breach. If less data are stored or transmitted through the API, there are fewer opportunities for attackers to access or compromise the data. Data minimization can also help to implement security controls such as encryption, access control, or logging more efficiently and effectively.

Performance: Data minimization can increase the performance of the API by optimizing the use of resources and bandwidth. If less data are stored or transmitted through the API, there are less storage space and network traffic required. Data minimization can also help to improve the speed and reliability of the API responses.

Some of the techniques for data minimization in API design are:

Define clear and specific purposes for the API and document them in the API specification or documentation.

Identify and classify the data that are needed for each purpose and assign them appropriate labels or levels, such as public, internal, confidential, or restricted.

Implement filters or parameters in the API queries that allow users or applications to specify or limit the data fields or attributes they want to retrieve or manipulate.

Use pagination or throttling in the API responses that limit the number or size of data items returned per request.

Use anonymization or pseudonymization techniques that remove or replace any identifying information from the data before sending them through the API.

Some examples of web resources that discuss data minimization in API design are:

Data Minimization in Web APIs - World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Adding Privacy by Design in Secure Application Development

Chung-ju/Data-Minimization: A repository of related papers. - GitHub

The primary purpose of requiring source code escrow in a contractual agreement is to ensure the source code is available. Source code escrow is a service that involves depositing the source code of a software or system with a third-party agent or escrow provider, who can release it to a designated beneficiary under specific conditions, such as bankruptcy, termination, or breach of contract by the software vendor or developer. Source code escrow can help to protect the interests and rights of the software user or licensee, who may need access to the source code for maintenance, modification, enhancement, or troubleshooting purposes. The IS auditor should verify that the contractual agreement specifies the terms and conditions for source code escrow, such as the escrow agent,the escrow fees, the deposit frequency and format,the release events and procedures, and the verification and audit requirements. References: CISA ReviewManual (Digital Version)1, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2

 Change control is the process of managing and documenting changes to an information system or its components. Change control aims to ensure that changes are authorized, tested, approved, implemented, and reviewed in a controlled and consistent manner. Change control is an essential part of ensuring the security, reliability, and quality of an information system.

One of the key elements of change control is testing and approval from quality assurance (QA). QA is the function that verifies that the changes meet the requirements and specifications, comply with the standards and policies, and do not introduce any errors or vulnerabilities. QA testing and approval provide assurance that the changes are fit for purpose, function as expected, and do not compromise the security or performance of the system.

An organization that has recently moved to an agile model for deploying custom code to its in-house accounting software system should still follow change control procedures, including QA testing and approval. Agile development methods emphasize flexibility, speed, and collaboration, but they do not eliminate the need for quality and security checks. In fact, agile methods can facilitate change control by enabling frequent and iterative testing and feedback throughout the development cycle.

However, if change control does not include testing and approval from QA, this poses a significant security concern for the organization. Without QA testing and approval, the changes may not be properly validated, verified, or evaluated before being deployed to production. This could result in introducing bugs, defects, or vulnerabilities that could affect the functionality, availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the accounting software system. For example, a change could cause data corruption, performance degradation, unauthorized access, or data leakage. These risks could have serious consequences for the organization’s financial operations, compliance obligations, reputation, or legal liabilities.

Therefore, change control that does not include testing and approval from QA is the most significant security concern to address when reviewing the procedures in place for production code deployment in an agile model.

The major advantage of automating internal controls is to efficiently test large volumes of data, because automated controls can perform repetitive tasks faster, more accurately, and more consistently than manual controls. Automated controls can also provide audit trails and exception reports that facilitate the monitoring and evaluationof the control effectiveness12. Reviewing large value transactions, identifying transactions with no segregation of duties, and performing analytical reviews are possible benefits of automating internal controls, but not the major advantage. References: 1: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5, Section 5.2.2 2: CISA Online Review Course, Module 5, Lesson 2

 Upon completion of audit work, an IS auditor should distribute a summary of general findings to the members of the auditing team. This is to ensure that the audit team members are aware of the audit results, have an opportunity to provide feedback, and can agree on the audit conclusions and recommendations. Providing a report to senior management prior to discussion with the auditee, providing a report to the auditee stating the initial findings, and reviewing the working papers with the auditee are not appropriate actions for an IS auditor to take upon completion of audit work, as they may compromise the audit independence, objectivity, and quality. References: ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition, page 221

 The best option to provide an IS auditor assurance that the interface between a point-of-sale (POS) system and the general ledger is transferring sales data completely and accurately is A. Electronic copies of customer sales receipts are maintained. Electronic copies of customer sales receipts are records of the transactions that occurred at the POS system, which can be compared with the data transferred to the general ledger. This can help detect any errors, omissions, or discrepancies in the data transfer process and ensure that the sales data is complete and accurate.

The other options are not as effective as A in providing assurance that the interface between the POS system and the general ledger is transferring sales data completely and accurately. B. Monthly bank statements are reconciled without exception. Monthly bank statements are records of the cash inflows and outflows of the organization, which may not match with the sales data recorded by the POS system and the general ledger. For example, there may be delays, discounts, returns, or refundsthat affect the cash flow but not the sales revenue. Therefore, reconciling monthly bank statements without exception does not necessarily mean that the sales data is complete and accurate. C. Nightly batch processing has been replaced with real-time processing. Nightly batch processing is a method of transferring data from the POS system to the general ledger in batches at a scheduled time, usually at night. Real-time processing is a method of transferring data from the POS system to the general ledger as soon as the transactions occur. Real-time processing may improve the timeliness and efficiency of the data transfer process, but it does not guarantee that the sales data is complete and accurate. There may still be errors, omissions, or discrepancies in the data transfer process that need to be detected and corrected. D. The data transferred over the POS interface is encrypted. Encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable form using a secret key or algorithm, so that only authorized parties can access the original data. Encryption protects the confidentiality and security of the data transferred over the POS interface, but it does not ensure that the sales data is complete and accurate. There may still be errors, omissions, or discrepancies in the data transfer process that need to be detected and corrected.

The finding that should be of greatest concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk associated with end-user computing (EUC) in an organization is the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications. EUC applications are applications that are developed and maintained by end-users, rather than by IT professionals, to support their business functions and processes. Examples of EUC applications include spreadsheets, databases, reports, and scripts. The lack of defined criteria for EUC applications means that the organization does not have clear and consistent standards or guidelines to identify, classify, and manage EUC applications. This can lead to various risks, such as:

Inaccurate or unreliable data and results from EUC applications that are not validated, verified, or tested

Unauthorized or inappropriate access or use of EUC applications that are not secured, controlled, or monitored

Inconsistent or incompatible data and results from EUC applications that are not integrated, documented, or updated

Loss or corruption of data and results from EUC applications that are not backed up, recovered, or archived

Therefore, the IS auditor should be most concerned about the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications, as it can affect the quality, integrity, and availability of the EUC applications and the data they produce.

Insufficient processes to track ownership of each EUC application is a finding that should be of concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk associated with EUC in an organization, but it is not the greatest concern. The ownership of an EUC application refers to the person or group who is responsible for creating, maintaining, and using the EUC application. Insufficient processes to track ownership of each EUC application means that the organization does not have adequate mechanisms orrecords to identify and communicate who owns each EUC application. This can lead to risks, such as:

Lack of accountability or ownership for the quality and accuracy of the EUC application and its data

Lack of support or maintenance for the EUC application when the owner leaves or changes roles

Lack of awareness or training for the users of the EUC application on its purpose and functionality

However, these risks are less severe than those caused by the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications.

Insufficient processes to test for version control is a finding that should be of concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk associated with EUC in an organization, but it is not the greatest concern. Version control is a process that tracks and manages the changes made to an EUC application over time. Insufficient processes to test for version control means that the organization does not have adequate procedures or tools to ensure that the changes made to an EUC application are authorized, documented, and tested. This can lead to risks, such as:

Errors or inconsistencies in the data and results from different versions of the EUC application

Conflicts or confusion among the users of the EUC application on which version is current or correct

Loss or overwrite of data and results from previous versions of the EUC application

However, these risks are less severe than those caused by the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications.

Lack of awareness training for EUC users is a finding that should be of concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk associated with EUC in an organization, but it is not the greatest concern. Awareness training for EUC users is a process that educates and informs the users of the EUC applications on their roles, responsibilities, and risks. Lack of awareness training for EUC users means that the organization does not have adequate programs or materials to raise the knowledge and skills of the users on how to use and manage the EUC applications effectively and securely. This can lead to risks, such as:

Misuse or abuse of the EUC applications by users who are not aware of their impact or implications

Non-compliance or violation of policies or regulations by users who are not aware of their requirements or expectations

Dissatisfaction or frustration among users who are not aware of their benefits or limitations

However, these risks are less severe than those caused by the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications.

The greatest concern with the lack of structure for technology risk governance is C. Key decision-making entities for technology risk have not been identified. Technology risk governance is the process of establishing and maintaining the policies, roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities for managing technology risks within an organization1. Technology risk governance requires a clear organizational structure that defines who has the authority and responsibility to make decisions, set objectives, allocate resources, monitor performance, and ensure compliance for technology risk management2. Without such a structure, an organization may face the following challenges:

Lack of alignment and integration between technology and business strategies, leading to suboptimal outcomes and missed opportunities.

Lack of clarity and consistency in technology risk identification, assessment, mitigation, and reporting, leading to gaps and overlaps in risk coverage and exposure.

Lack of communication and collaboration among different stakeholders involved in technology risk management, leading to conflicts and inefficiencies.

Lack of oversight and accountability for technology risk management activities and results, leading to poor quality and reliability.

The best tool for detailed testing of a business application’s data and configuration files is an audit analytics tool. An audit analytics tool is a software that helps auditors to analyze large sets of data and identify anomalies, trends, and patterns that are relevant to the audit objectives. An audit analytics tool can also provide audit evidence and support the auditor’s professional judgment and conclusions.

Some of the benefits of using an audit analytics tool are:

It can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the audit by reducing the time and effort required to perform manual tests and procedures.

It can enhance the quality and reliability of the audit by increasing the coverage and accuracy of the data analysis and testing.

It can enable the auditor to perform more complex and sophisticated tests and procedures that may not be possible or feasible with traditional methods.

It can help the auditor to discover new insights and risks that may not be apparent or detectable with traditional methods.

Some examples of audit analytics tools are:

IDEA: A data analysis software that allows auditors to import, analyze, and visualize data from various sources and formats. It also offers features such as sampling, stratification, gap analysis, duplicate detection, Benford’s law, and regression analysis.1

ACL: A data analysis software that helps auditors to access, analyze, and report on data from various sources and formats. It also offers features such as sampling, stratification, gap analysis, duplicate detection, Benford’s law, regression analysis, and scripting.2

TeamMate Analytics: A data analysis software that integrates with Microsoft Excel and provides auditors with a range of tools and functions to perform data analysis and testing. It also offers features such as sampling, stratification, gap analysis, duplicate detection, Benford’s law, regression analysis, and scripting.3

A self-checking digit is the most effective accuracy control for entry of a valid numeric part number. This method involves adding an extra digit at the end of every number which is calculated from the other digits. This digit is then used to check the accuracy of the entered number1. While hash totals, online review of description, and comparison to historical order pattern can be used as accuracy controls, they are not as effective as a self-checking digit.

The statement that BEST demonstrates alignment with data classification standards related to the protection of information assets is D. All information assets will be assigned a clearly defined level to facilitate proper employee handling. Data classification involves categorizing information assets based on their sensitivity, importance, and usage. Assigning clearly defined levels (such as public, internal, confidential, etc.) to information assets ensures that appropriate security controls are applied based on their classification. By doing so, organizations can manage access, encryption, and other protective measures effectively12.

A maturity model for a technology organization is a tool that measures the progress and capability of the IT function in relation to its goals, processes, and practices. A maturity model can help identify gaps and areas for improvement, as well as benchmark the IT function against industry standards or best practices. One of the key aspects of a maturity model is the definition and clarity of roles and responsibilities for the IT function and its stakeholders. A roles and responsibility matrix, such as a RACI matrix, is a document that clarifies who is responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed for each task or deliverable in a project or process. A roles and responsibility matrix can help avoid confusion, duplication, or omission of work, as well as ensure accountability and communication among the IT function and its customers, partners, and suppliers. Therefore, an IS auditor should focus on reviewing the roles and responsibility matrix when evaluating the maturity model for a technology organization.

A standard operating procedure (SOP) is a document that describes the steps and instructions for performing a routine or repetitive task or process. SOPs are important for ensuring consistency, quality, and compliance in the IT function, but they are not directly related to the maturity model. A service level agreement (SLA) is a contract that defines the expectations and obligations between an IT service provider and its customers. SLAs are important for ensuring customer satisfaction, performance measurement, and dispute resolution in the IT function, but they are not directly related to the maturity model. A business resiliency plan is a document that outlines how an IT function will continue to operate or recover from a disruption or disaster. Business resiliency is important for ensuring availability, reliability, and security in the IT function, but it is not directly related to the maturity model. References: 1: Maturity Models for IT & Technology | Splunk 2: Responsibility assignment matrix - Wikipedia 3: Roles and Responsibilities Matrix - SDLCforms

The first step in managing the impact of a recently discovered zero-day attack is to identify vulnerable assets. A zero-day attack is a cyberattack that exploits a previously unknown or unpatched vulnerability in a software or system, before the vendor or developer has had time to fix it. Identifying vulnerable assets is crucial for managing the impact of a zero-day attack, because it helps to determine the scope and severity of the attack, prioritize the protection and mitigation measures, and isolate or quarantine the affected assets from further damage or compromise. The other options are not the first steps in managing the impact of a zero-day attack, because they either require more informationabout the vulnerable assets, or they are part of the subsequentsteps of assessing, responding, or recovering from the attack. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)1, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.4

The primary benefit of automating application testing is to provide test consistency. Automated testing can ensure that the same test cases are executed in the same manner and order every time, which can improve the reliability and accuracy of the test results. Providing more flexibility, replacing all manual test processes, and reducing the time to review code are possible benefits of automating application testing, but they are not the primary benefit. References:

ISACA, CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2020, p. 3091

ISACA, CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription

The absence of a right-to-audit clause in the outsourcing contract for a cloud service provider would be of greatest concern to an IS auditor1. This clause gives the client the right to audit the service provider’s activities that are relevant to the services being provided1. It is crucial for ensuringthat the service provider is complying with the terms of the contract and meeting the client’s standards for performance, security, and other aspects1. Without this clause, the client may not be able to effectively monitor and manage risks associated with the outsourcing arrangement1.

 The rules of engagement define the scope, objectives, methodology, deliverables, and limitations of the penetration testing. They also specify the legal and ethical boundaries, communication channels, and escalation procedures. Establishing the rules of engagement is the first step when planning to conduct penetration testing for a client, as it ensures that both parties agree on the expectations and outcomes of the testing. The other options are important steps, but they should be done after the rules of engagement are established. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, page 381.

Discovery sampling is a type of statistical sampling that’s used when the expected error rate in the population is very low1. This method is designed to discover at least one instance of an attribute or condition in a population1. It’s often used in auditing to uncover fraud or noncompliance with rules and regulations1.

The missing access control requirements should present the greatest concern to the IS auditor when reviewing a contract for the outsourcing of IT facilities. Access control requirements are essential for ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the outsourced IT resources and data. They specify the roles, responsibilities, and permissions of the outsourcing vendor and its staff, as well as the client and its users, in accessing and managing the IT facilities. They also define the security policies, standards, and procedures that the outsourcing vendor must follow to protect the IT facilities from unauthorized or malicious access, use, modification, or disclosure. Without clear and comprehensive access control requirements, the outsourcing contract may expose the client to significant risks of data breaches, compliance violations, service disruptions, or reputational damage.

Hardware configurations, help desk availability, and perimeter network security diagram are important aspects of an outsourcing contract, but they are not as critical as access control requirements. Hardware configurations describe the technical specifications and performance of the IT equipment that the outsourcing vendor will provide and maintain. Help desk availability defines the service levels and support channels that the outsourcing vendor will offer to the client and its users. Perimeter network security diagram illustrates the network architecture and security measures that the outsourcing vendor will implement to protect the IT facilities from external threats. These aspects can be verified or modified during the implementation or operation phases of the outsourcing contract, but access control requirements need to be established and agreed upon before signing the contract.

Parallel simulation involves running the same data through two systems and comparing the results1. In this case, the bank’s data would be processed using both the modified interest calculation program and an audit software. The results from both systems would then be compared to check for discrepancies1. This technique provides strong evidence of the correctness of interest calculations as it directly tests the program’s output against a known and trusted output1. While source code review23, manual verification of a sample of results4567, and review of QA test results8910 can also provide valuable insights, they do not offer the same level of direct, comparative evidence as parallel simulation1.

 The risk assessment process involves identifying the information assets that are at risk, analyzing the threats and vulnerabilities that could affect them, evaluating the impact and likelihood of a risk event, and determining the appropriate controls to mitigate the risk. The first step is to identify the information assets, as they are the objects of protection and the basis for the rest of the process. Without knowing what assets are at risk, it is not possible to assess their value, exposure, or protection level. References: ISACA Frameworks: Blueprints for Success

Clustering is a technique that groups multiple servers or nodes together to act as one system, providing high availability, scalability, and load balancing for applications or services. Clustering can improve system resiliency, which is the ability of a system to withstand or recover from failures or disruptions without compromising its functionality or performance. Clustering can achieve this by providing redundancy and fault tolerance for critical components or processes, enabling automatic failover and recovery in case of node failures, distributing workload among multiple nodes to avoid overloading or bottlenecks, and allowing dynamic addition or removal of nodes to meet changingdemand or capacity needs. Clustering may also decrease system response time by improving performance and efficiency through load balancing and parallel processing, but this is not its primary purpose. Clustering may facilitate faster backups by enabling concurrent backup operations across multiple nodes, but this is not its main benefit. Clustering may improve the recovery time objective (RTO), which is the maximum acceptable time for restoring a system or service after a disruption, by reducing the downtime and data loss caused by failures, but this is not the best reason for using clustering, as there may be other factors that affect the RTO, such as backup frequency, recovery procedures, and testing methods. 

An application’s audit trail is a record of all actions or events that occur within or affect an application, such as user activities, system operations, data changes, errors, exceptions, etc. An audit trail can provide evidence and accountability for an application’s functionality and performance, and support auditing, monitoring, troubleshooting, and investigation purposes. An IS auditor should ensure that an application’s audit trail has adequate security, which means that it is protected from unauthorized access, modification, deletion, or disclosure. Adequate security can help ensure that an audit trail maintains its integrity, reliability, and availability, and prevents tampering or manipulation by attackers or insiders who want to hide their tracks or evidence of their actions. Logs all database records is a possible feature of an application’s audit trail, but it is not the most important thing for an IS auditor to ensure, as logging all database records may not be necessary or feasible for some applications, and may generate excessive or irrelevant data that can affect the storage or analysis of the audit trail. Is accessible online is a possible feature of an application’s audit trail, but it is not the most important thing for an IS auditor to ensure, as online accessibility may not be required or desirable for some applications, and may introduce security or privacy risks for the audit trail. Does not impact operational efficiency is a desirable outcome of an application’s audit trail, but it is not the most important thing for an IS auditor to ensure, as operational efficiency may not be the primary objective or concern of an application’s audit trail, and may depend on other factors or trade-offs such as storage capacity, performance speed, or data quality. 

When a data center is attempting to restore computing facilities at an alternative site following a disaster, the operating system should be restored FIRST. Here’s why:

1. Operating System (OS):

The OS is the foundation of any computing environment. It manages hardware resources, provides essential services, and allows applications to run.

Restoring the OS ensures that the infrastructure is operational and ready for further recovery steps.

Without a functional OS, applications cannot execute, and data backups cannot be effectively restored.

2. Data Backups:

While data backups are critical for recovery, they depend on a working infrastructure.

If the OS is not operational, restoring data backups becomes challenging.

Data backups should follow the OS restoration.

3. Applications:

Applications rely on the OS to function.

Restoring applications before the OS may lead to compatibility issues or incomplete functionality.

Applications should be restored after ensuring a stable OS environment.

4. Decision Support System (DSS):

DSS is an application category.

It should follow the restoration of both the OS and critical applications.

In summary, prioritize restoring the operating system, which forms the basis for subsequent recovery steps12. Once the OS is functional, proceed with data backups, applications, and other systems as needed.

 The best way to prevent a chip-level security vulnerability from being exploited is to install vendor patches. A chip-level security vulnerability is a flaw in the design or implementation of a processor that allows an attacker to bypass the normal security mechanisms and access privileged information or execute malicious code. A vendor patch is a software update provided by the manufacturer of the processor that fixes or mitigates the vulnerability. Installing vendor patches can help to protect the system from known exploits and reduce the risk of data leakage or compromise.

Security awareness training, reviewing hardware vendor contracts, and reviewing security log incidents are not as effective as installing vendor patches for preventing a chip-level security vulnerability from being exploited. Security awareness training is an educational program that teaches users about the importance of security and how to avoid common threats. Reviewing hardware vendor contracts is a legal process that evaluates the terms and conditions of the agreement between the organization and the processor supplier. Reviewing security log incidents is an analytical process that examines the records of security events and activities on the system. These methods may be useful for other security purposes, but they do not directly address the root cause of the chip-level vulnerability or prevent its exploitation. References: Protecting your device against chip-related security vulnerabilities, New ‘Downfall’ Flaw Exposes Valuable Data in Generations of Intel Chips

Implementing incident escalation procedures is the best way to ensure that an incident receives attention from appropriate personnel in a timely manner, because it defines the roles and responsibilities, communication channels, and escalation criteria for handlingdifferent types of incidents34. Incident escalation procedures help to prioritize and coordinate the response efforts and ensure that the incident is resolved by the most qualified and authorized personnel. Completing the incident management log, broadcasting an emergency message, and requiring a dedicated incident response team are not sufficient to ensure that an incident receives attention from appropriate personnel in a timely manner, because they do not specify how to escalate the incident based onits severity, impact,or complexity. References: 3: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 6, Section 6.3.2 4: CISA Online Review Course, Module 6, Lesson 3

Post-implementation testing is the process of verifying and validating the functionality, performance, and security of a system after it has been deployed to the production environment1. Post-implementation testing is important for ensuring that the system meets the user requirements and expectations, as well as the operational and business objectives. Post-implementation testing also helps to identify and resolve any defects, errors, or issues that may have occurred during the deployment process or that may have been missed during the previous testing stages2.

Therefore, the observation that post-implementation testing is not conducted for all system releases should be of greatest concern to an IS auditor performing an audit of change and release management controls for a new complex system developed by a small in-house IT team. This observation indicates that the system may have quality, reliability, or security problems that could affect the user satisfaction, system performance, or data integrity. This observation also suggests that the change and release management controls are not adequate or effective, as they do not ensure that all system releases are properly tested and validated before and after deployment.

Option A is not correct because access to change testing strategy and results is not restricted to staff outside the IT team is not a major concern for an IS auditor. While it is good practice to limit access to sensitive or confidential information, such as test data or test cases, to authorized personnel only, access to change testing strategy and results may not pose a significant risk to the system or the organization. Moreover, access to change testing strategy and results may be beneficial for some stakeholders outside the IT team, such as business users, project managers, or auditors, who may need to review or evaluate the testing process or outcomes.

Option B is not correct because some user acceptance testing (UAT) was completed by members of the IT team is not a major concern for an IS auditor. User acceptance testing is the process of verifying and validating that the system meets the user requirements and expectations by involving actual or representative users in the testing process3. While it is preferable to have independent and unbiased users perform UAT, it may not be feasible or practical for some organizations, especially those with small or limited resources. Therefore, some UAT may be completed by members of the IT team, as long as they have sufficient knowledge and experience of the user needs and expectations, and as long as they follow the UAT plan and criteria.

Option C is not correct because IT administrators have access to the production and development environment is not a major concern for an IS auditor. IT administrators are responsible for managing and maintaining the IT infrastructure, including the production and development environments4. Therefore, it is reasonable and necessary for them to have access to both environments, as long as they follow the appropriate policies and procedures for accessing, using, and securing them. Moreover, IT administrators may need to perform tasks such as backup, restore, patching, or troubleshooting in both environments.

The most important control for virtualized environments is hardening for the hypervisor and guest machines. Hardening is the process of applying security measures and configurations to reduce the vulnerabilities and risks of a system or device. Hardening for the hypervisor and guest machines is essential for protecting the virtualized environments from attacks, as they are exposed to various threats from both the physical and virtual layers. Hardening for the hypervisor and guest machines involves the following steps:

Applying the latest patches and updates for the hypervisor and guest operating systems, as well as the applications and drivers running on them.

Configuring the firewall and network settings for the hypervisor and guest machines, to restrict and monitor the network traffic and prevent unauthorized access or communication.

Disabling or removing any unnecessary or unused features, services, accounts, or ports on the hypervisor and guest machines, to minimize the attack surface and reduce the potential entry points for attackers.

Enforcing strong authentication and authorization policies for the hypervisor and guest machines, to ensure that only authorized users or administrators can access or manage them.

Encrypting the data and communication for the hypervisor and guest machines, to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the information stored or transmitted on them.

Implementing logging and auditing mechanisms for the hypervisor and guest machines, to record and track any activities or events that occur on them, and enable detection and investigation of any incidents or anomalies.

Hardening for the hypervisor and guest machines can help prevent or mitigate common attacks on virtualized environments, such as:

Hypervisor escape: An attack where a malicious guest machine breaks out of its isolated environment and gains access to the hypervisor or other guest machines.

Hypervisor compromise: An attack where an attacker exploits a vulnerability or misconfiguration in the hypervisor to gain control over it or its resources.

Guest compromise: An attack where an attacker exploits a vulnerability or misconfiguration in a guest machine to gain access to its data or applications.

Guest impersonation: An attack where an attacker creates a fake or cloned guest machine to trick other guests or users into interacting with it.

Guest denial-of-service: An attack where an attacker consumes or exhausts the resources of a guest machine to disrupt its availability or performance.

Therefore, hardening for the hypervisor and guest machines is the most important control for virtualized environments, as it can enhance their security, reliability, and performance. For more information about hardening for virtualized environments, you can refer to some of these web sources:

Hypervisor security on the Azure fleet

Chapter 2: Hardening the Hyper-V host

Plan for Hyper-V security in Windows Server

The most effective way for controlling visitor access to a data center is to ensure that visitors are escorted by an authorized employee, as this prevents unauthorized or malicious actions by the visitors and provides accountability and supervision. Pre-approval of entry requests, visitors signingin at the front desk upon arrival, and closed-circuit television (CCTV) are also useful measures, but they are not as effective as escorting visitors, as theydo not prevent or detect unauthorized or malicious actions by the visitors in real time. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5: Protection of Information Assets, Section 5.1: Physical Access Controls1

The best way to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed application is to review acceptance testing results. Acceptance testing is a process of verifying that the application meets the specified requirements and expectations of the users and stakeholders. Acceptance testing results can provide evidence of the functionality, usability, reliability, performance, security and quality of the application. Performing a post-implementation review, analyzing load testing results, and performing a secure code review are also important activities for evaluating an application, but they are not as comprehensive or conclusive as acceptance testing results.

 Access rights provisioned according to scheme would best help to support an auditor’s conclusion about the effectiveness of an implemented data classification program. This would indicate that the data classification program has been properly implemented and enforced, and that the data is protected according to its sensitivity and value. The other options are not sufficient to demonstrate the effectiveness of a data classification program, as they do not show how the data is actually accessed and used by authorized users. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 6, Section 6.2.31

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 2042

A load balancer is a tool or application that distributes incoming network traffic among multiple servers in a server farm, so that no server is overwhelmed and the performance of the system is optimized1. A load balancer can help the agency to handle the large influx of traffic to a regional office by balancing the workload among the available servers and preventing service disruptions. A load balancer can also provide high availability and fault tolerance by rerouting traffic to online servers if a server becomes unavailable2.

A virtual firewall is a software-based firewall that protects a virtual network or environment from unauthorized access and malicious attacks. A virtualfirewall can enhance the security of the agency’s network, but it does not improve the performance of its servers.

A proxy server is an intermediary server that acts as a gateway between the client and the destination server, hiding the client’s IP address and providing caching and filtering functions. A proxy server can improve the security and privacy of the agency’s network, but it does not improve the performance of its servers.

A virtual private network (VPN) is a secure connection between two or more devices over a public network, such as the internet. A VPN can encrypt and protect the data transmitted over the network, but it does not improve the performance of the agency’s servers.

This is because the follow-up of agreed corrective actions for reported audit issues should be done after the auditee has had enough time to implement the corrective actions and demonstrate their effectiveness and sustainability. The follow-up audit should not be too soon or too late, but based on a reasonable and realistic timeframe that allows for adequate testing and verification of the control operation12.

Answer A. Progress updates indicate that the implementation of agreed actions is on track. is not the best answer, because progress updates are not sufficient to guide the follow-up audit timing. Progress updates are useful for monitoring and communicating the status and challenges of the corrective actions, but they do not provide conclusive evidence of the control operation. The follow-up audit should be based on actual results and outcomes, not on expectations or projections12.

Answer C. Business management has completed the implementation of agreed actions on schedule. is not the best answer, because the completion of the implementation of agreed actions is not enough to guide the follow-up audit timing. The completion of the implementation only indicates that the auditee has taken the necessary steps to address the audit issues, but it does not guarantee that the corrective actions are effective and sustainable. The follow-up audit should be based on the evaluation and validation of the control operation, not on the completion of the control implementation12.

Answer D. Regulators have announced a timeline for an inspection visit. is not the best answer, because the regulators’ inspection visit is not relevant to guide the follow-up audit timing. The regulators’ inspection visit is an external factor that may or may not coincide with the internal follow-up audit schedule. The follow-up audit should be based on the internal audit plan and objectives, not on the external audit requirements or expectations12.

A computer-assisted technique is the most helpful method for an IS auditor to determine whether duplicate vendor payments exist on a complex system with a high volume of transactions. A computer-assisted technique is a tool or procedure that can be used to perform audit tests or procedures on data stored in electronic form. Examples of computer-assisted techniques include data analysis software, query tools, scripting languages, and specialized audit software. A computer-assisted techniquecan help an IS auditor to identify and extract duplicate payments from a large data set, perform calculations and comparisons, and generate reports and summaries. A computer-assisted technique can also provide more accuracy, efficiency, and coverage than manual methods.

Stratified sampling, statistical sampling, and process walk-through are not as helpful as a computer-assisted technique for this purpose. Stratified sampling is a sampling method that divides the population into subgroups based on certain characteristics and selects samples from each subgroup. Statistical sampling is a sampling method that uses probability theory to determine the sample size and selection criteria. Process walk-through is a review technique that involves following a transaction or process from start to finish and observing the inputs, outputs, controls, and documentation. These methods may be useful for other audit objectives, but they are not as effective as a computer-assisted technique for detecting duplicate payments in a complex and high-volume system. References: ISACA Frameworks: Blueprints for Success, [ISACA Glossary of Terms]

Aligning IT strategy with business strategy primarily helps an organization to optimize investments in IT. This is because alignment ensures that IT resources and capabilities are aligned with the business goals and priorities, and that IT delivers value to the business in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, innovation, and competitive advantage12. By aligning IT strategy with business strategy, an organization can avoid wasting money and time on IT projects or services that do not support or contribute to the business outcomes3. Alignment also helps to identify and prioritize the most critical and valuable IT initiatives that can create or optimize business value4.

Therefore, the correct answer to your question is A. optimize investments in IT.

The correct answer is C. Software escrow agreement. A software escrow agreement is a legal arrangement between three parties: the software developer (licensor), the end-user (licensee), and an escrow agent. The agreement ensures that the software’s source code and other relevant assets are securely stored with the escrow agent, and can be released to the licensee under certain conditions, such as the licensor’s bankruptcy, insolvency, or failure to provide support or maintenance1. A software escrow agreement can provide the licensee with assurance and continuity for the software they depend on, and protect them from losing access or functionality in case of any unforeseen events or disputes with the licensor1.

The correct answer is B. Management’s commitment to information security. Management’s commitment to information security is the most critical factor for the success of an information security program, as it provides the leadership, support, and resources needed to establish and maintain a secure environment. Management’s commitment to information security can be demonstrated by:

Setting the vision, mission, and goals for information security, and aligning them with the organization’s strategies and objectives1.

Establishing and enforcing the policies, standards, and procedures for information security, and ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations1.

Allocating sufficient budget, staff, and technology for information security, and investing in training and awareness programs2.

Promoting a culture of security within the organization, and engaging with stakeholders and partners to foster trust and collaboration2.

Segregation of duties is a fundamental concept in cybersecurity and information security. It refers to the practice of dividing critical tasks and responsibilities among different individuals or roles within an organization to reduce the risk of fraud, error, or unauthorized activities1. Segregation of duties is designed to prevent unilateral actions within an organization’s workflow, which can result in damaging events that would exceed the organization’s risk tolerance2.

There are different types of responses to risk associated with segregation of duties, depending on the level of risk and the cost-benefit analysis. Some of the common responses are:

Risk acceptance: This means acknowledging a risk and deciding to tolerate it without taking any corrective actions. This response is usually chosen when the risk is low or the cost of mitigation is too high3.

Risk mitigation: This means taking steps ahead of time to lessen the effects of a risk and make it less likely to happen. Some examples of mitigation strategies are making backup plans, setting up early warning systems, and staying away from high-risk areas or activities4.

Risk transference: This means shifting the negative impact of a risk and/or the responsibility for managing the risk response to a third party. Some examples of transference strategies are outsourcing, insurance, or contracts5.

Risk reduction: This means reducing the probability and/or severity of the risk below a threshold of acceptability. Some examples of reduction strategies are implementing controls, policies, or procedures to prevent or detect risks6.

Based on these definitions, the response to risk associated with segregation of duties that would incur the lowest initial cost is A. Risk acceptance. This is because risk acceptance does not require any additional resources or actions to address the risk. However, risk acceptance also implies that the organization is willing to bear the consequences of the risk if it occurs, which could be costly in the long run.

Therefore, the correct answer to your question is A. Risk acceptance.

The sampling method in which the entire sample is considered to be irregular if a single error is found is discovery sampling. Discovery sampling is a type of statistical sampling that is used to test for the existence of at least one occurrence of a specific characteristic or condition in a population. Discovery sampling is often used when the auditor expects the characteristic or condition to be very rare or nonexistent, and when any occurrence would have a significant impact on the audit objective. For example, discovery sampling can be used to test for fraud, noncompliance, or material misstatement.

Discovery sampling works by setting a very low tolerable error rate (the maximum rate of occurrence of the characteristic or condition that the auditor is willing to accept) and a high confidence level (the degree of assurance that the auditor wants to obtain). The auditor then selects a sample from the population using a random or systematic method, and examines each item in the sample for the presence or absence of the characteristic or condition. If no error is found in the sample, the auditor can conclude with a high level of confidence that the characteristic or condition does not exist or is very rare in the population. However, if one or more errors are found in the sample, the auditor cannot draw any conclusion about the population and must either expand the sample size or perform alternative procedures.

Discovery sampling differs from other sampling methods in that it does not allow for any errors in the sample. Other sampling methods, such as variable sampling, stop-or-go sampling, or judgmental sampling, can tolerate some errors in the sample and use them to estimate the error rate or amount in the population. However, discovery sampling is designed to test for zero-tolerance situations, where any error would be unacceptable or material. Therefore, discovery sampling considers the entire sample to be irregular if a single error is found.

The IS auditor’s next course of action should be to report this control process weakness to senior management, as it may indicate a lack of oversight and accountability for the reporting system. Read-only users may have access to sensitive or confidential information that should be restricted or monitored. Periodic reviews of read-only users are a good practice to ensure that the access rights are still valid and appropriate for the users’ roles and responsibilities. Reporting this weakness to senior management will also allow them to take corrective actions or implement compensating controls if needed.

Option A is incorrect because reviewing the list of end users and evaluating for authorization is not the IS auditor’s responsibility, but rather the system owner’s or administrator’s. The IS auditor should only verify that such reviews are performed and documented by the responsible parties.

Option C is incorrect because verifying management’s approval for this exemption is not sufficient to address the control process weakness. Even if there is a valid reason for not performing periodic reviews of read-only users, the IS auditor should still report this as a potential risk and recommend mitigating controls.

Option D is incorrect because obtaining a verbal confirmation from IT for this exemption is not adequate evidence or documentation. The IS auditor should obtain written approval from management and verify that it is aligned with the organization’s policies and standards.

Among the options provided, fingerprint scanning has the highest rate of false negatives. False negatives occur when a biometric system fails to recognize an authentic individual. Factors such as skin conditions (wet, dry, greasy), finger injuries, and inadequate scanning can contribute to false negatives in fingerprint scanning1. In comparison, iris recognition23, face recognition45, and retina scanning67 generally have lower rates of false negatives.

 IT governance should be driven by organizational strategies. It provides a formal structure for organizations to produce measurable results toward achieving their strategies and ensures that IT investments support business objectives12. While business unit initiatives, balanced scorecards, and policies and standards can play a role in IT governance, they are tools or methods that support the implementation of the organizational strategies.

The issue seems to stem from a breakdown in the workflow or process for handling assets that are due for destruction12. By examining the workflow, the IS auditor can identify where the process failed, such as why the vendor was not notified about the hard drives12. This could involve reviewing procedures for inventory management, communication with vendors, and tracking of assets due for destruction12. The findings can then be used to improve the workflow and prevent similar issues in the future12.

A post-incident review (PIR) is a process to review the incident information from occurrence to closure and to identify potential findings and recommendations for improvement1. The most important reason for an IS auditor to examine the results of a PIR is to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous improvement efforts and to ensure that the lessons learned from the incident are implemented and followed up2. A PIR can help an organization to eliminate or reduce the risk of the incident to re-occur, improve the initial incident detection time, identify improvements needed to diagnose and repair the incident, and update the incident management best practices1. Therefore, a PIR is a valuable source of information for an IS auditor to assess the maturity and performance of the organization’s incident management process.

During a pre-deployment assessment, the best indication that a business case will lead to the achievement of business objectives is that the business case reflects stakeholder requirements. A business case is a document that explains the rationale, benefits, costs, and risks of a proposed project or initiative. A business case should align with the strategic goals and vision of the organization and address the needs and expectations of the stakeholders who are involved in or affected by the project12.

Stakeholder requirements are the conditions or capabilities that stakeholders expect from a project or its outcomes. Stakeholders can include customers, users, employees, managers, suppliers, regulators, and others who have an interest or stake in the project. Stakeholder requirements should be identified, analyzed, prioritized, validated, and documented throughout the project lifecycle34.

The business case should reflect stakeholder requirements because they provide the basis for defining the project scope, objectives, deliverables, quality standards, success criteria, and benefits realization. By reflecting stakeholder requirements, the business case can demonstrate how the project will add value to the organization and its stakeholders, justify the investment and resources required for the project, and facilitate the decision-making and approval process for the project5 .

Therefore, during a pre-deployment assessment, an IS auditor should look for evidence that the business case reflects stakeholder requirements as the best indication that the business case will lead to the achievement of business objectives.

The best recommendation for the auditor to make is D. Line management should regularly review and request modification of access rights. Access rights are the permissions and privileges granted to users to access, view, modify, or delete data or resources on a system or network1. Excessive rights are access rights that are not necessary or appropriate for a user’s role or function, and may pose a risk of unauthorized or inappropriate use of data or resources2. Therefore, it is important to ensure that access rights are alignedwith the principle of least privilege, which means that users should only have the minimum level of access required to perform their duties2.

Line management is responsible for overseeing and supervising the activities and performance of their staff, and ensuring that they comply with the organization’s policies and standards3. Therefore, line management should regularly review and request modification of access rights for their staff, as they are in the best position to:

Understand the roles and functions of their staff, and determine the appropriate level of access rights needed for them to perform their duties effectively and efficiently.

Monitor and evaluate the usage and behavior of their staff, and identify any changes or anomalies that may indicate excessive or inappropriate access rights.

Communicate and collaborate with IT security or system administrators, who are responsible for granting, revoking, or modifying access rights, and request any necessary adjustments or corrections.

The type of risk that would most influence the selection of a sampling methodology is detection risk (option D). This is because:

Detection risk is the risk that the auditor will not detect a material misstatement that exists in an assertion1. Detection risk depends on the effectiveness of the audit procedures and how well they are applied by the auditor1.

The selection of a sampling methodology is part of the design of audit procedures, which aims to reduce detection risk to an acceptable level1. The auditor should consider the following factors when selecting a sampling methodology23:

The objectives of the audit procedure and the related assertions.

The characteristics of the population from which the sample will be drawn, such as its size, homogeneity, and structure.

The sampling technique to be used, such as random, systematic, haphazard, or judgmental.

The sample size and the method of selecting sample items.

The evaluation of the sample results and the projection of errors to the population.

The auditor should also consider the advantages and disadvantages of different sampling methodologies, such as statistical and non-statistical sampling23. Statistical sampling is a sampling technique that uses random selection and probability theory to evaluate sample results. Non-statistical sampling is a sampling technique that does not use random selection or probability theory to evaluate sample results. Some of the advantages and disadvantages are as follows23:

Statistical sampling allows the auditor to measure and control sampling risk, which is the risk that the sample is not representative of the population. Statistical sampling also allows the auditor to quantify the precision and reliability of the sample results. However, statistical sampling requires more technical knowledge and skills, as well as more time and cost, than non-statistical sampling.

Non-statistical sampling relies on the auditor’s professional judgment and experience to select and evaluate sample items. Non-statistical sampling is more flexible and less complex than statistical sampling. However, non-statistical sampling does not provide an objective basis for measuring and controlling sampling risk, nor does it allow the auditor to quantify the precision and reliability of the sample results.

Therefore, the type of risk that would most influence the selection of a sampling methodology is detection risk (option D), as it determines how effective and efficient the audit procedures should be in order to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence.

The correct answer is A. Overwriting multiple times. Overwriting is a method of securely erasing data from a hard disk by replacing the existing data with random or meaningless data, making it difficult or impossible to recover the original data1. Overwriting multiple times, also known as multiple-pass overwriting, is a more effective way of disposing of sensitive data than overwriting once, as it reduces the possibility of residual traces of data that could be recovered by advanced techniques2. Overwriting multiple times can be done by using specialized software tools that follow certain standards or algorithms, such as the US Department of Defense’s DoD 5220.22-M or the Gutmann method3.

This is because analyzing the data against predefined specifications is a method of data quality assessment that can help the organization achieve a reasonable level of data quality. Data quality assessment is the process of measuring and evaluating the accuracy, completeness, consistency, timeliness, validity, and usability of the data. Predefined specifications are the criteria or standards that define the expected or desired quality of the data. By comparing the actual data with the predefined specifications, the organization can identify and quantify any gaps, errors, or deviations in the data quality, and take corrective actions accordingly12.

Reviewing data against data classification standards (A) is not the best answer, because it is not a method of data quality assessment, but rather a method of data security management. Data classification standards are the rules or guidelines that define the level of sensitivity and confidentiality of the data, and determine the appropriate security and access controls for the data. For example, data can be classified into public, internal, confidential, or restricted categories. Reviewing data against data classification standards can help the organization protect the data from unauthorized or inappropriate use or disclosure, but it does not directly improve the data quality3.

Outsourcing data cleansing to skilled service providers (B) is not the best answer, because it is not a recommendation to help the organization achieve a reasonable level of data quality, but rather a decision to delegate or transfer the responsibility of data quality management to external parties. Data cleansing is the process of detecting and correcting any errors, inconsistencies, or anomalies in the data. Skilled service providers are third-partyvendors or contractors that have the expertise and resources to perform data cleansing tasks. Outsourcing data cleansing to skilled service providers may have some benefits, such as cost savings, efficiency, or scalability, but it also has some risks, such as loss of control, dependency, or liability4.

Consolidating data stored across separate databases into a warehouse © is not the best answer, because it is not a method of data quality assessment, but rather a method of data integration and storage. Data integration is the process of combining and transforming data from different sources and formats into a unified and consistent view. Data warehouse is a centralized repository that stores integrated and historical data for analytical purposes. Consolidating data stored across separate databases into a warehouse can help the organization improve the availability and accessibility of the data, but it does not necessarily improve the data quality.

The NEXT step for the IS auditor after noting that an employee who has recently changed roles within the organization still has previous access rights should be to B. determine the reason why access rights have not been revoked. Identifying the cause of this situation is crucial for understanding whether it’s due to oversight, process gaps, or other factors. Once the reason is determined, appropriate corrective actions can be recommended to ensure that access rights are aligned with the employee’s current role and responsibilities1.

An acceptable use policy (AUP) is a preventive control that sets out rules and guidelines for using an organization’s IT resources, including networks, devices, and software1. It defines acceptable and prohibited behaviors, aiming to protect assets, ensure security, and maintain a productive work environment1. By agreeing to and documenting an AUP for the equipment, both organizations can prevent potential misuse of IT resources2345.

 Control totals are a method of verifying the accuracy and completeness of data processing by comparing the totals of key fields in input and output records1. Control totals can be used to reduce the risk of incomplete processing, which is the failure to process all the data or transactions that are expected or required2.

Incomplete processing can result in data loss, inconsistency, or incompleteness, which can affect the quality and reliability of the information system and its outputs. Incomplete processing can be caused by various factors, such as:

Hardware or software failures that interrupt the processing or transmission of data2

Human errors or omissions that skip or miss some data or transactions2

Malicious attacks or unauthorized access that delete or modify some data or transactions2

Environmental hazards or disasters that damage or destroy some data or transactions2

Control totals can help detect and prevent incomplete processing by:

Providing a benchmark or reference point to compare the input and output data or transactions1

Identifying any discrepancies or deviations from the expected or required totals1

Alerting the users or operators to investigate and resolve the causes of incomplete processing1

Ensuring that all the data or transactions are properly transmitted, converted, and processed1

The other options are not as relevant as control totals for reducing the risk of incomplete processing. Posting to the wrong record is the error of assigning or transferring data or transactions to an incorrect account, file, or record3. Improper backup is the failure to create, store, or restore copies of data or transactions in case of loss, corruption, or damage4. Improper authorization is the lack of proper permission or approval to access, modify,or process data or transactions. Control totals may not be able to prevent or detect these errors or failures, as they are not related to the completeness of data processing. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

Substantive testing © provides the best evidence of the validity and integrity of logs in an organization’s security information and event management (SIEM) system, because it is a type of audit testing that directly examines the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of the data and transactions recorded in the logs. Substantive testing can involve various methods, such as re-performance, inspection, observation, inquiry, or computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs), to verify the existence, occurrence, valuation, ownership, presentation, and disclosure of the log data1. Substantive testing canalso detect any errors, omissions, alterations, or manipulations of the log data that may indicate fraud or misstatement2.

Compliance testing (A) is not the best evidence of the validity and integrity of logs in an organization’s SIEM system, because it is a type of audit testing that evaluates the design and effectiveness of the internal controls that are implemented to ensure compliance with laws, regulations, policies, and procedures. Compliance testing can involve various methods, such as walkthroughs, questionnaires, checklists, or flowcharts, to assess the adequacy, consistency, and operation of the internal controls1. Compliance testing can provide assurance that the log data are generated and processed in accordance with the established rules and standards, but it does not directly verify the accuracy and reliability of the log data itself2.

Stop-or-go sampling (B) is not a type of audit testing, but a type of sampling technique that auditors use to select a sample from a population for testing. Stop-or-go sampling is a sequential sampling technique that allows auditors to stop testing before reaching the predetermined sample size if the results are satisfactory or conclusive. Stop-or-go sampling can reduce the audit cost and time by avoiding unnecessary testing, but it can also increase the sampling risk and uncertainty by relying on a smaller sample3. Stop-or-go sampling does not provide any evidence of the validity and integrity of logs in an organization’s SIEM system by itself; it depends on the type and quality of the audit tests performed on the selected sample.

Variable sampling (D) is not a type of audit testing, but a type of sampling technique that auditors use to estimate a numerical characteristic of a population for testing. Variable sampling is a statistical sampling technique that allows auditors to measure the amount or rate of error or deviation in a population by using quantitative methods. Variable sampling can provide precise and objective results by using mathematical formulas and confidence intervals4. Variable sampling does not provide any evidence of the validity and integrity of logs in an organization’s SIEM system by itself; it depends on the type and quality of the audit tests performed on the selected sample.

This is because the business processes are the core activities and functions that enable the organization to achieve its objectives and create value for its stakeholders. The business processes are also the sources and drivers of various risks that may affect the organization’s performance, compliance, and reputation. Therefore, the IS auditor should focus on understanding, assessing, and prioritizing the business processes that are most critical, complex, or vulnerable to the organization’s success, and align the audit objectives, scope, and resources accordingly12.

Critical business applications (A) are not the most important area of focus for an IS auditor when developing a risk-based audit strategy, but rather a specific aspect of the business processes that may require attention. Critical business applications are the software systems that support the execution and automation of the business processes, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), or accounting systems. Critical business applications may pose significant risks to the organization if they are not reliable, secure, or efficient. Therefore, the IS auditor should consider the criticality, functionality, and dependency of the business applications when planning the audit, but not as the primary focus12.

Existing IT controls © are not the most important area of focus for an IS auditor when developing a risk-based audit strategy, but rather an outcome or output of the risk assessment process. Existing IT controls are the policies, procedures, practices, and technologies that are implemented to manage and mitigate the IT-related risks that may affect the organization’s business processes and objectives. Existing IT controls may vary in their design, effectiveness, and maturity. Therefore, the IS auditor should evaluate and testthe existing IT controls as part of the audit execution and reporting process, but not as the main focus12.

Recent audit results (D) are not the most important area of focus for an IS auditor when developing a risk-based audit strategy, but rather an input or source of information for the risk assessment process. Recent audit results are the findings, recommendations, and opinions of previous audits that may provide insights or feedback on the organization’s business processes, risks, and controls. Recent audit results may also indicate any changes or trends in the organization’s risk profile or environment. Therefore, the IS auditor should review and consider the recent audit results as part of the audit planning and scoping process, but not as the main focus12.

A quality assurance (QA) team is a group of professionals who are responsible for ensuring that the products or services of an organization meet the quality standards and expectations of customers and stakeholders1. A QA team performs various activities, such as:

Planning, designing, and executing quality tests and audits to verify the quality of the products or services1

Identifying, analyzing, and reporting quality issues, defects, or non-conformities1

Recommending and implementing corrective and preventive actions to resolve quality problems and prevent recurrence1

Monitoring and measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of the quality processes and improvements1

Establishing and maintaining quality documentation, records, and reports1

Providing quality training, guidance, and support to the staff and management1

One of the primary responsibilities of a QA team is to implement procedures to facilitate adoption of quality management best practices. Quality management best practices are the methods, techniques, or tools that have been proven to be effective in achieving and maintaining high-quality standards in an organization2. Some examples of quality management best practices are:

Adopting a customer-focused approach that aims to meet or exceed customer requirements and satisfaction2

Implementing a process approach that manages the interrelated activities as a coherent system2

Applying continuous improvement methods that seek to enhance the performance and value of the products or services2

Using evidence-based decision making that relies on factual data and information2

Developing a culture of engagement and empowerment that involves and motivates the people in the organization2

By implementing procedures to facilitate adoption of quality management best practices, a QA team can help the organization achieve the following benefits:

Improve the quality and reliability of the products or services2

Reduce the costs and risks associated with poor quality or non-compliance2

Increase the customer loyalty and retention2

Enhance the reputation and competitiveness of the organization2

Foster a culture of excellence and innovation in the organization2

The other options are not primary responsibilities of a QA team. Creating test data to facilitate the user acceptance testing (UAT) process is a task that can be performed by a QA team, but it is not their main duty. UAT is a process in which the end users test the product or service to ensure that it meets their needs and expectations before it is released or deployed3. A QA team can create test data to simulate real-world scenarios and conditions for UAT, but they are not directly involved in conducting UAT. Managing employee onboarding processes and background checks is not a responsibility of a QA team. Employee onboarding is a process in which new hires are integrated into the organization, while background checks are screenings that verify the identity, credentials, and history of potential employees4. These processes are usually handled by the human resources department or an external agency, not by a QA team. Advising the steering committee on quality management issues and remediation efforts is not a primary responsibility of a QA team. A steering committee is a group of senior executives or managers who provide strategic direction, oversight, and support for a project or program5. A QA team can advise the steering committee on quality management issues and remediation efforts, but they are not accountable for making decisions or implementing actions. Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

The most concerning thing for an IS auditor reviewing an IT strategy document is that the strategic IT goals are derived solely from the latest market trends. An IT strategy document is a blueprint that defines how an organization will use technology to achieve its goals. It should be based on a thorough analysis of the organization’s internal and external factors, such as its vision, mission, values, objectives, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, customers, competitors, regulations, and industry standards. An IT strategy document should also align with the organization’s business strategy and reflect its unique needs and capabilities. If an IT strategy document is derived solely from the latest market trends, it may not be relevant or appropriate for the organization’s specific situation. It may also lack coherence, consistency, feasibility, or sustainability.

The other options are not as concerning as option C. Target architecture is defined at a technical level is not a concern for an IS auditor reviewing an IT strategy document. Target architecture is the desired state of an organization’s IT systems in terms of their structure, functionality, performance, security, interoperability, and integration. Defining target architecture at a technical level can help an IS auditor to understand how the organization plans to achieve its strategic IT goals and what technical requirements and standards it needs to follow. The previous year’s IT strategic goals were not achieved is not a concern for an IS auditor reviewing an IT strategy document. The previous year’s IT strategic goals are the outcomes that the organization intended to accomplish with its IT initiatives in the past year. Not achieving these goals may indicate some challenges or gaps in the organization’s IT performance or execution. However, this does not necessarily affect the quality or validity of the current IT strategy document. An IS auditor should focus on evaluating whether the current IT strategy document is realistic, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. Financial estimates of new initiatives are disclosed within the document is not a concern for an IS auditor reviewing an IT strategy document. Financial estimates are projections of the costs and benefits of new initiatives that are part of the IT strategy document. Disclosing financial estimates within the document can help an IS auditor to assess whether the new initiatives are aligned with the organization’s budget and resources and whether they provide value for money. References: IT Strategy Template for a Successful Strategic Plan | Gartner, Definitive Guide to Developing anIT Strategy and Roadmap - CioPages, An Example of a Well-Developed IT Strategy Plan - Resolute

The best method for maintaining the security of corporate applications pushed to employee-owned mobile devices is implementing mobile device management (MDM). MDM is a software solution that allows an organization to remotely manage, configure, and secure the mobile devices that access its network and data. MDM can help protect corporate applications on employee-owned devices by:

Enforcing security policies and settings, such as encryption, password, firewall, antivirus, and VPN.

Controlling the installation, update, and removal of corporate applications and data.

Separating corporate and personal data and applications on the device using containers or profiles.

Monitoring and auditing the device’s compliance status, activity, and location.

Performing remote actions, such as lock, wipe, backup, or restore, in case of loss, theft, or compromise.

MDM can provide a comprehensive and centralized approach to maintain the security of corporate applications on employee-owned devices, regardless of the device type, platform, or ownership. MDM can also help the organization comply with regulatory and industry standards for data protection and privacy.

Enabling remote data destruction capabilities is a useful feature for maintaining the security of corporate applications on employee-owned devices, but it is not the best method by itself. Remote data destruction allows the organization to erase the corporate data and applications from the device in case of loss, theft, or compromise. However, this feature does not prevent unauthorized access or misuse of the corporate data and applications before they are destroyed. Remote data destruction is usually part of an MDM solution.

Disabling unnecessary network connectivity options is a good practice for maintaining the security of corporate applications on employee-owned devices,but it is not the best method by itself. Network connectivity options, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or USB, can expose the device to potential attacks or data leakage. Disabling these options when they are not needed can reduce the attack surface and improve battery life. However, this practice does not address other security risks or requirements for the corporate applications on the device. Disabling network connectivity options can also be part of an MDM solution.

Requiring security awareness training for mobile users is an important measure for maintaining the security of corporate applications on employee-owned devices, but it is not the best method by itself. Security awareness training can educate the users about the potential threats and best practices for using their devices securely. It can also help foster a culture of security and responsibility among the users. However, security awareness training cannot guarantee that the users will follow the security policies and guidelines consistently and correctly. Security awareness training should be complemented by technical controls, such as MDM.

End-user computing (EUC) is a system in which users are able to create working applications besides the divided development process of design, build, test and release that is typically followed by software engineers1. Examples of EUC tools include spreadsheets, databases, low-code/no-code platforms, and generative AI applications2. EUC tools can provide flexibility, efficiency, and innovation for the users, but they also pose significant risks if not properly managed and controlled3.

The greatest risk when relying on reports generated by EUC is that the data may be inaccurate. Data accuracy refers to the extent to which the data in the reports reflect the true values of the underlying information4. Inaccurate data can lead to erroneous decisions, misleading analysis, unreliable reporting, and compliance violations. Some of the factors that can cause data inaccuracy in EUC reports are:

Lack of rigorous testing: EUC tools may not undergo the same level of testing and validation as IT-developed applications, which can result in errors, bugs, or inconsistencies in the data processing and output3.

Lack of version and change control: EUC tools may not have a clear record of the changes made to them over time, which can create confusion, duplication, or loss of data. Users may also modify or overwrite the data without proper authorization or documentation3.

Lack of documentation and reliance on end-user who developed it: EUC tools may not have sufficient documentation to explain their purpose, functionality, assumptions, limitations, and dependencies. Users may also rely on the knowledge and expertise of the original developer, who may not be available or may not have followed best practices3.

Lack of maintenance processes: EUC tools may not have regular updates, backups, or reviews to ensure their functionality and security. Users may also neglect to delete or archive obsolete or redundant data3.

Lack of security: EUC tools may not have adequate access controls, encryption, or authentication mechanisms to protect the data from unauthorized access, modification, or disclosure. Users may also store or share the data in insecure locations or devices3.

Lack of audit trail: EUC tools may not have a traceable history of the data sources, inputs, outputs, calculations, and transformations. Users may also manipulate or falsify the data without detection or accountability3.

Overreliance on manual controls: EUC tools may depend on human intervention to input, verify, or correct the data, which can introduce errors, delays, or biases. Users may also lack the skills or training to use the EUC tools effectively and efficiently3.

The other options are not as great as data inaccuracy when relying on EUC reports. Reports may not work efficiently, reports may not be timely, and historical data may not be available are all potential risks associated with EUC tools, but they are less severe and less frequent than data inaccuracy. Moreover, these risks can be mitigated by improving the performance, scheduling, and storage of the EUC tools. However, data inaccuracy can have a pervasive and lasting impact on the quality and credibility of the reports and the decisions based on them. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

The first step when creating a data classification program is to develop a policy (D). A data classification policy is a document that defines the purpose, scope, objectives, roles, responsibilities, and procedures of the data classification program. A data classification policy is essential for establishing the governance framework, standards, and guidelines for the data classification process. A data classification policy also helps to communicate the expectations and benefits of the data classification program to the stakeholders, such as data owners, users, custodians, and auditors12.

Categorizing and prioritizing data (A) is not the first step when creating a data classification program, but the third step. Categorizing and prioritizing data involves defining and applying the criteria and labels for classifying data based on its sensitivity, value, and risk. For example, data can be categorized into public, internal, confidential, or restricted levels. Categorizing and prioritizing data helps to identify and protect the most critical and sensitive data assets of the organization12.

Developing data process maps (B) is not the first step when creating a data classification program, but the fourth step. Developing data process maps involves documenting and analyzing the flow and lifecycle of data within the organization. Data process maps show how data is created, collected, stored, processed, transmitted, used, shared, archived, and disposed of. Developing data process maps helps to understand the context and dependencies of data, as well as to identify and mitigate any potential risks or issues related to data quality, security, or compliance12.

Categorizing information by owner © is not the first step when creating a data classification program, but the second step. Categorizing information by owner involves assigning roles and responsibilities for each type of data based on its ownership and stewardship. Data owners are the individuals or entities that have the authority and accountability for the data. Data stewards are the individuals or entities that have the operational responsibility for managing and maintaining the data. Data custodians are the individuals or entities that have the technical responsibility for implementing and enforcing the security and access controls for the data12.

The best course of action for a security administrator who is called in the middle of the night by the on-call programmer who needs access to the live system is to give the programmer an emergency ID for temporary access and review the activity. This is because:

Requiring that a change request be completed and approved may delay the resolution of the problem and cause further damage or disruption to the system or business operations. A change request is a formal document that describes the proposed change, its rationale, impact, benefits, risks, costs, and approval process. A change request is usually required for planned or scheduled changes, not for emergency or urgent changes.

Giving the programmer read-only access to investigate the problem may not be sufficient or effective, as the programmer may need to perform actions or tests that require write or execute permissions. Read-only access means that the user can only view or copy data or files, but cannot modify or delete them.

Reviewing activity logs the following day and investigating any suspicious activity may not prevent or detect any unauthorized or malicious actions by the programmer in real time. Activity logs are records of events and actions that occur within a system or network. Activity logs can provide evidence and accountability for system activities, but they are not proactive or preventive controls.

Therefore, giving the programmer an emergency ID for temporary access and reviewing the activity is the best course of action, as it allows the programmer to access the live system and resolve the problem quickly, while also ensuring that the security administrator can monitor and verify the programmer’s activity and revoke the access when it is no longer needed. An emergency ID is a temporary account that grants a user elevated privileges or access to a system or resource for a specific purpose and duration. An emergency ID should be:

Created and authorized by a security administrator or manager

Assigned to a specific user and purpose

Limited in scope and time

Logged and audited

Revoked and deleted after use

Some of the best practices for emergency access to live systems are12:

Establish clear policies and procedures for requesting, approving, granting, monitoring, reviewing, and revoking emergency access

Define criteria and scenarios for emergency access, such as severity, impact, urgency, and risk

Implement controls to prevent unauthorized or unnecessary use of emergency access, such as multifactor authentication, approval workflows, alerts, notifications, and time restrictions

Implement controls to track and audit emergency access activities, such as logging, reporting, analysis, and investigation

Implement controls to ensure accountability and responsibility for emergency access users, such as attestation, justification, documentation, and feedback

 An IT strategic plan that best leverages IT in achieving organizational goals will include enterprise architecture (EA) impacts. EA is the practice of analyzing, designing, planning, and implementing enterprise analysis to successfully execute on business strategies1. EA helps organizations structure IT projects and policies to align with business goals, to stay agile and resilient in the face of rapid change, and to stay on top of industry trends and disruptions1. EA also describes an organization’s processes, information processes and personnel and other organizational subunits aligned with the organization’s core goals and strategies2. By including EA impacts in the IT strategic plan, an organization can ensure that the IT initiatives are consistent with the business vision, objectives, and tactics, and that they support the desired business outcomes3.

A comparison of future needs against current capabilities, a risk-based ranking of projects, and IT budgets linked to the organization’s budget are all important elements of an IT strategic plan, but they do not necessarily leverage IT in achieving organizational goals. A comparison of future needsagainst current capabilities can help identify gaps and opportunities for improvement, but it does not provide a clear direction or roadmap for how to achieve them. A risk-based ranking of projects can help prioritize the most critical and beneficial projects, but it does not ensure that they are aligned with the business strategy or that they deliver value to the stakeholders. IT budgets linked to the organization’s budget can help allocate resources and monitor costs, but they do not reflect the impact or contribution of IT to the business performance or growth.

 File checksums are values that are calculated from the contents of a file and can detect any changes or corruption in the file. They are used to verify that the files that are transferred or processed through system interfaces are not altered in any way. File checksums are more effective than periodic audits, file counts, or IT operator monitoring, which are other types of controls that can help ensure the integrity of system interfaces, but they are not as reliable or timely as file checksums.

The best recommendation to help prevent the situation where IT support staff were put in a position to make decisions beyond their level of authority during the review of a system disruption incident is to introduce escalation protocols. Escalation protocols are policies and procedures that define who should be notified, involved, or consulted when an incident occurs, how the communication and handover should take place, and what criteria or triggers should be used to escalate the incident to a higher level of authority or expertise2. Escalation protocols help to ensure that:

Incidents are handled by the appropriate staff with the required skills, knowledge, and experience

Incidents are resolved in a timely and effective manner

Incidents are escalated to senior management or specialized teams when necessary

Incidents are documented and reported accurately and transparently

Incidents are analyzed and learned from to prevent recurrence or mitigate impact

Therefore, by introducing escalation protocols, an organization can improve its incident management process and avoid putting IT support staff in a position to make decisions beyond their level of authority.

Unstructured data is data that does not have a predefined model or organization, making it difficult to store, process, and analyze using traditional relational databases or spreadsheets. Unstructured data can pose a risk to an organization if it contains sensitive, confidential, or regulated information that is not properly secured, managed, or governed. To minimize the risk of unstructured data, the first step is to identify the repositories of unstructured data, such as file servers, cloud storage, email systems, social media platforms, etc. This will help to understand the scope, volume, and nature of unstructured data in the organization, and to prioritize the areas that need further analysis and action. References: Unstructured data -Wikipedia

The IS auditor should first determine whether the business impact analysis (BIA) is current with the organization’s structure and context. The BIA is a critical component of the BCP and should reflect the current state of the organization. If the BIA is not up-to-date, it may not accurately reflect the impact of a disruption to the organization’s operations, including the closure of a production plant12.

The best indicator of the performance of a web application is the average response time. This metric measures how long it takes for the web server to process and deliver a request from the client. It reflects the user’s perception of how fast or slow the web application is, and it affects the user’s satisfaction, engagement, and conversion. A low average response time means that the web application is responsive and efficient, while a high average response time means that the web application is sluggish and unreliable.

HTTP server error rate, server thread count, and server uptime are not as good indicators of the performance of a web application as the average response time. HTTP server error rate measures how often the web server fails to handle a request and returns an error code, such as 404 (Not Found) or 500 (Internal Server Error). This metric indicates the reliability and availability of the web application, but it does not capture how fast or slow the web application is. Server thread count measures how many concurrent requests the web server can handle at a given time. This metric indicates the scalability and capacity of the web application, but it does not capture how long each request takes to process. Server uptime measures how long the web server has been running without interruption. This metric indicates the stability and resilience of the web application, but it does not capture how well the web application performs during that time.

Before selecting a SaaS vendor, the most important action is to complete a risk assessment. A risk assessment is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the potential risks associated with outsourcing software and IT infrastructure to a third-party provider. A risk assessment helps to determine the impact and likelihood of various threats, such as data breaches, service disruptions, vendor lock-in, compliance issues, and legal disputes. A risk assessment also helps to identify the mitigation strategies and controls that can reduce or eliminate the risks.

A risk assessment is more important than determining service level requirements, performing a business impact analysis (BIA), or conducting a vendor audit because it provides the basis for these other actions. Service level requirements are the expectations and obligations that define the quality and quantity of service that the vendor must provide to the customer. A BIA is a process of assessing the potential effects of an interruption or disruption of critical business functions or processes due to an incident or disaster. A vendor audit is a process of verifying the vendor’s compliance with the contract terms, service levels, security policies, and best practices.

Service level requirements, BIA, and vendor audit are all important actions for selecting a SaaS vendor, but they depend on the results of the risk assessment. For example, service level requirements should reflect the risk appetite and tolerance of the customer, which are determined by the risk assessment. A BIA should prioritize the recovery of the most critical and vulnerable business functions or processes, which are identified by the risk assessment. A vendor audit should focus on the areas of highest risk and concern, which are highlighted by the risk assessment.

Therefore, an IS auditor should recommend to management that completing a risk assessment is the most important action before selecting a SaaS vendor.

 The primary purpose of creating a simulated production environment with multiple vulnerable applications is to attract attackers in order to study their behavior. This is a technique known as honeypotting, which is a form of deception security that lures attackers into a fake system or network that mimics the real one, but is isolated and monitored1. Honeypotting can help security teams to learn about the attackers’ methods, tools, motives, and targets, and to collect valuable intelligence that can be used to improve the security posture of the organization1. Honeypotting can also help to divert the attackers’ attention from the real assets and to waste their time and resources2.

The other options are not the primary purpose of creating a simulated production environment with multiple vulnerable applications. To collect digital evidence of cyberattacks, security teams would need to use forensic tools and techniques that can preserve and analyze the data from the compromised systems or networks3. To provide training to security managers, security teams would need to use simulation tools and scenarios that can test and enhance their skills and knowledge in responding to cyber incidents4. To test the intrusion detection system (IDS), security teams would need to use penetration testing tools and methods that can evaluate the effectiveness and performance of the IDS in detecting and preventing malicious activities5.

The best option for the question is C, information owner. This is because:

The information owner is the person or entity that has the authority and responsibility for the business processes and functions that collect, use, store, and dispose of data1.

The information owner is accountable for ensuring that the data is handled in compliance with the applicable laws, regulations, policies, and standards, such as the GDPR and the PIPEDA1234.

The information owner is in the best position to determine the purpose and necessity of collecting and retaining data, as well as the risks and benefits associated with it1.

The information owner should consult with other stakeholders, such as the risk manager, the database administrator (DBA), and the privacy manager, to establish and implement appropriate data classification policies and procedures2.

Data classification is the process of organizing data in groups based on their attributes and characteristics, and then assigning class labels that describe a set of attributes that hold true for the corresponding data sets345.

Data classification helps organizations to identify, manage, protect, and understand their data, as well as to comply with modern data privacy regulations345.

Data classification also helps to determine appropriate user access levels, which means defining who can access, modify, share, or delete data based on their roles, responsibilities, and needs345.

Therefore, the information owner should be responsible for the data classification in an ERP migration project from local systems to the cloud (option C), as they have the authority and accountability for the data and its protection.

The other options are not correct because:

The information security officer (option A) is responsible for overseeing and coordinating the security policies and practices of the organization that involve data6. The information security officer should advise and assist the information owner on the best practices and standards for data security, but not determine the data classification.

The database administrator (DBA) (option B) is responsible for installing, configuring, monitoring, maintaining, and improving the performance of databases and data stores that contain data5. The DBA should support the information owner in implementing and enforcing the data classification policies and procedures, but not determine them.

The data architect (option D) is responsible for designing, modeling, and documenting the logical and physical structures of databases and data stores that contain data7. The data architect should collaborate with the information owner in creating and maintaining the data classification schema and metadata, but not determine them.

A data warehouse is a centralized repository of data that is collected from various sources and organized for analysis and reporting purposes. A data warehouse can help an organization gain insights into its business performance, trends, and opportunities. However, building a data warehouse requires careful planning, design, and implementation to ensure that it meets the needs of the organization.

One of the best practices that would provide management with the most reasonable assurance that a new data warehouse will meet the needs of the organization is A. Integrating data requirements into the system development life cycle (SDLC). The SDLC is a framework that defines the phases and activities involved in developing a software system, such as planning, analysis, design, testing, deployment, and maintenance1. By integrating data requirements into the SDLC, an organization can ensure that the data warehouse is aligned with the business objectives and expectations, and that it delivers value to the end users.

Some of the benefits of integrating data requirements into the SDLC are:

It helps to identify and prioritize the key business questions and metrics that the data warehouse should support2.

It helps to define and validate the data sources, models, structures, and quality standards that the data warehouse should follow3.

It helps to design and implement the data integration, transformation, and loading processes that the data warehouse should use4.

It helps to test and verify the functionality, performance, and accuracy of the data warehouse before deploying it to production.

It helps to monitor and maintain the data warehouse after deployment and incorporate feedback and changes as needed.

The most important task for an IS auditor to perform after the merger of two organizations is to verify that access privileges have been reviewed. Access privileges are the permissions granted to users, groups, or roles to access, modify, or manage IT resources, such as systems, applications, data, or networks. After a merger, the IS auditor should ensure that the access privileges of both organizations are aligned with the new business objectives, policies, and processes, and that there are no conflicts, overlaps, or gaps in the access rights. The IS auditor should also verify that the access privileges are based on the principle of least privilege, which means that users are granted only the minimum level of access required to perform their tasks.

The other options are not as important as verifying that access privileges have been reviewed:

Investigating access rights for expiration dates is a useful task, but it is not the most important one. Expiration dates are the dates when access rights are automatically revoked or suspended after a certain period of time or after a specific event. The IS auditor should check that the expiration dates are set appropriately and enforced consistently, but this is not as critical as reviewing the access privileges themselves.

Updating the continuity plan for critical resources is a necessary task, but it is not the most urgent one. A continuity plan is a document that outlines the procedures and actions to be taken in the event of a disruption or disaster that affects the availability of IT resources. The IS auditor should update the continuity plan to reflect the changes and dependencies introduced by the merger, but this can be done after verifying that the access privileges are secure and compliant.

Updating the security policy is an essential task, but it is not the most immediate one. A security policy is a document that defines the rules and guidelines for securing IT resources and protecting information assets. The IS auditor should update the security policy to incorporate the best practices and standards of both organizations, and to address any new risks or threats posed by the merger, but this can be done after verifying that the access privileges are aligned with the policy.

Analyzing risks posed by new regulations is an appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization’s privacy program. An internal auditor can provide assurance and advisory services on the compliance and effectiveness of the privacy program, as well as identify and assess the potential risks and impacts of new or changing privacy regulations. The other options are not appropriate roles of internal audit, but rather the responsibilities of the management, the information security officer, or the privacy officer. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 7, Section 7.4.21

CISA Review Questions, Answers & ExplanationsDatabase, Question ID 216

While all the options can help reduce the risk of data leakage, providing education and guidelines to employees on the use of social networking sites would be the most effective. This is because it directly addresses the issue at hand - the use of social networking sites for business purposes1. Education and guidelines can help employees understand the risks associated withsocial media use and teach them how to safely and responsibly use these platforms for business purposes1. This includes understanding privacy settings, recognizing phishing attempts, and knowing what information should not be shared on these platforms1.

This is because audit trails are records of system activity and user actions that can provide evidence of the validity and integrity of transactions and data in a financial application system. Audit trails can help to ensure compliance with laws, regulations, policies, and standards, as well as to detect and prevent fraud, errors, or misuse of information. Audit trails can also facilitate auditing, monitoring, and evaluation of the financial application system’s performance and controls1.

The application should meet the organization’s requirements (A) is not the best answer, because it is a general and obvious criterion that applies to any application system acquisition, not a specific and important recommendation for a financial application system. The organization’s requirementsshould be clearly defined and documented in the RFP, but they may not necessarily include audit trails as a design feature.

Potential suppliers should have experience in the relevant area © is not the best answer, because it is a factor that affects the selection of the supplier, not the design of the financial application system. The experience and reputation of potential suppliers should be evaluated and verified during the RFP process, but they may not guarantee that the supplier will include audit trails in the design.

Vendor employee background checks should be conducted regularly (D) is not the best answer, because it is a measure that affects the security and trustworthiness of the vendor, not the design of the financial application system. Vendor employee background checks should be performed as part of the vendor management and due diligence process, but they may not ensure that the vendor will include audit trails in the design.

The first step when developing a DLP solution for a large organization is to conduct a data inventory and classification exercise. This step involves identifying and locating all the data assets that the organization owns, generates, or handles, and assigning them to different categories based on their sensitivity, value, and regulatory requirements1. Data inventory and classification is essential for DLP because it helps to determine the scope and objectives of the DLP solution, as well as the appropriate level of protection and monitoring for each data category2. Data inventory and classification also enables the organization to prioritize its DLP efforts based on the risk and impact of data loss or leakage3.

Option B is not correct because identifying approved data workflows across the enterprise is a subsequent step after conducting data inventory and classification. Data workflows are the processes and channels through which data are created, stored, accessed, shared, or transmitted within or outside the organization4. Identifying approved data workflows helps to define the normal and legitimate use of data, as well as to detect and prevent unauthorized or anomalous data activities5. However, before identifying approved data workflows, the organization needs to know what data it has and how it should be classified.

Option C is not correct because conducting a threat analysis against sensitive data usage is another subsequent step after conducting data inventory and classification. Threat analysis is the process of identifying and assessing the potential sources, methods, and impacts of data loss or leakage incidents. Threat analysis helps to design and implement effective DLP controls and countermeasures based on the risk profile of each data category. However, before conducting threat analysis, the organization needs to know what data it has and how it should be classified.

Option D is not correct because creating the DLP policies and templates is the final step after conducting data inventory and classification, identifying approved data workflows, and conducting threat analysis. DLP policies and templates are the rules and configurations that specify how the DLP solution should monitor, detect, report, and respond to data loss or leakage events. DLP policies and templates should be aligned with the organization’s business needs, regulatory obligations, and risk appetite. However, before creating the DLP policies and templates, the organization needs to know what data it has, how it should be classified, how it should be used, and what threats it faces.

RFID stands for Radio Frequency Identification, and it is a technology that uses radio waves to identify or track objects that have a small chip (RFID tag) attached to them. RFID tags can store various types of information, such as serial numbers, product codes, or personal data. RFID readers can scan the tags from a distance and access the information without physical contact1.

RFID has many benefits for different applications, such as inventory management, supply chain optimization, asset tracking, and access control. However, RFID also poses some challenges and risks for information security and privacy. Some of these risks are:

Privacy: RFID tags can be read by unauthorized or malicious parties, who can collect personal or sensitive data without the knowledge or consent of the tag owners. This can lead to identity theft, profiling, tracking, or surveillance2. For example, a hacker could scan an RFID-tagged passport or credit card and steal the personal information or financial details of the owner3.

Communication attacks: RFID systems are vulnerable to various types of attacks that target the wireless communication between the tags and the readers. These include eavesdropping, jamming, spoofing, replaying, cloning, or modifying the data transmitted by the tags or the readers4. For example, an attacker could intercept the data from an RFID tag and alter it before sending it to the reader, causing false or misleading information to be recorded.

Mafia fraud: This is a type of attack where an adversary acts as a man-in-the-middle and relays the information between two legitimate parties. This can allow the adversary to bypass authentication or authorization mechanisms and gain access to restricted areas or resources. For example, an attacker could use a device to relay the signal from an RFID-tagged car key to the car’s ignition system and start the car without having the physical key.

The most useful metric for management to consider when reviewing a project portfolio is the net present value (NPV) of the portfolio. NPV is a measure of the profitability and value of a project or a portfolio of projects, taking into account the time value of money and the expected cash flows. NPV compares the present value of the future cash inflows with the present value of the initial investment and shows how much value is created or lost by undertaking a project or a portfolio of projects1. A positive NPV indicates that the project or portfolio is worth more than its cost and will generate a positive return on investment. A negative NPV indicates that the project or portfolio is worth less than its cost and will result in a loss. Therefore, NPV helps management to prioritize andselect the most profitable and valuable projects or portfolios that align with the organizational strategy and objectives2. The other options are less useful or incorrect because:

A. Cost of projects divided by total IT cost is not a useful metric for reviewing a project portfolio, as it does not reflect the benefits, value, or return of the projects. It only shows the proportion of IT budget allocated to the projects, which may not be indicative oftheir strategic importance or alignment3.

B. Expected return divided by total project cost is not a useful metric for reviewing a project portfolio, as it does not account for the time value of money and the timing of cash flows. It only shows the average return per unit of cost, which may not be comparable across different projects or portfolios with differentdurations, risks, and cash flow patterns4.

D. Total cost of each project is not a useful metric for reviewing a project portfolio, as it does not reflect the benefits, value, or return of the projects. It only shows theinitial investment required for eachproject, which may not be indicative of their profitability or viability5. References: Portfolio, Program and Project Management Using COBIT 5 - ISACA, Project PortfolioManagement - ISACA, CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Standards, Guidelines, Tools and Techniques

Data disposal controls are the measures that ensure that data are securely and permanently erased or destroyed when they are no longer needed or authorized to be retained. Data disposal controls support business strategic objectives by reducing the risk of data breaches, complying with dataprivacy regulations, optimizing the use of storage resources, and enhancing the reputation and trust of the organization1.

A media sanitization policy is a document that defines the roles, responsibilities, procedures, and standards for sanitizing different types of media that contain sensitive or confidential data. Media sanitization is the process of removing or modifying data on a media device to make it unreadable or unrecoverable by any means. Media sanitization can be achieved by various methods, such as overwriting, degaussing, encryption, or physical destruction2.

A media sanitization policy would provide an IS auditor with the greatest assurance that data disposal controls support business strategic objectives because it demonstrates that the organization has a clear and consistent approach to protect its data from unauthorized access or disclosure throughout the data life cycle. Amedia sanitization policy also helps the organization to comply with various data privacy regulations, such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), or the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), that require proper disposal of personal or sensitive data3.

The other options are not as effective as a media sanitization policy in providing assurance that data disposal controls support business strategic objectives. A media recycling policy is a document that defines the criteria and procedures for reusing media devices that have been sanitized or erased. A media recycling policy can help the organization to save costsand reduce environmental impact, but it does not address how the data are disposed of in the first place4. A media labeling policy is a document that defines the rules and standards for labeling media devices that contain sensitive or confidential data. A media labeling policy can help the organization to identify and classify its data assets, but it does not specify how the data are sanitized or destroyed when they are no longer needed. A media shredding policy is a document that defines the methods and procedures for physically destroying media devices that contain sensitive or confidential data. A media shredding policy can be a part of a media sanitization policy, but it is not sufficient to cover all types of media devices or data disposal scenarios.

The effectiveness of an organization’s security awareness program can be measured by capturing data on changes in the way people react to threats, such as the ability to recognize and avoid social engineering attacks1. An increase in the number of phishing emails reported by employees indicates that they are more aware of the signs and risks of phishing, and are more likely to take appropriate actions to prevent or mitigate the impact of such attacks23.

References

1: The Importance Of Measuring Security Awareness 2: Measuring the effectiveness of your security awareness program 3: How effective is security awareness training?

The primary responsibility of a project steering committee is to provide regular project updates and oversight. A project steering committee is an advisory group that consists of senior stakeholders and experts who offer guidance and support to a project manager and their team. The steering committee is mainly concerned with the direction, scope, budget, timeline, and methods used to realize a given project1.

One of the key roles of a steering committee is to monitor the progress and performance of the project and ensure that it aligns with the business objectives and stakeholder expectations. The steering committee also provides feedback, advice, and recommendations to the project manager and helps them resolve any issues or challenges that may arise during the project lifecycle. The steering committee communicates regularly with the project manager and other stakeholders through meetings, reports, and presentations23.

Therefore, providing regular project updates and oversight is the primary responsibility of a project steering committee.

Anti-malware tool audit logs would provide an IS auditor with the best evidence of continuous compliance with the global organization’s policy that states that all workstations must be scanned for malware each day. Anti-malware tool audit logs are records that capture the activities and events related to the anti-malware software installed on the workstations, such as scan schedules, scan results, updates, alerts, and actions taken1. These logs can help the IS auditor to verify that the anti-malware software is functioning properly, that the scans are performed regularly and effectively, and that any malware incidents are detected and resolved in a timely manner2. Anti-malware tool audit logs can also help the IS auditor to identify any gaps or weaknesses in the anti-malware policy or implementation, and to provide recommendations for improvement3.

The other options are not the best evidence of continuous compliance with the anti-malware policy. Penetration testing results are reports that show the vulnerabilities and risks of the workstations and network from an external or internal attacker’s perspective4. While penetration testing can help to assess the security posture and resilience of the organization, it does not provide information on the daily anti-malware scans or their outcomes. Management attestation is a statement or declaration from the management that they have complied with the anti-malware policy5. While management attestation can demonstrate commitment and accountability, it does not provide objective or verifiable evidence of compliance. Recent malware scan reports are documents that show the summary or details of the latest anti-malware scans performed on the workstations. While recent malware scan reports can indicate the current status and performance of the anti-malware software, they do not provide historical or comprehensive evidence of compliance.

The best way to provide assurance that a project is adhering to the project plan is to conduct compliance audits at major system milestones. A compliance audit is a systematic and independent examination of the project’s activities, documents, and deliverables to determine whether they conform to the project plan and its specifications, standards, and requirements1. A major system milestone is a significant point or event in the project’s life cycle that marks the completion of a phase, stage, or deliverable2.

By conducting compliance audits at major system milestones, the auditor can provide assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan by:

Verifying that the project’s scope, schedule, budget, quality, and risks are aligned with the project plan and its objectives1

Identifying any deviations, discrepancies, or non-compliances that may affect the project’s performance or outcome1

Recommending and monitoring corrective and preventive actions to address the identified issues and improve the project’s compliance1

Reporting and communicating the audit findings, conclusions, and recommendations to the relevant stakeholders1

The other options are not as effective as conducting compliance audits at major system milestones for providing assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan. Requiring design reviews at appropriate points in the life cycle is a useful technique for ensuring that the project’s design meets the user and business requirements and follows the design standards and best practices3. However, design reviews are not sufficient for providing assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan, as they do not cover other aspects of the project such as schedule, budget, quality, or risks. Having an IS auditor participate on the steering committee is a possible way for providing assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan, as the auditor can provide independent advice and oversight to the steering committee on quality management issues and remediation efforts4. However, this may not be feasible or appropriate for every project, as it may create a conflict of interest or compromise the auditor’s objectivity and independence. Having an IS auditor participate on the quality assurance (QA) team is another possible way for providing assurance that the project is adhering to the project plan, as the auditor can assist the QA team in implementing procedures to facilitate adoption of quality management best practices5. However, this may also not be feasible or appropriate for every project, as it may create a conflict of interest or compromise the auditor’s objectivity and independence. Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

If the audit team lacks the necessary knowledge to audit a system that uses an AI algorithm, engaging external consultants who have audit experience and knowledge of AI would be the best approach12. These consultants can provide the expertise needed to effectively audit the AI system12. This approach ensures that the audit is conducted thoroughly and accurately, without requiring the audit team to acquire new skills or knowledge12.

Transaction tagging is a technique by which transactions are marked with unique identifiers or headers and traced through the system using agents or sensors at each processing point1. Transaction tagging allows for continuous monitoring and analysis of transaction processing in a high-volume, real-time system by providing visibility into the performance, availability, and reliability of each transaction and its components1. Transaction tagging can also help to identify and isolate errors, bottlenecks, anomalies, and security issues in the system1.

Audit planning is the process of developing an overall strategy and approach for conducting an audit. Audit planning involves identifying the objectives, scope, criteria, and methodology of the audit, as well as the resources, schedule, and reporting requirements. Audit planning also involves performing a risk assessment to identify and prioritize the areas of highest risk and significance for the audit1.

Risk assessment is a systematic process of evaluating the potential risks that may be involved in a projected activity or undertaking. Risk assessment involves identifying the sources and causes of risk, analyzing the likelihood and impact of risk, and determining the level of risk and the appropriate response2.

During audit planning, the IS audit manager is considering whether to budget for audits of entities regarded by the business as having low risk. The best course of action in this situation is C. Validate the low-risk entity ratings and apply professional judgment.

This is because validating the low-risk entity ratings can help to ensure that the risk assessment is accurate, reliable, and consistent with the business objectives and expectations. Validating the low-risk entity ratings can also help to identify any changes or developments that may affect the risk profile of the entities since the last assessment. Applying professional judgment can help to determine whether the low-risk entities should be included or excluded from the audit plan, based on factors such as materiality, relevance, significance, and assurance needs3.

The associated risk of mobile computing that an IS auditor should identify during the planning phase of a data loss prevention (DLP) audit is increased vulnerability due to anytime, anywhere accessibility. Mobile computing refers to the use of portable devices, such as laptops, tablets, smartphones, or wearable devices, that can access data and applications over wireless networks from any location6. Mobile computing enables greater flexibility, productivity, and convenience for users, but also poses significant security challenges for organizations. One of these challenges is increased vulnerability due to anytime, anywhere accessibility. This means that mobile devices are exposed to a higher risk of loss, theft, damage, or unauthorized access than stationary devices7. If mobile devices contain oraccess sensitive data withoutproper protection, such asencryption or authentication, they could result in data leakage or breach in case of compromise8. Therefore, an IS auditor should identify this risk as part of a DLP audit. The other options are less relevant or incorrect because:

A. The use of cloud negatively impacting IT availability is not an associated risk of mobile computing that an IS auditor should identify during the planning phase of a DLP audit, as it is more related to cloud computing than mobile computing. Cloud computing refers to the delivery of computing services, such as data storage or processing, over the Internet from remote servers. Cloud computing may enable or support mobile computing by providing access to data and applications from any device or location, but it does not necessarily imply mobile computing. The use of cloud may negatively impact IT availability if there are disruptions or outages in the cloud service provider’s network or infrastructure, but this is not a direct consequence of mobile computing.

B. Increased need for user awareness training is not an associated risk of mobile computing that an IS auditor should identify during the planning phase of a DLP audit, as it is more of a control or mitigation measure than a risk. User awareness training refers to educating users about security policies, procedures, and best practices for using mobile devices and protecting data. User awareness training may help to reduce the risk of data loss or breach due to mobile computing by increasing user knowledge and responsibility, but it does not eliminate or prevent the risk.

D. Lack of governance and oversight for IT infrastructure and applications is not an associated risk of mobile computing that an IS auditor should identify during the planning phase of a DLP audit, as it is more of a general or organizational risk than a specific or technical risk. Governance and oversight refer to the establishment and implementation of policies, standards, and procedures for managing IT resources and aligning them with business objectives. Lack of governance and oversight for IT infrastructure and applications may affect the security and performance of mobile devices and data, but it is not a direct or inherent result of mobile computing. References: Mobile Computing - ISACA, Mobile Computing Device Threats, Vulnerabilities and Risk Factors Are Ubiquitous - ISACA, Data Loss Prevention—Next Steps -ISACA, [Cloud Computing - ISACA], [Cloud Computing Risk Assessment - ISACA], [User Awareness Training - ISACA], [Governance and Oversight - ISACA]

 The most efficient way to identify segregation of duties violations in a new system is to review a report of security rights in the system. Segregation of duties is a control principle that aims to prevent or detect errors, fraud, or abuse by ensuring that no single individual has the ability to perform incompatible or conflicting functions or activities within a system or process. A report of security rights in the system can provide a comprehensive and accurate overview of the roles, responsibilities, and access levels assigned to different users or groups in the system, and can help to identify any potential segregation of duties violations or risks. The other options are not as efficient as reviewing a report of security rights in the system, because they either rely on observation or testing rather than analysis, or they focus on existing rather than potential violations. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)1, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.2

 The IS audit manager should specifically review the detailed evidence of the successes and weaknesses of all contingency testing to substantiate the conclusions of the audit of the corporate disaster recovery test. This is because the detailed evidence can provide the audit manager with a clear and objective picture of how well the disaster recovery plan was executed, what issues or gaps were encountered, and what recommendations or actions were taken to address them. The detailed evidence can also help the audit manager to verify the accuracy, completeness, and validity of the audit findings, as well as to evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the disaster recovery controls.

The other options are not as specific or relevant as the detailed evidence of all contingency testing. Overviews of interviews between data center personnel and the auditor may provide some useful information, but they are not sufficient to substantiate the conclusions without supporting evidence from the actual testing. Prior audit reports involving other corporate disaster recovery audits may provide some benchmarking or comparison data, but they are not directly related to the current audit scope and objectives. Summary memos reflecting audit opinions regarding noted weaknesses may provide some high-level insights, but they are not enough to substantiate the conclusions without detailed evidence to back them up.

Data analytics is the process of collecting, transforming, analyzing, and visualizing data to gain insights and support decision making1. Data analytics can be used to facilitate the testing of a new account creation process by applying various techniques and methods to evaluate the quality, functionality, performance, and security of the process. One of the approaches that would utilize data analytics to test the new account creation process is to review new account applications submitted in the past month for invalid dates of birth. This approach would involve the following steps:

Extract the data of new account applications from the source system, such as a database or a web service, using appropriate tools and methods.

Transform and clean the data to ensure its accuracy, completeness, consistency, and validity, using techniques such as data profiling, data cleansing, data mapping, and data validation2.

Analyze the data to identify any anomalies, errors, or outliers in the date of birth field, using methods such as descriptive statistics, exploratory data analysis, hypothesis testing, or anomaly detection3.

Visualize the data to present the findings and insights in a clear and understandable way, using tools and techniques such as charts, graphs, dashboards, or reports.

By reviewing new account applications submitted in the past month for invalid dates of birth, the tester can use data analytics to:

Verify if the new account creation process is working as expected and meets the business requirements and specifications for the date of birth field.

Detect any defects or issues in the new account creation process that may cause invalid dates of birth to be accepted or rejected incorrectly.

Measure and monitor the performance and reliability of the new account creation process in terms of data quality, accuracy, and completeness.

Evaluate and improve the test coverage and effectiveness of the new account creation process by identifying any gaps or risks in the test cases or scenarios.

Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

Option A is not correct because attempting to submit new account applications with invalid dates of birth is not a data analytics approach, but a functional testing approach that involves executing test cases or scenarios manually or automatically to validate the behavior and functionality of the new account creation process. Option B is not correct because reviewing the business requirements document for date of birth field requirements is not a data analytics approach, but a requirements analysis approach that involves examining and understanding the needs and expectations of the stakeholders for the new account creation process. Option D is not correct because evaluating configuration settings for date of birth field requirements is not a data analytics approach, but a configuration testing approach that involves verifying if the settings and parameters of the new account creation process are correct and consistent with the requirements.

The best way to identify whether the IT help desk is meeting service level agreements (SLAs) is A. Review exception reports. Exception reports are documents that highlight any deviations from the agreed service levels, such as breaches, delays, or failures. They can help the IT help desk to monitor their performance, identify root causes, and implement corrective actions. Reviewing exception reports can also help the IT help desk to communicate with the end users and stakeholders about any service issues and their resolution.

 The best control for detecting unauthorized data changes in an IT organization where many responsibilities are shared is to have data changes independently reviewed by another group. This is because an independent review can provide an objective and unbiased verification of the data changes and ensure that they are authorized, accurate, and complete. An independent review can also help to detect any errors, fraud, or malicious activities that may have occurred during the data changes. An independent review can also provide assurance that the data integrity and security are maintained. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4, Section 4.31

CISA Online Review Course, Domain 1, Module 4, Lesson 22

 A business impact analysis (BIA) is the process of identifying and assessing the potential impacts a disruption or incident could have on an organization. A BIA helps organizations understand and prepare for these potential obstacles, so they can act quickly and face challenges head-on when they arise. A BIA tells the organization what to expect when unforeseen roadblocks occur, so they can make a plan to get their business back on track as quickly as possible. Therefore, a BIA is the best option to anticipate the effects of a disaster.

A top-down approach in the development of IT policies means that the policies are derived from the strategic objectives and goals of the organization, and are aligned with the business needs and expectations. This should result in greater consistency across the organization, as the policies will be coherent, integrated and applicable to all levels and functions of the organization. A bottom-up approach, on the other hand, means that the policies are developed by individual units or departments based on their operational needs and preferences, which may lead to inconsistency, duplication orconflict among different policies. References: ISACA Frameworks: Blueprints for Success, IT Governance and Process Maturity

 A heuristic intrusion detection system (IDS) provides the most protection against emerging threats, as it uses behavioral analysis and anomaly detection to identify unknown or zero-day attacks. A heuristic IDS can adapt to changing patterns and learn from previous incidents, making it more effective than a signature-based IDS, which relies on predefined rules and signatures to detect known attacks. A demilitarized zone (DMZ) is a network segment that separates the internal network from the external network, and it can provide some protection against external threats, but not against internal or emerging threats. Real-time updating of antivirus software is important to protect against malware, but it may not be sufficient to prevent new or sophisticated attacks that exploit unknown vulnerabilities. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, page 452-453.

The auditor should verify whether a right-to-audit clause exists (B) next, because it is a contractual provision that grants the auditor the right to access and examine the records, systems, and processes of the SaaS provider. A right-to-audit clause is important for ensuring transparency, accountability, and compliance of the SaaS provider with the customer’s requirements and expectations. A right-to-audit clause can also help the auditor to identify and mitigate any risks or issues related to the SaaS agreement12.

Verifying whether IT management monitors the effectiveness of the environment (A) is not the next step, because it is a part of the ongoing monitoring andevaluation process, not the initial walk-through procedures. The auditor should first establish the scope, objectives, and criteria of the audit before assessing the performance and controls of the SaaS provider.

Verifying whether a third-party security attestation exists © is not the next step, because it is not a mandatory requirement for a SaaS agreement. A third-party security attestation is a report or certificate issued by an independent auditor that evaluates and validates the security controls and practices of the SaaS provider. A third-party security attestation can provide assurance and confidence to the customer, but it does not replace or eliminate the need for a right-to-audit clause3.

Verifying whether service level agreements (SLAs) are defined and monitored (D) is not the next step, because it is not directly related to the audit process. SLAs are contractual agreements that specify the quality, availability, and performance standards of the SaaS provider. SLAs are important for measuring and managing the service delivery and customer satisfaction, but they do not grant or guarantee the right to audit4.

The most important factor for the organization to ensure when reducing the retention period for media containing completed low-value transactions is that the retention period complies with data owner responsibilities. Data owners are accountable for defining the retention and disposal requirements for the data under their custody, based on business, legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations. The policy should reflect the data owner’s decisions and obtain their approval. The policy should also include a risk-based approach, but this is not as important as complying with data owner responsibilities. The retention period should allow for review during the year-end audit, but this may not be necessary for low-value transactions that have minimal impact on financial reporting. The total transaction amount may have some impact on financial reporting, but this is not a direct consequence of reducing the retention period. References:

CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, pages 414-4151

CISA Review Questions, Answers & ExplanationsDatabase, Question ID: 255

 Following a configuration management process to maintain applications is the primary reason for ensuring proper change control. Configuration management is a process of identifying, documenting, controlling, and verifying the configuration items and their interrelationships within an IT system or environment. Following a configuration management process can help to ensure that any changes to the applications are authorized, tested, documented, and tracked throughout their lifecycle. This will help to prevent unauthorized or improper changes that could affect the functionality, performance, or security of the applications. The other options are not the primary reasons for following a configuration management process, but rather possible benefits or outcomes of doing so. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4, Section 4.3.31

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 225

The most effective way for the audit team to leverage the risk management maturity of the organization is to integrate the risk register for audit planning purposes. The risk register is a document that records the identified risks, their likelihood, impact, and mitigation strategies for a project or an organization. By using the risk register, the audit team can align their audit objectives, scope, and procedures with the organization’s risk profile and priorities. This will help the audit team to provide more value-added and relevant assurance and recommendations to the management and stakeholders.

Some of the web sources that support this answer are:

Audit Maturity And Risk Management | Ideagen

Building a Mature Enterprise Risk Management Plan | AuditBoard

CISA CertifiedInformation Systems Auditor – Question0551

The IS auditor’s next step after determining that many terminated users’ accounts were not disabled is to perform a review of terminated users’ account activity. This means that the IS auditor should check whether any of the terminated users’ accounts were accessed or used after their termination date, which could indicate unauthorized or fraudulent activity. The IS auditor should also assess the impact and risk of such activity on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of IT resources and data. The other options are not as appropriate as performing a review of terminated users’ account activity, as they do not provide sufficient evidence or assurance of the extent and effect of the problem. References: CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 240

The best recommendation for the IS auditor to facilitate compliance with the new regulation is to include the requirement in the incident management response plan. An incident management response plan is a document that defines the roles, responsibilities, processes, and procedures for responding to security incidents. By including the new regulation in the plan, the IS auditor can ensure that the organization is aware of the reporting obligation, has a clear workflow for notifying the regulator within 24 hours, and has the necessary documentation and evidence to support the report.

The other options are not as effective as including the requirement in the incident management response plan:

Establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) for timely identification of security incidents is a good practice, but it does not guarantee compliance with the regulation. KPIs are metrics that measure the performance of a process or activity, but they do not specify how to perform it. The IS auditor should also provide guidance on how to identify and report security incidents within 24 hours.

Engaging an external security incident response expert for incident handling is a possible option, but it may not be feasible or cost-effective. The organization may not have the budget or time to hire an external expert, or may prefer to handle the incidents internally. The IS auditor should also evaluate the qualifications and trustworthiness of the external expert, and ensure that they comply with the regulation and other contractual or legal obligations.

Enhancing the alert functionality of the intrusion detection system (IDS) is a useful measure, but it is not sufficient to comply with the regulation. An IDS is a tool that monitors network traffic for malicious activity and alerts the network administrator or takes preventive action. However, an IDS may not detect all types of security incidents, or may generate false positives or negatives. The IS auditor should also consider other sources of incident detection, such as logs, reports, audits, or user feedback.

 During an audit of a multinational bank’s disposal process, an IS auditor should be most concerned about backup media being disposed before the end of the retention period. This is because backup media contain sensitive and critical data that may be required for business continuity, legal compliance, or forensic purposes. Disposing backup media prematurely may result in data loss, unavailability, or corruption, which may have severe consequences for the bank’s reputation, operations, and security. Backup media not being reviewed before disposal, degaussing being used instead of physical shredding, and hardware not being destroyed by a certified vendor are also findings that may pose some risks to the bank’s disposal process, but they are not as critical as backup media being disposed before the end of the retention period. References: ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition, page 302.

 Root cause is the most important thing for an IS auditor to determine and understand to develop meaningful recommendations for findings. A root cause is the underlying factor or condition that leads to a problem or issue. A finding is a statement that describes a problem or issue identified during an audit. A recommendation is a suggestion or advice that aims to address or resolve a finding. To develop meaningful recommendations for findings, an IS auditor should determine and understand the root cause of each finding, as this can help to identify the most effective and appropriate actions to prevent or correct the problem or issue. The other options are not as important as determining and understanding the root cause, as they do not directly address or resolve the finding. References: CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 434

 Data classification is the process of organizing and labeling data into categories based on file type, contents, and other metadata. Data classification helps organizations answer important questions about their data that inform how they mitigate risk and manage data governance policies. Data classification also enables appropriate protection measures, and efficient search, retrieval and use of each data category12.

While evaluating the data classification process of an organization, an IS auditor’s primary focus should be on whether data is correctly classified. This means that the data is assigned to the appropriate classification level based on its sensitivity, importance, integrity, availability, compliance requirements, and business value. Correct data classification ensures that the data is protected according to its risk level, and that the organization can comply with relevant laws and regulations that apply to different types of data3.

The other three options are not the primary focus of an IS auditor while evaluating the data classification process, although they may be relevant or useful for certain aspects of data management. Data classifications are automated means that the organization uses software tools or algorithms to analyze and label data based on predefined rules or criteria. This can improve the efficiency and consistency of data classification, but it does not guarantee that the data is correctly classified. The IS auditor still needs to verify the accuracy and validity of the automated classifications, and check for any errors or anomalies.

A data dictionary is maintained means that the organization keeps a record of the definitions, formats, sources, and relationships of the data elements in its systems or databases. This can enhance the understanding and usability of the data, but it does not ensure that the data is correctly classified. The IS auditor still needs to examine the content and context of the data, and compare it with the classification criteria and policies.

Data retention requirements are clearly defined means that the organization specifies how long it will keep different types of data, and when it will delete or archive them. This can help reduce storage costs, improve performance, and comply with legal obligations, but it does not ensure that the data is correctly classified. The IS auditor still needs to assess whether the data is stored and protected according to its classification level, and whether the retention periods are appropriate for each type of data.

Therefore, data is correctly classified is the best answer.

According to the ISACA’s Information Security Governance Guidance for Boards of Directors and Executive Management, the highest level of maturity of an information security program is Level 5: Optimized, which means that the program is aligned with the business objectives and strategy, and continuously monitors and improves its performance and effectiveness. A framework is in place to measure risks and track effectiveness, and the program is proactive, adaptive, and innovative.

The other options represent lower levels of maturity:

A training program is in place to promote information security awareness. This is Level 2: Repeatable, which means that the program has some basic policies and procedures, and provides awareness training to employees.

Information security policies and procedures are established. This is Level 3: Defined, which means that the program has formalized policies and procedures, and assigns roles and responsibilities for information security.

The program meets regulatory and compliance requirements. This is Level 4: Managed, which means that the program has established metrics and reporting mechanisms, and complies with relevant laws and regulations.

The greatest concern for an IS auditor when reviewing IT policies and procedures that are not regularly reviewed and updated is that policies and procedures might not reflect current practices. Policies are documents that define the goals, objectives, and guidelines for an organization’s information systems and resources. Procedures are documents that describe the steps, tasks, or activities for implementing or executing policies. Policies and procedures should be regularly reviewed and updated to ensure that they are relevant, accurate, consistent, and effective for the organization’s information systems and resources. Policies and procedures that are not regularly reviewed and updated might not reflect current practices, as they might be outdated, obsolete, or incompatible with the current state or needs of the organization’s information systems and resources. This can cause confusion, inconsistency, inefficiency, or noncompliance among users or stakeholders who rely on policies and procedures for guidance or direction. Policies and procedures might not include new systems and corresponding process changes is a possible concern for an IS auditor when reviewing IT policies and procedures that are not regularly reviewed and updated, but it is not the greatest one. Policies and procedures might not include new systems and corresponding process changes, as they might be unaware of or unresponsive to the introduction or modification of information systems or resources within the organization. This can cause gaps, overlaps, or conflicts among policies and procedures that affect different information systems or resources. 

 Changes to the job scheduler application’s parameters are not approved and reviewed by an operations supervisor. This is a serious control weakness that could compromise the integrity, availability, and security of the IT operations. An IS auditor should be concerned about the lack of oversight and accountability for such changes, which could result in unauthorized, erroneous, or malicious modifications that affect the processing environment. The other options are less critical issues that may not have a significant impact on the IT operations. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4, Section 4.2.3.11

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 202

 In an online application, data architecture provides the most information about the transaction audit trail, as it describes how data are created, stored, processed, accessed and exchanged among different components of the application. Data architecture includes data models, schemas, dictionaries, metadata, standards and policies that define the structure, quality, integrity, security and governance of data. Data architecture can help the IS auditor to trace the origin, flow, transformation and destination of data in an online transaction, and to identify the key data elements, attributes and relationships that are relevant for audit purposes. A system/process flowchart is a graphical representation of the sequence of steps or activities that are performed by a system or process. A system/process flowchart can provide some information about the transaction audit trail, but it is not as detailed or comprehensive as data architecture. A system/process flowchart shows the inputs, outputs, decisions and actions of a system or process, but it does not show the data elements, attributes and relationships that are involved in each step or activity. A file layout is a specification of the format and structure of a data file. A file layout can provide some information about the transaction audit trail, but it is not as detailed or comprehensive as data architecture. A file layout shows the fields, types, lengths and positions of data in a file, but it does not show the origin, flow, transformation and destination of data in an online transaction. Source code documentation is a description of the logic, functionality and purpose of a program or module written in a programming language. Source code documentation can provide some information about the transaction audit trail, but it is not as detailed or comprehensive as data architecture. Source code documentation shows the instructions, variables and parameters that are used to perform calculations and operations on data, but it does not show the data elements, attributes and relationships that are involved in each instruction or operation. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, Chapter 4: Information Systems Operations and Business Resilience, Section 4.2: Data Administration Practices.

 Capacity management is a process that ensures that the IT resources of an organization are sufficient to meet the current and future demands of the business. Capacity management enables organizations to identify the extent to which components need to be upgraded, by monitoring and analyzing the performance, utilization, and availability of the IT components, such as servers, networks, storage, applications, etc., and identifying any bottlenecks, gaps, or risks that may affect the service level agreements (SLAs) or quality of service (QoS). Capacity management also helps organizations to plan and optimize the use of IT resources, by forecasting the future demand and growth of the business, and aligning the IT capacity with the business needs and objectives. Forecasting technology trends is a possible outcome of capacity management, but it is not its main purpose. Establishing the capacity of network communication links is a part of capacity management, but it is not its main goal. Determining business transaction volumes is an input for capacity management, but it is not its main objective.

Signature-based intrusion detection systems (IDS) are systems that compare network traffic with predefined patterns of known attacks, called signatures. The effectiveness of signature-based IDS depends on how well they can detect new or unknown attacks that are not in their signature database. Therefore, an increase in the number of detected incidents not previously identified is the best indicator of the effectiveness of signature-based IDS, as it shows that they can recognize novel or modified attacks. 

The best way to prevent accepting bad data from a third-party service provider is to implement business rules to reject invalid data. Business rules are logical statements that define the data quality requirements and standards for the organization. By implementing business rules, the organization can ensure that only data that meets the predefined criteria is accepted into the enterprise data warehouse. Obtaining error codes indicating failed data feeds, purchasing data cleansing tools from a reputable vendor, and appointing data quality champions across the organization are useful measures to improve data quality, but they do not prevent accepting bad data in the first place. References: ISACA Journal Article: Data Quality Management

 Including the data warehouse in the impact analysis for any changes in the source system is the best way to prevent data quality issues caused by changes from a source system. A data warehouse is a centralized repository of integrated data from one or more source systems. An impact analysis is a technique of assessing the potential effects and consequences of a change on the existing system or environment. Including the data warehouse in the impact analysis can help to identify and mitigate any data quality issues that may arise from changes in the source system, such as data inconsistency, incompleteness, or inaccuracy. The other options are less effective ways to prevent data quality issues, as they may involve data quality alerts, approval for changes, or access restrictions. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5, Section 5.41

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 226

 The IS auditor should be most concerned about the lack of follow-up education for staff members who failed the phishing simulation test. Phishing simulation tests are designed to assess the level of awareness and susceptibility of staff members to phishing attacks, and to provide feedback and training to improve their security behavior. If staff members who failed the test do not receive follow-up education, they will not learn from their mistakes and may continue to fall victim to real phishing attacks, which could compromise the security of the organization.

The other options are less concerning for the IS auditor:

Test results were not communicated to staff members. This is not ideal, as staff members should receive feedback on their performance and learn from the test results. However, this does not necessarily mean that they did not receive any training or education on how to avoid phishing attacks.

Staff members were not notified about the test beforehand. This is a common practice for phishing simulation tests, as it mimics the real-world scenario where staff members do not know when they will receive a phishing email. The purpose of the test is to measure their spontaneous reaction and awareness, not their preparedness or compliance.

Security awareness training was not provided prior to the test. This is not a major concern, as the test can serve as a baseline measurement of the current level of awareness and susceptibility of staff members, and as a starting point for providing tailored training and education based on the test results.

 Validating that assets are protected according to assigned classification is the primary role of the IS auditor in an organization’s information classification process. An IS auditor should evaluate whether the information security controls are adequate and effective in safeguarding the information assets based on their classification levels. The other options are not the primary role of the IS auditor, but rather the responsibilities of the information owners, custodians, or security managers. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 6, Section 6.2.31

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 206

Access to the spreadsheet is given only to those who require access is the most important control for maintaining the security of data in the spreadsheet. An IS auditor should ensure that the principle of least privilege is applied to limit the access to sensitive financial data and prevent unauthorized disclosure, modification, or deletion. The other options are less important controls that may enhance the accuracy, availability, or integrity of data in the spreadsheet, but not its security. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 6, Section 6.31

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 210

 The most important reason to classify a disaster recovery plan (DRP) as confidential is to reduce the risk of data leakage that could lead to an attack. A DRP contains sensitive information about the organization’s IT infrastructure, systems, processes, and procedures for recovering from a disaster. If this information falls into the wrong hands, it could be exploited by malicious actors to launch targeted attacks, sabotage recovery efforts, or extort ransom. Therefore, a DRP should be protected from unauthorized access, disclosure, modification, or destruction.

The other options are not as important as reducing the risk of data leakage that could lead to an attack:

Ensuring compliance with the data classification policy is a good practice, but it is not a sufficient reason to classify a DRP as confidential. The data classification policy should reflect the level of risk and impact associated with each type of data, and a DRP should be classified as confidential based on its potential harm if compromised.

Protecting the plan from unauthorized alteration is a valid concern, but it is not a primary reason to classify a DRP as confidential. A DRP should be protected from unauthorized alteration by implementing access controls, audit trails, version control, and change management processes. Classifying a DRP as confidential may deter some unauthorized alterations, but it does not prevent them.

Complying with business continuity best practice is a desirable goal, but it is not a compelling reason to classify a DRP as confidential. Business continuity best practice may recommend classifying a DRP as confidential, but it does not mandate it. The decision to classify a DRP as confidential should be based on a risk assessment and a cost-benefit analysis.

Penetration testing is a method of evaluating the security of a system or network by simulating an attack from a malicious source. Penetration testing typically consists of four phases: planning, discovery, attacks, and reporting. In the discovery phase, penetration testers gather information about the target system or network, such as host detection, domain name system (DNS) interrogation, port scanning, service identification, operating system fingerprinting, vulnerability scanning, etc. This information can help to identify potential entry points, weaknesses, or vulnerabilities that can be exploited in the subsequent attack phase. Host detection and DNS interrogation are techniques that can be used in the discovery phase to determine the active hosts and their IP addresses and hostnames on the target network. References: [ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition], page 368.

The IS auditor’s primary concern when an organization has recently implemented a Voice-over IP (VoIP) communication system is a single point of failure for both voice and data communications. VoIP is a technology that allows voice communication over IP networks such as the internet. VoIP can offer benefits such as lower costs, higher flexibility, and better integration with other applications. However, VoIP also introduces risks such as dependency on network availability, performance, and security. If both voice and data communications share the same network infrastructure and devices, then a single point of failure can affect both services simultaneously and cause significant disruption to business operations. Therefore, the IS auditor should evaluate the availability and redundancy of the network components and devices that support VoIP communication. The other options are not as critical as a single point of failure for both voice and data communications, as they do not pose a direct threat to business continuity. References: CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 385

The completeness of the vulnerability scanning process depends on the accuracy and currency of the organization’s systems inventory, which is a list of all the hardware and software assets that are owned or used by the organization. A complete and up-to-date systems inventory can help ensure that all the systems are identified and scanned for vulnerabilities, and that no system is missed or overlooked. Vulnerability scanning results are reported to the CISO is a good practice for ensuring accountability and visibility of the vulnerability management process, but it is not the most important thing to verify when determining the completeness of the vulnerability scanning process, as reporting does not guarantee that all the systems are scanned. The organization is using a cloud-hosted scanning tool for identification of vulnerabilities is a possible option for conducting vulnerability scanning, but it is not the most important thing to verify when determining the completeness of the vulnerability scanning process, as the type of scanning tool does not affect the scope or coverage of the scanning. Access to the vulnerability scanning tool is periodically reviewed is a critical control for ensuring the security and integrity of the vulnerability scanning tool, but it is not the most important thing to verify when determining the completeness of the vulnerability scanning process, as access review does not ensure that all the systems are scanned. 

 The auditor’s next course of action should be to evaluate the appropriateness of the remedial action taken by the auditee. The auditor should assess whether the alternative approach taken by the auditee is effective, efficient, and aligned with the audit objectives and recommendations. The auditor should also consider the impact of the change on the audit scope, criteria, and risk assessment. Conducting a risk analysis incorporating the change, reporting results of the follow-up to the audit committee, and informing senior management of the change in approach are possible subsequent actions that the auditor may take after evaluating the appropriateness of the remedial action taken. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version): Chapter 1 - Information Systems Auditing Process

Determining accountability of data owners is the most important activity in the data classification process. Data classification is a process that assigns categories or labels to data based on their value, sensitivity, criticality and risk to the organization. Data classification helps to determine the appropriate level of protection, access and retention for data. Determining accountability of data owners is an activity that identifies and assigns roles and responsibilities for data classification, protection and management to individuals or functions within the organization. Data owners are individuals or functions who have authority and responsibility for defining, classifying, protecting and managing data throughout their lifecycle. Determining accountability of data owners is essential for ensuring that data are classified correctly and consistently, and that data classification policies and procedures are followed and enforced. The other options are not as important as option C, as they are dependent on or derived from the accountability of data owners. Labeling the data appropriately is an activity that applies the categories or labels assigned by data owners to data based on their classification criteria. Identifying risk associated with the data is an activity that assesses the potential impact and likelihood of loss, disclosure, modification or destruction of data based on their classification level. Determining the adequacy of privacy controls is an activity that evaluates whether the controls implemented to protect personal or sensitive data are sufficient and effective based on their classification level. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) , Chapter 5: Protection of Information Assets, Section 5.3: Data Classification.

 Team member assignments based on individual competencies is the most important factor to meet the IS audit standard for proficiency. Proficiency is the ability to apply knowledge, skills and experience to perform audit tasks effectively and efficiently. The IS audit standard for proficiency requires that IS auditors must possess the knowledge, skills and discipline to perform audit tasks in accordance with applicable standards, guidelines and procedures. Team member assignments based on individual competencies is a way to ensure that each IS auditor is assigned to audit tasks that match their level of proficiency, and that the audit team as a whole has sufficient and appropriate proficiency to conduct the audit. The other options are not as important as option C, as they do not ensure that the IS auditors have the required proficiency to perform audit tasks. Having a globally recognized audit certification is a way to demonstrate proficiency in IS auditing, but it does not guarantee that the IS auditor has the specific knowledge, skills and experience needed for a particular audit task or system. Technical co-sourcing is a way to supplement the proficiency of the IS audit team by hiring external experts or consultants to perform certain audit tasks or functions, but it does not replace the need for internal IS auditors to have adequate proficiency. Having a supervisor review the new auditors’ work is a way to ensure quality and accuracy of the audit work, but it does not ensure that the new auditors have the necessary proficiency to perform audit tasks independently or competently. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) , Chapter 1: Information Systems Auditing Process, Section 1.4: Audit Skills and Competencies.

 A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process that identifies and evaluates the potential effects or consequences of disruptions or disasters on an organization’s critical business functions or processes. A BIA can help prioritize the recovery of critical functions by assessing their importance and urgency for the organization’s operations, objectives, and stakeholders, and determining their recovery time objectives (RTOs), which are the maximum acceptable time for restoring a functionafter a disruption. A business continuity plan (BCP) testing is a process that verifies and validates the effectiveness and readiness of a BCP, which is a document that outlines the strategies and procedures for ensuring the continuity of critical business functions in the event of a disruption or disaster. A BCP testing does not prioritize the recovery of critical functions, but rather evaluates how well they are recovered according to the BCP. A disaster recovery plan (DRP) testing is a process that verifies and validates the effectiveness and readiness of a DRP, which is a document that outlines the technical and operational steps for restoring the IT systems and infrastructure that support critical business functions in the event of a disruption or disaster. A DRP testing does not prioritize the recovery of critical functions, but rather evaluates how well they are supported by the IT systems and infrastructure according to the DRP. A risk assessment is a process that identifies and analyzes the potential threats and vulnerabilities that could affect an organization’s critical business functions or processes. A risk assessment does not prioritize the recovery of critical functions, but rather estimates their likelihood and impact of being disrupted by various risk scenarios. 

The condition that would be of most concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk of a successful brute force attack against encrypted data at rest is short key length. A brute force attack is a method of breaking encryption by trying all possible combinations of keys until finding the correct one. The shorter the key length, the easier it is for an attacker to guess or crack the encryption. Random key generation, use of symmetric encryption, and use of asymmetric encryption are not conditions that would increase the risk of a successful brute force attack. In fact, random key generation can enhance security by preventing predictable patterns in key selection. Symmetric encryption and asymmetric encryption are different types of encryption that have their own advantages and disadvantages, but neither is inherently more vulnerable to brute force attacks than the other. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version): Chapter 5 - Information Systems Operations and Business Resilience

The most critical finding when reviewing an organization’s information security management is no periodic assessments to identify threats and vulnerabilities. Periodic assessments are essential for ensuring that the organization’s information security policies, procedures, standards, and controls are aligned with the current and emerging risks and threats that may affect its information assets. Without periodic assessments, the organization may not be aware of its actual security posture, gaps, or weaknesses, and may not be able to take appropriate measures to mitigate or prevent potential security incidents. No dedicated security officer, no official charter for the information security management system, and no employee awareness training and education program are also findings that may indicate some deficiencies in the organization’s information security management, but they are not as critical as no periodic assessments to identify threats and vulnerabilities. References: ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition, page 343.

 The organizational policies and procedures are the first source of guidance for an IS auditor when planning a customer data privacy audit. They provide the framework and objectives for ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, customer agreements and data classification. The IS auditor should review them first to understand the scope, roles and responsibilities, standards and controls related to customer data privacy in the organization. The other options are also important, but they are secondary sources of information thatshould be reviewed after the organizational policies and procedures. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, Chapter 2: Governance and Management of Information Technology, Section 2.5: Privacy Principles and Policies.

 The waterfall life cycle model of software development is best suited for situations where the project requirements are well understood. The waterfall life cycle model is a sequential and linear approach to software development that consists of several phases, such as planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Each phase depends on the completion and approval of the previous phase before proceeding to the next phase. The waterfall life cycle model is best suited for situations where the project requirements are well understood, as it assumes that the requirements are clear, stable, and fixed at the beginning of the project, and do not change significantly throughout the project. The project is subject to time pressures is not a situation where the waterfall life cycle model of software development is best suited, as it may not be flexible or agile enough to accommodate changes or adjustments in the project schedule or timeline. The waterfall life cycle model may involve long delays or dependencies between phases, and may not allow for early feedback or delivery of software products. The project intends to apply an object-oriented design approach is not a situation where the waterfall life cycle model of software development is best suited, as it may not be compatible or effective with the object-oriented design approach. The object-oriented design approach is a technique that models software as a collection of interacting objects that have attributes and behaviors. The object-oriented design approach may require iterative and incremental development methods that allow for dynamic and adaptive changes in software design and functionality. The project will involve the use of new technology is not a situation where the waterfall life cycle model of software development is best suited, as it may not be able to cope with the uncertainty or complexity of new technology. The waterfall life cycle model may not allow for sufficient exploration or experimentation with new technology, and may not be able to handle changes or issues that arise from new technology.

 Restricting program functionality according to user security profiles is the best control for ensuring appropriate segregation of duties within an accounts payable department. An IS auditor should verify that the access rights and permissions of the accounts payable staff are based on their roles and responsibilities, and that they are not able to perform incompatible or conflicting functions such as creating, approving, or paying invoices. This will help to prevent fraud, errors, or abuse of authority within the accounts payable process. The other options are less effective controls for ensuring segregation of duties, as they may involve audit trails, access restrictions, or user identification. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 6, Section 6.31

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database,Question ID 223

Source code for the software must be placed in escrow is the most important requirement to include in the vendor contract to ensure continuity. Source code is the original code of a software program that can be modified or enhanced by programmers. Placing source code in escrow means depositing it with a trusted third party who can release it to the customer under certain conditions, such as vendor bankruptcy, breach of contract, or failure to provide support. This can help to ensure continuity of the software product and its maintenance in case of vendor unavailability or dispute. The other options are less important requirements to include in the vendor contract, as they may involve support availability, disaster recovery plan, or staff training. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5, Section 5.51

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID228

 To ensure that management concerns are addressed, internal audit should recommend that the data quality team review the data reported to the regulatory body first. This is because this data set is the most relevant and critical to the issue that triggered the enhancement of the data quality program. The data reported to the regulatory body should be accurate, complete, consistent, and timely, as any discrepancies could result in fines, penalties, or reputational damage for the organization.Data with customer personal information is important for data quality, but it is not directly related to the regulatory reporting issue. Data supporting financial statements is important for data quality, but it may not be the same as the data reported to the regulatory body. Data impacting business objectives is important for data quality, but it may not be as urgent or sensitive as the data reported to the regulatory body. References:

CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, pages 404-4051

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID: 262

The best way to obtain assurance that certain automated calculations comply with the regulatory requirements is to re-perform the calculation with audit software. This will allow the auditor to independently verify the accuracy and validity of the calculation and compare it with the expected results. Reviewing sign-off documentation, source code, or user acceptance test results may not provide sufficient evidence or assurance that the calculation is correct and compliant. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), page 325

CISA Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, question ID 3335

A key performance indicator (KPI) is a quantifiable measure of performance over time for a specific objective1. KPIs help organizations and teams track their progress and achievements towards their strategic goals. To be useful, a KPI must have a target value, which is the desired level of performance or outcome that the organization or team aims to achieve. A target value provides a clear direction and a benchmark for measuring success or failure. Without a target value, a KPI is meaningless, as it does not indicate whether the performance is good or bad, or how far or close the organization or team is from reaching their objective.

 The greatest benefit of using a prototyping approach in software development is that it helps to conceptualize and clarify requirements. A prototyping approach is a method of creating a simplified or partial version of a software product to demonstrate its features and functionality. A prototyping approach can help to elicit, validate, and refine the requirements of the software product, as well as to obtain feedback from the users and stakeholders. The other options are not the greatest benefits of using a prototyping approach, but rather possible outcomes or advantages of doing so. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4, Section 4.3.11

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 227

 Decreased time for incident resolution is the best indicator that an incident management process is effective. Incident management is a process that aims to restore normal service operation as quickly as possible after an incident, which is an unplanned interruption or reduction in quality of an IT service. Decreased time for incident resolution means that the incident management process is able to identify, analyze, respond to, and resolve incidents efficiently and effectively. The other indicatorsdo not necessarily reflect the effectiveness of the incident management process, as they may depend on other factors such as the nature, frequency, and severity of incidents. References: CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 372

The best source of information for an IS auditor to use as a baseline to assess the adequacy of an organization’s privacy policy is the local privacy standards and regulations. Privacy standards and regulations are legal requirements that specify how personal data should be collected, processed, stored, shared, and disposed of by organizations. By using local privacy standards and regulations as a baseline, the IS auditor can ensure that the organization’s privacy policy complies with the applicable laws and protects the rights and interests of data subjects. Historical privacy breaches and related root causes, globally accepted privacy best practices, and benchmark studies of similar organizations are useful sources of information for improving an organization’s privacy policy, but they are not as authoritative and relevant as local privacy standards and regulations. References: CISAReview Manual (Digital Version): Chapter 2 - Governance and Management of Information Technology

 A service level agreement (SLA) is a contract between a service provider and a customer that defines the expected level of performance, risks, and capabilities of an IT infrastructure. An IS auditor can use an SLA to measure how well the IT infrastructure meets the business needs and objectives, as well as to identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed. The other options are not directly related to measuring the performance, risks, and capabilities of an IT infrastructure. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5, Section 5.2.11

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID 203

 This should be the IS auditor’s greatest concern, because it means that the organization has not considered the potential impact of the cloud document storage solution on its ability to continue its operations in the event of a disruption or disaster. A BCP is a document that outlines the procedures and actions to be taken in order to maintain or resume critical business functions during and after a crisis. A BCP should be updated whenever there is a significant change in the organization’s IT infrastructure, systems, processes, or dependencies, such as implementing a cloud document storage solution. The IS auditor should verify that the BCP reflects the current state of the organization’s IT environment, and that it addresses the risks, challenges, and opportunities associated with the cloud document storage solution.

The other options are not as concerning as the BCP not being updated:

Users are not required to sign updated acceptable use agreements. This is a minor concern, but it does not pose a major threat to the organization’s business continuity. Acceptable use agreements are documents that define the rules and guidelines for using IT resources, such as the cloud document storage solution. Users should sign updated acceptable use agreements to acknowledge their responsibilities and obligations, and to comply with the organization’s policies and standards. However, this does not affect the organization’s ability to continue its operations in a crisis.

Users have not been trained on the new system. This is a moderate concern, but it does not jeopardize the organization’s business continuity. Training users on the new system is important to ensure that they can use it effectively and efficiently, and to avoid errors or misuse that could compromise the security or performance of the system. However, this does not prevent the organization from accessing or restoring its data in a crisis.

Mobile devices are not encrypted. This is a serious concern, but it does not directly impact the organization’s business continuity. Encrypting mobile devices is a security measure thatprotects the data stored on them from unauthorized access or disclosure in case of loss or theft. However, this does not affect the availability or integrity of the data stored in the cloud document storage solution, which should have its own encryption mechanisms.

The best audit procedure to determine whether a firewall is configured in compliance with the organization’s security policy is reviewing the parameter settings. Parameter settings are values or options that define how a firewall operates and functions, such as rules, filters, ports, protocols, etc. By reviewing the parameter settings of a firewall, an IS auditor can verify whether they match with the organization’s security policy, which is a document that outlines the security objectives, requirements, and guidelines for an organization’s information systems and resources. Reviewing the system log is a possible audit procedure to determine whether a firewall is configured in compliance with the organization’s security policy, but it is not the best one, as a system log records events or activities that occur on a firewall, such as connections, requests, responses, errors, alerts, etc., and may not indicate whether they comply with the organization’s security policy. Interviewing the firewall administrator is a possible audit procedure to determine whether a firewall is configured in compliance with the organization’s security policy, but it is not the best one, as a firewall administrator may not provide accurate or reliable information about the firewall configuration, and may have conflicts of interest or ulterior motives. Reviewing the actual procedures is a possibleaudit procedure to determine whether a firewall is configured in compliance with the organization’s security policy, but it is not the best one, as actual procedures describe how a firewall is configured and maintained, such as installation, testing, updating, etc., and may not reflect whether they comply with the organization’s security policy. 

The best indicator of the effectiveness of an organization’s incident response program is the financial impact per security event. This metric measures the direct and indirect costs associated with security incidents, such as loss of revenue, reputation damage, legal fees, recovery expenses, and fines. By reducing the financial impact per security event, the organization can demonstrate that its incident response program is effective in mitigating the consequences of security breaches and restoring normal operations as quickly as possible. Number of successful penetration tests, percentage of protected business applications, and number of security vulnerability patches are indicators of the security posture of the organization, but they do not reflect the effectiveness of the incident response program. References: ISACA Journal Article: Measuring Incident Response Effectiveness

 The best environment for copying data and transforming it into a compatible data warehouse format is the staging environment. The staging environment is a temporary area where data from various sources are extracted, transformed, and loaded (ETL) before being moved to the data warehouse. The staging environment allows for data cleansing, validation, integration, and standardization without affecting the source or target systems. The testing environment is not suitable for copying data and transforming it into a compatible data warehouse format, as it is used for verifying and validating the functionality and performance of applications or systems. The replication environment is not suitable for copying data and transforming it into a compatible data warehouse format, as it is used for creating identical copies of data or systems for backup or recovery purposes. The development environment is not suitable for copying data and transforming it into a compatible data warehouse format, as it is used for creating or modifying applications or systems. References:

CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, pages 475-4761

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, Question ID: 2642

The metric that would best measure the agility of an organization’s IT function is average time to turn strategic IT objectives into an agreed upon and approved initiative. IT agility is the ability of an IT function to respond quickly and effectively to changing business needs and opportunities. By measuring how fast an IT function can translate strategic IT objectives into actionable initiatives, such as projects or programs, an organization can assess how well its IT function can align with and support its business strategy. Average number of learning and training hours per IT staff member, frequency of security assessments against the most recent standards and guidelines, and percentage of staff with sufficient IT-related skills for the competency required of their roles are metrics that may indicate other aspects of IT performance, such as capability development, security maturity, and skills gap analysis, but they do not directly measure IT agility. References: ISACA Journal Article: Measuring IT Agility

he design of an incident management process should include prioritization criteria to ensure that incidents are handled according to their impact and urgency. Without prioritization criteria, the organization may not be able to allocate resources effectively and respond to incidents in a timely manner. Expected time to resolve incidents, service management standards, and metrics reporting are important aspects of incident management, but they are not as critical as prioritization criteria for the design of the process. References: ISACA Journal Article: Incident Management: A Practical Approach

 An IS auditor is conducting a review of a data center. An observation that could indicate an access control issue is muddy footprints directly inside the emergency exit. Access control is a process that ensures that only authorized entities or individuals can access or use an information system or resource, and prevents unauthorized access or use. Access control can be implemented using various methods or mechanisms, such as physical, logical, administrative, etc. Muddy footprints directly inside the emergency exit could indicate an access control issue, as they could suggest that someone has entered the data center through the emergency exit without proper authorization or authentication, and potentially compromised the security or integrity of the data center. Security cameras deployed outside main entrance is not an observation that could indicate an access control issue, but rather a control that could enhance access control, as security cameras are devices that capture and record video footage of the surroundings, and can help monitor and deter unauthorized access or activity. Antistatic mats deployed at the computer room entrance is not an observation that could indicate an access control issue, but rather a control that could prevent static electricity damage, as antistatic mats are devices that dissipate or reduce static charges from people or objects, and can help protect electronic equipment from electrostatic discharge (ESD). Fencing around facility is two meters high is not an observation that could indicate an access control issue, but rather a control that could improve physical security, as fencing is a barrier that encloses or surrounds an area, and can help prevent unauthorized entry or intrusion. 

The primary reason for an IS auditor to use data analytics techniques is to reduce detection risk. Detection risk is the risk that an IS auditor will fail to detect material errors or irregularities in the information systems environment. By using data analytics techniques, such as data extraction, analysis, visualization, and reporting, an IS auditor can enhance the audit scope, coverage, efficiency, and effectiveness. Data analytics techniques can help an IS auditor to identify anomalies, patterns, trends, correlations, and outliers in large volumes of data that may indicate potential issues or risks. Technology risk, control risk, and inherent risk are types of audit risk that are not directly affected by the use of data analytics techniques by an IS auditor. References: [ISACA Journal Article: Data Analytics for Auditors]

 The major advantage of moving from many desktop PCs to a thin client architecture is that desktop application software will never have to be upgraded. A thin client architecture is a type of client-server architecture that uses lightweight or minimal devices (thin clients) as clients that connect to a central server that provides most of the processing and storage functions. A thin client architecture can offer several benefits over a traditional desktop PC architecture, such as lower cost, higher security, easier maintenance, etc. One of these benefits is that desktop application software will never have to be upgraded on thin clients, as all the applications are installed and updated on the server, and accessed by thin clients through a network connection. This can save time and money for installing and upgrading software on individual devices, and ensure consistency and compatibility among different devices. The security of the desktop PC is enhanced is a possible advantage of moving from many desktop PCs to a thin client architecture, but it is not the major one. A thin client architecture can enhance the security of desktop PCs by reducing the exposure orvulnerability of data and applications on individual devices, and centralizing the security management and control on the server. However, this advantage may depend on other factors such as network security, server security, user authentication, etc. Administrative security can be provided for the client is a possible advantage of moving from many desktop PCs to a thin client architecture, but it is not the major one. A thin client architecture can provide administrative security for clients by allowing administrators to configure and manage client devices remotely from the server, and enforce policies and restrictions on client access or usage. However, this advantage may depend on other factors such as network reliability, server availability, user compliance, etc. System administration can be better managed is a possible advantage of moving from many desktop PCs to a thin client architecture, but it is not the major one. A thin client architecture can improve system administration by simplifying and streamlining the tasks and activities involved in maintaining and supporting client devices, such as backup, recovery, troubleshooting, etc., and consolidating them on the server. However, this advantage may depend on other factors such as network bandwidth, server capacity, user satisfaction

The best source of information for IT management to estimate resource requirements for future projects is the records of actual time spent on projects. This data can provide a realistic and reliable basis for forecasting future resource needs based on historical trends and patterns. The records of actual time spent on projects can also help IT management to identify any gaps or inefficiencies in resource allocation and utilization. The human resources (HR) sourcing strategy is not a good source of information for estimating resource requirements for future projects, as it may not reflect the actual demand and availability of IT resources. The peer organization staffing benchmarks are not a good source of information for estimating resource requirements for future projects, as they may not account for the specific characteristics and needs of each organization. The budgeted forecast for the next financial year is not a good source of information for estimating resource requirements for future projects, as it may not be based on accurate or realistic assumptions. References:

CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, pages 465-4661

CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database,Question ID: 263

This must be in place before an IS auditor initiates audit follow-up activities, because it indicates that management has acknowledged and accepted the audit findings and recommendations, and has agreed to take corrective actions within a specified timeframe. Audit follow-up activities are the processes and procedures that the IS auditor performs to verify that management has implemented the agreed-upon actions effectively and in a timely manner, and that the audit findings have been resolved or mitigated.

The other options are not required to be in place before an IS auditor initiates audit follow-up activities:

Available resources for the activities included in the action plan. This is a factor that may affect the feasibility and success of the action plan, but it is not a prerequisite for the audit follow-up activities. The IS auditor should assess the availability and adequacy of the resources for the action plan during the audit planning and execution phases, and provide recommendations accordingly. However, the IS auditor does not need to wait for the resources to be available before initiating the audit follow-up activities.

A heat map with the gaps and recommendations displayed in terms of risk. This is a tool that may help the IS auditor prioritize and communicate the gaps and recommendations, but it is not a requirement for the audit follow-up activities. A heat map is a graphical representation of data that uses colors to indicate the level of risk or impact of each gap or recommendation. The IS auditor may use a heat map to support the audit report or presentation, but it does not replace the need for a management response with a committed implementation date.

Supporting evidence for the gaps and recommendations mentioned in the audit report. This is a component that should be included in the audit report, but it is not a condition for the audit follow-up activities. Supporting evidence is the information or data that supports or substantiates the audit findings and recommendations. The IS auditor should collect and document sufficient, reliable, relevant, and useful evidence during the audit execution phase, and present it in the audit report. However, the IS auditor does not need to have supporting evidence in place before initiating the audit follow-up activities.

Mirroring (Option B) is the best choice for applications requiring a short Recovery Point Objective (RPO) because it provides real-time replication of data, ensuring minimal data loss.

ISACA CISA Reference: Data replication strategies in disaster recovery planning emphasize mirroring for high-availability systems.

Risk Implication: If mirroring is not implemented for critical systems, significant data loss may occur in the event of a failure.

Alternative Choices:

Option A: Snapshots capture data at specific points in time, leading to potential data loss.

Option C: Log shipping has delays due to batch processing.

Option D: Backups are periodic and not suitable for short RPO needs.

The best way to facilitate the legal process in the event of an incident is to preserve the chain of custody of the evidence. The chain of custody is a record of who handled, accessed, or modified the evidence, when, where, how, and why. The chain of custody helps to ensure the integrity, authenticity, and admissibility of the evidence in a court of law. The chain of custody also helps to prevent tampering, alteration, or loss of evidence that could compromise the investigation or the prosecution. References:

CISAReview Manual (Digital Version)

CISA Questions, Answers & Explanations Database

An appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization’s privacy program is analyzing risks posed by new regulations. A privacy program is a set of policies, procedures, and controls that aim to protect the personal data of individuals from unauthorized or unlawful collection, use, disclosure, or disposal. A privacy program should comply with the applicable laws and regulations that govern the privacy rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). New regulations may introduce new requirements or changes that affect the organization’s privacy program and expose it to potential compliance risks or penalties. Therefore, internal audit can help to establish an organization’s privacy program by analyzing the risks posed by new regulations and providingassurance, advice, or recommendations on how to address them1. The other options are less appropriate or incorrect because:

B. Developing procedures to monitor the use of personal data is not an appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization’s privacy program, as it is more of a management or operational role. Internal audit should not be involved in designing or implementing the organization’s privacy program, as it would compromise its independence and objectivity. Internal audit should provide assurance on the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization’s privacy program, but not create or execute it2.

C. Defining roles within the organization related to privacy is not an appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization’s privacy program, as it is more of a governance or strategic role. Internal audit should not be involved in setting or approving the organization’s privacy strategy, objectives, or policies, as it would compromise its independence and objectivity. Internal audit should provide assurance on the alignment and compliance ofthe organization’s privacy program with its strategy, objectives, and policies, but not define or approve them2.

D. Designing controls to protect personal data is not an appropriate role of internal audit in helping to establish an organization’s privacy program, as it is more of a management or operational role. Internal audit should not be involved in designing or implementing the organization’s privacy program, as it would compromise its independence and objectivity. Internal audit should provide assurance on the adequacy and effectiveness of the organization’s privacy program, but not design or implement it2. References: ISACA Introduces New Audit Programs for Business Continuity/Disaster …, Best Practices for Privacy Audits - ISACA, ISACA Produces New Audit and Assurance Programs for Data Privacy and …

 The first thing that the audit manager should do when faced with a situation where only 60% of the audit has been completed and the due date is approaching is to determine where delays have occurred. This can help the audit manager to identify and analyze the root causes of the delays, such as unexpected issues, scope changes, resource constraints, communication problems, etc., and evaluate their impact on the audit objectives, scope, quality, and timeline. Based on this analysis, the audit manager can then decide on the best course of action to address the delays and complete the audit successfully. Assigning additional resources to supplement the audit is a possible option forresolving delays in an audit project, but it is not the first thing that the audit manager should do, as it may not be feasible or effective depending on the availability, cost, and suitability of the additional resources. Escalating to the audit committee is a possible option for communicating delays in an audit project and seeking guidance or support from senior management, but it is not the first thing that the audit manager should do, as it may not be necessary or appropriate depending on the severity and urgency of the delays. Extending the audit deadline is a possible option for accommodating delays in an audit project and ensuring sufficient time for completing the audit tasks and activities, but it is not the first thing that the audit manager should do, as it may not be possible or desirable depending on the contractual obligations, stakeholder expectations, and regulatory requirements. 

 Risk assessment is a mandatory part of the annual audit planning process, as it helps to identify and prioritize the areas that pose the highest risk to the organization’s objectives and operations. Risk assessment involves analyzing the internal and external factors that affect the organization’s risk profile, evaluating the likelihood and impact of potential events or scenarios, assessing the existing controls and mitigation strategies, and determining the residual risk level. Based on the risk assessment results, the IS auditor can allocate resources and schedule audits accordingly. A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process that identifies and evaluates the critical business functions and processes that could be disrupted by a disaster or incident, and estimates the potential impact on the organization’s operations, reputation and finances. A BIA is not a mandatory part of the annual audit planning process, but it can be used as an input for risk assessment or as a subject for audit. Fieldwork is the phase of an audit where the IS auditor collects evidence to support the audit objectives and conclusions. Fieldwork is not part of the annual audit planning process, but it is part of each individual audit engagement. A risk control matrix is a tool that maps the risks identified in a risk assessment to the controls that mitigate them. A risk control matrix is not a mandatory part of the annual audit planning process, but it can be used as an output of risk assessment or as a tool for audit testing. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, Chapter 1: Information Systems Auditing Process, Section 1.2: Audit Planning.

The best recommendation for improving IT governance within the organization is to implement key performance indicators (KPIs). KPIs are measurable values that show how effectively the organization is achieving its key business objectives. KPIs can help the organization tomonitor and evaluate the performance, efficiency, and alignment of its IT processes and resources with its business goals and strategies1.

The other options are not as effective as implementing KPIs for improving IT governance. Option B, implementing annual third-party audits, is a good practice but may not be sufficient or timely to identify and address the issues or gaps in IT governance. Option C, benchmarking organizational performance against industry peers, is a useful technique but may not reflect the specific needs and expectations of the organization’s stakeholders. Option D, requiring executive management to draft IT strategy, is a necessary step but not enough to ensure that IT governance is implemented and monitored throughout the organization.

The primary role of a control self-assessment (CSA) facilitator is to focus the team on internal controls. A CSA facilitator is a person who guides the CSA process and helps the participants to identify, assess, and improve their internal controls. The facilitator does not conduct interviews, report on weaknesses, or provide solutions, as these are the responsibilities of the participants themselves1.

The other options are incorrect because they are not the primary role of a CSA facilitator. Option A, conduct interviews to gain background information, is a preliminary step that may be done by the facilitator or the participants before the CSA session, but it is not the main purpose of the facilitator. Option C, report on the internal control weaknesses, is an outcome of the CSA process that should be done by the participants who own and operate the controls. Option D, provide solutions for control weaknesses, is also an outcome of the CSA process that should be done by the participants who are in charge of implementing the improvements.