CRT-450 Questions and Answers

Option A: Using aTest Data Factoryclass is a recommended approach to create test records programmatically. This ensures that the test is independent of existing data and can be executed in isolation.

Option B: The@IsTest(SeeAllData=true)annotation allows the test to access existing records in the database, includingPricing_Structure__c. However, this is less recommended as it creates a dependency on existing org data.

Not Suitable:

Option C:Test.loadDatais used to load records from a static resource (CSV) but doesn't suit the requirement directly.

Option D: Addingwithout sharingto a class impacts sharing rules but does not create or ensure the existence of test data.

Testing Best Practices

Why External ID?

The Order Number is used to identify records uniquely, both in Salesforce and in external systems.

Marking it as anExternal IDensures it can be matched or referenced during data imports and integrations.

Why Unique?

Setting the field as Unique ensures that duplicate values are not allowed for the Order Number.

Why Not Other Options?

A. Indirect Lookup: Used for external object relationships, which is not applicable here.

B. Direct Lookup: Not relevant for unique field identification.

D. Lookup: Used for creating relationships, not for identifying unique fields.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In Lightning Web Components, to cache the results of Apex methods on the client side, the Apex method should be annotated with @AuraEnabled(cacheable=true). This enables the Lightning Data Service to cache the method's response, improving performance by reducing server calls.

C (Correct):This is the correctSOSL (Salesforce Object Search Language)syntax. It performs a full-text search across multiple objects and fields.

The format FIND '*ACME*' IN ALL FIELDS RETURNING Contact, Lead is thestandard and correctapproach for cross-object keyword searches.

Incorrect options:

A:Incorrect syntax; needs ALL FIELDS or NAME FIELDS, and proper result typing.

B:SOQL does not support searching across multiple objects in a single query.

D:Incorrect casing and structure; missing proper list handling.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The lightning-input-field component automatically respects field-level security and permissions. When used within a lightning-record-edit-form, it ensures that the field is displayed as a currency input and follows user permissions (viewable/editable) for the Salary__c field.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A (Correct):AnApproval Processcan lock a record (making it read-only) once the record meets certain criteria like stage = Closed/Won.

B (Correct):AValidation Rulecan prevent users from saving changes when the stage is Closed/Won, by throwing an error.

Example validation formula:

text

CopyEdit

AND(ISCHANGED(StageName), ISPICKVAL(StageName, "Closed Won"))

Incorrect options:

C:Before triggers run before the record is saved but don’t prevent UI-level edits unless combined with DML rollbacks or errors.

D:Auto-response rules are for sending emails, not restricting edits.

In the provided code snippet, the classmyClassdoes not specify a sharing declaration (with sharingorwithout sharing). In Salesforce, when a class does not explicitly declare its sharing context, it defaults towithout sharing. This means sharing rules are not enforced.

To check test coverage for autolaunched flows before deployment, developers need to use SOQL queries with the Tooling API. This provides detailed information about which flows are covered and their test results.

To make an LWC available for use on a record page:

Target Configuration:

Addlightning__RecordPagein the component's.js-meta.xmlfile to specify where the component can be used.

Expose the Component:

SetisExposedtotruein the.js-meta.xmlfile to make the component available for use.

Example.js-meta.xmlFile:

57.0

true

lightning__RecordPage

A: Incorrect placement. Thetag must be in the.js-meta.xmlfile, not the JavaScript file.

D: Thetag is used for metadata labeling, not for exposing or targeting a component.

Option B: UsingSchema.sObjectType.Account.isDeletable()checks if the current user has permission to delete records of theAccountobject. This approach adheres to Salesforce's security model.

Not Suitable:

Option A:accountRec.isDeletable()is not a valid method.

Option C: Incorrect syntax for checking permissions.

Option D:Account.isDeletabledoes not exist.

Schema Methods for Object Permissions

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine the most efficient SOQL statement for retrieving Contact records where the related Account’s Industry is 'Technology', along with their associated Job_Application__c records, we need to analyze the object relationships, SOQL syntax, and relationship names. Let’s break down the problem and evaluate each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official documentation.

Understanding the Object Relationships:

Job_Application__c and Contact: The Job_Application__c custom object has a master-detail relationship with the Contact object, where Contact is the master. In a master-detail relationship, the child (Job_Application__c) records are dependent on the parent (Contact) records. The Salesforce Data Model documentation states: “In a master-detail relationship, the detail record inherits security and ownership from the master record” (Salesforce Object Reference Guide, Relationships).

Contact and Account: The Contact object has a standard lookup relationship with the Account object (via the AccountId field). This allows a Contact to be associated with an Account, and we can access Account fields in SOQL queries using the relationship name Account. The Salesforce Object Reference Guide confirms: “The AccountId field on Contact references the Account object, and the relationship name is Account” (Salesforce Object Reference Guide, Contact Object).

Requirement: The query must:

Retrieve Contact records where the related Account’s Industry field equals 'Technology'.

Include the related Job_Application__c records for each Contact.

Be efficient and syntactically correct based on Salesforce SOQL standards.

SOQL Relationship Query Basics:

Parent-to-Child Queries: To retrieve child records (Job_Application__c) along with parent records (Contact), we use a subquery in the SELECT clause with the relationship name. The Apex Developer Guide states: “For custom objects in a master-detail relationship, the relationship name for the child is typically the plural form of the object name with __r (e.g., Job_Applications__r)” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, SOQL Relationship Queries).

Accessing Parent Fields: To filter on a parent object’s field (e.g., Account’s Industry), we use the relationship name (e.g., Account.Industry). The SOQL and SOSL Reference Guide notes: “In a lookup relationship, use the parent object’s API name (e.g., Account) followed by the field name” (Salesforce SOQL and SOSL Reference Guide, Relationship Queries).

Efficiency: The most efficient query minimizes the number of fields retrieved, uses correct relationship names, and avoids syntax errors. All options retrieve only Id fields, so efficiency depends on correct syntax and relationship names.

Analyzing the Relationship Name for Job_Application__c:

In a master-detail relationship, the child object (Job_Application__c) has a relationship field pointing to the parent (Contact). The relationship name for accessing child records from the parent is typically the plural form of the child object’s name with __r. For a custom object named Job_Application__c, the standard relationship name is Job_Applications__r. The Salesforce Apex Developer Guide explains: “For custom objects, the relationship name is usually the object name pluralized, with __r appended” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, Understanding Relationship Names).

However, the exact relationship name depends on the field definition. If the master-detail field on Job_Application__c was created with a custom relationship name, it could differ, but the question does not specify a custom name. Therefore, we assume the default naming convention, making Job_Applications__r the correct relationship name for the subquery.

Evaluating the Options:

A. [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Applications__r) FROM Contact WHERE Accounts.Industry = 'Technology']

Subquery: Uses Job_Applications__r, which is likely the correct relationship name for Job_Application__c child records, assuming standard naming conventions.

WHERE Clause: Uses Accounts.Industry, which is incorrect. The relationship name for the Account object from Contact is Account (singular), not Accounts. The SOQL and SOSL Reference Guide states: “The relationship name for the Account object from Contact is Account” (Salesforce SOQL and SOSL Reference Guide, Relationship Queries). Using Accounts results in a SOQL syntax error: “No such field Accounts on entity Contact.”

Conclusion: Incorrect due to the invalid Accounts.Industry reference.

B. [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Application__c) FROM Contact WHERE Accounts.Industry = 'Technology']

Subquery: Uses Job_Application__c, which is the object’s API name, not the relationship name. In SOQL parent-to-child queries, the subquery must use the relationship name (e.g., Job_Applications__r), not the object name. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “In a subquery, use the relationship name, not the object name” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, SOQL Relationship Queries). Using Job_Application__c causes a SOQL syntax error: “No such relationship Job_Application__c on Contact.”

WHERE Clause: Uses Accounts.Industry, which, as noted, is incorrect due to the invalid relationship name Accounts.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to both the invalid subquery (Job_Application__c) and the incorrect Accounts.Industry reference.

C. [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Application__c) FROM Contact WHERE Account.Industry = 'Technology']

Subquery: Uses Job_Application__c, which is incorrect for the same reason as option B. The subquery must use the relationship name (Job_Applications__r), not the object name, resulting in a SOQL syntax error.

WHERE Clause: Uses Account.Industry, which is correct. The relationship name for the Account object from Contact is Account, and Industry is a valid field on Account. The Salesforce Object Reference Guide confirms: “Industry is a picklist field on the Account object” (Salesforce Object Reference Guide, Account Object).

Conclusion: Incorrect due to the invalid subquery (Job_Application__c), despite the correct Account.Industry reference.

D. [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Applications__r) FROM Contact WHERE Account.Industry = 'Technology']

Subquery: Uses Job_Applications__r, which is the correct relationship name for accessing Job_Application__c child records from the Contact parent, assuming standard naming conventions.

WHERE Clause: Uses Account.Industry, which is correct, as it properly references the Account object’s Industry field via the Account relationship.

Conclusion: Correct, as it uses the proper relationship name for the subquery and the correct syntax for filtering on the Account’s Industry field.

Why Option D is Correct:

Option D is the most efficient and syntactically correct because:

It uses the correct relationship name (Job_Applications__r) for the parent-to-child subquery, adhering to Salesforce’s naming conventions for master-detail relationships.

It correctly references the Account’s Industry field using Account.Industry, aligning with the standard lookup relationship between Contact and Account.

It retrieves only the necessary fields (Id for Contact and Id for Job_Application__c), ensuring efficiency.

It satisfies the requirement to retrieve Contact records where the Account’s Industry is 'Technology' and includes related Job_Application__c records.

Potential Typos or Ambiguities:

The question is clear, with no obvious typos. However, the relationship name Job_Applications__r assumes the default pluralized naming convention. If the master-detail field on Job_Application__c was created with a custom relationship name (e.g., Applications__r), the correct answer could differ. Since the question does not specify a custom name, we follow the standard convention (Job_Applications__r).

The field Industry on Account is a standard picklist field, and 'Technology' is a common default value, so no issues arise there.

Example for Clarity:

The SOQL query in option D would look like:

apex

Copy

List contacts = [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Applications__r)

FROM Contact

WHERE Account.Industry = 'Technology'];

for (Contact c : contacts) {

System.debug('Contact: ' + c.Id);

for (Job_Application__c ja : c.Job_Applications__r) {

System.debug('Job Application: ' + ja.Id);

}

}

This query retrieves all Contacts where the related Account’s Industry is 'Technology' and includes their Job_Application__c records via the subquery. The results can be iterated to access both Contact and Job_Application__c data.

The@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)annotation makes an Apex method available to Lightning Web Components and allows it to be wired to a property while enabling client-side caching for improved performance.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine the correct component code to meet the requirements for desktops and tablets, we need to analyze the behavior of the and components in Salesforce Lightning, focusing on their responsive design attributes. Let’s break11:51 PM BST on Friday, May 30, 2025, break down the problem and evaluate each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official documentation.

Understanding the Requirements and Components:

Components: The code uses and , which are part of the Salesforce Lightning Design System (SLDS) grid system for building responsive layouts in Aura components.

Requirements Breakdown:

Mobile Devices: The information (Name, AccountNumber, Industry) should display in three rows.

Desktops and Tablets: The information should display in a single row.

Current Issue: The provided code has multipleRows="true", which forces each to start on a new row, regardless of device size. This satisfies the mobile requirement (three rows), but fails the desktop/tablet requirement (single row).

Responsive Grid: The SLDS grid system uses a 12-column layout. The component supports attributes like size (for small devices, e.g., mobile), mediumDeviceSize (for tablets), and largeDeviceSize (for desktops) to control column widths across device sizes. The Lightning Design System documentation states: “The grid system allows you to specify the width of a layoutItem for different device sizes using size, mediumDeviceSize, and largeDeviceSize attributes” (Salesforce Lightning Design System, Grid System).

Key Attributes and Device Breakpoints:

Device Sizes:

size: Applies to small devices (mobile, < 768px).

mediumDeviceSize: Applies to medium devices (tablets, ≥ 768px).

largeDeviceSize: Applies to large devices (desktops, ≥ 1024px).

Grid Behavior:

Each occupies a number of columns based on the specified size attribute.

If the total columns in a row exceed 12, the next wraps to a new row, unless multipleRows="true" forces each item to a new row.

If multipleRows="true", each starts on a new row, ignoring column sizes.

Requirement Analysis:

Mobile (size): Each should use the full row (size="12") to create three rows (one per field).

Tablets (mediumDeviceSize): Should ideally be in one row, but the requirement specifies desktops and tablets together, so we’ll interpret this as both needing a single row.

Desktops (largeDeviceSize): All three fields should fit in one row, meaning the total columns must be ≤ 12.

Fixing the Issue:

Remove multipleRows="true": Setting multipleRows="true" forces each to a new row, which prevents the desktop/tablet requirement (single row) from being met. The Lightning Component Reference states: “When multipleRows is true, each layoutItem starts a new row” (Salesforce Lightning Component Reference, lightning:layout). To allow items to stay in the same row on larger devices, multipleRows should be omitted or set to false (default).

Set Column Sizes:

For mobile (size="12"), each item takes the full row (12 columns), resulting in three rows.

For tablets and desktops, we need all three fields in one row. Since there are three fields, each should take 4 columns (12 total columns ÷ 3 fields = 4 columns per field) to fit in one row.

Both mediumDeviceSize (tablets) and largeDeviceSize (desktops) should be set to 4 to ensure a single row on both device types.

Evaluating the Options:

A.

{!v.account.Name}

{!v.account.AccountNumber}

{!v.account.Industry}

Mobile: size="12" → Each item takes 12 columns, creating three rows (meets requirement).

Tablets: mediumDeviceSize="4" → Each item takes 4 columns, but multipleRows="true" forces each item to a new row, resulting in three rows (fails desktop/tablet requirement).

Desktops: No largeDeviceSize specified, so it inherits mediumDeviceSize="4", but multipleRows="true" still forces three rows (fails).

Conclusion: Incorrect, as multipleRows="true" prevents a single row on tablets and desktops.

B.

{!v.account.Name}

{!v.account.AccountNumber}

{!v.account.Industry}

Mobile: size="12" → Three rows (meets requirement).

Tablets: First item has mediumDeviceSize="4", but the other two have no mediumDeviceSize, so they inherit size="12". With multipleRows="true", it’s still three rows (fails).

Desktops: largeDeviceSize="4" for the last two items, but the first item has no largeDeviceSize, so it uses mediumDeviceSize="4". However, multipleRows="true" forces three rows (fails).

Conclusion: Incorrect, as multipleRows="true" prevents a single row, and the first item lacks largeDeviceSize.

C.

{!v.account.Name}

{!v.account.AccountNumber}

{!v.account.Industry}

Mobile: size="12" → Three rows (meets requirement).

Tablets: mediumDeviceSize="6" → Total columns = 6 + 6 + 6 = 18. Without multipleRows="true", this would wrap into two rows (6 + 6, then 6), but with multipleRows="true", it forces three rows (fails).

Desktops: No largeDeviceSize, so it uses mediumDeviceSize="6", still three rows due to multipleRows="true" (fails).

Conclusion: Incorrect, as multipleRows="true" prevents a single row, and even without it, the total columns (18) exceed 12, creating multiple rows.

D.

{!v.account.Name}

{!v.account.AccountNumber}

{!v.account.Industry}

Mobile: size="12" → Three rows (meets requirement).

Tablets: mediumDeviceSize="6" → Total columns = 6 + 6 + 6 = 18. With multipleRows="true", this forces three rows (fails tablet requirement).

Desktops: largeDeviceSize="4" → Total columns = 4 + 4 + 4 = 12, which fits in one row. However, multipleRows="true" forces three rows (fails desktop requirement).

Conclusion: Appears incorrect due to multipleRows="true", but let’s reconsider the interpretation of the requirement.

Reinterpreting the Requirement:

The question states: “Requirement 2 is not displaying as desired,” and Requirement 2 is “For desktops and tablets, the information should display in a single row.” However, the options all include multipleRows="true", which inherently conflicts with the desktop/tablet requirement.

Assumption: The inclusion of multipleRows="true" in all options might be a mistake in the question, as it directly contradicts the requirement for desktops and tablets. Let’s evaluate option D without multipleRows="true" (assuming it’s a typo in the question):

{!v.account.Name}

{!v.account.AccountNumber}

{!v.account.Industry}

Mobile: size="12" → Each item takes 12 columns, creating three rows (meets requirement).

Tablets: mediumDeviceSize="6" → Total columns = 6 + 6 + 6 = 18. First two items fit in one row (6 + 6 = 12), third item wraps to a second row (6), resulting in two rows (fails tablet single-row requirement).

Desktops: largeDeviceSize="4" → Total columns = 4 + 4 + 4 = 12, all fit in one row (meets desktop requirement).

Interpretation Adjustment: The requirement specifies “desktops and tablets” together, but the SLDS grid treats them separately (mediumDeviceSize for tablets, largeDeviceSize for desktops). Option D is the only one that sets largeDeviceSize="4", ensuring a single row on desktops. For tablets, it results in two rows, which contradicts the requirement if tablets must also be in a single row. However, if we prioritize desktops (as the most specific match for largeDeviceSize), option D is the closest fit.

“

Why Option D is Correct (with Assumption):

Option D is the best match if we assume multipleRows="true" is a typo in the question:

Without multipleRows="true", option D becomes:

{!v.account.Name}

{!v.account.AccountNumber}

{!v.account.Industry}

It meets the mobile requirement (size="12", three rows).

It meets the desktop requirement (largeDeviceSize="4", total 12 columns, one row).

For tablets, it results in two rows (mediumDeviceSize="6", total 18 columns), which may not strictly meet the requirement, but the question’s focus on “desktops and tablets” might prioritize desktops, where it succeeds.

The other options either fail to set largeDeviceSize correctly (A, C) or have inconsistent attributes (B).

Handling Typos:

The provided code has typos:

→ .

→ .

Extra space in 3ize → size.

These are corrected in the analysis to match the intended component names.

The presence of multipleRows="true" in all options contradicts the desktop/tablet requirement. We assume this is a mistake in the question, as no option would meet the requirement otherwise. Removing multipleRows="true" makes option D the closest match.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To embed a Lightning component in a Visualforce page, you need to:

Include the Lightning framework using .

Use $Lightning.use to load Lightning components and resources.

Use $Lightning.createComponent to render the component dynamically in the Visualforce page.

 Option B:Custom events in LWC allow data to be passed using thedetailproperty of theCustomEventobject. This is the recommended way to pass data in a custom event.

Allow Reparenting in Master-Detail Relationships:

In a master-detail relationship, the child record (in this case, OrderItem) is tightly bound to the parent record (Order).

By default, child records cannot be reassigned to a different parent record in master-detail relationships. However, enabling the"Allow Reparenting"option on the master-detail field allows the child record (OrderItem) to be reparented to a different master record (Order).

This is the correct solution as it ensures that OrderItem records can be reassigned to a new Order without changing the structure of the relationship.

Why not the other options?

A. Add without sharing to the Apex class declaration:

Adding without sharing modifies sharing rules but does not affect the ability to reparent child records. This is unrelated to the issue described.

B. Change the master-detail relationship to an external lookup relationship:

Changing the relationship type is not necessary. Additionally, doing so could introduce unintended side effects, as master-detail relationships have features like roll-up summaries that are lost with a lookup relationship.

C. Create a junction object between OrderItem and Order:

Introducing a junction object is not required. This adds unnecessary complexity and deviates from the intended use of master-detail relationships.

Why Salesforce CLI?

The Salesforce CLI supports scripting for Continuous Integration (CI) pipelines, allowing automatic testing and deployment as part of the CI process.

Why Not Other Options?

B: Visual Studio Code is a development IDE, not a CI tool.

C: Force.com Toolkit is outdated and does not support CI processes.

D: Developer Console is for debugging and manual testing, not automation.

Why Lookup on Account to Global Address?

An Account can reference a single default Global Address via a lookup field, allowing multiple Accounts to share the same address.

This is more efficient than the reverse (lookup on Global Address to Account), as Global Address is the parent in this relationship.

Avoiding Master-Detail:

Lookup relationships provide flexibility in this use case since Accounts and Global Addresses have independent lifecycles.

Example:Create a custom lookup field on Account referencing the Global Address object.

Scratch orgs are created using the Salesforce CLI (sfdx force:org:create) as part of Salesforce DX. It is specifically designed for development and testing purposes.

Why not other options?

B: Sandbox refresh is used for creating sandboxes, not scratch orgs.

C: Developer Console is used for debugging and code development but cannot create scratch orgs.

D: Workbench is a tool for API testing and data manipulation, not for scratch org creation.

Salesforce CLI and Scratch Orgs

A: Custom objects and fields are the fundamental building blocks of the database layer in Salesforce for creating and storing custom data.

C: Roll-up summary fields are a declarative feature used to perform calculations (e.g., sum, count) on child records and display the results on the parent record.

D: Relationships (e.g., master-detail, lookup) are essential for defining how data objects are related to each other.

Why not other options?

B: Triggers are a programmatic solution, which goes against the declarative-only requirement.

E: Flows are used for automation and logic, not for building the database layer.

Salesforce Data Modeling

Why Controller?

A customcontrollerallows:

Complex validation involving multiple objects.

Redirection to another Visualforce page upon success.

Controllers can implement custom save logic and redirect usingPageReference.

Why Not Other Options?

A. Apex: Apex is the underlying programming language, but a controller specifically handles the Visualforce logic.

B. Trigger: Triggers execute on DML events, not on button clicks in Visualforce.

D. Extension: Extensions enhance standard controllers but are not necessary here since a custom controller is being built.

To create and manage scratch orgs in Salesforce DX, the Dev Hub must be enabled in your Salesforce production or Developer Edition org. Dev Hub acts as the central hub for managing scratch orgs.

An Apex REST class can be used to retrieve real-time data from an external order management system. The flow can then call the REST class to display the retrieved data on the screen dynamically.

The correct syntax for using @wire to connect a Lightning Web Component property to an Apex method requires specifying the method and a configuration object that includes the reactive property prefixed with $. The correct usage is:

javascript

CopyEdit

@wire(getAccounts, { searchTerm: '$searchTerm' })

This correctly wires the reactive searchTerm property to the getAccounts method.

C. Update the PrimaryId__c field definition to mark it as an External Id:

Marking PrimaryId__c as anExternal Idallows Salesforce to use this field to match records during the data import process, streamlining the process of mapping CSV rows to existing Candidate__c records.

External Id fields are indexed and can be used in tools likeData Loader,Data Import Wizard, orAPI-based upsertsto ensure that records are matched correctly based on the value of the external ID field.

In this case, since PrimaryId__c is unique, marking it as an external ID eliminates the need for custom triggers or flows.

Why this is the best solution?

This technique leverages built-in Salesforce capabilities (no need for custom code or automation).

It ensures accurate record matching and is the standard approach for data enrichment tasks involving unique identifiers.

Why not the other options?

A. Upload the CSV into a custom object related to Candidate__c:

This approach unnecessarily introduces another object, adding complexity. The goal is to update existing Candidate__c records, not store the data in a separate object.

B. Create a before insert trigger to correctly map the records:

Using triggers for this purpose is overengineering. Salesforce already provides tools likeupsertfor this exact use case. Writing a trigger would require additional effort and could introduce unintended errors or performance issues.

D. Create a before save flow to correctly map the records:

While flows are powerful, they are not the optimal solution for this use case. Data mapping is better handled using an external ID during import to ensure proper matching and updates.

A Flow with an Assignment element is the best declarative solution to assign cases based on criteria such as Case Origin. It can automatically evaluate the value of the Case Origin and assign the support representative.

Why not other options?

A: Using a trigger is a programmatic approach and less ideal when declarative tools can solve the problem.

B: A formula field cannot assign values; it only calculates and displays results.

C: Validation rules are used to enforce constraints, not for assigning values.

Salesforce Flows Overview

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

By default, Apex tests run in a system context that does not respect sharing rules. However, the getAllAccounts method is defined in a with sharing class, so it does respect sharing rules. Therefore, to correctly simulate how a Standard User would see the data, the test must be run in the context of that user.

To do this, the developer should use System.runAs() to switch the test context to the Standard User, ensuring that sharing rules are enforced for the user running the test. This allows the test to correctly verify the data the user can access.

Example of Corrected Test Method:

apex

CopyEdit

@isTest

private static void getAllAccounts_StandardUser_Test() {

User standardUser = [SELECT Id FROM User WHERE Profile.Name = 'Standard User' AND UserName = 'test@test.com' AND isActive = true LIMIT 1];

System.runAs(standardUser) {

List result = AccountsController.getAllAccounts();

System.assertEquals(20, result.size());

}

}

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A validation rule can be configured to prevent updates to Opportunity records in the Closed/Won stage by evaluating the Stage field and returning an error message when edits are attempted.

Why Data Loader?

Data Loader supports all standard and custom objects, including Opportunities.

It is suitable for importing large data volumes like 500 records.

Why Not Data Import Wizard?

The Data Import Wizard does not support all objects, such as Opportunities.

Why Not Other Options?

A: Data Loader does not automatically relate Opportunities to Accounts unless provided external IDs.

B: Data Loader is a desktop application, not browser-based.

D: The Data Import Wizard can handle more than 500 records for supported objects, but it doesn't support Opportunities.

A: Declarative development does not require Apex test classes since it leverages built-in Salesforce features such as flows, process builders, and validation rules.

C: Declarative development can be done using the Setup menu, which includes point-and-click tools like page layouts, workflows, and Lightning App Builder.

Why not other options?

B: Declarative development has strict limits (e.g., process builders and flows have governor limits that are lower than programmatic approaches like Apex).

D: Declarative logic still requires maintenance, especially as business needs evolve.

Declarative vs Programmatic Development

The deployment fails because the Apex trigger has 0% test coverage. Even though the helper class is covered, Salesforce requires at least 1% test coverage for the trigger itself. To resolve this, a test class and methods must specifically invoke the trigger by performing DML operations on the related object.

Option A: A screen-based flow is ideal for gathering multiple pieces of information from the user interactively. It provides a declarative way to guide the service agent through the process step-by-step.

Not Suitable:

Option B: An approval process is for routing records for approval, not for gathering user input.

Option C: Apex triggers are for automation, not for interactive user input.

Option D: A Lightning Component could work but requires custom development, which is less efficient than using flows.

Flows Overview

A. Roll-up summary fields can cause the parent record to go through Save:

When a roll-up summary field on a parent object (like Account) is updated due to changes in child records (like Branch), the parent record (Account) is implicitly saved again.

This can result in the execution of the trigger on the parent object. Developers must consider this behavior to avoid unintended recursion or infinite loops.

SFDX CLI (A):Salesforce CLI allows the automation of deployment scripts to sandboxes. Using commands likesfdx force:source:deploy, developers can deploy metadata directly from source control.

Abefore triggerfires when records are inserted, updated, or deleted. Using the Data Loader or Bulk API to import data updates records, which triggers thebefore insertorbefore updateevents.

Not Suitable:

Option A: Renaming or replacing picklists does not trigger a record-level operation.

Option B: The Mass Address Update tool is not a record operation that triggersbeforetriggers.

Option D: Converting leads to contacts triggers lead conversion events, not directly related to Account triggers.

Apex Triggers

A: Thesave()method in the custom controller must be tested to ensure it works as intended and redirects to the correct page.

B: Setting parameters viaApexPages.currentPage().getParameters()is crucial to test scenarios where user input or URL parameters drive logic.

D: UsingTest.setCurrentPage(pageRef)is essential for simulating page context in unit tests.

Why not other options?

C: This statement does not belong to testing a custom controller.

B (second occurrence): It appears to be incorrectly formatted in the question.

Testing Apex Controllers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

B (Correct):Apex methods exposed toFlowmust be:

Static

Annotated with @InvocableMethod

Accept aListof parameters (for bulkification)

Return aList of custom class objects

This method signature supports Flow Builder’s bulk processing model, which is required in enterprise scenarios where the Flow might process multiple records.

A validation rule can ensure that theLead Sourcefield is populated before the Lead is converted. This prevents users from proceeding unless the required data is entered.

Why not other options?

A: Triggers are programmatic, whereas a declarative solution like validation rules is simpler and more efficient.

B: Lead Conversion field mapping maps fields between Lead and Account/Contact but cannot enforce field requirements.

C: A formula field is read-only and cannot enforce user input.

Validation Rules Documentation

Option A: This is the correct syntax for SOSL to retrieve data across multiple objects. It searches for "Universal Containers" in theCompanyNamefields and returns the specified fields forLead,Account, andContact.

Other Options:

Option BandD: These are invalid SOQL statements since SOQL does not support multi-object queries.

Option C:Namefields are not relevant to the search term "CompanyName."

SOSL Syntax

Option A (Apex Class): Trace flags can be configured for specific Apex classes to debug issues during their execution.

Option C (User): Trace flags can be set for specific users to debug issues occurring in their transactions.

Option E (Apex Trigger): Trace flags can be set for specific triggers to debug execution.

Not Suitable:

Option B (Flow): Trace flags cannot be configured for Flows directly.

Option D (Visualforce): Trace flags are not used to debug Visualforce pages directly.

Debug Logs and Trace Flags

Why@TestSetup?

The@TestSetupannotation creates a baseline set of test data once per test class.

Test methods reuse this data, avoiding the need to recreate it repeatedly, which improves efficiency.

Why Not Other Options?

A: HttpCalloutMock is used for mocking callouts, not for creating test data.

C: UsingseeAllData=trueis discouraged because it relies on org data, violating test isolation principles.

D: While creating data inTest.startTest()works, it is less efficient than@TestSetupfor shared data.

A try-catch block allows the batch to continue processing even if some records cause errors. Errors can be logged for review, ensuring the integration process does not stop entirely.

A: Formula fields are calculated at runtime based on the formula definition and are not stored in the database.

C: Formula fields can reference fields from related objects, allowing cross-object calculations.

Why not other options?

B: Formulas cannot reference themselves; doing so would result in a circular reference error.

D: If a field used in a formula field is deleted, the formula field will break, and Salesforce will prevent deletion until the formula field is updated.

Formula Fields Documentation

B. Updates to FeedItem:

Triggers can fire when FeedItem records are updated, such as posts on records or Chatter updates.

C. Cascading delete operations:

When a parent record is deleted, cascading delete operations on related child records can trigger child object triggers.

Why Not Other Options?

A: Changing a user's default division does not fire triggers.

D: Renaming or replacing a picklist entry does not fire triggers.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To determine the correct definition of the Apex method for a Next Best Action strategy’s Enhance Element, we need to evaluate the syntax and requirements for an @InvocableMethod used in this context, focusing on its accessibility, input/output types, and compatibility with Next Best Action. Let’s analyze the problem and each option systematically, referencing Salesforce’s official documentation.

Understanding Next Best Action and Enhance Elements:

Next Best Action (NBA): NBA is a Salesforce feature that provides personalized recommendations to users, often used in process automation (e.g., via Flow or Einstein Next Best Action). It evaluates strategies to suggest actions, such as offering a discount to a Contact.

Enhance Element: In NBA, an Enhance Element allows developers to invoke custom logic (e.g., an Apex method) to modify or generate recommendations. The Salesforce Next Best Action documentation states: “An Enhance Element in a Next Best Action strategy can invoke an Apex method to dynamically generate or modify recommendations” (Salesforce Help, Next Best Action).

Apex Method Requirements:

The method must be annotated with @InvocableMethod to be callable from NBA or Flow.

It must be global and static to be accessible outside the class.

For NBA, the method typically returns recommendations as a List or List> (for bulk processing).

The input can be a List of a custom wrapper class (e.g., ContactWrapper) to pass data like Contact details.

The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “An @InvocableMethod must be global, static, and can take a List of inputs and return a List of outputs” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation).

Requirement Analysis:

Purpose: The method determines a discount level for a Contact, which suggests it generates or modifies a recommendation (e.g., a discount offer).

Input: The method likely takes a List as input, where ContactWrapper is a custom class containing Contact data and other factors.

Output: Since this is for NBA, the method should return a List, where Recommendation is a standard Salesforce sObject used by NBA to represent suggested actions (e.g., a discount offer). The Salesforce Object Reference Guide confirms: “The Recommendation object represents a suggested action in Next Best Action, with fields like Name, Description, and ActionReference” (Salesforce Object Reference Guide, Recommendation Object).

Enhance Element Specifics: An Enhance Element typically expects a List as output for each input, not a nested List>, unless bulkified in a specific way. However, the method must support bulkification (taking a List as input and returning a List).

Evaluating the Options:

A.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global static List> getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: global static and @InvocableMethod are correct for an invocable method.

Input: List is appropriate, assuming ContactWrapper is a custom class with @InvocableVariable properties to pass Contact data.

Output: Returns List>, which is a nested list. The Apex Developer Guide notes: “An @InvocableMethod can return a nested List, but for Flow or NBA, the expected output is typically List for direct mapping” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation). In NBA, an Enhance Element generally expects a List<Recommendation> to map directly to recommendations, not a nested list. A nested list (List<List<Recommendation>>) is more common in Flows when processing multiple outputs for multiple inputs, but for NBA, this is not the standard pattern for an Enhance Element.

Conclusion: Incorrect, as the nested List> return type does not align with the typical expectation of an Enhance Element in NBA, which expects List.

B.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global Recommendation getLevel(ContactWrapper input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: Uses @InvocableMethod and global, but the method is not static. The Apex Developer Guide states: “An @InvocableMethod must be static to be callable from Flow or Next Best Action” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation). This results in a compilation error.

Input: Takes a single ContactWrapper, not a List. Invocable methods must support bulkification by taking a List as input, even if only one record is passed. The Apex Developer Guide specifies: “Invocable methods must take a List as input to support bulkification” (Salesforce Apex Developer Guide, InvocableMethod Annotation).

Output: Returns a single Recommendation, not a List. Similarly, the output must be a List to support bulkification.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to missing static keyword, and both input and output violate the bulkification requirement (must use List).

C.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global List> getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: Uses @InvocableMethod and global, but the method is not static, resulting in a compilation error (same issue as option B).

Input: List is correct for bulkification.

Output: Returns List>, which, as noted in option A, is not the typical return type for an NBA Enhance Element. It expects List to directly map to recommendations.

Conclusion: Incorrect due to missing static keyword and the nested List> return type, which is not ideal for NBA Enhance Elements.

D.

apex

Copy

@InvocableMethod

global static List getLevel(List input)

{ /*implementation*/ }

Accessibility: global static and @InvocableMethod are correct, making the method accessible to NBA.

Input: List supports bulkification and is appropriate for passing Contact data and factors.

Output: Returns List, which aligns with the expectation of an NBA Enhance Element. The Enhance Element can use the returned recommendations (e.g., discount offers) directly in the NBA strategy. The Salesforce Help documentation for Next Best Action confirms: “An Apex method invoked by an Enhance Element typically returns a List to provide or modify recommendations” (Salesforce Help, Next Best Action Enhance Element).

Conclusion: Correct, as it meets all requirements: proper accessibility, bulkified input/output, and the expected return type for NBA.

Why Option D is Correct:

Option D is correct because:

It uses @InvocableMethod, global, and static, making the method callable from a Next Best Action Enhance Element.

The input List supports bulkification and allows passing Contact data and other factors.

The output List matches the expected return type for an NBA Enhance Element, allowing the strategy to use the returned recommendations (e.g., discount offers) directly.

This aligns with Salesforce best practices for invocable methods in process automation, as outlined in the Apex Developer Guide and Next Best Action documentation.

Example for Clarity:

Here’s how option D might be implemented:

apex

Copy

global class DiscountCalculator {

@InvocableMethod(label='Get Discount Level' description='Determines discount level for a Contact')

global static List getLevel(List input) {

List recommendations = new List();

for (ContactWrapper wrapper : input) {

// Example logic to determine discount level

Decimal discountLevel = 0.1; // 10% discount based on factors

Recommendation rec = new Recommendation();

rec.Name = 'Discount Offer';

rec.Description = 'Offer a ' + (discountLevel * 100) + '% discount to ' + wrapper.contactName;

rec.ActionReference = 'ApplyDiscount'; // Reference to a Flow or action

recommendations.add(rec);

}

return recommendations;

}

}

global class ContactWrapper {

@InvocableVariable

global String contactName;

@InvocableVariable

global Id contactId;

// Add other factors as InvocableVariables

}

Usage in NBA: The Enhance Element in the Next Best Action strategy calls getLevel, passing a List with Contact data. The method returns a List, each representing a discount offer, which NBA can then present to the user.

Handling Typos:

The options are syntactically correct in the provided image, with no typos to address.

The question assumes ContactWrapper is a properly defined class with @InvocableVariable properties, which is a reasonable assumption for the context.

Option D’s ListRecommendation in the original question appears to be a typo (missing < and >). The correct syntax is List, as assumed in the analysis and corrected in the formatted options.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A (Correct):AVisualforce quick actioncan include Apex logic for a callout, and Visualforce is still valid in Lightning Experience.

C (Correct):ALightning Web Component (or Aura component)exposed as aquick actioncan perform callouts via Apex when the user clicks a button. This supports a more modern UI experience.

Incorrect options:

B:@future(callout=true) works but cannot be triggeredsynchronously by a button press. It’s for background/automated processes.

D:Remote Actionis legacy functionality used with Visualforce/Aura and doesn't suit modern Lightning and button-driven synchronous actions.

In Aura components:

B. Renderer:Contains custom rendering logic.

C. Controller:Manages user interaction and component events.

E. Helper:Contains reusable JavaScript functions for logic.

Since theCaseandDefect__cobjects have aPrivateorganization-wide default (OWD), their records must be explicitly shared for a user to gain access to the relatedCase_Defect__crecord. Sharing both parent records ensures that the user can access the junction object and the associated parent objects.

The variableisOKis declared but not initialized, so its value isnull. Theif-elseconditions check for specific values ofisOK(trueorfalse), but since it isnull, none of those conditions are satisfied. The program defaults to theelseblock, assigning4tox.

A Global Picklist Value Set allows the same set of picklist values to be shared across multiple objects, making maintenance easier and ensuring consistency.

Why not other options?

B: Alphabetical ordering does not ensure consistent value maintenance across objects.

C: Validation rules do not streamline picklist value maintenance.

D: Restricting picklist values helps ensure data integrity but does not streamline maintenance across objects.

Global Picklists Documentation

When troubleshooting batch Apex jobs:

Asynchronous Job Monitoring:

Navigate toSetup > Apex Jobsto view the status of the batch job.

Provides information such as success, errors, and total execution time.

This step is crucial to diagnose whether the issue is with system limits, batch size, or specific records.

Debug Logs:

After identifying the issue in the job monitoring page, use debug logs to pinpoint specific errors or bottlenecks.

B. Check the debug logs for the batch job: Debug logs are a secondary step after checking the job status.

C. Disable and recreate with fewer records: Premature without investigating the root cause.

D. Decrease the batch size: Adjusting batch size is a solution but only after identifying the cause of the timeout.

When building a Lightning Web Component (LWC) to collect and manage data, developers must ensure compliance with Salesforce's security model, including field-level security (FLS) and object-level security (OLS). To meet the requirement of respecting security controls,lightning-input-fieldis the correct choice.

Why lightning-input-field?

Field-Level Security (FLS):lightning-input-field respects the user’s field-level security settings. This means users can only view or edit fields that they have permissions for, ensuring compliance with the organization’s security model.

Object-Level Security (OLS):It respects object-level security, ensuring users cannot access objects they are restricted from accessing.

Simplified Development:It is part of the Lightning Data Service (LDS), which eliminates the need to write custom Apex or SOQL queries for CRUD operations, reducing the potential for security gaps.

Dynamic Rendering:Since the component dynamically renders fields based on the user’s permissions, developers can share the component across various user groups without additional customization.

Declarative Syntax:lightning-input-field simplifies form creation in LWC by using declarative syntax to bind to record fields directly.

Example Code Implementation:

A: A Flow can guide sales reps through a set of scripted steps and call an Apex action to interact with an external REST endpoint.

B: An Invocable method is used to make an Apex method callable from a Flow. This method can call the REST endpoint and return the data for display.

Why not other options?

C: Future methods are asynchronous and cannot return data to the user in real time.

D: Triggers are used for database events, not for guiding users through scripted processes or making REST calls.

Invocable Methods in Flows

The Data Import Wizard allows importing data while adhering to Salesforce's sharing and security model. By setting field-level security, sensitive fields can be hidden from unauthorized users.

Other Options:

Option A: Encrypting data externally is unnecessary since Salesforce has built-in security features.

Option B: Using the Data Loader with Apex adds unnecessary complexity.

Option D: The Salesforce CLI does not provide direct data import capabilities with security settings.

Data Import Wizard Documentation

To override the Account's standard Edit button in Lightning Experience, a Lightning action can be created and associated with the object. This action can include custom logic or a Lightning component.

Test Isolation Principle:

Apex test methods run in a sandboxed environment without access to existing org data unlessseeAllData=trueis used.

The test fails if it relies on data not created within the test itself.

Why Not Other Options?

A:runAssimulates user context but does not affect test isolation.

B: @future methods do not cause failures if handled correctly.

D: Syntax errors would prevent code compilation.