Data-Engineer-Associate Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

AWS Lake Formation is a service that allows you to easily set up, secure, and manage data lakes. One of the features of Lake Formation is row-level security, which enables you to control access to specific rows or columns of data based on the identity or role of the user. This feature is useful for scenarios where you need to restrict access to sensitive or regulated data, such as customer data from different countries. By registering the S3 bucket as a data lake location in Lake Formation, you can use the Lake Formation console or APIs to define and apply row-level security policies to the data in the bucket.You can also use Lake Formation blueprints to automate the ingestion and transformation of data from various sources into the data lake. This solution requires the least operational effort compared to the other options, as it does not involve creating or moving data, or managing multiple tables, views, or roles. References:

AWS Lake Formation

Row-Level Security

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 4: Data Lakes and Data Warehouses, Section 4.2: AWS Lake Formation

For exactly-once delivery and processing in Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, the best approach is to design the application so that it handlesidempotency. By embedding aunique IDin each record, the application can identify and remove duplicate records during processing.

Exactly-Once Processing:

Kinesis Data Streams does not natively support exactly-once processing. Therefore,idempotencyshould be designed into the application, ensuring that each record has a unique identifier so that the same event is processed only once, even if it is ingested multiple times.

This pattern is widely used for achieving exactly-once semantics in distributed systems.

Amazon EC2 instances can use two types of storage volumes: instance store volumes and Amazon EBS volumes. Instance store volumes are ephemeral, meaning they are only attached to the instance for the duration of its life cycle. If the instance is stopped, terminated, or fails, the data on the instance store volume is lost. Amazon EBS volumes are persistent, meaning they can be detached from the instance and attached to another instance, and the data on the volume is preserved. To meet the requirement of persisting the data even if the EC2 instances are terminated, the data engineer must use Amazon EBS volumes to store the application data. The solution is to launch new EC2 instances by using an AMI that is backed by an EC2 instance store volume, which is the default option for most AMIs. Then, the data engineer must attach an Amazon EBS volume to each instance and configure the application to write the data to the EBS volume. This way, the data will be saved on the EBS volume and can be accessed by another instance if needed. The data engineer can apply the default settings to the EC2 instances, as there is no need to modify the instance type, security group, or IAM role for this solution. The other options are either not feasible or not optimal. Launching new EC2 instances by using an AMI that is backed by an EC2 instance store volume that contains the application data (option A) or by using an AMI that is backed by a root Amazon EBS volume that contains the application data (option B) would not work, as the data on the AMI would be outdated and overwritten by the new instances. Attaching an additional EC2 instance store volume to contain the application data (option D) would not work, as the data on the instance store volume would be lost if the instance is terminated. References:

Amazon EC2 Instance Store

Amazon EBS Volumes

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 2: Data Store Management, Section 2.1: Amazon EC2

The company wants to ensure that no customer records are deleted or modified for 7 years, and even the root user should not have the ability to change the data.S3 Object LockinCompliance Modeis the correct solution for this scenario.

Option B: Enable compliance mode on the S3 bucket. Use a default retention period of 7 years.InCompliance Mode, even the root user cannot delete or modify locked objects during the retention period. This ensures that the data is protected for the entire 7-year duration as required. Compliance mode is stricter than governance mode and prevents all forms of alteration, even by privileged users.

Option A (Governance Mode)still allows certain privileged users (like the root user) to bypass the lock, which does not meet the company's requirement.Option C (legalhold)andOption D (setting retention per object)do not fully address the requirement to block root user modifications.

The goal is to archive historical data from an Amazon Redshift data warehouse while combining live transactional data from Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with current and historical data in a cost-efficient manner. The company wants to keep only the last 15 months of data in Redshift to reduce costs.

Option A: "Configure the Amazon Redshift Federated Query feature to query live transactional data that is in the PostgreSQL database."Redshift Federated Queryallows querying live transactional data directly from Aurora PostgreSQL without having to move it into Redshift, thereby enabling seamless integration of the current data in Redshift and live data in PostgreSQL. This is a cost-effective approach, as it avoids unnecessary data duplication.

Option C: "Schedule a monthly job to copy data that is older than 15 months to Amazon S3 by using the UNLOAD command. Delete the old data from the Redshift cluster. Configure Amazon Redshift Spectrum to access historical data in Amazon S3."This option usesAmazon Redshift Spectrum, which enables Redshift to query data directly in S3 without moving it into Redshift. By unloading older data (older than 15 months) to S3, and then using Spectrum to access it, this approach reduces storage costs significantly while still allowing the data to be queried when necessary.

Option B (Redshift Spectrum for live PostgreSQL data)is not applicable, as Redshift Spectrum is intended for querying data in Amazon S3, not live transactional data in Aurora.

Option D (S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval)is not suitable because Glacier is designed for long-term archival storage with infrequent access, and querying data in Glacier for analytics purposes would incur higher retrieval times and costs.

Option E (materialized views)would not meet the need to archive data or combine it from multiple sources; it is best suited for combining frequently accessed data already in Redshift.