SP-SAFe-Practitioner Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

 = The “3 Cs” of user stories are three criteria that help to ensure that the requirements in your story are clear, complete, and correct. These three criteria are Card, Conversation, and Confirmation1.

• Card: A user story card is a placeholder for a conversation. It is a brief and informal description of a software feature written from the perspective of the end user. It captures the essence of the user’s need, without going into too much detail or technical jargon. It is usually written on a physical or digital card that can be easily moved and prioritized2.
• Conversation: A user story card is not enough to convey all the information needed to develop and deliver the feature. It is meant to trigger a conversation between the product owner, the development team, and other stakeholders. The conversation is where the details, assumptions, risks, and acceptance criteria are discussed and clarified. The conversation is also an opportunity to collaborate, negotiate, and validate the user story3.
• Confirmation: A user story is not complete until it has a confirmation. This is a set of criteria that define what done looks like for the feature. It is also known as acceptance criteria, and it specifies the conditions that must be met for the user story to be accepted by the product owner and the customer. The confirmation is usually written as a series of testable statements that can be verified by the development team and the product owner4.

References: = 1: 3 C’s of User Stories- Well Explained - KnowledgeHut1; 2: Understanding the three “C”s of agile User Stories - Medium2; 3: 3 C’s For Writing User Stories | 3 C’s of User Stories - PremierAgile3; 4: 3 C’s Of Agile User Stories: A Brief Summary - BarnRaisers, LLC5

Decentralized decision-making is one of the principles of the Lean-Agile mindset, which is the foundation of SAFe. It empowers teams and individuals to make decisions based on the local context and the best available information, rather than waiting for approval from higher authorities. This reduces delays, increases speed, and improves responsiveness to customer needs. It also fosters innovation, learning, and ownership of the outcomes. References: Lean-Agile Mindset, Unlock the Intrinsic Motivation of Knowledge Workers, Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe Practitioner

The modified Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers that starts with 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 100, and so on. It is used when estimating the relative size and complexity of backlog items, such as stories and features, using story points or normalized estimation. The modified Fibonacci sequence reflects the uncertainty in estimating larger items, as the gap between the numbers increases as the numbers get bigger. This means that the larger the item, the less precise the estimate, and the more likely it is to be split into smaller items. The modified Fibonacci sequence also helps to avoid the false sense of accuracy that comes from using linear scales, such as hours or days, which may not account for the variability and unpredictability of the work. References: Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe® Practitioner, Story, Feature, Estimating

The Release Train Engineer (RTE) is a servant leader and coach for the Agile Release Train (ART), which is a group of Agile teams that work together to deliver value. The RTE facilitates the ART events and processes, and supports the teams in delivering value. They communicate with stakeholders, escalate impediments, help manage risk, and drive relentless improvement. The RTE also serves as the Scrum Master for the ART, which means they help the teams apply and improve the Scrum practices, such as planning, reviewing, and retrospecting. The RTE is not the technical leader, the content authority, or the program manager of the ART, but rather the facilitator and enabler of the ART’s success. References: Release Train Engineer - Scaled Agile Framework, Release Train Engineer (RTE): Responsibilities and Skills | Indeed.com

Flow efficiency is the ratio of the total time spent in value-added work activities divided by the total flow time. Flow time is the time it takes for a work item to move from the start to the end of the process. Value-added work activities are those that directly contribute to the customer value or the quality of the product. Non-value-added work activities are those that do not add value to the customer or the product, such as waiting, rework, or handoffs. Flow efficiency measures how well the organization is minimizing the non-value-added work and maximizing the value-added work. The formula to calculate flow efficiency is:

Flow efficiency=Flow timeTotal active time​×100%

A higher flow efficiency indicates a more streamlined and effective process, while a lower flow efficiency indicates a more wasteful and inefficient process. Flow efficiency can be used to identify and eliminate the sources of waste and improve the flow of value to the customer1234. References: Flow Efficiency - Scaled Agile Framework, Flow Efficiency: A great metric you probably aren’t using, Flow Efficiency: A Great Metric You Probably Aren’t Using - Nimblework, Flow Efficiency: A Kanban Metric Introduction - Everyday Kanban