OGBA-101 Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

The chart depicted is a Gantt chart, which typically represents the schedule for project activities. In the context of TOGAF's ADM, it is used to illustrate the sequence and interdependencies of tasks across different phases of architecture development. The ADM is an iterative cycle that includes various phases, from the preliminary phase, through architecture vision, business, information systems, and technology architectures, to opportunities and solutions, migration planning, implementation governance, and architecture change management. Each phase must be conducted in a sequence to ensure that the outputs of one phase feed into the next, thereby producing a coherent and structured architecture.

The statement that best describes iteration and the ADM is that the ADM is iterative, over the whole process, between phases, and within phases4. Iteration is a key concept in managing the complexity of developing an Enterprise Architecture and managing its lifecycle4. The ADM supports several forms of iteration as follows:

• Iteration over the whole process: Projects will iterate through the entire ADM cycle, commencing with Phase A (Architecture Vision) and ending with Phase H (Architecture Change Management)4. Each cycle of the ADM will be bound by a Request for Architecture Work that defines the scope and objectives of the project4. The architecture output will populate or update the Architecture Landscape that describes the current and target states of the enterprise4.
• Iteration between phases: Projects may cycle between ADM phases in planned cycles covering multiple phases4. Typically, this is used to converge on a detailed Target Architecture when higher-level architecture does not exist to provide context and constraint4. For example, a project may iterate between Phase B (Business Architecture), Phase C (Information Systems Architectures), and Phase D (Technology Architecture) until a satisfactory solution is achieved4.
• Iteration within phases: Projects may return to previous activities within an ADM phase in order to circle back and update work products with new information4. Typically, this is used to manage the inter-relationship between different aspects of an architecture domain or viewpoint4. For example, a project may revisit Business Architecture models after developing Information Systems Architecture models to ensure alignment and consistency4.

 The technique shown in the example is called relationship mapping. It is a technique that can be used to show how a business architecture addresses stakeholder concerns across different parts of an organization2. It can highlight gaps or overlaps in the coverage of stakeholder concerns by a business architecture. In this case, the technique is used to relate business capabilities to organization units so as to highlight duplication and redundancy.

This modeling technique is referred to as Relationship Mapping. It's used to relate business capabilities to organizational units to highlight areas of duplication and redundancy, as well as to indicate where capabilities are being performed well (green), where there are potential issues (yellow), and where there are significant problems or gaps (red). This visualization helps in understanding the alignment between organizational units and capabilities, and where improvements or changes may be needed.

According to the TOGAF Series Guide: Organization Mapping, one of the derived relationships in an organization map is value flow1. A value flow is a relationship that shows how value is exchanged between business units or other entities in an organization map1. A value flow can be expressed as a verb phrase that indicates what type of value is transferred or shared between entities1. For example, in an organization map for an online retailer, a possible value flow could be “Delivers products” between the Warehouse business unit and the Customer entity.

According to the TOGAF Standard, business scenarios are an important technique that may be used at various stages of the enterprise architecture, principally the Architecture Vision and theBusiness Architecture, but in other architecture domains as well, if required, to derive the characteristics of the architecture directly from the high-level requirements of the business1. The Architecture Vision is developed in Phase A, and the Business Architecture is developed in Phase B. The Preliminary Phase is also a stage where business scenarios can be used to help identify and understand business needs2.

Business scenarios are a tool used within TOGAF to help identify and understand the business requirements and to drive the creation of the enterprise's architecture. They are used in the Preliminary Phase to understand the organizational context, Phase A to develop the Architecture Vision, and Phase B to derive the Business Architecture based on the stakeholder's requirements and the business strategy.