CTFL-AcT Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

During defect analysis in the context of acceptance testing, the business analyst plays a key role in mapping test results back to business needs and requirements. If a defect is identified during acceptance testing, the business analyst typically evaluates which requirement, user story, or business rule was not fulfilled. This helps determine whether the issue is critical from a business perspective and what corrective action is required.

Option A is correct because it is the primary responsibility of the business analyst to assess unmet requirements or user stories in the event of a defect.

Other options:

B is typically a developer or architect’s responsibility, as it involves evaluating the technical impact.

C is part of root cause analysis, usually performed by developers or technical leads.

D refers to broader testing scope and could be part of test analysis but is less specific to the business analyst’s role in defect analysis.

Answer: A. Identify the requirements / user stories that are not satisfied.

==================

In acceptance testing, testers execute test cases that are directly derived from user stories or requirements via their acceptance criteria. During execution, testers compare the actual outcome of the system with the expected result described in the acceptance criteria. If there's a mismatch (a deviation), it is documented as a defect or discrepancy.

This process is essential for validating that the system meets business needs. The tester’s role includes reporting clear, objective findings—not fixing the defect or deciding its severity (which might involve developers or business analysts).

Option A is incorrect: Business analysts may support testing, but execution is primarily a tester’s responsibility.

Option C is not fully correct: While developers may fix defects, assignment and triage follow a formal workflow and do not happen automatically.

Option D is incorrect: Business analysts don’t repeat test executions; this is the tester’s responsibility.

Test reports summarize the results of test execution and are often used by stakeholders, including business owners and release managers, to make informed decisions about whether to release a product. If these reports are ambiguous, incomplete, or inaccurate, the decisions based on them could be flawed, leading to reputational damage, customer dissatisfaction, or regulatory issues.

Option A is correct because it highlights the risk of basing critical go/no-go decisions on poor-quality reporting.

Other options:

B describes a problem with test case implementation, not test reporting.

C mentions public perception, which might be influenced by report quality, but it is secondary to the internal decision-making purpose.

D refers to human error during test execution or design, not the purpose of reviewing test reports.

Answer: A. If the test reports are unclear or incomplete, the decision to release the product can be based on non-reliable information

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation (Approx. 200 words):

Acceptance criteria should focus on business-relevant outcomes that are specific, testable, and observable. In this user story, the goal is to validate that the registration functionality is available and behaves as expected.

Let's analyze each proposition:

i) “A registration form is displayed on the screen.”

→ Valid. It is observable, specific, and directly aligned with the user story.

ii) “The form is written in the Groovy language; the cursor is initially set on the ‘login’ field...”

→ Invalid as acceptance criteria. It contains implementation details (e.g., “Groovy language”) irrelevant to business stakeholders. Also, low-level UI behavior like cursor position is overly technical and not a business-driven criterion.

iii) “I cannot register myself if the login I choose is used by another player.”

→ Valid. It defines system behavior based on a business rule (unique login) and is testable.

iv) “After successful registration process I am informed about it by an e-mail.”

→ Valid. It describes a user-visible outcome after registration, which is observable and testable.

Correct answer: D. only i), iii), and iv) are well-written acceptance criteria.

Exact Reference – ISTQB CTFL Acceptance Testing Syllabus (Section 1.3.2):

“Acceptance criteria must describe the externally visible and verifiable system behavior, excluding implementation details.”

Security testing ensures the system protects data and maintains intended behavior under potential attacks. Different techniques address specific security goals.

Option A is correct: Static vulnerability analysis inspects code or architecture without executing it, identifying weaknesses in mechanisms such as authentication (e.g., login controls) and authorization (e.g., access permissions). These mechanisms are foundational security requirements.

Other options:

B is misleading — penetration testing simulates attacks, but input validation is more often verified with fuzzing or code review.

C is incorrect — fuzzing tests input handling, not the performance of cryptographic algorithms.

D is incorrect — threat modeling is a design-time activity to identify risks; it’s not used to test policies directly.

Answer: A. Static vulnerability analysis to test authentication and authorization mechanisms