PC-BA-FBA-20 Questions and Answers

Gap analysis is a structured process used to identify the differences between the current state (as-is) and the desired future state (to-be). The first step in this process involves understanding the current situation.

Key Steps in Gap Analysis:

Assemble representations of the existing situation: This involves documenting the current state, including processes, systems, and capabilities.

Compare representations of the existing and target situations: After understanding the current state, it is compared with the desired future state to identify gaps.

Identify gaps to be addressed: Once gaps are identified, they are prioritized based on their impact and feasibility.

Consider possible actions to address the gaps: Finally, potential solutions or actions are developed to bridge the identified gaps.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Assemble representations of existing situation:Understanding the current state is the foundational step in gap analysis. Without this, there is no baseline for comparison.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. Consider possible actions to address the gaps:This is a later step in the process, not the first.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Compare representations of the existing and target situations:Comparison occurs after the current state has been documented.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Identify gaps to be addressed:Identifying gaps follows the documentation and comparison steps.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The first step in the gap analysis process is:

A. Assemble representations of existing situation.

The Power/Interest Grid is a tool used to determine appropriate strategies for managing different stakeholder groups based on their level of power (influence) and interest in the project. The grid defines four quadrants, each with a recommended management strategy:

High Power, High Interest: Manage Closely

High Power, Low Interest: Keep Satisfied

Low Power, High Interest: Keep Informed

Low Power, Low Interest: Watch (Minimum effort)

The category of Some Power, Some Interest is generally considered the mid-range or main group of stakeholders. For these individuals, the best strategy is to Keep onside (or Manage Regularly). This strategy means maintaining regular communication, involving them in the project at appropriate times, and ensuring their needs and concerns are addressed so that their interest remains positive and their moderate power does not turn against the project.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Stakeholder Management, Power/Interest Grid)

===========

Design thinking is a human-centered, iterative approach used to uncover innovative solutions by focusing on user needs and exploring multiple possibilities. It emphasizes creativity, collaboration, and experimentation.

Key Characteristics of Techniques:

Design Thinking: Uses an iterative process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test) to generate innovative options.

Fishbone Diagram: A root cause analysis tool, not focused on innovation.

Rich Pictures: A visual representation of a situation, useful for understanding context but not for generating innovative options.

Mind Maps: A brainstorming tool that organizes ideas hierarchically, but it does not inherently follow an iterative approach.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Design thinking:Design thinking explicitly uses an iterative approach to uncover innovative options.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. Fishbone diagram:Fishbone diagrams focus on identifying root causes, not innovation.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Rich pictures:Rich pictures visualize complex situations but do not inherently foster innovation.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Mind maps:Mind maps organize ideas but do not follow an iterative, innovative process like design thinking.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The technique that uses an iterative approach to uncover innovative options is:

A. Design thinking.

The Requirements Engineering (RE) Framework is a structured approach used by business analysts to define, document, and manage requirements. It consists of five iterative stages: Investigate Situation, Consider Perspectives, Analyze Needs, Evaluate Options, and Define Requirements .

Key Considerations:

Suitability for Waterfall Projects Only: The RE Framework is flexible and can be adapted to both waterfall and Agile methodologies.

Iterative Stages: The framework emphasizes iteration and refinement, making it suitable for evolving requirements.

Defining Requirements: The framework explicitly supports the definition and management of requirements.

Sequential Steps: While the stages are presented in a sequence, they are iterative and not strictly linear.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. It is only suitable for use with waterfall projects:The RE Framework can be applied to both waterfall and Agile projects.Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. It shows five iterative stages that a business analyst needs to carry out to establish the requirements:This accurately describes the RE Framework's structure and purpose.Conclusion: This is correct .

C. Using the Requirements Engineering Framework does not help to define requirements:The framework is specifically designed to define and manage requirements.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. It shows steps in the requirements engineering process that a business analyst must follow sequentially:While the stages are presented in a sequence, they are iterative and not strictly sequential.Conclusion: This is not correct .

A change strategy outlines how an organization will move from its current state to its desired future state. Its purpose is to ensure a structured and effective transition.

Key Considerations:

Ensuring the simplest way for transition: While simplicity is desirable, it is not the primary purpose of a change strategy.

Ensuring the quickest way for transition: Speed is not the main focus; effectiveness and alignment with goals are more important.

Achieving the transition between current state and future state: This accurately describes the purpose of a change strategy, which is to bridge the gap between where the organization is now and where it wants to be.

Mapping the alternative options: While mapping options may be part of the planning process, it is not the ultimate purpose of the change strategy.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Ensuring the simplest way for transition:Simplicity is a consideration but not the primary purpose of a change strategy.Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. Ensuring the quickest way for transition:Speed is secondary to achieving an effective and sustainable transition.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Achieving the transition between current state and future state:This is the core purpose of a change strategy, ensuring the organization moves effectively toward its goals.Conclusion: This is correct .

D. Mapping the alternative options:Mapping options is part of the analysis phase, not the overarching purpose of the strategy.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The best description of the purpose of a change strategy is:

C. Achieving the transition between current state and future state.

Gap analysis is a technique for comparing the current state of the business ('As Is') with the desired future state ('To Be') to identify what is missing and what needs to change. The logical first step is to establish the current starting point. Therefore, the process begins by:

Assemble representations of existing situation (The 'As Is' model). This involves investigating and documenting the current processes, organisation, people, information, and technology (POPIT).

Assemble representations of target or desired situation (The 'To Be' model).

Identify gaps to be addressed (The difference between As Is and To Be).

Consider possible actions to address the gaps (Developing the recommendations).

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Gap Analysis)

===========

In an iterative or Agile lifecycle, requirements are not defined entirely upfront but are explored and refined just-in-time, immediately prior to implementation. The stage where the detailed solution requirements (functional and non-functional) are elaborated, modeled, and defined—ready for construction—is the Develop solution stage (often referred to as the Implementation or Construction phase of an iteration/sprint). The detailed work of defining, modelling, and validating the specific requirements happens as a preparatory step for the actual build, distinguishing it from the preceding planning phase (C) or the upstream strategic work (A, B).

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Lifecycle Models, Iterative Development)

The development of a Business Case is often an iterative process. Before significant investment is made in creating the detailed Initial Business Case (often called the Outline Business Case or OBC), a preliminary assessment is required to ensure the proposed change is viable. This assessment is the Feasibility study (or Feasibility Assessment). A feasibility study quickly evaluates the proposed initiative to confirm it is technically possible, financially justifiable, and strategically aligned (Business Feasibility). The outcomes of this study determine whether it is worthwhile to proceed to the more detailed, full business case development. The other options (A, B, D) occur after the initial business case is approved and investment is committed.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Business Case Lifecycle)

Scenario analysis is an investigation technique used to explore and evaluate potential future scenarios or situations. It helps stakeholders understand how different factors might impact a business area or process.

Key Characteristics of Scenario Analysis:

Broad View: Scenario analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the business area by considering multiple possible outcomes.

Prototyping Basis: The insights gained from scenario analysis can inform the development of prototypes.

Tacit Knowledge Identification: By exploring real-world scenarios, it helps uncover implicit knowledge embedded in business practices.

Testing Scripts: Scenario analysis is not directly involved in preparing test scripts, which are typically created during the testing phase.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Provides a broad view of the business area under investigation:Scenario analysis evaluates multiple possibilities, offering a broad perspective.Conclusion: This is true .

B. Provides a basis for developing subsequent prototypes:Insights from scenario analysis can guide prototype development.Conclusion: This is true .

C. Helps identify tacit knowledge used in business practice:Exploring scenarios uncovers hidden knowledge and practices.Conclusion: This is true .

D. Helps prepare the scripts that will be used to test the delivered solution:Preparing test scripts is part of testing activities, not scenario analysis.Conclusion: This is false .

To determine which measures are appropriate Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the Critical Success Factor (CSF) "provide excellent customer service," we must first understand the relationship between CSFs and KPIs:

Critical Success Factors (CSFs): These are the essential areas or activities that an organization must excel at to achieve its goals. In this case, "provide excellent customer service" is a CSF.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): These are measurable metrics used to evaluate progress toward achieving a CSF. KPIs should directly align with the CSF and provide actionable insights.

Now, let’s evaluate each option to determine whether it is an appropriate KPI for the CSF "provide excellent customer service":

A. The number of customers who make use of their in-room mini bar

This measure tracks customer behavior related to a specific hotel amenity (the mini bar). While it may indicate customer satisfaction with the room's offerings, it does not directly measure the quality of customer service.

Conclusion: This is not an appropriate KPI for the CSF "provide excellent customer service."

B. The percentage of customers who use the leisure facilities

This measure tracks how many customers utilize the hotel's leisure facilities (e.g., gym, pool, spa). While it may reflect customer engagement with the hotel's amenities, it does not directly assess the quality of customer service.

Conclusion: This is not an appropriate KPI for the CSF "provide excellent customer service."

C. The number of customers who complain

Customer complaints are a direct indicator of dissatisfaction and can highlight areas where customer service needs improvement. A high number of complaints suggests poor customer service, while a low number indicates better service quality.

This measure is closely aligned with the CSF "provide excellent customer service" because it provides actionable feedback on service performance.

Conclusion: This is an appropriate KPI for the CSF.

D. The percentage of customers who join the hotel loyalty scheme

Customers are more likely to join a loyalty scheme if they have had a positive experience with the hotel, including excellent customer service. This measure reflects customer satisfaction and loyalty, which are outcomes of good service.

Conclusion: This is an appropriate KPI for the CSF.

E. The percentage of customers who return

Repeat customers are a strong indicator of customer satisfaction and loyalty, which are directly influenced by the quality of customer service. If customers return to the hotel, it suggests they were satisfied with their previous experience, including the service they received.

Conclusion: This is an appropriate KPI for the CSF.

To determine the best way to present the changes to the scheduling team, we need to consider the nature of the information being communicated and the audience (the scheduling team). The extract describes changes to processes, roles, and systems, which are best represented visually to ensure clarity and understanding.

Key Considerations:

Business Process Model (BPM): A BPM is a visual representation of the steps in a process. It is particularly useful for communicating changes to workflows, roles, and responsibilities. Since the extract discusses splitting the scheduling team into two groups and introducing new software and processes, a BPM would effectively illustrate how these changes impact the workflow.

Business Activity Model (BAM): A BAM focuses on high-level activities and their logical dependencies, often used in strategic planning. However, it is less detailed than a BPM and may not adequately capture the specific changes to scheduling processes.

POPIT (People, Organization, Process, Information, Technology): POPIT is a framework for analyzing business change across multiple dimensions. While it provides a holistic view, it is not a presentation tool and would not be the best choice for directly communicating the changes to the scheduling team.

Prototype: A prototype is typically used to demonstrate the functionality of a system or software. While the introduction of telephony software and an online booking system could involve prototyping, this option does not address the need to communicate process and role changes.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Business Process Model:A BPM is ideal for illustrating the changes to the scheduling process, including the split into inpatient and outpatient teams and the integration of new software. It provides a clear, step-by-step visual representation that the scheduling team can easily understand.Conclusion: This is the best option .

B. Business Activity Model:While a BAM could provide a high-level overview of the changes, it lacks the detail needed to explain specific process adjustments.Conclusion: This is not the best option .

C. POPIT:POPIT is a framework for analysis, not a communication tool. It would not effectively convey the changes to the scheduling team.Conclusion: This is not the best option .

D. Prototype:Prototyping is relevant for demonstrating software functionality but does not address the need to communicate process and role changes.Conclusion: This is not the best option .

Final Recommendation:

The changes should be presented using a Business Process Model , as it effectively communicates the revised workflows and roles to the scheduling team.

A process model is a visual representation of a business process or workflow, showing how activities are performed and how they relate to one another. It is commonly used in business analysis to understand, analyze, and improve processes.

Key Characteristics of a Process Model:

Graphical Representation: Process models visually depict workflows and subprocesses, making them easier to understand.

Cost Differences: Cost analysis is not the primary purpose of a process model.

Job Descriptions: Process models focus on workflows, not individual job roles.

Software Features: Informal descriptions of software features are unrelated to process modeling.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. A graphical representation of a business process or workflow and its related sub-processes:This accurately describes the purpose and nature of a process model.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. The cost differences between how a customer currently does something and how they would like to do something:Cost differences are analyzed separately and are not part of process modeling.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. The detailed job description of the work to be performed by an individual:Job descriptions are documented separately and are not part of process modeling.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. An informal, detailed, description of a software system feature derived from an end user's perspective:This describes user stories or feature descriptions, not process models.Conclusion: This is not correct .

The hierarchy of requirements organizes requirements into levels (e.g., business needs, stakeholder requirements, solution requirements) to ensure alignment and traceability. Let’s evaluate each statement to determine which is false .

Key Characteristics of the Requirements Hierarchy:

Linking Requirements: The hierarchy ensures that detailed requirements are connected to higher-level business needs and objectives.

Order of Development: The hierarchy does not dictate the sequence in which requirements should be developed; it focuses on relationships and dependencies.

Driven by Strategy: Requirements are derived from the organization's values, strategy, and objectives.

Traceability: The hierarchy links different types of requirements to ensure consistency and alignment.

Evaluation of Each Statement:

A. The requirements hierarchy enables detailed requirements to be linked to the business need:This is true; the hierarchy ensures traceability between high-level and detailed requirements.Conclusion: This is true .

B. The requirements hierarchy shows the order in which requirements should be developed:The hierarchy does not specify the development order; it focuses on relationships and dependencies.Conclusion: This is false .

C. Requirements are driven by the organisation's values, strategy and objectives:This is true; requirements must align with organizational goals.Conclusion: This is true .

D. The requirements hierarchy links different requirements to each other:This is true; the hierarchy ensures traceability and alignment across levels.Conclusion: This is true .

Final Recommendation:

The false statement is:

B. The requirements hierarchy shows the order in which requirements should be developed.

To identify the stakeholder groups represented in the scenario, we need to analyze the relationships and roles described:

Stakeholder Groups in the Scenario:

Owner:The two founders of AlpineTrails, who each own 50% of the business, are clearly stakeholders as owners. They have a vested interest in the success of the business and its partnerships.

Partner:WalkNation is described as a partner organization that collaborates with AlpineTrails to offer special holidays for its members. This partnership involves shared responsibilities (marketing and booking by WalkNation, holiday organization by AlpineTrails).

Supplier:AlpineTrails books hotels, transport, and equipment to create bespoke holidays. These entities (hotels, transport providers, equipment suppliers) are suppliers to AlpineTrails and play a critical role in delivering the holidays.

Manager:While managers may exist within AlpineTrails, they are not explicitly mentioned in the scenario. Therefore, this group is not represented.

Competitor:Competitors are not mentioned or implied in the scenario, so this group is not represented.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Owner:The two founders of AlpineTrails are explicitly described as owners.Conclusion: This is a relevant stakeholder group .

B. Partner:WalkNation is explicitly described as a partner.Conclusion: This is a relevant stakeholder group .

C. Supplier:Hotels, transport, and equipment providers are implicitly described as suppliers.Conclusion: This is a relevant stakeholder group .

D. Manager:Managers are not explicitly mentioned in the scenario.Conclusion: This is not a relevant stakeholder group .

E. Competitor:Competitors are not mentioned or implied in the scenario.Conclusion: This is not a relevant stakeholder group .

A RACI chart (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) is a tool used to clarify roles and responsibilities in a project or process. Each role in the chart has a specific meaning:

Key Definitions:

Responsible: The person or role responsible for performing the task or completing the work.

Accountable: The person ultimately answerable for the task's completion and outcomes.

Consulted: Individuals or roles who provide input or expertise before decisions are made or tasks are completed.

Informed: Individuals or roles who need to be kept updated on progress or outcomes.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Responsible:The "Responsible" role is assigned to the person or team performing the task.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. Accountable:The "Accountable" role ensures the task is completed but does not necessarily perform the task.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Consulted:The "Consulted" role provides input or advice but does not perform the task.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Informed:The "Informed" role receives updates but is not involved in task execution.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The category assigned to the role or person performing the task is:

A. Responsible.

The Iterative (or Agile) lifecycle model is specifically designed to deal with changing requirements and a rapid pace of change. Unlike linear models like Waterfall or the V model, which expect requirements to be fixed early, the iterative model delivers the solution in a series of repeated cycles (iterations/sprints). This approach embraces the reality that requirements will change as stakeholders learn more about the evolving product and the business environment shifts. It explicitly incorporates frequent feedback loops and allows for the adaptation of requirements throughout the project, making it the most flexible and suitable model for unstable or complex environments.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Lifecycle Models, Agile/Iterative)

The technique focused on analyzing the fit between an organisation's offerings and customer needs, specifically examining the combination of product and service attributes, the company's image, and the customer relationship, is the Value Proposition. The Value Proposition describes the unique benefits, value, and experience that a company promises to deliver to its customers to satisfy their needs and wants better than the competition. It's a critical tool for ensuring that the business improvement efforts are truly valuable from a customer's perspective. Porter's Five Forces and SWOT analysis are macro-strategic tools, and SIPOC is a process analysis technique.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Improving Business Services and Processes, Value Proposition)

To identify the generic business improvement strategy that involves eliminating redundant tasks, we need to analyze each option:

Key Considerations:

Change task sequence: This strategy involves reordering tasks to improve efficiency but does not necessarily eliminate redundancy.

Simplification: This strategy focuses on streamlining processes by removing unnecessary or redundant tasks, making workflows more efficient.

Redefine boundary: This strategy involves changing the scope or boundaries of a process, which may or may not involve eliminating redundant tasks.

Bottleneck removal: This strategy targets specific constraints or bottlenecks in a process but does not focus on eliminating redundant tasks.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Change task sequence:Changing the order of tasks does not inherently eliminate redundancy.Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. Simplification:Simplification directly involves identifying and removing redundant or unnecessary tasks to streamline processes.Conclusion: This is correct .

C. Redefine boundary:Redefining boundaries changes the scope of a process but does not specifically target redundancy.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Bottleneck removal:Removing bottlenecks addresses constraints but does not focus on eliminating redundant tasks.Conclusion: This is not correct .