Organizational-Behavior Questions and Answers

In group dynamics, the failure described—redundant efforts and a lack of task synchronization—points to a failure incoordination. TheCoordinatorrole is responsible for clarifying goals, delegating tasks, and ensuring that the efforts of individual team members are integrated rather than duplicated. Without effective coordination, even highly motivated and skilled teams can fail because their energy is dissipated through "working in different directions".

While a "Planner" (Option B) sets the initial schedule and a "Controller" (Option C) monitors outcomes, the Coordinator acts as the glue during the execution phase. The Coordinator ensures that every member knows their specific contribution and how it fits into the whole. In this case, because the members were "mistakenly working on the same tasks," a Coordinator would have intervened to clarify boundaries and manage the interdependencies of the work. Effective coordination is the primary antidote to the "process losses" that occur when team members overlap in their efforts.

The link between performance evaluation and motivation is best explained throughExpectancy Theory. According to this theory, an individual's motivation to exert effort depends on three relationships: Effort-Performance, Performance-Reward, and Rewards-Personal Goals. For an employee to be motivated, theymust have confidence that the effort they exert will lead to a favorable performance evaluation(the Effort-Performance relationship).

Image of Vroom's Expectancy Theory

If an employee believes that no matter how hard they work, the evaluation process is biased, based on luck, or uses unclear criteria (like personality traits rather than measurable behaviors), their motivation will suffer. Furthermore, the employee must believe that a good evaluation will lead to organizational rewards (such as a bonus or promotion) and that those rewards will satisfy their personal goals. If any of these links are weak—for instance, if the evaluation process is perceived as unfair—the entire motivational chain is broken. Therefore, the perceptual process is central to this relationship; it is not the objective reality of the evaluation that motivates, but the employee's perception of its fairness and accuracy.

Astrong organizational cultureis one in which the core values are both intensely held and widely shared by the members. One of the primary advantages of such a culture is theformation of strong employee commitment. When employees believe in and identify with the organization's values, they are more likely to be dedicated to its goals and more willing to put in extra effort to see the organization succeed.

A strong culture also serves to reduce turnover because it creates a high level of agreement among members about what the organization stands for. This unanimity of purpose builds cohesiveness and loyalty. Furthermore, a strong culture acts as a substitute for formalization; it tells employees how they are expected to behave without the need for thick manuals or rigid rules. While it can have liabilities (as noted in Q32), the immediate organizational benefit is a motivated, committed workforce that shares a common sense of direction.

Charismatic Leadership Theory suggests that followers make attributions of heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors. The most fundamental way a charismatic leader increases performance is byarticulating an appealing vision. This vision serves as a long-term strategy for attaining a goal by making the future better than the status quo.

Image of Charismatic Leadership Characteristics

A charismatic leader does not just set goals; they provide a "vision statement"—a formal proclamation of an organization's mission—that they use to imprint on followers an overarching goal and purpose. They then communicate high-performance expectations and express confidence that followers can attain them, which enhances follower self-esteem. Unlike transactional leaders who rely on rewards or directive approaches, charismatic leaders use emotional appeal and personal risk-taking to inspire followers to go beyond their self-interest for the sake of the organization. This articulation of a "better future" is the primary engine of motivation in charismatic leadership.

In the context of global operations, teams are often physically dispersed across different time zones and geographic locations. To maximize participation, organizations rely onvirtual teamtechnologies. Usingonline computer technologies and/or phone communication(such as video conferencing, instant messaging, and collaborative platforms) allows for real-time or near-real-time interaction that bridges the physical distance. These technologies enable members to share ideas, provide immediate feedback, and engage in the "give-and-take" necessary for effective decision-making.

While unilateral messaging (Option C) or physical mail (Option D) might transmit information, they lack the interactive richness required to sustain high levels of participation and engagement. Effective global leadership involves selecting the communication channel that best balances the need for speed with the need for social presence. By utilizing synchronous online tools, global teams can simulate the "face-to-face" experience, which helps in building the rapport and trust that are often difficult to establish in a virtual environment. This approach ensures that all members, regardless of their location, have an equal platform to contribute to the team's objectives.

In Organizational Behavior, a critical distinction is made between a "work group" and a "work team". A work group is a collection of individuals who interact primarily to share information and make decisions to help each member perform within his or her area of responsibility. In a work group, there is no particular need or opportunity for collective work that requires joint effort; therefore, their performance is merely the summation of each group member’s individual contribution.

A work team, however, is a group whose individual efforts result in performance that is greater than the sum of those individual inputs. The fundamental goal of a work team iscollective performance. While work groups focus on individual accountability and sharing information to assist individual tasks, work teams focus on mutual accountability and synergy. This synergy allows the team to achieve a level of output that exceeds what the members could accomplish alone. For a team to be effective, it requires a mix of complementary skills—technical, problem-solving, and interpersonal—directed toward a common purpose and specific performance goals. Managers transition from groups to teams when the task at hand is complex enough that it requires the coordinated, collective effort of multiple people rather than just a series of independent tasks. Therefore, the shift from "sharing information" (group) to "collective performance" (team) represents a significant increase in the interdependence of the members.

The distinguishing factor between different types of teams is the level of authority and the scope of their responsibility.Problem-solving teamstypically only make recommendations; they do not have the authority to implement their suggestions or take full responsibility for the results.Virtual teamsare defined by their use of technology to bridge physical distance rather than their level of autonomy.

In this scenario, because management wants the team to "take full responsibility for outcomes," they must organizeself-managed teams. These teams are designed to operate without direct supervision, handling the planning, execution, and monitoring of their work. They go beyond critical thinking and process review—which a problem-solving team might do—by actually making the operating decisions and being held accountable for the final performance. This structure requires a high degree of trust from management and extensive training for employees, as the team essentially performs the roles previously held by first-line supervisors.