2V0-17.25 Questions and Answers

In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, the construct of VM Applications Organizations was deprecated in favor of All Applications Organizations. The documentation highlights this change:

“Organizations for All Applications provide a unified model for managing both VM and Kubernetes workloads. They support third-party integrations such as Tanzu Salt and Active Directory, and enable deployments to Native Public Cloud endpoints.”

Since the customer upgraded from VCF 5.2, their first new Organization after the upgrade must use the All Applications model. VM Applications Organizations (Option A) are legacy and do not support the full feature set such as NPC or third-party integrations. Option C is incorrect because the Fleet Management API is for monitoring and operational insights, not for creating Organizations.

Therefore, the administrator must create the new Organization as an All Applications Organization in the VCF Automation Provider Management Portal.

The requirement is to ensure DNS records are created only when a domain name is provided.

Since the blueprint includes a custom property for domainName, the correct conditional logic in the event subscription must validate that this property is not null.

Adding the condition:

event.data.customProperties['domainName'] != null

ensures the workflow executes only when the domain name is provided.

Option B validates hostname instead of domain name.

Option A controls workflow blocking, not conditional execution.

Option C relates to cleanup, not creation condition validation.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The VCF 9.0 Architecture and Deployment Guide explains that within a single Workload Domain, administrators can scale resources by adding additional clusters, including compute or vSAN storage clusters. Specifically, “A Workload Domain can contain multiple clusters. You can deploy a new cluster, such as a vSAN cluster, into an existing domain without introducing new management components.” .

Options A and D both introduce new workload domains or VCF instances, which require their own management stack (vCenter, NSX Manager, etc.) and are unnecessary in this scenario. Option B is incorrect because “vSAN storage-only nodes” are supported in vSAN but are not the method for adding a new cluster within VCF automation. The correct approach is deploying a second cluster inside the same workload domain—this reuses the existing management components while meeting the requirement for a new vSAN storage cluster.

To integrate VCF Automation with an external CMDB (such as ServiceNow) for compliance and tracking of Kubernetes or VM resources, the system utilizes a specific extensibility framework. According to the VCF 9.0 documentation on "Integrating VCF Automation for ITSM with ServiceNow":

Event Subscriptions (D): These act as the trigger mechanism within the VCF Automation Event Broker Service. When a resource (such as a Kubernetes cluster or deployment) is provisioned, an event is published. An administrator creates a subscription to listen for these specific lifecycle events (e.g., Compute.PostProvision or Kubernetes-specific topics) to initiate the registration process.

VCF Operations orchestrator (B): This is the orchestration engine (formerly known as VMware Aria Automation Orchestrator or vRO). Documentation specifies that for CMDB and ITSM compliance, VCF Automation is integrated with VCF Operations orchestrator workflows. These workflows contain the complex technical logic required to:

Separate objects and feed inputs into technical integration tasks.

Handle API tokens and authentication for the external CMDB.

Execute the REST API calls to the CMDB (e.g., to the cmdb_ci_vmware_instance table).

Update custom properties (like serviceNowSysId) back into the deployment for future decommissioning lifecycle events.

Extract from VCF 9.0 Documentation:

"Enterprise users commonly integrate their Cloud Management Platform with an IT Service Management (ITSM) and Configuration Management Database (CMDB) platform for compliance. Following this example, you can integrate VCF Automation with ServiceNow for CMDB and ITSM using VCF Operations Orchestrator Client... This integration uses Event Subscriptions to trigger VCF Operations Orchestrator workflows."

The VCF 9.0 Architecture Guide outlines valid principal storage options for the management domain. It states: “The management domain must be deployed using vSAN, NFS, or Fibre Channel (FC). Supported protocols include NFSv3 and VMFS on FC.” vSAN (including OSA) is the default recommended option, but NFSv3 and VMFS on FC are also supported for environments where external storage arrays are required.

NVMe/TCP and vVols are not supported for the initial management domain’s principal storage. vVols may be used in workload domains after deployment, but they are not a supported foundation for the management domain. Therefore, the three correct storage solutions for the first management workload domain are: VMFS on FC, NFSv3, and vSAN OSA.

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 documentation for vSphere Supervisor and Kubernetes workload management specifies that Kubernetes-native backup and restore for Supervisor-provisioned clusters is performed using Velero.

From the VCF 9.0 documentation covering Supervisor Services and Kubernetes workload protection:

“For backup and restore of Kubernetes workloads deployed on clusters enabled with vSphere Supervisor, VMware supports the use of Velero to protect Kubernetes resources and persistent volumes.”

Velero is Kubernetes-native and integrates with the Supervisor cluster to protect:

Namespaces

Kubernetes objects

Persistent volumes

TKG clusters

The other options are incorrect for this use case:

Site Recovery Manager (now part of VMware Live Site Recovery) protects vSphere VMs at the infrastructure level, not Kubernetes objects.

Restic is a backup utility used by Velero internally but is not the primary supported platform tool.

VMware Live Recovery is used for disaster recovery at the VM/site level, not Kubernetes-native backup inside Supervisor.

Document reference (VCF 9.0):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → Workload Management → Supervisor Services → Backup and Restore for Kubernetes Workloads (Velero support section).

When converging an existing vSphere cluster into a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Fleet, the cluster must already be a functional vSphere environment. According to the VCF 9.0 Convergence Guide, the minimum prerequisites for convergence include:

A deployed and operational vCenter Server managing the cluster.

ESXi (VMware ESX) hosts installed and joined to that vCenter cluster.

The documentation states:

“The vSphere environment to be converged must consist of ESXi hosts managed by a supported vCenter Server instance.”

NSX (C) is not required before convergence because NSX is deployed and configured as part of the VCF bring-up or workload domain conversion process.

VCF Operations (D) is not a prerequisite for cluster convergence.

vSAN (E) is optional because VCF supports multiple principal storage types (vSAN, VMFS, NFS).

Therefore, the required components that must exist prior to convergence are VMware ESX hosts and VMware vCenter Server.

The Network Operations feature within VMware Cloud Foundation is powered by VCF Operations for Networks (formerly Aria Operations for Networks).

The VCF 9.0 documentation explains:

“VCF Operations for Networks provides application dependency mapping, network flow visibility, micro-segmentation validation, and network troubleshooting capabilities.”

Without this component, advanced network analytics and topology visualization are not available.

vDefend firewall (B) provides security enforcement but does not deliver analytics and visibility features.

NSX networking (C) provides networking services but does not itself deliver network operations insights and analytics.

VCF Operations collector (D) collects data but does not provide the network operations feature set.

Thus, to enable full Network Operations capability, the administrator must install and configure VCF Operations for Networks.

The VCF Operations Dashboards Guide describes the Storage Overview dashboard:

“The Storage Overview dashboard provides visibility into capacity, performance, and health across vSAN and non-vSAN datastores. Administrators can track datastore utilization, latency, throughput, and availability from a single pane of glass.”

Diagnostic Findings (B) shows troubleshooting insights, not full storage details. Data Protection & Recovery (C) covers backup/replication information. VCF Health (D) focuses on SDDC Manager, vCenter, NSX, and host health, not datastore metrics.

Therefore, the required datastore overview is accessed through the Storage Overview dashboard in VCF Operations.

The VCF 9.0 Deployment Guide notes: “All ESXi hosts must be installed with a supported ESXi version using a VMware ISO before they are commissioned into SDDC Manager. Commissioning is always performed via the management domain vCenter.” The new workload domain vCenter does not exist until the domain is deployed, ruling out option A. The VCF Installer is used for initial bring-up, not workload domain expansion (E). Therefore, the two required steps are: install ESXi using a valid ISO (D) and commission hosts via the management domain vCenter (B).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The VCF Operations 9.0 Monitoring Guide specifies: “For any alert definition to be active in the environment, it must be associated with and enabled in an Active Policy.” . Creating symptom and alert definitions only defines conditions; they do not generate alerts until policies include them. REST notification plugins or payload templates are used for outbound integrations, not for enabling alerts. A super metric is only needed for custom composite KPIs, not for native read latency which is a standard metric already available. Therefore, the required step is to enable the alert in an Active Policy so that when the symptom triggers (latency > 1 ms), the alert activates.

The VCF 9.0 Resource Policy Guide describes IaaS Resource Policies as mechanisms to enforce deployment rules for Supervisor-based Kubernetes clusters.

For the production project, only Kubernetes resources are allowed, so administrators must disallow VM deployments (A).

To tolerate a single control plane node failure, production clusters should use multi-control-plane node templates, ensuring availability (B).

In the development project, resources should be minimized, so a single-control-plane node policy is enforced (D), which reduces overhead.

Incorrect options:

Organization-wide policies (C and F) would apply to both projects, which is not desired since dev and prod have different requirements.

Enforcing single-control-plane nodes in production (E) contradicts the requirement for failure tolerance.

Thus, the correct approach is: Disallow VMs in production, enforce multi-control-plane clusters in production, and enforce single-control-plane clusters in development.

The VCF 9.0 Operations Guide – Views and Reports explains the four types of views available for custom dashboards:

Object Relationship View: Displays dependencies and hierarchy between objects (for example, VMs, hosts, datastores) but does not provide exportable tabular data.

Scoreboard View: Provides a high-level KPI visualization of a few key objects but is not intended for large tabular exports.

List View (Correct): Displays tabular data across many objects, such as CPU, memory, and disk metrics for VMs. The guide states: “List views are useful when you want to compare metrics across multiple objects and can be exported to CSV for further analysis.”

Trend View: Focuses on historical data and growth over time, but export to CSV is not its primary purpose.

Because the security team requires both tabular comparison of VM resource usage and the ability to export the data to CSV, the List View is the only option that meets both requirements.

The VCF 9.0 Operations Documentation identifies Operations for Networks as the key enabler for the Network Operations feature:

“VCF Operations for Networks (formerly vRNI) provides visibility into network traffic flows, NSX fabric health, application dependency mapping, and micro-segmentation planning. It integrates directly into VCF Operations dashboards under Network Operations.”

The vDefend firewall is unrelated, as it provides workload-level security. The VCF Operations Collector is required for telemetry ingestion but does not provide full Network Operations. NSX itself provides the underlying virtual networking, but it must be monitored through VCF Operations for Networks. Therefore, the correct answer is VCF Operations for Networks.

In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, the strategy for monitoring diverse application types (internal, commercial, and open-source) in a consolidated manner relies heavily on the ingestion and analysis of log data.

According to the VCF 9.0 Operations and Monitoring Guide:

VCF Operations for Logs (D): This is the core platform (formerly VMware Aria Operations for Logs) used for real-time log management. It provides a centralized location to collect logs from any source—be it a custom-coded internal app, a commercial database, or an open-source web server. This satisfy the "consolidated manner" requirement by aggregating disparate data streams into a single searchable interface.

VCF Operations for Logs Content Packs (E): To provide "simple" monitoring for commercial and open-source applications without manual configuration, VCF utilizes Content Packs. These packs contain pre-defined dashboards, extracted fields, and alerts tailored for specific applications (e.g., Apache, Microsoft SQL Server, Linux, etc.). By using Content Packs, an administrator can immediately gain deep visibility into the health and performance of diverse applications without building custom monitoring logic.

Why other options are incorrect:

VCF Operations Service/Application Discovery (A & C): These features are used to map relationships between virtual machines and services to understand dependencies. While they help identify what is running, they do not provide the deep "monitoring" (log analysis and alerting) requested for a mix of internal and open-source apps.

VCF Operations for Applications (B): This usually refers to high-frequency metrics and trace analysis (formerly Tanzu Observability/Wavefront). While powerful, it is often more complex to implement across a standard VCF fleet compared to the "simple, consolidated" log-based approach provided by VCF Operations for Logs and its associated Content Packs.

Per the VCF 9.0 Automation Provider Management Guide:

Supervisor Activation: “Kubernetes-based workloads require Supervisor to be enabled in the Management Domain before deploying organizations.”

Region Configuration: “Organizations for All Applications must be deployed into a preconfigured Region, defined in the Provider Management Portal.”NSX Federation (D) is optional for multi-site deployments. Supervisor is not activated in workload domains (B) but centrally in the management domain. VMware Kubernetes Service (E) is enabled per tenant but not required before Organization creation. Thus, correct prerequisites are A and C.

The documentation clarifies the scenario when a password is changed outside of VCF Operations: “When an error occurs, for example after a password expires, you must manually reset the password in the component product. After you reset the password in a component, you must remediate the password in VCF Operations.” “Password Rotation” is different—it “allows you to orchestrate the rotation” of stored credentials (a planned, VCF-driven change), not reconcile an externally altered password. Therefore, after the direct password change in vCenter, the correct recovery step in VCF Operations is to use Remediate password to synchronize credentials and restore management from VCF Operations.

===========

VCF 9.0 states for the Simple Automation model: “Single node… Applies to Small… Can be scaled out to the high availability model by resizing the node to Medium or Large, which also forces the scale out to 3 nodes.” In addition, the Day-N procedure confirms the action is a Scale (scale-out) operation: “Scale VCF Automation… choose a larger target deployment type such as Medium or Large…” and provide “Additional VIPs” and a “Cluster Node IP Pool” (Medium requires a minimum of four IPs), then submit the scale out request. Therefore, moving from Small (Simple) to Medium necessarily transitions to the High Availability (3-node) model rather than remaining a single medium node. This aligns the form factor with the documented model behavior and the fleet management workflow.

===========

The VCF 9.0 Design Guide highlights that for resiliency across sites with RPO = 0, the recommended approach is a vSAN Stretched Cluster. Documentation states: “Stretched clusters provide site-level resilience by mirroring data across two fault domains (sites). In the event of a full site outage, workloads remain available with no data loss (RPO = 0).” Relocating six hosts to another site creates the two fault domains required for vSAN Stretched Cluster. Options B and C provide backup or redundancy but not synchronous replication with zero RPO. Option D (fault domains) protects against host/rack failures, not entire data center loss. Therefore, the correct solution is to relocate hosts and configure a stretched cluster.

When creating a Region in VCF Automation, multiple workload domains can be aggregated to provide capacity to Organizations. For consistent provisioning across domains, resource constructs must be uniform.

The VCF 9.0 Automation documentation specifies:

VM Classes must exist with identical names across integrated vCenters to ensure consistent deployment behavior.

Storage Classes must also be consistently defined across Supervisors to allow Kubernetes and VM workloads to consume storage predictably.

Region quotas (A) are applied after region creation.

Reserved VM Classes (C) are not a prerequisite unless specifically required for policy enforcement.

An Organization for VM Applications (D) is not required prior to region creation.

Thus, the administrator must validate:

Consistent VM Classes (B)

Consistent Storage Classes (E)

VCF 9.0 introduces Log Data Transfer initiated from VCF Operations. The docs say: “You can transfer log data for up to 90 days from Aria Operations for Logs 8.x… The migrated logs are stored in VCF Operations for logs.” and “To transfer logs… navigate to the Logs Data Transfer card in Administration > Control Panel… click the INITIATE TRANSFER button… You can select the duration of logs to transfer…” (emphasis added).

They further clarify that simple forwarding does not transfer already ingested logs: “Forward logs… does not transfer already ingested logs. Transfer historical logs up to 90 days… using the Log Data Transfer feature in VCF Operations.”

Hence, the correct action is to initiate the transfer in VCF Operations (Administration > Control Panel > Logs Data Transfer).

===========

The vSphere 9.0 Resource Management Guide describes Enhanced vMotion Compatibility (EVC) as the mechanism that masks CPU instruction set differences across ESXi hosts, presenting a consistent baseline to VMs.

The documentation states:

“EVC ensures vMotion compatibility across hosts with different CPU generations by exposing a uniform set of CPU features to all virtual machines in the cluster.”

vSphere Fault Tolerance (A): Provides continuous availability for individual VMs but does not address CPU instruction compatibility.

vSphere Availability (B): Refers to HA (High Availability) which handles VM failover, not CPU feature alignment.

Host Affinity Rules (C): Control placement of VMs but cannot solve compatibility between mixed CPU generations.

Enhanced vMotion Compatibility (D): Specifically addresses the requirement for vMotion and DRS across mixed CPU generations, making it the correct answer.

According to the VCF 9.0 Operations and Monitoring Guide:

Fleet Management: “VCF Operations Fleet Management enables cross-instance monitoring, unifying health and metrics across multiple VCF instances.”

Operations for Networks: “Provides application and network visibility, dependency mapping, and traffic analytics. Required to complete full-stack monitoring.”

Core VCF Operations is already deployed as part of the management stack and does not need to be added separately. Operations for Logs is optional for log aggregation, not mandatory for full-stack observability. The Management Pack Builder (C) is an add-on tool for custom packs, not a required component. Therefore, the correct two to add for full-stack monitoring are VCF Operations Fleet Management (A) and VCF Operations for Networks (E).

The VCF 9.0 Service Mesh Integration Guide defines Istio as: “Istio Service Mesh provides an infrastructure layer that transparently handles service-to-service communication, securing, observing, and controlling traffic between microservices.” The key purpose is enabling structured and observable communication between applications. While Istio includes discovery and load balancing, those are features, not the overarching purpose. A centralized routing table (Option D) is not the core definition. VMware documentation highlights Istio’s role in service-to-service communication, observability, and policy enforcement within the service mesh. Therefore, the correct answer is B.

To deploy Kubernetes workloads through VCF Automation (Organization for All Applications), the following prerequisites are required:

vSphere Supervisor must be activated within the workload domain (B) to enable Kubernetes functionality.

A Region must be configured (A) to provide compute and storage capacity to the Organization.

NSX Federation (C) is optional and not required.

VKS activation in the Management domain (D, E) is not required for workload domain Kubernetes deployments.

In VMware vSphere with Supervisor (used within VCF), a vSphere Namespace allows administrators to define resource quotas for Kubernetes workloads.

The vSphere documentation specifies that administrators can configure limits on:

CPU resources

Memory resources

Storage capacity

These quotas control the maximum resources that workloads deployed within the namespace can consume.

Incorrect options:

The number of containers (A) is managed at the Kubernetes level, not directly as a namespace resource quota in vSphere.

The number of services (D) is a Kubernetes object count limit, not a vSphere namespace resource limit.

Thus, the three configurable resource limitations are CPU, Memory, and Storage.