Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Questions and Answers

To comply with FIPS 140-2 for the messaging app, you need to ensure that both data at rest and data in transit are encrypted according to the standard. Using customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) ensures that you have control over the encryption keys, and BoringSSL is a library that meets FIPS 140-2 standards for encrypting data in transit.

Steps:

Encrypt Local SSDs: Modify the instance template for the Managed Instance Group (MIG) to use customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) for encrypting Local SSDs.

Enable BoringSSL: Update the application to use the BoringSSL library for all instance-to-instance communication to ensure that all data in transit is encrypted according to FIPS 140-2 standards.

Managing IAM permissions at the KeyRing level is more efficient and scalable compared to managing them at the individual Key level. By creating a single KeyRing and placing all encryption keys within it, you can apply uniform IAM permissions to the entire KeyRing, simplifying the management of permissions.

Steps:

Create a KeyRing: Set up a single KeyRing in Cloud KMS for all the encryption keys required for the persistent disks.

Create Encryption Keys: Generate the necessary encryption keys within this KeyRing.

Set IAM Permissions: Assign IAM roles and permissions to the KeyRing to manage access control at this level, ensuring that all keys within the KeyRing inherit these permissions.

Enable VPC Service Controls:

VPC Service Controls help mitigate the risk of data exfiltration by allowing you to define a security perimeter around GCP resources.

Set up a service perimeter around your BigQuery project to restrict data access to within the defined perimeter.

Create Access Levels:

In the Google Cloud Console, navigate to the Access Context Manager.

Define access levels based on IP address conditions, specifying the authorized source IP addresses that are allowed to access your BigQuery resources.

These access levels are used to enforce policies that restrict who can access your sensitive data based on their IP addresses.

Apply Service Perimeter with Access Levels:

Apply the created access levels to the service perimeter to ensure that only requests originating from the specified IP addresses are able to access BigQuery tables.

This setup ensures that the sensitive PII data is not accessible from unauthorized IP addresses, reducing the risk of data exfiltration.

To identify all principals who can change firewall rules, you need to determine which users or service accounts have permissions that allow them to modify firewall rules in your Google Cloud project. The correct permissions to check for this are compute.firewalls.create and compute.firewalls.delete. These permissions enable a user to create and delete firewall rules, respectively.

The Policy Analyzer tool in Google Cloud allows you to query and analyze IAM policies to identify which principals have specific permissions. By using Policy Analyzer, you can effectively identify all principals with the compute.firewalls.create and compute.firewalls.delete permissions.

Open Policy Analyzer: Go to the Google Cloud Console, navigate to IAM & Admin, and select Policy Analyzer.

Set Up Query: Create a new query specifying the permissions compute.firewalls.create and compute.firewalls.delete.

Run Query: Execute the query to retrieve a list of principals who have these permissions.

Review Results: Analyze the results to identify all users and service accounts with the capability to modify firewall rules.

This method ensures you have a comprehensive list of all principals who can change firewall rules, enhancing your audit and security posture.

The problem requires ensuring that only images that have passed vulnerability scanning and meet corporate policies are allowed to be deployed to GKE, with the process being automated and integrated into the existing CI/CD pipeline.

Binary Authorization: This Google Cloud service is purpose-built to enforce deployment policies on images before they are run on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Run, and other deployable platforms. It acts as a policy gate that prevents the deployment of non-compliant images.

Extract Reference: "Binary Authorization is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Run, and Anthos clusters." and "With Binary Authorization, you can require images to be signed by trusted authorities and enforce validation policies during deployment." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Binary Authorization overview" - https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/overview)

Artifact Analysis (part of Container Analysis): Artifact Analysis (which includes Container Analysis) provides vulnerability scanning capabilities for container images stored in Artifact Registry. It generates findings and metadata about vulnerabilities.

Extract Reference: "Container Analysis is a service that scans your images for known vulnerabilities and provides metadata about them." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Overview | Container Analysis" - https://cloud.google.com/container-analysis/docs/overview)

Binary Authorization can be configured to integrate with Artifact Analysis (or other attestors) to check for vulnerability scan results as part of its deployment policy.

Integration and Automation: Binary Authorization policies can require attestations before deployment. An attestation confirms that an image meets specific criteria (e.g., it has passed a vulnerability scan, it was signed by an approved CI/CD process, it adheres to corporate policies). Cloud Build can be configured to generate these attestations after a successful vulnerability scan (using Artifact Analysis). This fully automates the process and integrates directly into the CI/CD pipeline.

Extract Reference: "With Binary Authorization, you create a policy that enforces your requirements. The policy defines rules that govern deployment. For example, a policy can require all images to be signed by a trusted authority before deployment." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Binary Authorization overview" - https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/overview)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Custom script in Cloud Build... Fail the build: While scanning during the build is good practice (shift-left security), failing the build only prevents the image from being pushed. It doesn't prevent a developer or an automated process from manually deploying an old or non-compliant image that might already exist in Artifact Registry, or from bypassing the build system. The enforcement needs to happen at deployment time.

B. Configure GKE to use only images from a specific... trusted Artifact Registry repository. Manually inspect all images: Manually inspecting images is not automated and does not scale for a "large number of containerized applications." It also doesn't programmatically enforce vulnerability scan results or corporate policies.

D. Enable Artifact Analysis vulnerability scanning and regularly scan images... Remove any images that do not meet... before deployment: This describes scanning and remediation, which are important. However, it's a reactive approach ("remove any images") rather than a proactive enforcement ("only images that... are allowed to be deployed"). There's still a window where a non-compliant image could be deployed before it's removed. Binary Authorization is the enforcement gate.

Therefore, configuring Binary Authorization with a policy that integrates with Artifact Analysis (or requires attestations based on its findings) is the most robust, automated, and Google-recommended solution for enforcing deployment policies based on vulnerability scanning and corporate compliance.

To migrate the current data backup and disaster recovery solutions to GCP while keeping the production environment on-premises, the most scalable and cost-efficient solution is using Google Cloud Storage with scheduled tasks and the gsutil command.

Setup Cloud Storage: Create a Cloud Storage bucket to store the backups.

Go to the Cloud Console and navigate to Cloud Storage.

Click "Create bucket" and follow the prompts to configure the storage bucket.

Install gsutil: Ensure gsutil is installed on the on-premises servers.

gsutil is a command-line tool for interacting with Cloud Storage.

Follow the installation guide here.

Create Backup Script: Write a script to upload data to Cloud Storage using gsutil.

#!/bin/bash gsutil -m cp -r /path/to/local/backup gs://your-bucket-name

Schedule Backup Task: Use a scheduling tool like cron on Linux to run the backup script at regular intervals.

Edit the crontab file with crontab -e and add an entry like:

To meet the requirements for exporting and auditing security logs in near real-time for login activity events and API calls:

Organization-Level Log Sink with Pub/Sub: Create a log sink at the organization level to ensure logs from all projects are captured. Use the includeChildren parameter to include logs from all child resources (projects). Set the destination to a Pub/Sub topic to facilitate near real-time log export to an external SIEM.

Enable Data Access Audit Logs: Enable Data Access audit logs at the organization level to capture and export detailed information about API calls that modify configurations of Google Cloud resources across all projects.

These steps ensure comprehensive logging and real-time export capabilities, which are crucial for security auditing and monitoring.

References

Audit Logs Overview

Exporting with Sinks

https://gsuite.google.com/learn-more/security/security-whitepaper/page-1.html

Shared responsibility “Security of the Cloud” - GCP is responsible for protecting the infrastructure that runs all of the services offered in the GCP Cloud. This infrastructure is composed of the hardware, software, networking, and facilities that run GCP Cloud services.

This is a Customer-supplied encryption keys (CSEK). We generate our own encryption key and manage it on-premises. A KEK never leaves Cloud KMS.There is no KEK or KMS on-premises. Encryption at rest by default, with various key management options https://cloud.google.com/security/encryption-at-rest

Uniform Bucket-Level Access: Enable uniform bucket-level access for all your Cloud Storage buckets. This feature ensures that access control is applied consistently at the bucket level, simplifying management and improving security.

Domain Restricted Sharing: Enforce domain-restricted sharing through an organization policy. This policy ensures that only users within your organization’s domain can access the data in the buckets, preventing public exposure.

Policy Enforcement: Apply the necessary IAM policies and ensure that no buckets are configured to allow public access. This combination of settings ensures that data in Cloud Storage buckets remains private and accessible only to authorized users within your organization. References:

Google Cloud - Uniform Bucket-Level Access

Google Cloud - Organization Policy Service

To ensure that the developers can view audit logs for the development environment and the security team can review all logs, you should grant IAM roles at the appropriate resource levels:

Grant logging.admin Role to the Security Team:

Assign the logging.admin role to the security team at the organization resource level.

This grants the security team full access to all logging data across the organization, including both production and development environments.

Grant logging.viewer Role to the Developer Team:

Assign the logging.viewer role to the developer team at the folder resource level that contains all the development projects.

This restricts the developers' access to only view logs in the development environment, ensuring they do not have access to production logs.

By using these roles and assigning them at the appropriate levels, you ensure that each team has the access they need while adhering to the principle of least privilege.

https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/organization-policy/org-policy-constraints - constraints/compute.trustedImageProjects

This list constraint defines the set of projects that can be used for image storage and disk instantiation for Compute Engine. If this constraint is active, only images from trusted projects will be allowed as the source for boot disks for new instances.

To delegate management of access control permissions to each business unit effectively, organizing projects into folders and assigning permissions to Google groups at the folder level allows for scalable and manageable access control. Using Google Cloud Directory Sync (GCDS) to synchronize users and groups from the on-premises directory service ensures that access controls are maintained and updated automatically as users change roles or leave the company.

Steps:

Organize Projects in Folders: Create a folder structure in the Google Cloud Resource Manager to organize projects by business unit.

Assign Permissions to Google Groups: Use IAM to assign necessary permissions to Google Groups at the folder level, ensuring each business unit can manage access controls for their own projects.

Synchronize Users and Groups: Use GCDS to sync users and group memberships from your on-premises directory service to Google Cloud Identity, ensuring that changes in the on-premises directory are reflected in Google Cloud.

Challenge:

Ensuring secure access to Google Cloud resources from GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelines without directly managing service account keys.

Workload Identity Federation:

Allows for the delegation of access to Google Cloud resources based on federated identities, such as those from GitHub.

Benefits:

This approach eliminates the need to manage service account keys, reducing the risk of key leakage.

It leverages GitHub's identity provider capabilities to authenticate and authorize access.

Steps to Configure Workload Identity Federation:

Step 1: Create a workload identity pool in Google Cloud.

Step 2: Add GitHub as an identity provider within the pool.

Step 3: Configure the necessary permissions and bindings for the identity pool to allow GitHub Actions to access Google Cloud resources.

Step 4: Update the GitHub Actions workflow to use the identity federation for authentication.

The problem describes an application with two Cloud Run services (Service A - frontend, Service B - backend) and requires setting up IAM with the principle of least privilege. Service A calls Service B.

Principle of Least Privilege: This principle dictates that each entity (in this case, a Cloud Run service) should only have the minimum permissions necessary to perform its function.

Separate Service Accounts for Separate Services: To adhere to the principle of least privilege, it's best practice to assign a unique service account to each distinct service or component. This ensures that a compromise of one service account does not grant excessive permissions across other services. Service A needs permissions to run itself and to invoke Service B. Service B only needs permissions to run itself.Extract Reference: "Assign a service account to a Cloud Run service. The service account acts as the identity for your service and determines what permissions your revisions have when executing requests. It is a best practice to grant each service account only the permissions that are required to run the specific service (principle of least privilege)." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/service-accounts)

Authentication for Cloud Run Services: When one Cloud Run service (caller) needs to invoke another Cloud Run service (callee), the caller must be authorized to do so. This is typically achieved by assigning the roles/run.invoker role on the callee service to the caller's service account.Extract Reference: "To allow a service to invoke another service, grant the roles/run.invoker role on the called service to the caller's service account." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/securing/service-to-service)

Let's evaluate the options:

A. Create a new service account with the permissions to run service A and service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the new service account to call the backend. This violates the principle of least privilege by giving a single service account permissions for both services. If that service account were compromised, both services would be affected.

B. Create two separate service accounts. Grant one service account the permissions to execute service A, and grant the other service account the permissions to execute service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the service account for service A to call the back-end. This aligns perfectly with least privilege. Service A gets its own identity, Service B gets its own identity. Service A's service account is then granted run.invoker permissions on Service B, allowing it to call the backend while Service B requires authentication. This is the recommended approach.

C. Use the Compute Engine default service account to run service A and service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the default service account to call the backend. The Compute Engine default service account often has broad permissions (e.g., editor role in its project). Using it violates the principle of least privilege and is generally discouraged for production applications due to the potential for excessive permissions.

D. Create three separate service accounts. Grant one service account the permissions to execute service A. Grant the second service account the permissions to run service B. Grant the third service account the permissions to communicate between both services A and B. Require authentication for service B. Call the back-end by authenticating with a service account key for the third service account. This introduces unnecessary complexity with a third service account just for communication. More critically, using a service account key for authentication is generally discouraged in Cloud Run environments where ADC (Application Default Credentials) can be used, as managing keys securely becomes an operational overhead and security risk. Cloud Run services automatically use their attached service accounts for authentication when making calls to other Google Cloud services, including other Cloud Run services.

Therefore, option B is the best solution, adhering to the principle of least privilege and Google Cloud best practices for Cloud Run service-to-service authentication.

https://cloud.google.com/network-intelligence-center/docs/firewall-insights/concepts/overview#shadowed-firewall-rules

Firewall Insights analyzes your firewall rules to detect firewall rules that are shadowed by other rules. A shadowed rule is a firewall rule that has all of its relevant attributes, such as its IP address and port ranges, overlapped by attributes from one or more rules with higher or equal priority, called shadowing rules.

To manage user accounts and ensure they comply with corporate policies, using Google Cloud Directory Sync (GCDS) allows synchronization between your local identity system and Cloud Identity. The Transfer Tool for Unmanaged Users (TTUU) helps identify and manage conflicting accounts by allowing users to transfer their personal accounts to managed accounts.

Steps:

Synchronize Identities: Use GCDS to sync users from your local identity management system to Cloud Identity, ensuring that all corporate user accounts are managed.

Identify Conflicting Accounts: Use TTUU to find users who have personal Google accounts using corporate email addresses.

Manage Conflicting Accounts: Request users to transfer their personal accounts to managed accounts using TTUU, ensuring all accounts are under corporate control.

To reduce the scope of systems subject to PCI audit standards, segregate the cardholder data environment (CDE) into a separate GCP project. This ensures that only the project containing the CDE will be subject to PCI DSS compliance, reducing the audit scope for other projects.

Create Separate GCP Project:

Go to the Cloud Console, navigate to IAM & Admin > Manage Resources.

Click "Create Project" and set up a new project for the CDE.

Migrate CDE:

Transfer the systems processing, storing, or transmitting cardholder data to the new project.

Apply PCI DSS Controls:

Implement PCI DSS required controls on the new project.

Use appropriate security measures such as firewalls, access controls, and encryption.

Cloud NAT (Network Address Translation) enables instances in a private network to connect to external services while not exposing their internal IP addresses to the public internet. This solution helps in situations where VMs need to initiate outbound connections without having a public IP address:

Cloud NAT Setup: Configure Cloud NAT for the subnet where your VMs are located. This allows these VMs to use the NAT gateway to communicate with external services securely.

Network Security: By using Cloud NAT, the internal IP addresses of VMs remain private, reducing the attack surface and enhancing security.

Operational Continuity: VMs can continue to communicate with external sites as needed for operations without requiring public IP addresses, meeting both security and functional requirements.

References

Cloud NAT Documentation

Web Security Scanner is designed to scan your web applications deployed on Google Cloud for common vulnerabilities, including cross-site scripting (XSS). It can authenticate using Google accounts and can be scheduled to run scans regularly.

Steps:

Enable Web Security Scanner: In the Google Cloud Console, enable Web Security Scanner for your project.

Configure Scan: Set up the scan configuration, specifying the target URLs, authentication details (Google accounts), and scan frequency (at least once per week).

Run and Monitor Scans: Run the scans and monitor the results for vulnerabilities, addressing any issues found.

Cloud DNS with DNSSEC (Domain Name System Security Extensions) provides authentication for DNS responses, ensuring that they are legitimate and have not been tampered with. DNSSEC helps protect against DNS spoofing and cache poisoning attacks, which are common techniques used in DDoS attacks.

Steps:

Enable DNSSEC: In the Google Cloud Console, navigate to Cloud DNS and enable DNSSEC for your managed zones.

Configure Key Signing: Set up key signing keys (KSK) and zone signing keys (ZSK) to sign your DNS records.

Monitor DNSSEC Status: Regularly monitor the DNSSEC status and logs to ensure it is functioning correctly.

To provide temporary write access to a Cloud Storage bucket with the minimum permissions necessary, you should:

Identify the Compute Engine instance’s default service account: Each Compute Engine instance has a default service account that is used to interact with other Google Cloud services.

Assign the storage.objectCreator role: This predefined IAM role grants permissions to create objects in a Cloud Storage bucket, which is sufficient for temporary write access. It does not grant permissions to read or delete objects, thus adhering to the principle of least privilege.

Avoid using full permissions or long-lived keys: Options A and C suggest using broader permissions than necessary or embedding long-lived keys, which could pose a security risk if compromised.

Service account impersonation (Option D) is not necessary for this task and would be more appropriate for scenarios where you need to assume a different identity with different permissions.

Google Cloud customers with additional requirements for encryption of data over WAN can choose to implement further protections for data as it moves from a user to an application, or virtual machine to virtual machine. These protections include IPSec tunnels, Gmail S/MIME, managed SSL certificates, and Istio. https://cloud.google.com/docs/security/encryption-in-transit

Objective: Identify the layers of the stack the customer shares responsibility for in a shared security responsibility model for IaaS.

Solution: Understand the shared responsibility model.

Explanation:

Network Security: Customers are responsible for configuring network security, such as setting up firewalls, managing VPCs, and ensuring secure network traffic.

Access Policies: Customers are responsible for managing access policies, including IAM roles and permissions, to ensure only authorized users can access resources.

In IaaS, the cloud provider is typically responsible for the underlying infrastructure, while the customer is responsible for securing their applications and data on the cloud.

The problem has two key requirements:

All applications must send data to a centralized security service.

Developers need high autonomy over firewall rules within their projects.

Prevent accidental blockage of access to the central security service.

This scenario requires a mechanism to enforce critical network policies at a higher level of the resource hierarchy while still allowing project-level flexibility.

Hierarchical Firewall Policies: Google Cloud's Hierarchical Firewall Policies (HFP) are designed precisely for this purpose. They allow administrators to define firewall rules at the organization or folder level, and these rules are inherited by all projects and VPC networks within that hierarchy. Crucially, HFP rules can be prioritized. Rules with higher priority (lower numerical value) are evaluated first. This means you can create high-priority "allow" rules for critical services that cannot be overridden or blocked by project-level firewall rules.Extract Reference: "Hierarchical firewall policies allow you to define and enforce consistent network security policies across your organization. Policies can be applied at the organization or folder level, and they are inherited by all projects and VPC networks within that hierarchy." and "Rules in a hierarchical firewall policy can take precedence over VPC network firewall rules based on priority. A rule with a lower priority value takes precedence over a rule with a higher priority value." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/firewall-policies-overview)

Preventing Accidental Blockage while Allowing Autonomy: By setting a high-priority "allow" rule for the central security service in a hierarchical firewall policy, you guarantee that this traffic will always be permitted, regardless of what project-level firewall rules developers might configure. This ensures the critical connectivity while still allowing developers to manage other, less critical firewall rules within their projects with high autonomy.

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Deploy a central Secure Web Proxy and connect it to all VPC networks. Create a Secure Web Proxy policy to allow traffic to the central security service. A Secure Web Proxy is for HTTP/S outbound traffic to external web services. The central security service might not be an external web service, and this solution is focused on application-layer proxies, not general network connectivity like sending data to an internal service. Also, it doesn't directly address the challenge of developers blocking access with project-level firewall rules.

C. Create a central project to manage Shared VPC networks which will be accessible to all other projects. Administer all firewall rules centrally within this project. While Shared VPC centralizes network management, it means all firewall rules are administered centrally. This directly contradicts the requirement for developers to have "high autonomy to configure firewall rules within their projects." Shared VPC would centralize too much control for this specific scenario.

D. Use Terraform to automate the creation of the required firewall rule in all projects. Restrict rule change permissions solely to the Terraform service account. This approach automates the creation but doesn't prevent developers from creating conflicting or overriding rules in their projects (unless Terraform is used to manage all rules, again removing autonomy). It also relies on restricting IAM permissions for all firewall rules, which is against the "high autonomy" requirement for developers. Hierarchical firewall policies offer a more robust and native solution for overriding and enforcing specific rules.

Therefore, implementing a hierarchical firewall policy is the most effective solution, as it allows for the enforcement of critical security service connectivity at a higher level, while still granting developers the desired autonomy over their project-specific firewall rules.

Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (Cloud IAP) provides a way to control access to your web applications and resources running on Google Cloud. It works by verifying the identity of a user trying to access the application and supports multi-factor authentication (MFA). Cloud IAP can restrict access to users on the corporate network and also supports access over the internet securely.

Steps:

Enable Cloud IAP: In the Google Cloud Console, navigate to the IAP section and enable IAP for your web application.

Configure OAuth Consent Screen: Set up the OAuth consent screen to manage how users grant access.

Set Up Authentication: Use Google Identity Platform to manage users and enable two-factor authentication.

Add Users: Grant users access to the application by adding their identities in the IAP settings.

Use Pub/Sub and Cloud Functions to trigger a Cloud Data Loss Prevention scan every time a file is uploaded to the administrator's bucket. If the scan does not detect PII, have the function move the objects into the shared Cloud Storage bucket:

Configure a Pub/Sub topic to publish notifications when new files are uploaded to the administrator's bucket.

Create a Cloud Function that is triggered by the Pub/Sub topic. This function uses the Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) API to scan the uploaded files for PII.

If the scan does not detect PII, the function moves the file to the shared Cloud Storage bucket. This ensures that only non-sensitive data is accessible to analysts, while PII remains secure in the administrator's bucket.

To prevent developers from creating user-managed service account keys and reduce the risk of key mismanagement, you should enable an organization policy that specifically prohibits the creation of these keys.

Enable an organization policy to prevent service account keys from being created (C):

Google Cloud provides the capability to enforce organizational policies that restrict various actions, including the creation of service account keys. By enabling this policy, you ensure that developers cannot create new user-managed service account keys, thus minimizing the risk of key mismanagement and potential security breaches.

References

Service Accounts documentation

Organization Policy Service documentation

Using Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) for managing SSH access to private VMs ensures secure access control and avoids the need for public IPs. IAP allows you to enforce identity-based access control policies.

Enable IAP: Ensure that IAP is enabled for your project. This can be done via the Google Cloud Console under "Security" -> "Identity-Aware Proxy".

Set Up Firewall Rule: Create a firewall rule to allow SSH traffic from the IAP IP ranges.

Navigate to "VPC network" -> "Firewall".

Create a new rule allowing ingress traffic on port 22 (SSH) from the IAP IP ranges.

Assign IAP-Secured Tunnel User Role: Grant the roles/iap.tunnelResourceAccessor role to the administrators who need SSH access.

Go to "IAM & Admin" -> "IAM".

Assign the IAP-Secured Tunnel User role to the relevant users or groups.

SSH Using IAP: Administrators can now use IAP to SSH into the instances. This can be done using the gcloud command:

gcloud compute ssh [INSTANCE_NAME] --tunnel-through-iap

Objective: Implement external web application protection and validate policy changes before enforcement.

Solution: Use Google Cloud Armor's preconfigured rules in preview mode.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the Google Cloud Armor section.

Step 3: Create or select a security policy.

Step 4: Apply preconfigured rules to the policy.

Step 5: Enable preview mode to simulate the effects of the rules without enforcing them.

Step 6: Monitor the logs to validate the policy changes.

Google Cloud Armor's preview mode allows you to test and validate the impact of security policies on your application traffic before applying them, ensuring that they work as intended without disrupting the service.

Objective: Provide evidence of access reviews for an upcoming audit.

Solution: Use Policy Analyzer to review and report on IAM policies.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the Policy Analyzer tool.

Step 3: Select the project for which you need to review access policies.

Step 4: Use the tool to generate reports on IAM roles and permissions.

Step 5: Export the reports as evidence for the audit.

Policy Analyzer provides detailed insights into IAM policies, helping you to review access configurations and generate necessary reports for compliance and auditing purposes.

To enhance the security of your microservices architecture on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and ensure that only approved container images are deployed, implementing Binary Authorization is a robust solution.​

Option A: Enforcing Binary Authorization in your GKE clusters ensures that only container images that meet your organization's security policies are deployed. By integrating container image vulnerability scanning into your Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipeline, you can assess images for known vulnerabilities before they are deployed. Binary Authorization can be configured to use these vulnerability scan results to make policy decisions, effectively preventing the deployment of insecure images. This approach leverages managed services provided by Google Cloud, ensuring scalability and compliance with security standards.​

Option B: Developing custom organization policies to restrict deployments to images within a specific Artifact Registry project helps in controlling the source of images but does not inherently assess the security posture of those images. Without integrated vulnerability scanning and enforcement mechanisms, this approach may not fully mitigate the risk of deploying vulnerable images.​

Option C: Building a system using third-party vulnerability databases and custom scripts requires significant maintenance and may not integrate seamlessly with GKE. This approach can be error-prone and lacks the efficiency of managed services designed for this purpose.​

Option D: Automatically deploying new images upon successful CI/CD builds ensures rapid deployment but does not address the need for security assessments of the images. While setting up firewall rules is good practice, it does not prevent the deployment of potentially vulnerable images.​

Therefore, Option A is the most effective approach, as it utilizes Google Cloud's managed services to enforce security policies and integrate vulnerability assessments directly into the deployment process, ensuring that only approved and secure container images are deployed to your GKE clusters.​

To enable Engineering Group A to attach a Compute Engine instance to a specific subnet (10.1.1.0/24) in a Shared VPC, you should grant the Compute Network User Role at the subnet level. This role allows users to use the subnetwork for their instances without giving them broader permissions at the project level.

Step-by-Step:

Identify the Subnet: Locate the subnet (10.1.1.0/24) in the host project.

Grant Role:

Navigate to the GCP Console > VPC network > VPC networks.

Select the Shared VPC host project and locate the specific subnet.

Click on "Edit" and go to the "IAM & Admin" section.

Assign the "Compute Network User" role to Engineering Group A at the subnet level.

Verification: Ensure that Engineering Group A can now attach Compute Engine instances to the specified subnet.

To protect your web application from threats like malware by implementing TLS interception for incoming traffic, configuring a Secure Web Proxy with TLS offloading at the load balancer is an effective approach.​

Option A: By configuring a Secure Web Proxy, you can offload TLS traffic at the load balancer, inspect the decrypted traffic for threats such as malware, and then forward the inspected traffic to your web application. This approach ensures that encrypted traffic is securely analyzed without compromising the security of the data in transit.​

Option B: An internal proxy load balancer is designed for distributing traffic within a private network and may not support TLS interception capabilities required for inspecting incoming traffic from external sources.​

Option C: Hierarchical firewall policies in Google Cloud are used to enforce security rules across your organization but do not provide TLS interception capabilities.​

Option D: VPC firewall rules control traffic to and from VM instances based on specified rules but do not have the capability to perform TLS interception or traffic inspection.​

Therefore, Option A is the most suitable solution, as it allows for TLS interception through a Secure Web Proxy, enabling the inspection of incoming encrypted traffic to detect and mitigate threats like malware before the traffic reaches your web application.​

Use Cryptographic Verification If there is a risk of IAP being turned off or bypassed, your app can check to make sure the identity information it receives is valid. This uses a third web request header added by IAP, called X-Goog-IAP-JWT-Assertion. The value of the header is a cryptographically signed object that also contains the user identity data. Your application can verify the digital signature and use the data provided in this object to be certain that it was provided by IAP without alteration.

Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) allows you to control access to your web applications running on Google Cloud. It ensures that only authenticated users who are part of a specified Google Group can access the application. Here’s how you can restrict access to in-progress sites using IAP:

Enable IAP: First, you need to enable Cloud IAP for your App Engine application. This will require configuring OAuth consent and setting up necessary permissions.

Create a Google Group: Create a Google Group that includes all the customers and company employees who should have access to the in-progress sites.

Configure Access: Configure IAP to allow access only to members of the created Google Group. This involves setting up the necessary IAP policies and ensuring that only authenticated users in the group can access the application.

By using IAP, you ensure that the access control is centrally managed and only authorized users can view the in-progress sites from any location.

References

Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Documentation

Setting up IAP

Security Command Center (SCC) in Google Cloud provides several features to help organizations detect and respond to security threats and misconfigurations.

Event Threat Detection: This feature continuously monitors and analyzes system logs to detect potential threats such as crypto mining. It uses machine learning and threat intelligence to identify suspicious activities and generate alerts.

Security Health Analytics: This feature helps identify common misconfigurations and compliance violations that could impact security. It provides visibility into security posture and helps remediate issues related to misconfigurations in your Google Cloud environment.

By using both Event Threat Detection and Security Health Analytics, you can effectively monitor for crypto mining activities and detect common misconfigurations that could compromise security.

References

Security Command Center Documentation

Event Threat Detection

Security Health Analytics

Challenge:

Prevent common misconfigurations that expose services (e.g., MYSQL) to the public internet.

Hierarchical Firewall Policies:

These policies can be applied at the organization level to enforce consistent network security rules across all projects.

Solution:

Create a hierarchical firewall policy that allows connections only from internal IP ranges.

This policy ensures that services like MySQL are not exposed to 0.0.0.0/0 (the entire internet).

Steps:

Step 1: Define the hierarchical firewall policy at the organization level.

Step 2: Set the rule to allow traffic only from internal IP ranges.

Step 3: Apply the policy to all projects under the organization.

Benefits:

Centralized management of network security.

Prevents accidental exposure of services to the public internet, enhancing security.

Cloud NAT Service: Use Cloud NAT (Network Address Translation) to allow VM instances without external IP addresses to access the internet securely.

Configuration: Configure Cloud NAT for the subnets containing your VM instances. This setup allows the VMs to initiate outbound connections to the internet for updates and other necessary communications.

Security Compliance: By using Cloud NAT, you adhere to the security policy of not assigning external IP addresses to VMs while still enabling necessary internet connectivity. Cloud NAT provides a secure method for outbound internet traffic without exposing VMs directly to the public internet. References:

Google Cloud - Cloud NAT Overview

Google Cloud - Configuring Cloud NAT

To ensure compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) at the infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) level within Google Cloud, it's essential to have continuous monitoring and assessment tools that can detect deviations from compliance requirements.​

Option A: Creating data profiles and configuring Data Discovery jobs in Google Cloud Sensitive Data Protection focuses on identifying and analyzing sensitive data but does not directly address infrastructure compliance monitoring.​

Option B: Downloading the latest PCI DSS report from the Compliance Reports Manager provides a static compliance report but does not offer real-time detection of deviations within your specific environment.​

Option C: Utilizing Assured Workloads helps in creating environments that meet specific compliance requirements, but migrating existing projects into such folders does not actively detect deviations; it primarily ensures that new workloads comply with predefined policies.​

Option D: Activating Security Command Center (SCC) Premium and leveraging its Compliance Monitoring capabilities allows for continuous assessment of your Google Cloud environment against PCI DSS requirements. SCC can identify misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and compliance violations in real-time, providing actionable insights to address any issues promptly.​

Therefore, Option D is the most effective approach to detect deviations at the IaaS level in preparation for a PCI DSS audit.​

Objective: Reduce the risk of Google Cloud user accounts being compromised.

Solution: Implement strong password policies and post-SSO 2-Step Verification using security keys.

Steps:

Step 1: In Active Directory, configure a domain password policy with strong settings (e.g., complexity, length, expiration).

Step 2: In the Google Admin console, navigate to the Security settings.

Step 3: Enable 2-Step Verification and configure it to use security keys for post-SSO verification.

Step 4: Ensure all users enroll in the 2-Step Verification with security keys.

Using strong password policies in Active Directory along with security keys for 2-Step Verification post-SSO provides enhanced security against account compromises.

https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/organization-policy/restricting-domains#setting_the_organization_policy

The domain restriction constraint is a type of list constraint. Google Workspace customer IDs can be added and removed from the allowed_values list of a domain restriction constraint. The domain restriction constraint does not support denying values, and an organization policy can't be saved with IDs in the denied_values list. All domains associated with a Google Workspace account listed in the allowed_values will be allowed by the organization policy. All other domains will be denied by the organization policy.

Activate Security Command Center (SCC) Premium: Security Command Center (SCC) Premium provides advanced security analytics and best practice recommendations for your Google Cloud environment. It includes functionalities such as asset discovery, vulnerability scanning, and security findings.

Create a Custom Rule to Mute Irrelevant Security Findings:

Navigate to the Security Command Center (SCC) in the Google Cloud Console.

Go to the "Settings" tab and find the "Mute findings" section.

Create a new mute rule by specifying the conditions that match the irrelevant controls you want to disregard. These conditions can be based on attributes such as resource type, finding type, and other metadata.

Apply this mute rule, which will ensure that the specified findings are not evaluated in your security posture assessments.

Ensure Continuous Compliance Monitoring:

The mute rules will automatically filter out the irrelevant findings, ensuring that only relevant controls from the CIS Google Cloud Computing Foundations Benchmark v1.3.0 are evaluated.

Regularly review and update the mute rules to adapt to any changes in your compliance requirements or security posture.

The Standard Tier network only provides regional load balancing, while the Premium Tier supports global load balancing with a single anycast IP address. To distribute requests across multiple regions, you need to use the Premium Tier and update the load balancer configuration accordingly.

Steps:

Upgrade to Premium Tier: Update the load balancer to use the Premium Tier network in the Google Cloud Console.

Add New Instance Group: Add the instance group in the new region (us-east-2) to the backend configuration of the existing load balancer.

Verify Configuration: Ensure that the frontend configuration of the load balancer uses a single external IP address for global distribution.

If a user loses their second factor for 2-Step Verification (2SV), you can help them regain access with minimal risk by generating a backup code.

Generate a Backup Code (A):

In the Google Admin console, navigate to the user's account settings.

Generate a backup code for the user. This code allows them to sign in despite not having access to their usual second factor.

Instruct the user to log in using the backup code and then update their second factor in their account settings.

This method ensures that only the affected user’s access is temporarily adjusted, minimizing risk while maintaining overall security policies.

References

Google Admin console 2-Step Verification documentation

Titan Security Keys are a physical form of two-step verification (2SV) that provide the highest level of account security by using cryptographic signatures to verify the user and the URL of the login page.

Cryptographic Security: Titan Security Keys use a hardware-based cryptographic method to authenticate users, which is resistant to phishing attacks. This ensures that the authentication process is secure and not susceptible to being intercepted or spoofed.

URL Verification: Titan Security Keys verify the URL of the login page during the authentication process, providing an additional layer of security against phishing attempts that may try to redirect users to malicious websites.

Ease of Use: These keys are easy to use and integrate with Google's 2SV process, providing a seamless and highly secure authentication method for users.

References

Titan Security Keys

In Google Cloud's Logging service, log entries are automatically routed to the _Default log bucket unless configured otherwise. When you create a new log bucket and intend to redirect all log entries from the _Default bucket to this new bucket, the most efficient approach is to modify the existing _Default sink to point to the new log bucket.​

Option A: Creating a new user-defined sink with filters replicated from the _Default sink is redundant and may lead to configuration complexities.​

Option B: Implementing exclusion filters on the _Default sink and then creating a new sink introduces unnecessary steps and potential for misconfiguration.​

Option C: Disabling the _Default sink would stop all log routing to it, but creating a new sink to replicate its functionality is inefficient.​

Option D: Editing the _Default sink to change its destination to the new log bucket ensures a seamless transition of log routing without additional configurations.​

Therefore, Option D is the most efficient and straightforward method to achieve the desired log routing.​

DNSSEC — use a DNS registrar that supports DNSSEC, and enable it. DNSSEC digitally signs DNS communication, making it more difficult (but not impossible) for hackers to intercept and spoof. Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) adds security to the Domain Name System (DNS) protocol by enabling DNS responses to be validated. Having a trustworthy Domain Name System (DNS) that translates a domain name like www.example.com into its associated IP address is an increasingly important building block of today’s web-based applications. Attackers can hijack this process of domain/IP lookup and redirect users to a malicious site through DNS hijacking and man-in-the-middle attacks. DNSSEC helps mitigate the risk of such attacks by cryptographically signing DNS records. As a result, it prevents attackers from issuing fake DNS responses that may misdirect browsers to nefarious websites. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/dnssec-now-available-in-cloud-dns

Physical Token for MFA: Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) using physical tokens (such as security keys) for super admin accounts. This adds an extra layer of security to the highest privilege accounts.

Non-Privileged Identities: Provide super admins with separate non-privileged accounts for daily activities. This practice minimizes the risk associated with using highly privileged accounts for routine tasks.

Account Management: Ensure that super admin accounts are only used for tasks requiring elevated privileges, reducing exposure to potential security threats. These measures enhance the security of super admin accounts, protecting your Google Cloud organization from unauthorized access. References:

Google Cloud - Best Practices for Securing Cloud Identity

Google Cloud - Using Security Keys

To address inconsistencies in your project's Identity and Access Management (IAM) configuration and gain comprehensive visibility into IAM policy changes, user activity, service account behavior, and access to sensitive projects, leveraging Google Cloud's auditing capabilities is essential.​

Option A: While Cloud Monitoring's metrics explorer can track certain metrics, it is not designed to provide detailed logs of IAM policy changes or user activities.​

Option B: Cloud Audit Logs offer detailed records of administrative activities, including IAM policy changes and authentications. By creating log export sinks, you can forward these logs to a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution, enabling correlation with other event sources and comprehensive analysis. This approach provides the necessary visibility into IAM configurations and user activities.​

Option C: Triggering Cloud Functions based on IAM policy changes and analyzing them with a policy simulator is a proactive approach. However, it may not provide the depth of historical data and comprehensive analysis capabilities that a SIEM solution offers.​

Option D: Deploying the OS Config Management agent focuses on VM configuration and patch management, which does not directly address IAM policy monitoring or user activity tracking.​

Therefore, Option B is the most effective solution to gain detailed visibility into IAM-related activities and address the identified inconsistencies.​

https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/packet-mirroring

Packet Mirroring clones the traffic of specified instances in your Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) network and forwards it for examination. Packet Mirroring captures all traffic and packet data, including payloads and headers.

Google Cloud Armor helps to protect applications from DDoS attacks and web application firewall (WAF) threats like XSS and SQLi. To use Google Cloud Armor security policies, certain requirements must be met:

External Load Balancers: Google Cloud Armor is specifically designed to work with external HTTP(S) load balancers, which handle traffic at the edge of the Google Cloud network. This type of load balancer provides a global frontend that can distribute traffic to various backends.

Load Balancing Scheme: The backend service associated with the Google Cloud Armor policy must have an EXTERNAL load balancing scheme. This scheme allows the service to accept traffic from outside the Google Cloud network, which is necessary for applying security policies effectively at the network edge.

These requirements ensure that Google Cloud Armor can inspect and filter incoming traffic before it reaches your web application's backend services, providing an additional layer of security against common web vulnerabilities.

References

Google Cloud Armor Documentation

External HTTP(S) Load Balancing Overview

Enable Dry Run Mode: Start by enabling the dry run mode for your VPC Service Controls perimeter. This mode allows you to test changes without actually enforcing them, thus preventing any disruption to your current setup.

Add Access Level: Add your new access level to the dry run configuration. This way, you can monitor how the new access level would behave and interact with your existing setup without any real impact.

Vetting Process: Carefully vet the new access level by analyzing logs and monitoring the behavior in the dry run mode. Ensure that the new configuration meets your security and operational requirements.

Update Perimeter: Once you are confident that the new access level will not disrupt existing services and meets all requirements, update the actual perimeter configuration with the new access level. This approach minimizes risk by allowing you to test changes before they take effect, ensuring seamless updates with minimal disruption. References:

Google Cloud - Configuring VPC Service Controls

Google Cloud - Using Dry Run Mode

To allow a large number of users to access the GCP Console while keeping the existing Active Directory or LDAP server for identity management, use Google Cloud Directory Sync (GCDS).

Install GCDS:

Download and install Google Cloud Directory Sync from here.

Configure GCDS:

Set up the synchronization by specifying the LDAP server details and the Google domain.

Map the LDAP attributes to Google attributes to ensure user data is synchronized correctly.

Run Synchronization:

Perform an initial synchronization to populate the Google domain with existing users from the LDAP server.

Schedule regular synchronizations to keep the data up-to-date.

Benefits:

Automated Sync: Ensures that user data is consistently updated without manual intervention.

Secure Access: Users can log in to the GCP Console using their existing credentials, enhancing security and user experience.

Review Admin Activity logs:

Admin Activity logs contain entries for API calls that modify or read the configuration or metadata of resources.

These logs are useful for monitoring and auditing administrative actions, including those that could indicate malicious activity on a Cloud SQL instance.

To ensure that your organization’s record data is retained for at least seven years in Cloud Storage, you need to apply a retention policy and enable bucket lock. This prevents the policy from being altered or the data from being deleted before the retention period ends.

Identify Buckets: Determine which Cloud Storage buckets contain the record data that needs to be retained.

Apply Retention Policy:

Go to the Google Cloud Console and navigate to "Cloud Storage".

Select the bucket you identified.

Go to the "Retention" tab and set a retention policy to retain objects for seven years.

Enable Bucket Lock:

Once the retention policy is set, you need to lock the bucket to make the retention policy permanent.

This is done by enabling the bucket lock. Go to the "Retention" tab and click "Lock".

Confirm and Monitor:

Confirm that the bucket lock is applied.

Monitor the bucket using log-based alerts to ensure compliance.

To manage IAM permissions efficiently for a large engineering team with different levels of access in development and production environments, follow these steps:

Create Separate Folders:

Create a folder for the development environment.

Create a folder for the production environment.

This allows you to organize projects and apply different policies and permissions to each environment.

Navigate to IAM & Admin in the GCP Console.

Select "Folders" from the left-hand menu.

Create a new folder named "Development".

Create a new folder named "Production".

Create Google Groups:

Create Google Groups for different teams within the engineering department (e.g., Development Team, Production Team).

This helps in managing permissions centrally.

Use the Google Admin Console to create groups.

Add relevant engineers to each group.

Assign Permissions at the Folder Level:

Assign appropriate IAM roles to the Google Groups at the folder level.

For example, grant Viewer role to the Development Team group for the development folder.

Grant Editor or more restrictive roles as required for the Production Team group for the production folder.

Select the development folder.

Go to the "Permissions" tab.

Click on "Add" and enter the email address of the Development Team Google Group.

Assign the "Viewer" role.

Repeat for the production folder, assigning appropriate roles to the Production Team Google Group.

By following these steps, you create a clear separation between development and production environments and manage permissions efficiently using Google Groups and folders.

App Engine ingress firewall rules are available, but egress rules are not currently available. Per requirements 1.2.1 and 1.3.4, you must ensure that all outbound traffic is authorized. SAQ A-EP and SAQ D–type merchants must provide compensating controls or use a different Google Cloud product. Compute Engine and GKE are the preferred alternatives. https://cloud.google.com/solutions/pci-dss-compliance-in-gcp

To ensure that each team's service account has the necessary permissions to manage resources within their assigned folders while adhering to the principle of least privilege, the following considerations apply:​

Folder Administrator Role: Granting each service account the Folder Administrator role on its respective folder provides comprehensive permissions to manage resources within that folder, including creating, updating, and deleting projects and resources. This approach ensures that teams have the necessary control over their environments without extending permissions beyond their assigned scope.​

Principle of Least Privilege: By assigning permissions at the folder level, you limit the service account's access to only the resources within its designated folder, aligning with the principle of least privilege and reducing the risk of unauthorized access to other parts of the organization.​

Therefore, Option A is the most effective approach, as it provides the necessary permissions for teams to manage their resources within their assigned folders while adhering to security best practices.​

Enable Firewall Rules Logging on the latest rules that were changed. Use Logs Explorer to analyze whether the rules are working correctly:

Enable Firewall Rules Logging for the specific firewall rules in question through the Google Cloud Console.

Once logging is enabled, use Logs Explorer to filter and review the firewall logs.

Analyze the logs to determine if the rules are allowing or blocking traffic as intended, identifying any misconfigurations or issues.

https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/public-access-prevention

Public access prevention protects Cloud Storage buckets and objects from being accidentally exposed to the public. If your bucket is contained within an organization, you can enforce public access prevention by using the organization policy constraint storage.publicAccessPrevention at the project, folder, or organization level.

Rewriting the objects in-place within the same bucket, specifying the new CMEK for encryption, allows you to re-encrypt the data without downloading and re-uploading it, thus minimizing costs and time.

https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/encryption/using-customer-managed-keys

Objective: Ensure that a Cloud Storage bucket in Project A can only be readable from Project B and prevent data access or copying to Cloud Storage buckets outside the network, even with correct credentials.

Solution: Use VPC Service Controls to create a security perimeter.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the VPC Service Controls page.

Step 3: Create a new service perimeter.

Step 4: Add Project A and Project B to the service perimeter.

Step 5: Include Cloud Storage service in the perimeter configuration.

Step 6: Define access levels to ensure that only resources within the perimeter can access the Cloud Storage bucket.

By setting up a VPC Service Controls perimeter, you can enforce security boundaries that restrict data access and movement to within defined projects, providing an extra layer of protection beyond IAM permissions.

Enable Security Command Center (SCC):

SCC provides centralized visibility and control over your cloud resources' security status.

Ensure that SCC is enabled in your Google Cloud environment.

Configure Virtual Machine Threat Detection (VMTD):

VMTD is part of SCC and specializes in detecting threats within VM instances, such as cryptocurrency mining malware.

Navigate to the SCC settings in the Google Cloud Console.

Activate VMTD:

Enable VMTD for the projects or resources where you want to monitor and detect potential threats.

VMTD uses behavioral analysis to identify anomalies indicative of unauthorized mining activities.

Monitor and Respond to Alerts:

VMTD generates alerts when it detects suspicious activities, such as unauthorized cryptocurrency mining.

Set up appropriate response actions, such as notifications, automatic remediation, or manual investigation, to handle these alerts.

To ensure end-user access is only allowed if the traffic originates from a specific known good CIDR and to utilize GCP's native SYN flood protection, you can use the following product:

VPC Firewall Rules: By configuring VPC firewall rules, you can control traffic to and from your instances based on IP address, protocol, and port. You can set rules to only allow traffic from a specific CIDR block, ensuring that only authorized traffic can reach your application.

Additionally, Google Cloud Platform provides built-in protections against SYN flood attacks, which are a type of DDoS attack. These protections are part of the underlying infrastructure and do not require additional configuration.

Using VPC firewall rules will help you comply with the internal requirement of allowing access only from a specific CIDR and provide the necessary SYN flood DDoS protection.

References

Google Cloud VPC Firewall Rules

Google Cloud DDoS Protection

Configure Binary Authorization:

Binary Authorization is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on GKE. It uses attestations to verify the authenticity and integrity of the images.

Enable Binary Authorization in your project through the Google Cloud Console or using the gcloud command-line tool.

Define attestation policies that specify which attestors (trusted entities) must sign off on container images before deployment.

Set Up Attestors:

Create and configure attestors that will sign the container images. This involves generating cryptographic keys and setting up trusted authorities.

Attestors can be configured to sign images based on criteria such as vulnerability scanning results, compliance checks, and other security policies.

Create a Custom Organization Policy Constraint:

Define an organization policy constraint that enforces Binary Authorization across your GKE clusters.

This custom constraint ensures that all clusters in the organization must adhere to the Binary Authorization policy, preventing the deployment of unsigned or unauthorized container images.

Implement and Enforce the Policies:

Apply the Binary Authorization policy and the organization policy constraint to your GKE clusters.

Regularly review and update the policies and attestation rules to align with your security and compliance requirements.

Set the Resource Location Restriction organization policy constraint at the Folder level:

Setting the constraint at the folder level allows for very granular control over data residency requirements.

Each folder can represent a specific geographical location, and projects within those folders will inherit the location constraint, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.

This approach provides flexibility to manage data residency across different regions within the same organization.

Generate Supply Chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA) level 3 assurance by using Cloud Build: SLSA is a framework for ensuring the integrity of software artifacts. By using Cloud Build, you can automate the build process and generate SLSA level 3 compliance, which includes verifiable build steps and provenance.

View the build provenance in the Security insights side panel within the Google Cloud console: The build provenance provides a detailed history of how the software was built, including the source code, build process, and any dependencies. This information is accessible through the Security insights side panel in the Google Cloud console, allowing you to verify the integrity and authenticity of your software artifacts.

References

Supply Chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA) documentation

Cloud Build documentation

Security insights in Google Cloud console