Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Questions and Answers

To ensure that the developers can view audit logs for the development environment and the security team can review all logs, you should grant IAM roles at the appropriate resource levels:

Grant logging.admin Role to the Security Team:

Assign the logging.admin role to the security team at the organization resource level.

This grants the security team full access to all logging data across the organization, including both production and development environments.

Grant logging.viewer Role to the Developer Team:

Assign the logging.viewer role to the developer team at the folder resource level that contains all the development projects.

This restricts the developers' access to only view logs in the development environment, ensuring they do not have access to production logs.

By using these roles and assigning them at the appropriate levels, you ensure that each team has the access they need while adhering to the principle of least privilege.

IAM Roles for Cloud Logging

Resource Hierarchy in Google Cloud

Cloud DNS with DNSSEC (Domain Name System Security Extensions) provides authentication for DNS responses, ensuring that they are legitimate and have not been tampered with. DNSSEC helps protect against DNS spoofing and cache poisoning attacks, which are common techniques used in DDoS attacks.

Steps:

Enable DNSSEC: In the Google Cloud Console, navigate to Cloud DNS and enable DNSSEC for your managed zones.

Configure Key Signing: Set up key signing keys (KSK) and zone signing keys (ZSK) to sign your DNS records.

Monitor DNSSEC Status: Regularly monitor the DNSSEC status and logs to ensure it is functioning correctly.

Enable automatic key version rotation on a regular schedule:

Regularly rotating keys reduces the impact of a potentially compromised key by limiting the amount of data encrypted with a single key version.

Set up automatic key rotation in Cloud KMS to ensure keys are rotated without manual intervention.

Limit the number of messages encrypted with each key version:

Reducing the number of messages encrypted with each key version minimizes the potential data exposure in case of a key compromise.

Implement policies to ensure that new key versions are used periodically to limit the usage of each key version.

Objective: Prevent users from creating projects while allowing only the DevOps team to create projects.

Solution: Modify IAM roles and permissions.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the IAM & Admin page.

Step 3: At the organizational level, find and remove all users from the Project Creator role.

Step 4: Create or identify a group for the DevOps team.

Step 5: Assign the Project Creator role to the DevOps team group at the organizational level.

By removing all users from the Project Creator role and granting it only to the DevOps team, you ensure that only the designated team can create projects.

Configure Binary Authorization:

Binary Authorization is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on GKE. It uses attestations to verify the authenticity and integrity of the images.

Enable Binary Authorization in your project through the Google Cloud Console or using the gcloud command-line tool.

Define attestation policies that specify which attestors (trusted entities) must sign off on container images before deployment.

Set Up Attestors:

Create and configure attestors that will sign the container images. This involves generating cryptographic keys and setting up trusted authorities.

Attestors can be configured to sign images based on criteria such as vulnerability scanning results, compliance checks, and other security policies.

Create a Custom Organization Policy Constraint:

Define an organization policy constraint that enforces Binary Authorization across your GKE clusters.

This custom constraint ensures that all clusters in the organization must adhere to the Binary Authorization policy, preventing the deployment of unsigned or unauthorized container images.

Implement and Enforce the Policies:

Apply the Binary Authorization policy and the organization policy constraint to your GKE clusters.

Regularly review and update the policies and attestation rules to align with your security and compliance requirements.

To secure a container supply chain, you need two things: Visibility (Scanning) and Enforcement (Policy). Google Cloud provides Artifact Analysis (integrated with Artifact Registry) and Binary Authorization to solve this.

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Software Supply Chain Security):

"To secure your supply chain, use Artifact Registry with automatic vulnerability scanning to identify risks in your images. Then, use Binary Authorization to define a policy that requires images to be signed by trusted authorities (attestors) before they can be deployed to GKE or Cloud Run. This ensures that only images that have passed your security checks (like vulnerability scans) are allowed to run."

How it works:

Scanning: Every time an image is pushed to Artifact Registry, it is automatically scanned for CVEs.

Attestation: A successful scan (e.g., no 'Critical' vulnerabilities) triggers a CI/CD step to "Sign" the image (create an attestation).

Enforcement: The GKE admission controller (Binary Authorization) checks for this signature. If it's missing or invalid, the deployment is blocked.

Why other options are incorrect:

A is incorrect: Container Threat Detection is for runtime (after it's already running). Supply chain security is about pre-deployment prevention.

B is incorrect: While Grafeas/Kritis are the open-source foundations, Option D represents the managed Google Cloud services which "minimize management overhead."

C is incorrect: Firewalls inspect network traffic, not the integrity or vulnerability status of the container image itself.

Objective: Understand the security characteristics of VPC peering.

Security Characteristics:

Non-transitive Peering: VPC peering connections are non-transitive. This means that peering is strictly between two VPC networks. If VPC A is peered with VPC B, and VPC B is peered with VPC C, VPC A cannot communicate with VPC C unless a direct peering connection is established.

Inter-Organization Peering: VPC peering allows you to connect VPC networks across different Google Cloud Platform organizations, facilitating private communication between distinct organizational units.

These characteristics ensure controlled and secure connectivity between VPC networks while preventing unintended data exposure.

To grant an IAM user access to HTTPS resources protected by Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP), you should assign the IAP-Secured Web App User role.

IAP-Secured Web App User (C):

This role grants the necessary permissions for a user to access web applications secured by IAP. It includes permissions to access the IAP-secured resources, ensuring that users can authenticate and gain the appropriate access based on the policies defined in IAP.

Assigning this role ensures that users have the right level of access to protected web resources, aligned with the security controls enforced by IAP.

References

Identity-Aware Proxy Documentation

IAP Roles and Permissions

For "automatic discovery, redaction, or pseudonymization" of sensitive data, the specific product is Sensitive Data Protection (formerly known as Cloud Data Loss Prevention - DLP).10

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Sensitive Data Protection Overview):

"Sensitive Data Protection provides visibility into where PII exists in your organization. It allows you to automatically discover and classify data using over 150 predefined infoTypes (like SSN, Credit Card, etc.). Beyond discovery, it can redact (remove), mask (cover), or pseudonymize (replace with a token) the data so that it can be used for analysis without exposing the raw PII."

Why other options are incorrect:

A is incorrect: Cloud Armor is a WAF; it doesn't scan data contents inside a database for PII.

C is incorrect: Encryption (KMS) protects the data from unauthorized disk access, but once an authorized user opens the database, the PII is still visible. It doesn't perform "redaction" or "pseudonymization."

D is incorrect: While the DLP API is mentioned, this option focuses on Cloud Storage and alerts rather than the "redaction/pseudonymization" for analysis requested in the prompt. Option B is the comprehensive managed service approach.

The problem requires exposing a sensitive AI model endpoint internally (strictly isolated from the internet) to a defined list of projects within the organization.

Internal Exposure and Isolation: An "internal Application Load Balancer" is suitable for exposing services within your VPC network, ensuring they are not accessible from the internet.

Private Service Connect (PSC): This is the key technology for securely and privately exposing services from one VPC network (the service producer, where the model is) to other VPC networks (the service consumers, the defined list of projects) within the same or different organizations. PSC allows consumers to access services using internal IP addresses, with traffic remaining on Google's private network. You can configure a service attachment that points to the internal load balancer, and then permit specific consumer projects to connect to this service attachment.Extract Reference: "Private Service Connect is a capability of Google Cloud networking that allows consumers to access managed services privately from inside their VPC network. Similarly, it allows managed service producers to host these services in their own separate VPC networks and offer a private connection to their consumers." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Private Service Connect | VPC" - https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/private-service-connect)

Extract Reference: "Private Service Connect endpoints are internal IP addresses in a consumer VPC network that can be directly accessed by clients in that network. Endpoints are created by deploying a forwarding rule that references a service attachment or a bundle of Google APIs." (Google Cloud Documentation: "About Private Service Connect | VPC" - https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/private-service-connect)

Extract Reference: "Private Service Connect can be used to access managed services that are owned by Google, third-party software as a service (SaaS) companies, or other teams within the consumer's own company. Both published services and Google APIs can be targets of Private Service Connect." (Google Cloud Documentation: "About Private Service Connect | VPC" - https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/private-service-connect)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Shared VPC and central firewall rules: While Shared VPC centralizes network management, it does not provide a direct managed service exposure mechanism like PSC for a model endpoint to specific projects. It's more about sharing subnets and network resources. Administering all firewall rules centrally would also not meet the need for exposing only this specific model to a defined list of projects in a managed, private service pattern.

B. Activate Private Google Access (PGA): Private Google Access allows VMs without external IP addresses to access Google APIs and services (like Cloud Storage, BigQuery, etc.) privately from within their VPC network. It's for consuming Google services, not for exposing custom services hosted in a Google Cloud project to other projects.

D. External Application Load Balancer + Cloud Armor: An "external Application Load Balancer" exposes the service to the internet. While Cloud Armor can restrict access based on IP addresses, it still involves internet exposure, which contradicts the "strictly isolated from the internet" requirement. Restricting to "Google Cloud IP addresses" doesn't guarantee access only to a defined list of projects and still exposes the service externally.

Therefore, creating an internal Application Load Balancer and exposing it via Private Service Connect is the most suitable and secure solution for this scenario.

VM Manager is a suite of tools that can be used to manage operating systems for large virtual machine (VM) fleets running Windows and Linux on Compute Engine. It helps drive efficiency through automation and reduces the operational burden of maintaining these VM fleets. VM Manager includes several services such as OS patch management, OS inventory management, and OS configuration management. By using VM Manager, you can apply patches, collect operating system information, and install, remove, or auto-update software packages. The suite provides a high level of control and automation for managing large VM fleets on Google Cloud.

https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/vm-manager

There is mention about simulating in Web Security Scanner. "Web Security Scanner cross-site scripting (XSS) injection testing *simulates* an injection attack by inserting a benign test string into user-editable fields and then performing various user actions." https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/docs/how-to-remediate-web-security-scanner-findings#xss

To manage user accounts and ensure they comply with corporate policies, using Google Cloud Directory Sync (GCDS) allows synchronization between your local identity system and Cloud Identity. The Transfer Tool for Unmanaged Users (TTUU) helps identify and manage conflicting accounts by allowing users to transfer their personal accounts to managed accounts.

Steps:

Synchronize Identities: Use GCDS to sync users from your local identity management system to Cloud Identity, ensuring that all corporate user accounts are managed.

Identify Conflicting Accounts: Use TTUU to find users who have personal Google accounts using corporate email addresses.

Manage Conflicting Accounts: Request users to transfer their personal accounts to managed accounts using TTUU, ensuring all accounts are under corporate control.

To centrally govern and restrict which AI models (from the Model Garden) can be used within an organization, Google Cloud provides a specific Organization Policy Constraint.9

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Vertex AI Organization Policy Constraints):

"The constraints/vertexai.allowedModels constraint allows you to define a list of allowed models that can be deployed or used within your organization. This includes Google first-party models, open-source models, and third-party models available in the Model Garden.10 By using this policy, you can prevent users from using unvetted or non-compliant models even if they have IAM permissions to use Vertex AI."

How it works:

You define an "Allowlist" of model IDs.

When a user attempts to deploy a model or call an API for a model not on the list, the request is blocked.

This is the most scalable and compliant way to manage AI governance.

Why other options are incorrect:

A is incorrect: Model Garden is a catalog; you cannot apply granular IAM permissions to individual entries within the public catalog itself in the same way you can restrict API usage via Org Policy.

B is incorrect: Auditing is reactive. The requirement is to ensure users can only access approved models (prevention).

When a vulnerability patch is released for a running container in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), the recommended approach is to update the application code or apply the patch directly to the codebase. Then, a new container image should be built incorporating these changes. After building the new image, it should be deployed to replace the running containers. This method ensures that the containers run the updated, secure code.

Steps:

Update Application Code: Modify the application code or dependencies to incorporate the vulnerability patch.

Build New Image: Use a tool like Docker to build a new container image with the updated code.

Push New Image: Push the new container image to the Container Registry.

Update Deployments: Update the Kubernetes deployment to use the new image. This can be done by modifying the image tag in the deployment YAML file.

Redeploy Containers: Apply the updated deployment configuration using kubectl apply -f .yaml, which will redeploy the containers with the new image.

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/g-suite/7-ways-admins-can-help-secure-accounts-against-phishing-g-suite

https://www.duocircle.com/content/email-security-services/email-security-in-cryptography#:~:text=Customer%20Login-,Email%20Security%20In%20Cryptography%20Is%20One%20Of%20The%20Most,Measures%20To%20Prevent%20Phishing%20Attempts &text=Cybercriminals%20love%20emails%20the%20most,networks%20all%20over%20the%20world.

To ensure that Vertex AI Workbench Instances are automatically kept up-to-date and that users cannot alter operating system settings, implementing specific organization policies is essential.​

Option A: Enabling VM Manager and adding Compute Engine instances assists in managing and monitoring VM instances but does not enforce automatic updates or restrict user modifications to the operating system.​

Option B: Enforcing the disableRootAccess organization policy prevents users from gaining root access, thereby restricting unauthorized changes to the operating system. Additionally, the requireAutoUpgradeSchedule policy ensures that instances are automatically updated according to a defined schedule. Together, these policies maintain system integrity and compliance with update requirements.​

Option C: Assigning AI Notebooks Runner and AI Notebooks Viewer roles controls user permissions related to running and viewing notebooks but does not directly influence operating system settings or update mechanisms.​

Option D: Implementing firewall rules to prevent SSH access limits direct access to instances but does not ensure automatic updates or prevent alterations through other means.​

Therefore, Option B is the most appropriate action, as it directly addresses both the enforcement of automatic updates and the prevention of unauthorized operating system modifications.​

Google Cloud customers with additional requirements for encryption of data over WAN can choose to implement further protections for data as it moves from a user to an application, or virtual machine to virtual machine. These protections include IPSec tunnels, Gmail S/MIME, managed SSL certificates, and Istio. https://cloud.google.com/docs/security/encryption-in-transit

Use Cloud External Key Management (EKM) that integrates with an external Hardware Security Module (HSM) system from supported vendors: Cloud EKM allows you to use encryption keys that are managed externally to Google Cloud. This means you can generate and store your keys in an on-premises HSM or another supported external HSM service, and integrate these keys with various Google Cloud services.

Integration with Google Services: Cloud EKM integrates seamlessly with many Google Cloud services, including BigQuery, Cloud Storage, Compute Engine, and more. This provides you with full control over your encryption keys while still taking advantage of Google Cloud's powerful services.

References

Cloud External Key Management (EKM) documentation

External Key Management overview

Objective: Provide evidence of access reviews for an upcoming audit.

Solution: Use Policy Analyzer to review and report on IAM policies.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the Policy Analyzer tool.

Step 3: Select the project for which you need to review access policies.

Step 4: Use the tool to generate reports on IAM roles and permissions.

Step 5: Export the reports as evidence for the audit.

Policy Analyzer provides detailed insights into IAM policies, helping you to review access configurations and generate necessary reports for compliance and auditing purposes.

Cloud NAT Service: Use Cloud NAT (Network Address Translation) to allow VM instances without external IP addresses to access the internet securely.

Configuration: Configure Cloud NAT for the subnets containing your VM instances. This setup allows the VMs to initiate outbound connections to the internet for updates and other necessary communications.

Security Compliance: By using Cloud NAT, you adhere to the security policy of not assigning external IP addresses to VMs while still enabling necessary internet connectivity. Cloud NAT provides a secure method for outbound internet traffic without exposing VMs directly to the public internet. References:

Google Cloud - Cloud NAT Overview

Google Cloud - Configuring Cloud NAT

The core requirement is to grant temporary, external users access to your Google Cloud environment while ensuring access control remains managed by their employer's identity provider (IdP). This allows your organization to follow the principle of least privilege and ensures access is revoked automatically when the user leaves the partner company (or is removed from the partner's IdP).

Workforce Identity Federation is the service specifically designed for granting external identities (partners, vendors, customers) access to Google Cloud resources without needing to sync or create managed Google accounts for them.

Extracts:

"Workforce Identity Federation is designed for the scenario where a partner organization needs to access your Google Cloud resources... it lets you use an external IdP to authenticate and authorize access to Google Cloud." (Source 1.1)

"Using Workforce Identity Federation is the most secure and efficient way to give external users access. Because authentication is handled by the external IdP, access is automatically revoked or suspended if the user is deactivated in the partner's IdP." (Source 1.2)

Option C would require your organization to manage the partner identities, violating the requirement for the partner's IdP to control the access lifecycle.

To identify all principals who can change firewall rules, you need to determine which users or service accounts have permissions that allow them to modify firewall rules in your Google Cloud project. The correct permissions to check for this are compute.firewalls.create and compute.firewalls.delete. These permissions enable a user to create and delete firewall rules, respectively.

The Policy Analyzer tool in Google Cloud allows you to query and analyze IAM policies to identify which principals have specific permissions. By using Policy Analyzer, you can effectively identify all principals with the compute.firewalls.create and compute.firewalls.delete permissions.

Open Policy Analyzer: Go to the Google Cloud Console, navigate to IAM & Admin, and select Policy Analyzer.

Set Up Query: Create a new query specifying the permissions compute.firewalls.create and compute.firewalls.delete.

Run Query: Execute the query to retrieve a list of principals who have these permissions.

Review Results: Analyze the results to identify all users and service accounts with the capability to modify firewall rules.

This method ensures you have a comprehensive list of all principals who can change firewall rules, enhancing your audit and security posture.

Google Cloud Policy Analyzer Documentation

Google Cloud IAM Documentation

This option directly addresses the needs of the business user who must access curated reports. By creating curated tables in a separate dataset, you can control access to specific data. Assigning the roles/bigquery.dataViewer role allows the business user to view the data in BigQuery.

By generating a key in your on-premises environment and storing it in an HSM that you manage, you're ensuring that the key material is fully under your control. Using the key as an external key in Cloud KMS allows you to use the key with Google Cloud services without having the key stored on Google Cloud. Activating Key Access Justifications (KAJ) provides a reason every time the key is accessed, and you can configure the external key system to reject unauthorized access attempts.

The problem describes an application with two Cloud Run services (Service A - frontend, Service B - backend) and requires setting up IAM with the principle of least privilege. Service A calls Service B.

Principle of Least Privilege: This principle dictates that each entity (in this case, a Cloud Run service) should only have the minimum permissions necessary to perform its function.

Separate Service Accounts for Separate Services: To adhere to the principle of least privilege, it's best practice to assign a unique service account to each distinct service or component. This ensures that a compromise of one service account does not grant excessive permissions across other services. Service A needs permissions to run itself and to invoke Service B. Service B only needs permissions to run itself.Extract Reference: "Assign a service account to a Cloud Run service. The service account acts as the identity for your service and determines what permissions your revisions have when executing requests. It is a best practice to grant each service account only the permissions that are required to run the specific service (principle of least privilege)." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/service-accounts)

Authentication for Cloud Run Services: When one Cloud Run service (caller) needs to invoke another Cloud Run service (callee), the caller must be authorized to do so. This is typically achieved by assigning the roles/run.invoker role on the callee service to the caller's service account.Extract Reference: "To allow a service to invoke another service, grant the roles/run.invoker role on the called service to the caller's service account." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/securing/service-to-service)

Let's evaluate the options:

A. Create a new service account with the permissions to run service A and service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the new service account to call the backend. This violates the principle of least privilege by giving a single service account permissions for both services. If that service account were compromised, both services would be affected.

B. Create two separate service accounts. Grant one service account the permissions to execute service A, and grant the other service account the permissions to execute service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the service account for service A to call the back-end. This aligns perfectly with least privilege. Service A gets its own identity, Service B gets its own identity. Service A's service account is then granted run.invoker permissions on Service B, allowing it to call the backend while Service B requires authentication. This is the recommended approach.

C. Use the Compute Engine default service account to run service A and service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the default service account to call the backend. The Compute Engine default service account often has broad permissions (e.g., editor role in its project). Using it violates the principle of least privilege and is generally discouraged for production applications due to the potential for excessive permissions.

D. Create three separate service accounts. Grant one service account the permissions to execute service A. Grant the second service account the permissions to run service B. Grant the third service account the permissions to communicate between both services A and B. Require authentication for service B. Call the back-end by authenticating with a service account key for the third service account. This introduces unnecessary complexity with a third service account just for communication. More critically, using a service account key for authentication is generally discouraged in Cloud Run environments where ADC (Application Default Credentials) can be used, as managing keys securely becomes an operational overhead and security risk. Cloud Run services automatically use their attached service accounts for authentication when making calls to other Google Cloud services, including other Cloud Run services.

Therefore, option B is the best solution, adhering to the principle of least privilege and Google Cloud best practices for Cloud Run service-to-service authentication.

DNSSEC — use a DNS registrar that supports DNSSEC, and enable it. DNSSEC digitally signs DNS communication, making it more difficult (but not impossible) for hackers to intercept and spoof. Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) adds security to the Domain Name System (DNS) protocol by enabling DNS responses to be validated. Having a trustworthy Domain Name System (DNS) that translates a domain name like www.example.com into its associated IP address is an increasingly important building block of today’s web-based applications. Attackers can hijack this process of domain/IP lookup and redirect users to a malicious site through DNS hijacking and man-in-the-middle attacks. DNSSEC helps mitigate the risk of such attacks by cryptographically signing DNS records. As a result, it prevents attackers from issuing fake DNS responses that may misdirect browsers to nefarious websites. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/dnssec-now-available-in-cloud-dns

SSO/SAML Integration: Implement SSO (Single Sign-On) with SAML integration through Cloud Identity to streamline user authentication and lifecycle management. This ensures centralized management of user identities and access.

Predefined Roles: Use predefined roles to provide granular access control. These roles are designed to follow the principle of least privilege, ensuring that users have the minimum necessary permissions to perform their tasks.

User Management: By leveraging SSO/SAML, user provisioning and de-provisioning become more efficient and secure. This integration helps maintain consistent access policies across your organization.

Access Control: Predefined roles reduce the risk of over-permission by offering well-defined access levels, enhancing security and compliance. References:

Google Cloud - SSO with SAML

Google Cloud - IAM Best Practices

When implementing new security perimeters or access levels, Google Cloud recommends using Dry Run Mode in VPC Service Controls.12 This allows you to see what would have been blocked without actually disrupting traffic.

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Dry Run Mode for Service Perimeters):

"Dry run mode allows you to test the impact of a service perimeter before enforcing it. You can associate an Access Level (which contains Context-Aware attributes like device status and location) with the dry run configuration. Any request that violates the perimeter or the access level will be logged in Cloud Audit Logs as a 'dry run violation,' but the request will still be allowed to proceed."13

Evaluation Process:

Define the Access Level in Access Context Manager (Managed Device + Location).

Configure the VPC-SC Perimeter to include the project.

Apply the Access Level to the Dry Run section of the perimeter.

Monitor the VPC Service Controls Violation Dashboard or Audit Logs for dry run errors to identify legitimate users who would be blocked under the new policy.

Google Cloud Directory Sync (GCDS): Install and configure GCDS to synchronize your on-premises Active Directory with Google Cloud Identity. This tool helps in maintaining consistency between your local directory and Google Cloud.

IAM Groups: Create IAM groups in Google Cloud with permissions that correspond to your Active Directory groups. This mapping ensures that users inherit the appropriate permissions based on their AD group membership.

Synchronization: Set up regular synchronization schedules to keep the user and group information up-to-date between your on-premises AD and Google Cloud.

Access Management: Use these IAM groups to manage access to Google Cloud resources, ensuring that permissions are applied consistently and securely. This approach leverages existing AD infrastructure for identity management, providing a seamless integration with Google Cloud. References:

Google Cloud - Google Cloud Directory Sync

Google Cloud - IAM Groups

Packet Mirroring Setup: Configure Packet Mirroring in your Google Cloud VPC to capture traffic to and from specific VM instances. This allows you to analyze the traffic for security and compliance purposes.

Security Software: Use specialized security software to inspect the mirrored traffic. This software can detect invalid or malicious content in the IP packets.

Mirroring Configuration: Specify the instances, network, and traffic direction (ingress, egress, or both) to be mirrored. Ensure that the mirrored traffic is directed to an appropriate analysis destination.

Traffic Analysis: Continuously monitor and analyze the mirrored traffic for any signs of malicious activity or anomalies. Use the findings to enhance your security posture and respond to potential threats. References:

Google Cloud - Packet Mirroring

Google Cloud - Packet Mirroring Best Practices

The core security and privacy requirement is to prevent personal data from being used in the training process, which necessitates de-identification. Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP), also referred to as Sensitive Data Protection (SDP), is the specific Google Cloud tool for this purpose. The secondary requirement, restricting access, is handled by IAM.

Extracts:

"Sensitive Data Protection (SDP)... De-identification enables you to transform your data to reduce data risk while retaining data utility." (Source 1.4)

"De-identification techniques like encryption, obfuscate raw sensitive identifiers in your data. These techniques let you preserve the utility of your data for joining or analytics, while reducing the risk of handling the data." (Source 1.1)

"DLP provides tools to classify and de-identify sensitive elements or unwanted content within your data... Find and remove sensitive elements from your data before model training." (Source 1.4)

IAM policies are the standard mechanism to satisfy the requirement to "restrict access to the dataset to an authorized subset of people only." Option B combines the precise technical solution for privacy (DLP De-identification) with the necessary access control (IAM).

The Standard Tier network only provides regional load balancing, while the Premium Tier supports global load balancing with a single anycast IP address. To distribute requests across multiple regions, you need to use the Premium Tier and update the load balancer configuration accordingly.

Steps:

Upgrade to Premium Tier: Update the load balancer to use the Premium Tier network in the Google Cloud Console.

Add New Instance Group: Add the instance group in the new region (us-east-2) to the backend configuration of the existing load balancer.

Verify Configuration: Ensure that the frontend configuration of the load balancer uses a single external IP address for global distribution.

Objective: Reduce the risk of Google Cloud user accounts being compromised.

Solution: Implement strong password policies and post-SSO 2-Step Verification using security keys.

Steps:

Step 1: In Active Directory, configure a domain password policy with strong settings (e.g., complexity, length, expiration).

Step 2: In the Google Admin console, navigate to the Security settings.

Step 3: Enable 2-Step Verification and configure it to use security keys for post-SSO verification.

Step 4: Ensure all users enroll in the 2-Step Verification with security keys.

Using strong password policies in Active Directory along with security keys for 2-Step Verification post-SSO provides enhanced security against account compromises.

Google Cloud Logging supports Field-level access control, which allows you to hide specific sensitive fields within a log entry from certain users while still allowing them to see the rest of the log entry.5 This is achieved using Log Views and IAM.

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Configuring field-level access):

"Field-level access control allows you to restrict access to specific fields of LogEntry objects. You can define which fields are sensitive (such as principalEmail) and then grant the logging.fieldAccessor role to specific users or groups.6 Users without this role will see the log entry, but the sensitive fields will be redacted or omitted from their view."

Key Implementation Steps:

Identify Fields: Determine which paths in the JSON payload are sensitive.

Define Access: Use a Log View to define the scope of logs and apply field-level restrictions.7

Grant Permissions: Grant the standard logging.viewer role for general access and the logging.fieldAccessor role ONLY to the security team for the specific sensitive fields.

Why other options are incorrect:

B is incorrect: IAM conditions cannot natively parse and redact specific JSON fields within a log entry at the platform level; they are typically used for resource-level access.

C is incorrect: While excluding fields via a sink works, it is "all or nothing." If you exclude it at the sink, no one (including the security team) will see that data in the destination.

D is incorrect: This is a workaround that only works if the team uses BigQuery for logs. It doesn't solve the problem within the Cloud Logging Logs Explorer itself.

To enforce private connectivity between on-premises hosts and Google Cloud APIs while optimizing for cost and operational efficiency, using a dedicated or Partner Interconnect is the best solution. This setup ensures a reliable, high-bandwidth connection with private IP addressing.

Choose Interconnect Type: Decide between Dedicated Interconnect and Partner Interconnect based on your bandwidth needs and proximity to Google Cloud locations.

Set Up Interconnect:

For Dedicated Interconnect, order circuits through the Google Cloud Console.

For Partner Interconnect, select a supported service provider and order the connection through them.

Configure VPC and Private Google Access:

In your VPC, enable Private Google Access to allow on-premises hosts to access Google APIs privately.

Go to "VPC network" -> "Private Google Access" and enable it for your subnets.

Establish Connectivity: Work with your network team and (if applicable) your Partner Interconnect provider to set up the physical and logical connections.

Test Connectivity: Verify that on-premises hosts can reach Google Cloud services using private IP addresses.

The requirement is to protect data while in use (meaning data in memory or CPU registers, during processing). This is a concept addressed by Confidential Computing using Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs).

Extracts:

"Confidential VMs are an IaaS solution... Confidential VMs offer: Encryption for 'data in use', including the processor state and the virtual machine's memory." (Source 4.1)

"Confidential computing protects data during processing by isolating workloads inside hardware-based trusted execution environments (TEEs), ensuring even cloud operators cannot access them." (Source 4.3)

"Confidential VMs extend the standard virtual machine concept by adding hardware-enforced confidentiality controls... they ensure data remains encrypted not only at rest and in transit, but also while in use." (Source 4.4)

Options A (CMEK) and B (CSEK) protect data at rest (disk encryption). Option D (Shielded VM) protects integrity and prevents rootkit compromise but does not encrypt memory while the data is actively being processed. Only Confidential VM (or TEE) protects data in use.

The problem focuses on securing "super administrator accounts for the organization" when Cloud Identity is synced with Microsoft Entra ID and uses Entra ID for SSO. The key requirements are the principle of least privilege and strong authentication.

Principle of Least Privilege & Dedicated Accounts: Google's best practices strongly recommend creating dedicated, non-federated accounts for super administrators that are distinct from regular user accounts. These accounts should only be used for super administrator tasks and not for daily activities. This segregation ensures that the highest privilege accounts are isolated and adhere to the principle of least privilege by not having combined responsibilities.

Extract Reference: "Designate Organization Administrators... We recommend keeping your super admin account separate from your Organization Administrator group." and "Give super admins a separate account that requires a separate login. For example, user alice@example.com could have a super admin account alice-admin@example.com." and "Use the super admin account only when needed. Delegate administrator tasks to user accounts with limited admin roles. Use the least privilege approach..." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Super administrator account best practices | Resource Manager Documentation" - https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/super-admin-best-practices)

Strong Authentication (Google 2-Step Verification): Even when using a third-party identity provider like Microsoft Entra ID for most users, Google recommends enforcing Google's own 2-Step Verification for the critical super administrator accounts. This provides a "break-glass" mechanism that is independent of the external IdP. If the Entra ID integration were to fail or become compromised, the Google-managed super administrator accounts, protected by Google's own 2SV, would still be accessible for emergency recovery.

Extract Reference: "Even when using the legacy SSO profile, super admins can't sign in with SSO in these cases: Admin console. When super administrators try to sign in to an SSO-enabled domain via admin.google.com, they must enter their full Google administrator account email address and associated Google password (not their SSO username and password), and click Sign in to directly access the Admin console. Google doesn't redirect them to the SSO sign-in page." (Google Cloud Identity Help: "Super administrator SSO" - https://support.google.com/cloudidentity/answer/6341409) - This highlights that super admin accounts can bypass SSO for direct Admin console access, making Google 's 2SV crucial.

Extract Reference: "It's especially important for super admins to use 2SV because their accounts control access to all business and employee data in the organization. Protect your business with 2-Step Verification. Use security keys for 2-Step Verification." (Cloud Identity Help: "Security best practices for administrator accounts" - https://support.google.com/cloudidentity/answer/9011373)

Options C and D are incorrect because combining "organization administrator" (IAM role for GCP resources) and "super administrator" (Google Workspace/Cloud Identity domain-level control) privileges violates the principle of least privilege. Option A is less secure than B because relying solely on Entra ID's 2SV for super administrators means a compromise of Entra ID or an outage would leave the Google Cloud organization vulnerable without an independent break-glass mechanism.

Objective: Ensure that the analytics workload on Compute Engine instances accessing Cloud Storage does not interact with the public internet.

Solution:

Private Google Access: This allows Compute Engine instances that only have internal IP addresses to reach Google APIs and services through a private connection without the need for a public IP address.

No Public IP Addresses: By avoiding public IP addresses for the instances, you ensure that they are not accessible from the internet and do not initiate internet connections.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the VPC Network page and select the subnet where the Compute Engine instances are located.

Step 3: Enable Private Google Access for the subnet.

Step 4: Ensure that when launching the Compute Engine instances, no public IP addresses are assigned to them.

The Organization Policy Service provides a specific constraint called constraints/gcp.restrictServiceUsage. This is the most direct and efficient way to "Allow" or "Deny" specific Google Cloud APIs (services) at any node in the hierarchy (Org, Folder, or Project).

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Restricting Resource Service Usage):

"The Restrict Resource Service Usage constraint allows enterprise administrators to control which Google Cloud services can be used within their Google Cloud resource hierarchy. This constraint can be enforced on an Organization, Folder, or Project. When applied at the folder level, it restricts service usage for all descendant projects within that folder."

Why Option C is the most efficient:

Targeted: By applying it directly to the folder, you don't need to manage complex "exceptions" at the Org level (as in Option B).

Simple: It is a single policy rule that defines an "Allowlist" of services.

IAM vs. Org Policy: IAM (Option A) controls who can do something, but Org Policy controls what can be done. Even if a user is an Editor, the Org Policy will block them from enabling a restricted API.

VPC-SC (Option D): VPC Service Controls is much more complex and is used for data exfiltration prevention, not for simply restricting which APIs can be enabled/used in a project.

"The service evaluates all changes and remote access attempts to detect runtime attacks in near-real time." : https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/docs/concepts-container-threat-detection-overview This has nothing to do with KNOWN security Vulns in images

For external applications (outside of Google Cloud) to access resources securely, Workload Identity Federation (WIF) is the modern standard.3 It avoids the use of permanent service account keys and relies on external identity providers (OIDC or SAML) to exchange short-lived Google Cloud tokens.

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Workload Identity Federation):

"You can use Workload Identity Federation to grant on-premises or multi-cloud workloads access to Google Cloud resources without using a service account key. This reduces the risk associated with long-lived service account keys and simplifies the implementation of security best practices."

Key points:

It allows external identities (from AWS, Azure, or OIDC/SAML providers) to assume a Google IAM role.

The access is short-lived and scoped to specifically what the application needs (e.g., storage.objects.create).

Why other options are incorrect:

A is incorrect: Long-lived service account keys are a security liability.

B is incorrect: While a proxy works, it adds architectural complexity and overhead compared to direct federation.

C is incorrect: IP-based ACLs are weak because IPs can be spoofed or changed, and Cloud Storage ACLs do not provide robust identity-based security for public-facing apps.

https://cloud.google.com/sql/docs/mysql/cmek

"You might have situations where you want to permanently destroy data encrypted with CMEK. To do this, you destroy the customer-managed encryption key version. You can't destroy the keyring or key, but you can destroy key versions of the key."

Google Cloud Armor helps to protect applications from DDoS attacks and web application firewall (WAF) threats like XSS and SQLi. To use Google Cloud Armor security policies, certain requirements must be met:

External Load Balancers: Google Cloud Armor is specifically designed to work with external HTTP(S) load balancers, which handle traffic at the edge of the Google Cloud network. This type of load balancer provides a global frontend that can distribute traffic to various backends.

Load Balancing Scheme: The backend service associated with the Google Cloud Armor policy must have an EXTERNAL load balancing scheme. This scheme allows the service to accept traffic from outside the Google Cloud network, which is necessary for applying security policies effectively at the network edge.

These requirements ensure that Google Cloud Armor can inspect and filter incoming traffic before it reaches your web application's backend services, providing an additional layer of security against common web vulnerabilities.

References

Google Cloud Armor Documentation

External HTTP(S) Load Balancing Overview

To maintain a historical record of what was running in Google Cloud Platform at any point in time, you should use Forseti Security to automate inventory snapshots. Forseti Security is an open-source toolkit that helps to automate security and compliance in GCP by taking inventory snapshots of GCP resources.

Step-by-Step:

Install Forseti Security:

Follow the installation guide to deploy Forseti Security on your GCP environment.

Configure Inventory:

Set up the inventory module in Forseti to capture and store snapshots of GCP resources.

Schedule Snapshots:

Use Forseti’s configuration to schedule regular inventory snapshots.

Access Historical Data:

Review and access historical records through Forseti’s dashboard or by querying the Forseti database.

Compliance and Monitoring: Use Forseti to ensure compliance and monitor changes over time.

Forseti Security Overview

Inventory Module

To ensure servers do not have any direct communication with the public internet, they must be configured without a public IP address.

VPC and Private Subnet: A Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) network provides the isolated, internal network structure. A subnet is the logical partition within the VPC.

Private IP Address: Assigning only a private IP address to the database servers ensures they can only communicate internally within the VPC (or connected on-premises networks) and cannot directly connect to or be connected from the public internet.

Extracts:

"Resources in a VPC network can be assigned two types of IP addresses: internal (private) and external (public). If a VM is not assigned an external IP address, it can only communicate internally with other resources in the VPC network..." (Source 6.1)

Option A and C involve assigning a public IP address, which violates the "no direct communication with the public internet" rule. Option D uses NAT to provide outbound internet connectivity, which also violates the requirement.

To keep track of "who did what, where, and when?" within GCP projects, the administrator should focus on Admin Activity logs and Data Access logs. Here’s a detailed explanation of why these two log streams are essential:

Admin Activity Logs:

These logs capture administrative actions performed in your Google Cloud resources. This includes actions like creating, modifying, or deleting resources.

Admin Activity logs provide detailed information about the user who performed the action, the resource that was affected, the action performed, and the timestamp.

Data Access Logs:

These logs capture read and write operations on data within your Google Cloud services. This includes actions like accessing or modifying data stored in databases, storage buckets, etc.

Data Access logs help track the access patterns of users and services to sensitive data, providing insights into who accessed which data and when.

Steps to Enable and Access Logs:

Navigate to the Google Cloud Console.

Go to Logging in the left-hand menu.

Enable Admin Activity and Data Access logs if not already enabled.

Use Logs Explorer to filter and view specific logs based on your requirements.

By monitoring both Admin Activity and Data Access logs, administrators can gain comprehensive visibility into the actions performed on their GCP resources and data, ensuring robust security and compliance tracking.

Google Cloud Logging Documentation

Audit Logs Overview

To meet the requirements for exporting and auditing security logs in near real-time for login activity events and API calls:

Organization-Level Log Sink with Pub/Sub: Create a log sink at the organization level to ensure logs from all projects are captured. Use the includeChildren parameter to include logs from all child resources (projects). Set the destination to a Pub/Sub topic to facilitate near real-time log export to an external SIEM.

Enable Data Access Audit Logs: Enable Data Access audit logs at the organization level to capture and export detailed information about API calls that modify configurations of Google Cloud resources across all projects.

These steps ensure comprehensive logging and real-time export capabilities, which are crucial for security auditing and monitoring.

References

Audit Logs Overview

Exporting with Sinks

https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/private-service-connect

An API bundle:

All APIs (all-apis): most Google APIs

(same as private.googleapis.com).

VPC-SC (vpc-sc): APIs that VPC Service Controls supports

(same as restricted.googleapis.com).

VMs in the same VPC network as the endpoint (all regions)

On-premises systems that are connected to the VPC network that contains the endpoint

https://gsuite.google.com/learn-more/security/security-whitepaper/page-1.html

Shared responsibility “Security of the Cloud” - GCP is responsible for protecting the infrastructure that runs all of the services offered in the GCP Cloud. This infrastructure is composed of the hardware, software, networking, and facilities that run GCP Cloud services.

Objective: Ensure that a Cloud Storage bucket in Project A can only be readable from Project B and prevent data access or copying to Cloud Storage buckets outside the network, even with correct credentials.

Solution: Use VPC Service Controls to create a security perimeter.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the VPC Service Controls page.

Step 3: Create a new service perimeter.

Step 4: Add Project A and Project B to the service perimeter.

Step 5: Include Cloud Storage service in the perimeter configuration.

Step 6: Define access levels to ensure that only resources within the perimeter can access the Cloud Storage bucket.

By setting up a VPC Service Controls perimeter, you can enforce security boundaries that restrict data access and movement to within defined projects, providing an extra layer of protection beyond IAM permissions.

The action fails because a constraints/iam.allowedPolicyMemberDomains organization policy is in place and only members from the flowlogistic.com organization are allowed. The inheritFromParent: false property on the “Apps” folder means that it does not inherit the organization policy from the organization node. Therefore, only the policy set at the folder level applies, which allows only members from the flowlogistic.com organization. As a result, the attempt to grant access to the user testuser@terramearth.com fails because this user is not a member of the flowlogistic.com organization.

Google Cloud Armor provides protection against DDoS attacks and allows you to define security policies to control access to your application. It enables you to block traffic from specific IP addresses or ranges, making it suitable for denying traffic from a list of malicious IP addresses while protecting your application from being directly exposed to the internet.

Steps:

Set Up Cloud Armor: Enable Cloud Armor in your Google Cloud Console.

Create Security Policies: Define security policies that specify the rules for allowing or denying traffic based on IP addresses.

Attach Policies to Backend Services: Apply these security policies to the backend services of your web application.

To enhance the security of your machine learning (ML) model supply chain within a serverless architecture, it's crucial to implement measures that protect both the development and deployment pipelines.​

Option A: While limiting external dependencies and rotating encryption keys are good security practices, they do not directly address the risks associated with the ML model supply chain.​

Option B: Implementing container image vulnerability scanning during development and pre-deployment helps identify and mitigate known vulnerabilities in your container images. Enforcing Binary Authorization ensures that only trusted and verified images are deployed in your environment. This combination directly strengthens the security of the ML model supply chain by validating the integrity of container images before deployment.​

Option C: Sanitizing training data and applying role-based access controls are important security practices but do not specifically safeguard the deployment pipeline against compromised container images.​

Option D: While strict firewall rules and intrusion detection systems enhance network security, they do not specifically address vulnerabilities within the container images or the deployment process.​

Therefore, Option B is the most effective approach, as it directly addresses the security of the development and deployment pipeline by ensuring that only vetted and secure container images are used in your environment.​

To ensure end-user access is only allowed if the traffic originates from a specific known good CIDR and to utilize GCP's native SYN flood protection, you can use the following product:

VPC Firewall Rules: By configuring VPC firewall rules, you can control traffic to and from your instances based on IP address, protocol, and port. You can set rules to only allow traffic from a specific CIDR block, ensuring that only authorized traffic can reach your application.

Additionally, Google Cloud Platform provides built-in protections against SYN flood attacks, which are a type of DDoS attack. These protections are part of the underlying infrastructure and do not require additional configuration.

Using VPC firewall rules will help you comply with the internal requirement of allowing access only from a specific CIDR and provide the necessary SYN flood DDoS protection.

References

Google Cloud VPC Firewall Rules

Google Cloud DDoS Protection

Storing secrets securely is crucial for maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of your applications. Here is how you can achieve this using Google Cloud Platform:

Encrypt the Secrets: Use Customer-Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK) to encrypt your secrets. CMEK allows you to have greater control over the encryption keys used to protect your data. This ensures that even if the storage medium is compromised, the secrets remain protected by strong encryption.

Store in Cloud Storage: Store the encrypted secrets in Google Cloud Storage. Cloud Storage is a secure and scalable object storage service. By using encrypted storage, you can ensure that the secrets are securely stored and can only be accessed by authorized entities.

This method provides a secure and managed way to store secrets, ensuring that they are not exposed in plain text within your source code management system.

References

Customer-Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK)

Google Cloud Storage Security

This approach allows you to control network traffic at the folder level. By attaching external IP addresses to the VMs in scope, you can ensure that the VMs have a unique, routable IP address for outbound connections. Then, by defining and applying a hierarchical firewall policy at the folder level, you can enforce that egress connections are limited to the specified IP range and only from the specified VPC network.

Use Google Shielded VM including secure boot Virtual Trusted Platform Module (vTPM) and integrity monitoring: Shielded VMs provide verifiable integrity of the VM by ensuring that it was not tampered with or compromised at the boot level. They use features like Secure Boot, vTPM, and integrity monitoring to detect and prevent malicious changes to the VM's operating system and firmware.

Activate Confidential Computing: Confidential Computing provides a secure environment for processing sensitive data. It uses hardware-based enclaves to protect data in use by ensuring it cannot be accessed by the underlying host or any other unauthorized entity. By leveraging Intel SGX or AMD SEV, it ensures that data remains encrypted even when it is being processed.

Enforce these actions by using organization policies: Organization policies can enforce the use of Shielded VMs and Confidential Computing across your organization. This ensures that all VMs comply with these security measures without requiring manual configuration for each VM.

References

Shielded VMs documentation

Confidential Computing documentation

Organization Policies documentation

The problem requires automating user provisioning to a Cloud Identity security group using a service account, adhering to Google-recommended practices and the principle of least privilege.

Cloud Identity Groups and Google Workspace: Cloud Identity groups are managed as part of Google Workspace. To programmatically manage Google Workspace resources (like groups), you typically use the Admin SDK APIs.

Domain-Wide Delegation: Service accounts cannot directly authenticate to Google Workspace APIs using IAM roles. Instead, they require "domain-wide delegation" to impersonate a user with the necessary administrative privileges within Google Workspace. This allows a service account to access user data or perform administrative tasks across the domain. The correct scope for managing groups is https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.group.Extract Reference: "To allow a service account to access user data on behalf of users in a Google Workspace domain, you must delegate domain-wide authority to your service account." (Google Cloud documentation: https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/service-account#delegating)

Extract Reference (Admin SDK Scopes): The https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.group scope is explicitly listed for "View and manage all groups on the domain." (Google Workspace Admin SDK documentation: https://developers.google.com/admin-sdk/directory/v1/scopes)

Application Default Credentials (ADC) with Resource-Attached Service Account: Google-recommended practices strongly advise against using service account keys directly for authentication when running on Google Cloud infrastructure. Instead, it's recommended to use Application Default Credentials (ADC) with a service account attached to the resource (e.g., a Compute Engine VM, Cloud Run service, or Cloud Functions). This method manages credentials automatically and securely, reducing the risk associated with managing and rotating keys.Extract Reference: "For most Google Cloud services, Application Default Credentials (ADC) is the recommended way to authenticate." and "When running code in a Google Cloud environment, such as Compute Engine, Cloud Run, or Cloud Functions, use the built-in service account to authenticate automatically with ADC. This is the most secure approach, as you don't need to manually create or manage service account keys." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/docs/authentication/production)

Options C and D are incorrect because granting an IAM role like "Groups Editor" in Google Cloud does not enable a service account to manage Google Workspace (Cloud Identity) group memberships; domain-wide delegation is required for that. Option A uses a service account key, which is less secure than ADC with a resource-attached service account according to Google's recommendations.

Therefore, option B is the most aligned with Google's recommended practices for securely automating group provisioning using a service account and domain-wide delegation.

Understand Organization Policies:

Organization policies allow you to enforce restrictions on Google Cloud resources to adhere to your organization’s security and compliance requirements.

Policies can be set at the organization, folder, or project level, with project-level policies able to override higher-level policies unless explicitly prevented.

Identify the Policy Constraint:

The specific constraint in question is likely constraints/compute.vmExternalIpAccess, which controls whether VMs can have external IP addresses.

Check Policy Overwrites:

Navigate to the Organization Policies page in the Google Cloud Console.

Check the policy settings at the project level under the affected folder to see if there is an override in place with an 'allow' value.

This override would permit the creation of VMs with external IP addresses despite the higher-level restriction.

Resolve the Policy Conflict:

If an override is found, remove or modify the project-level policy to align with the organizational policy denying external IP addresses.

Communicate with project administrators to ensure they understand and comply with the overarching security policies.

To ensure compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) at the infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) level within Google Cloud, it's essential to have continuous monitoring and assessment tools that can detect deviations from compliance requirements.​

Option A: Creating data profiles and configuring Data Discovery jobs in Google Cloud Sensitive Data Protection focuses on identifying and analyzing sensitive data but does not directly address infrastructure compliance monitoring.​

Option B: Downloading the latest PCI DSS report from the Compliance Reports Manager provides a static compliance report but does not offer real-time detection of deviations within your specific environment.​

Option C: Utilizing Assured Workloads helps in creating environments that meet specific compliance requirements, but migrating existing projects into such folders does not actively detect deviations; it primarily ensures that new workloads comply with predefined policies.​

Option D: Activating Security Command Center (SCC) Premium and leveraging its Compliance Monitoring capabilities allows for continuous assessment of your Google Cloud environment against PCI DSS requirements. SCC can identify misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and compliance violations in real-time, providing actionable insights to address any issues promptly.​

Therefore, Option D is the most effective approach to detect deviations at the IaaS level in preparation for a PCI DSS audit.​

The problem requires ensuring that only images that have passed vulnerability scanning and meet corporate policies are allowed to be deployed to GKE, with the process being automated and integrated into the existing CI/CD pipeline.

Binary Authorization: This Google Cloud service is purpose-built to enforce deployment policies on images before they are run on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Run, and other deployable platforms. It acts as a policy gate that prevents the deployment of non-compliant images.

Extract Reference: "Binary Authorization is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Run, and Anthos clusters." and "With Binary Authorization, you can require images to be signed by trusted authorities and enforce validation policies during deployment." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Binary Authorization overview" - https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/overview)

Artifact Analysis (part of Container Analysis): Artifact Analysis (which includes Container Analysis) provides vulnerability scanning capabilities for container images stored in Artifact Registry. It generates findings and metadata about vulnerabilities.

Extract Reference: "Container Analysis is a service that scans your images for known vulnerabilities and provides metadata about them." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Overview | Container Analysis" - https://cloud.google.com/container-analysis/docs/overview)

Binary Authorization can be configured to integrate with Artifact Analysis (or other attestors) to check for vulnerability scan results as part of its deployment policy.

Integration and Automation: Binary Authorization policies can require attestations before deployment. An attestation confirms that an image meets specific criteria (e.g., it has passed a vulnerability scan, it was signed by an approved CI/CD process, it adheres to corporate policies). Cloud Build can be configured to generate these attestations after a successful vulnerability scan (using Artifact Analysis). This fully automates the process and integrates directly into the CI/CD pipeline.

Extract Reference: "With Binary Authorization, you create a policy that enforces your requirements. The policy defines rules that govern deployment. For example, a policy can require all images to be signed by a trusted authority before deployment." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Binary Authorization overview" - https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/overview)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Custom script in Cloud Build... Fail the build: While scanning during the build is good practice (shift-left security), failing the build only prevents the image from being pushed. It doesn't prevent a developer or an automated process from manually deploying an old or non-compliant image that might already exist in Artifact Registry, or from bypassing the build system. The enforcement needs to happen at deployment time.

B. Configure GKE to use only images from a specific... trusted Artifact Registry repository. Manually inspect all images: Manually inspecting images is not automated and does not scale for a "large number of containerized applications." It also doesn't programmatically enforce vulnerability scan results or corporate policies.

D. Enable Artifact Analysis vulnerability scanning and regularly scan images... Remove any images that do not meet... before deployment: This describes scanning and remediation, which are important. However, it's a reactive approach ("remove any images") rather than a proactive enforcement ("only images that... are allowed to be deployed"). There's still a window where a non-compliant image could be deployed before it's removed. Binary Authorization is the enforcement gate.

Therefore, configuring Binary Authorization with a policy that integrates with Artifact Analysis (or requires attestations based on its findings) is the most robust, automated, and Google-recommended solution for enforcing deployment policies based on vulnerability scanning and corporate compliance.

”This encryption method is reversible, which helps to maintain referential integrity across your database and has no character-set limitations.” https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/take-charge-of-your-data-how-tokenization-makes-data-usable-without-sacrificing-privacy

https://cloud.google.com/dlp/docs/pseudonymization

FPE provides fewer security guarantees compared to other deterministic encryption methods such as AES-SIV. For these reasons, Google strongly recommends using deterministic encryption with AES-SIV instead of FPE for all security sensitive use cases. Other methods like deterministic encryption using AES-SIV provide these stronger security guarantees and are recommended for tokenization use cases unless length and character set preservation are strict requirements—for example, for backward compatibility with a legacy data system.

The most effective way to address VM sprawl while enforcing consistent security baselines at the VM creation stage (VM lifecycle management) is through the use of immutable, hardened images built via an automated pipeline.

Centralized Image Management and Hardening: A Cloud Build pipeline is the standard way to automate the creation of "golden images." The pipeline can install OS/packages, apply hardening scripts (e.g., CIS benchmarks), run vulnerability scans, and then store only the verified, secure images in a central registry. This centralizes control over the security baseline.

Enforcement: Instance Templates are the mechanism to standardize VM deployment. By configuring the templates to only point to the central registry of approved, hardened images, you ensure that every new VM spun up automatically adheres to the security baseline. This prevents teams from deploying unhardened or insecure images, solving the "VM sprawl" and "consistent security hardening" problem at its source.

Option A (SCC Posture Management) is a detective control that monitors after the VM is deployed; it does not prevent unhardened VMs from being created, which is the goal of lifecycle management.

Option D (VM Manager) is excellent for ongoing patching and updating of existing VMs, but it doesn't solve the initial problem of ensuring a secure, centralized, hardened image is used for creation (which is where the baseline is enforced).

Extracts:

"Golden images that are configured and used to create servers play a key role in allowing companies to scale securely." (Source 1.2)

"Using an automated tool eradicates this issue. When engineers use images produced by [automated tools], the evidence is clear, as everything needed is pre-baked into the image." (Source 1.2)

"An instance template is a convenient way to save a virtual machine (VM) instance's configuration that includes machine type, boot disk image... You can use an instance template to... Create individual VMs." (Source 3.3)

The overall strategy described in Option B—automate hardening, scan, store, and enforce usage via templates—is the best practice for secure and compliant VM deployment at scale.

o ensure that users can only access the data in a BigQuery table during working hours, you can assign the BigQuery Data Viewer role with an IAM condition that specifies the allowed access times. This method leverages IAM Conditions, which allow you to define and enforce time-based access policies. Here's how to do it:

Identify the BigQuery Table: Determine which BigQuery table(s) require restricted access.

Create an IAM Policy with Conditions: Define an IAM policy that includes a condition for time-based access. You can do this using the Google Cloud Console, gcloud command-line tool, or directly editing the IAM policy JSON.

Specify Working Hours: In the IAM condition, specify the time frame during which access is allowed. For example, you can set access to be allowed from 9 AM to 5 PM on weekdays.

Assign the Role with Conditions: Apply the policy to the users or groups who need access. Ensure that the condition is correctly attached to the BigQuery Data Viewer role.

Example using gcloud:

gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding [PROJECT_ID] \

--member=user:[USER_EMAIL] \

--role=roles/bigquery.dataViewer \

--condition=expression="(request.time.getFullYear() == 2024) && (request.time.getDayOfWeek() in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) && (request.time.getHours() >= 9) && (request.time.getHours() < 17)",title="Working hours condition",description="Access limited to working hours"

References

Google Cloud IAM Conditions

Google Cloud BigQuery IAM Roles

The core requirement is to ensure only scanned and verified containers can run in the environment, which is a deployment-time enforcement action.

Binary Authorization is the service designed for this purpose. It is a deployment-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) or other supported container platforms. The core mechanism it uses to verify that an image has completed required steps (like a vulnerability scan) is an attestation.

Extracts:

"GCP Binary Authorization is a security feature designed to prevent the deployment of unverified, unauthorized, or potentially malicious container images to Kubernetes clusters." (Source 1.1)

"Binary Authorization ensures that only images that are signed by trusted entities (such as a trusted attestation authority) are allowed to be deployed." (Source 1.1)

"Binary Authorization aims to reduce the risk of deploying defective, vulnerable, or unauthorized software in this type of environment. Using this service, you can prevent images from being deployed unless it satisfies a policy you define." (Source 1.2)

"The most common Binary Authorization use cases involve attestations. An attestation certifies that a specific image has completed a previous stage... Attestations signify that the associated image was built by successfully executing a specific, required process. For example, the attestation might indicate that the image has passed all required end-to-end functional testing in a staging environment." (Source 1.2, 1.4)

"After a container image is built, an attestation can be created to affirm that a required activity was performed on the image such as a regression test, vulnerability scan, or other test." (Source 1.5)

Option A correctly identifies the two necessary components for this deployment-time enforcement: Binary Authorization for policy enforcement and attestations to certify that the vulnerability scan (or other required check) has been completed and verified.

Security Command Center (SCC) in Google Cloud provides several features to help organizations detect and respond to security threats and misconfigurations.

Event Threat Detection: This feature continuously monitors and analyzes system logs to detect potential threats such as crypto mining. It uses machine learning and threat intelligence to identify suspicious activities and generate alerts.

Security Health Analytics: This feature helps identify common misconfigurations and compliance violations that could impact security. It provides visibility into security posture and helps remediate issues related to misconfigurations in your Google Cloud environment.

By using both Event Threat Detection and Security Health Analytics, you can effectively monitor for crypto mining activities and detect common misconfigurations that could compromise security.

References

Security Command Center Documentation

Event Threat Detection

Security Health Analytics

Use Pub/Sub and Cloud Functions to trigger a Cloud Data Loss Prevention scan every time a file is uploaded to the administrator's bucket. If the scan does not detect PII, have the function move the objects into the shared Cloud Storage bucket:

Configure a Pub/Sub topic to publish notifications when new files are uploaded to the administrator's bucket.

Create a Cloud Function that is triggered by the Pub/Sub topic. This function uses the Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) API to scan the uploaded files for PII.

If the scan does not detect PII, the function moves the file to the shared Cloud Storage bucket. This ensures that only non-sensitive data is accessible to analysts, while PII remains secure in the administrator's bucket.

To prevent developers from creating user-managed service account keys and reduce the risk of key mismanagement, you should enable an organization policy that specifically prohibits the creation of these keys.

Enable an organization policy to prevent service account keys from being created (C):

Google Cloud provides the capability to enforce organizational policies that restrict various actions, including the creation of service account keys. By enabling this policy, you ensure that developers cannot create new user-managed service account keys, thus minimizing the risk of key mismanagement and potential security breaches.

References

Service Accounts documentation

Organization Policy Service documentation

Layer 7 attacks like XSS and SQL injection are application-level threats that require a Web Application Firewall (WAF) for protection. Google Cloud Armor provides this functionality, integrated with the load balancer.

Cloud Armor: Google Cloud's distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) and WAF service.

WAF Rules: Cloud Armor offers pre-configured OWASP Top 10 rules, which directly defend against XSS, SQL injection, and other common application vulnerabilities.

Deployment: Cloud Armor security policies are applied to a backend service that is behind an external HTTP(S) Load Balancer.

Extracts:

"Cloud Armor WAF capabilities help protect web applications from the OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities... This includes rulesets specifically designed to detect and mitigate SQL injection (SQLi) and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks." (Source 4.1)

"Cloud Armor security policies are implemented at the edge of the Google Cloud network, applied to the backend services of an external HTTP(S) Load Balancer." (Source 4.2)

Option A is close but incomplete; WAF rules are implemented via a security policy (Option D). Option B relies on Adaptive Protection, which is primarily for volumetric DDoS and advanced attacks, but the direct protection for known XSS/SQLi signatures comes from explicit WAF rules.

Define Trusted Image Projects:

Identify the project or projects where your trusted operating system images are stored.

Ensure these images meet your organization’s security requirements and are regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Create an Organization Policy:

Navigate to the Organization Policies page in the Google Cloud Console.

Create a policy constraint that restricts the creation of boot disks to only those images stored in your trusted image project(s).

The policy constraint to use is constraints/compute.trustedImageProjects.

Apply the Policy:

Apply this organization policy at the appropriate level (organization, folder, or project) to enforce that all new VM instances use images from the trusted repository.

This ensures consistency in the security posture across all projects within the organization.

Monitor Compliance:

Regularly monitor the compliance with this policy using audit logs and other monitoring tools.

Update the trusted images as necessary to ensure they remain secure and compliant with your security standards.

Web Security Scanner is designed to scan your web applications deployed on Google Cloud for common vulnerabilities, including cross-site scripting (XSS). It can authenticate using Google accounts and can be scheduled to run scans regularly.

Steps:

Enable Web Security Scanner: In the Google Cloud Console, enable Web Security Scanner for your project.

Configure Scan: Set up the scan configuration, specifying the target URLs, authentication details (Google accounts), and scan frequency (at least once per week).

Run and Monitor Scans: Run the scans and monitor the results for vulnerabilities, addressing any issues found.

To ensure that no personally identifiable information (PII) is published in your yearly website usage analytics reports while preserving data integrity, the Cloud Data Loss Prevention (Cloud DLP) API can be utilized to identify and transform PII within your datasets.​

Option A: Encrypting PII does not remove it from the reports; it merely obscures it, which may not be sufficient for compliance or privacy requirements.​

Option B: Discovering and transforming PII ensures that sensitive information is either masked, tokenized, or otherwise obfuscated, effectively removing PII from the reports while maintaining the overall structure and utility of the data.​

Option C: Detecting and deleting PII could lead to loss of valuable data and may disrupt the integrity of the reports.​

Option D: Quarantining PII data implies isolating it, which doesn't address the need to publish reports without PII.​

Therefore, Option B is the most appropriate approach, as it leverages the Cloud DLP API to identify and transform PII, ensuring that the published reports are free from sensitive information while preserving data integrity.​

To manage IAM permissions efficiently for a large engineering team with different levels of access in development and production environments, follow these steps:

Create Separate Folders:

Create a folder for the development environment.

Create a folder for the production environment.

This allows you to organize projects and apply different policies and permissions to each environment.

Navigate to IAM & Admin in the GCP Console.

Select "Folders" from the left-hand menu.

Create a new folder named "Development".

Create a new folder named "Production".

Create Google Groups:

Create Google Groups for different teams within the engineering department (e.g., Development Team, Production Team).

This helps in managing permissions centrally.

Use the Google Admin Console to create groups.

Add relevant engineers to each group.

Assign Permissions at the Folder Level:

Assign appropriate IAM roles to the Google Groups at the folder level.

For example, grant Viewer role to the Development Team group for the development folder.

Grant Editor or more restrictive roles as required for the Production Team group for the production folder.

Select the development folder.

Go to the "Permissions" tab.

Click on "Add" and enter the email address of the Development Team Google Group.

Assign the "Viewer" role.

Repeat for the production folder, assigning appropriate roles to the Production Team Google Group.

By following these steps, you create a clear separation between development and production environments and manage permissions efficiently using Google Groups and folders.

Google Cloud IAM Documentation

Google Cloud Resource Manager Documentation

https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/scan-with-dlp

Cloud Data Loss Prevention API allows to detect and redact or remove sensitive data before the comments or reviews are published. Cloud DLP will read information from BigQuery, Cloud Storage or Datastore and scan it for sensitive data.

Enable the compute.restrictXpnProjectLienRemoval organization-level policy constraint:

This constraint prevents users from removing liens from Shared VPC host projects.

By enabling this constraint, you ensure that the Shared VPC host project cannot be accidentally deleted, as liens prevent deletion without proper authorization.

Apply this constraint via the Google Cloud Console or using the gcloud command-line tool.

To evaluate Google Cloud Platform (GCP) for PCI compliance and identify Google's inherent controls, you should review the "Google Cloud Platform: Customer Responsibility Matrix". This document provides detailed information about the shared responsibility model, outlining the security controls managed by Google and those that are the responsibility of the customer.

Steps to access and use the document:

Access the Document:

Go to the Google Cloud compliance resource center.

Locate the "Customer Responsibility Matrix" for PCI DSS compliance.

Review Inherent Controls:

The document lists various controls and specifies whether they are managed by Google, the customer, or both.

It covers different aspects such as infrastructure security, data protection, and compliance requirements.

Analyze PCI Compliance:

Use the matrix to understand which PCI DSS requirements are inherently addressed by Google Cloud.

Identify the controls you need to implement and manage as a customer to ensure full compliance.

By reviewing this document, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of the inherent controls provided by Google Cloud and the responsibilities you must fulfill to achieve PCI compliance.

Google Cloud Compliance Documentation

PCI DSS Compliance on Google Cloud

Provision a Cloud NAT Instance:

Cloud NAT (Network Address Translation) allows instances without external IP addresses to access the internet securely.

In the Google Cloud Console, navigate to the VPC Network section and select Cloud NAT.

Create a new Cloud NAT configuration, specifying the VPC and region where your Compute Engine VMs are deployed.

Configure Cloud NAT:

Ensure that the Cloud NAT instance is configured to provide outbound internet connectivity for the VMs in your specified subnet.

This setup allows the VMs to access the internet for package updates and external installations without requiring public IP addresses.

Enable Private Google Access:

Private Google Access allows VMs in a subnet to reach Google APIs and services using internal IP addresses.

In the Google Cloud Console, navigate to the VPC Network section and select Subnets.

Edit the subnet used by your Compute Engine VMs and enable Private Google Access.

Update DevOps Scripts:

Ensure that your DevOps scripts are updated to work with the new network configuration.

Test the build process to confirm that the VMs can access necessary resources and complete the build pipeline successfully.

To prepare for migrating Google Cloud projects to a new organization node, it's crucial to ensure that the projects' current configurations and dependencies are appropriately managed. The two necessary preparation steps are:

Identify inherited Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles on projects to be migrated (C):

Projects inherit IAM roles from their parent resources. Identifying these roles is essential to understand the permissions and access levels that users have on the projects. This will help in ensuring that after migration, the appropriate roles and permissions are applied correctly.

Remove the specific migration projects from any VPC Service Controls perimeters and bridges (E):

VPC Service Controls provide security boundaries around your Google Cloud resources to mitigate data exfiltration risks. Before migrating the projects, they need to be removed from any existing VPC Service Controls perimeters and bridges to prevent any disruption in access or network communication. After migration, the projects can be added back to the necessary perimeters.

References

Google Cloud IAM documentation

VPC Service Controls documentation

An unmanaged Google account is a personal account created by an individual using a corporate email address (e.g., john@company.com), which the organization cannot control. The root cause is that the organization has not claimed the identity for that email address.

Extracts:

"To prevent unmanaged Google account creation, you have two options: Create a user for every person who has an email address in your domain... If there are unmanaged accounts already created, you can use the Transfer Tool for unmanaged users to invite them to become managed users." (Source 5.1)

"If an admin creates a managed Google Account using the same account name as an existing unmanaged user account, this results in a conflicting account." (Source 5.3)

By provisioning an account for every employee (via Google Workspace or Cloud Identity), you effectively claim that domain identity, making it a managed account under IT control and preventing the creation of a new, unmanaged consumer account with the same email address.

Option B describes the foundational, preventative step in identity management: provisioning managed identities for all users in the domain.

To comply with FIPS 140-2 for the messaging app, you need to ensure that both data at rest and data in transit are encrypted according to the standard. Using customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) ensures that you have control over the encryption keys, and BoringSSL is a library that meets FIPS 140-2 standards for encrypting data in transit.

Steps:

Encrypt Local SSDs: Modify the instance template for the Managed Instance Group (MIG) to use customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) for encrypting Local SSDs.

Enable BoringSSL: Update the application to use the BoringSSL library for all instance-to-instance communication to ensure that all data in transit is encrypted according to FIPS 140-2 standards.

The problem requires granting an external partner team access solely to a database, without extending to other network resources, and following Google-recommended practices.

Workforce Identity Federation: This Google Cloud IAM feature is specifically designed for scenarios where an organization needs to grant Google Cloud access to external identities (like partners, contractors, or customers) who are managed by their own identity provider (IdP). It allows these external users to authenticate using their existing credentials and then gain access to specified Google Cloud resources.

Extract Reference: "Workforce Identity Federation lets you use an external identity provider (IdP) to authenticate and authorize a workforce—a group of users, such as employees, partners, and contractors—using IAM, so that the users can access Google Cloud services." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Workforce Identity Federation | IAM Documentation" - https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/workforce-identity-federation)

Extract Reference: "Secure access for partners and vendors. Workforce Identity Federation can enable enterprises to selectively federate users from partner or vendor IdPs without requiring IT teams to sync or create a separate identity store to use Google Cloud resources." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Introducing Workforce Identity Federation..." - https://www.azalio.io/introducing-workforce-identity-federation-to-easily-manage-workforce-access-to-google-cloud/)

Least Privilege and Isolation: With Workforce Identity Federation, you create an identity pool and a provider that trusts the partner's IdP. You then grant IAM roles only to the workforce pool (or specific identities within it) on the specific database resource. This ensures fine-grained access control and prevents access to other resources in your network, directly addressing the least privilege and isolation requirements. The partner's identities are never synced into your internal Cloud Identity directory.

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Add a public IP address... Securely distribute credentials: Adding a public IP address exposes the database to the internet, which is a major security risk and contradicts "restricted solely to the database and can not extend to any other resources within your company's network" as it allows any external network to potentially reach it. Distributing credentials manually is also not a Google-recommended secure practice.

B. Create accounts for the partner team in your corporate identity provider. Synchronize these accounts with Google Cloud Identity: This means you become responsible for managing the partner's identities within your own corporate IdP and syncing them. This is an unnecessary operational burden and blurs the lines of identity management. It also may inadvertently grant them broader network access if your corporate IdP is connected to your internal network resources.

C. Ask the partner team to set up Cloud Identity accounts within their own corporate environment and identity provider. Grant the partner’s Cloud Identity accounts access: While better than B, this implies the partner managing Cloud Identity accounts themselves and you directly granting IAM roles to their Cloud Identity users. Workforce Identity Federation is a more robust and scalable solution for federating any external IdP with Google Cloud IAM, rather than requiring partners to adopt Cloud Identity directly. Workforce Identity Federation is the explicit pattern for cross-organization access using existing external IdPs.

Therefore, Workforce Identity Federation is the most secure, scalable, and Google-recommended solution for granting restricted access to external partner teams.

To ensure least-privilege access and provide necessary permissions to the DevOps team only during a deployment issue, follow these steps:

Create a Service Account:

In your Google Cloud project, create a new service account specifically for the DevOps team.

Assign Limited Permissions:

Grant the service account permissions with only the necessary list/view roles. For instance, you can create a custom IAM role with compute.instances.list and compute.instances.get permissions.

Grant Service Account User Role:

Assign the Service Account User role to the DevOps team members for the created service account. This allows them to act as the service account and use its permissions.

Access Control During Incidents:

During a deployment issue, the DevOps team can temporarily use the service account to access the resources. This ensures they have the least-privilege access required to investigate and resolve the issue.

Automation and Monitoring:

Implement automation to enable and disable the service account access as needed and monitor the usage to ensure compliance with the least-privilege principle.

Benefits:

Security: Limits access to only what is necessary, reducing the risk of unauthorized changes.

Flexibility: Provides necessary access during incidents without granting permanent elevated permissions.

References

Creating and Managing Service Accounts

Service Account User Role

https://cloud.google.com/network-intelligence-center/docs/firewall-insights/concepts/overview#shadowed-firewall-rules

Firewall Insights analyzes your firewall rules to detect firewall rules that are shadowed by other rules. A shadowed rule is a firewall rule that has all of its relevant attributes, such as its IP address and port ranges, overlapped by attributes from one or more rules with higher or equal priority, called shadowing rules.

To enable Engineering Group A to attach a Compute Engine instance to a specific subnet (10.1.1.0/24) in a Shared VPC, you should grant the Compute Network User Role at the subnet level. This role allows users to use the subnetwork for their instances without giving them broader permissions at the project level.

Step-by-Step:

Identify the Subnet: Locate the subnet (10.1.1.0/24) in the host project.

Grant Role:

Navigate to the GCP Console > VPC network > VPC networks.

Select the Shared VPC host project and locate the specific subnet.

Click on "Edit" and go to the "IAM & Admin" section.

Assign the "Compute Network User" role to Engineering Group A at the subnet level.

Verification: Ensure that Engineering Group A can now attach Compute Engine instances to the specified subnet.

Shared VPC Overview

Compute Network User Role

To ensure user-uploaded comments and product reviews do not include sensitive data before publication, use the Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) API.

Enable DLP API:

Go to the Cloud Console and navigate to APIs & Services > Library.

Search for "Data Loss Prevention API" and enable it.

Configure DLP API:

Create an inspection template specifying the types of sensitive data to detect.

Set up de-identification templates if you want to redact or mask sensitive data.

Implement DLP in Application:

Use the Google Cloud DLP Client Library for the desired programming language.

Send the text data to the DLP API for inspection before saving or publishing.

from google.cloud import dlp_v2 dlp_client = dlp_v2.DlpServiceClient() parent = f"projects/{project_id}" item = {"value": "User comment text here"} inspect_config = {"info_types": [{"name": "PERSON_NAME"}, {"name": "CREDIT_CARD_NUMBER"}]} response = dlp_client.inspect_content(parent=parent, inspect_config=inspect_config, item=item)

Cloud Data Loss Prevention API Documentation

DLP API Client Libraries

To ensure that only trusted container images are deployed on Cloud Run, you can implement Binary Authorization, which is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted images are used.

Set Up Binary Authorization:

Navigate to the Google Cloud Console.

Go to Security > Binary Authorization.

Configure the policy to include attestors that verify your trusted images.

Enable Binary Authorization on Cloud Run:

Go to the Cloud Run service.

Enable Binary Authorization on your existing Cloud Run services by selecting the appropriate Binary Authorization policy.

Set Organization Policy:

Go to the Organization Policies page in the Google Cloud Console.

Add a constraint for constraints/run.allowedBinaryAuthorizationPolicies.

Specify the list of allowed Binary Authorization policy names to enforce across your organization.

These steps ensure that any container image deployed on Cloud Run is validated against the specified Binary Authorization policies, preventing untrusted images from being deployed.

Binary Authorization Documentation

Enabling Binary Authorization on Cloud Run