DP-800 Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

Because the SQL Server 2025 instance has no outbound network connectivity , the embedding model cannot rely on a remote REST endpoint such as Azure AI Foundry or Azure OpenAI. Microsoft’s CREATE EXTERNAL MODEL documentation includes a local deployment pattern using ONNX Runtime running locally with local runtime/model paths . That is the right design when embeddings must be generated inside the SQL Server instance without external network access. Microsoft explicitly documents a local ONNX Runtime example for SQL Server 2025 and notes the required local runtime setup and model path configuration.

The permission requirement is handled by granting the application user access to use the external embeddings model. Microsoft’s AI_GENERATE_EMBEDDINGS documentation states that, as a prerequisite, you must create an external model of type EMBEDDINGS that is accessible via the correct grants, roles, and/or permissions . Among the choices, the exam-appropriate action is to grant execute permission on the external model project to AlApplicationUser so only that database user can run embedding generation through the model.

The requirement is to ensure embeddings are updated every time the underlying content changes without relying on a nightly batch job. The right design is to enable change tracking on the source table so an external process can identify which rows changed and regenerate embeddings only for those rows. Microsoft documents that change detection mechanisms are used to pick up new and updated rows incrementally , which is the right pattern when you need near-continuous refresh instead of full nightly rebuilds.

This is better than:

A. fixed-size chunking , which affects chunk strategy but not change detection.

B. a smaller embedding model , which affects model cost/latency but not update triggering.

C. table triggers , which would push embedding-maintenance logic directly into write operations and is generally not the best design for AI-processing pipelines. The question specifically asks for a solution that replaces the nightly batch requirement, not one that performs heavyweight work inline during every transaction.

This does not meet the goal. A row-by-row DELETE against the oldest month is not the lowest-impact way to purge data from a monthly partitioned table. Microsoft’s partitioning guidance specifically says partitioning lets you perform maintenance and retention operations more efficiently by targeting just the relevant partition, including the ability to truncate data in a single partition .

The proposed statement:

DELETE FROM dbo.Orders

WHERE OrderDate < DATEADD(month, -36, SYSUTCDATETIME());

would log row deletions and can hold locks longer, creating more overhead for other queries than a partition-level maintenance operation. Since the table is already partitioned by month , the expected low-impact approach is to operate on the oldest partition directly, not issue a broad delete predicate over rows. Microsoft explicitly highlights partition-targeted truncation as a faster, more efficient retention operation than working against the whole table or rowset.

The correct way to avoid full table scans here is to add a computed column that extracts the JSON scalar property with JSON_VALUE , and then create a nonclustered index on that computed column with the report’s returned columns in the INCLUDE list. Microsoft’s JSON indexing guidance specifically recommends creating a computed column that exposes the JSON property you filter on, using the same expression as in the query, and then indexing that computed column.

So the computed column must be:

AS JSON_VALUE([log], ' $.severity ' ) PERSISTED

This is correct because $.severity is a scalar JSON value, so JSON_VALUE is the proper function. JSON_QUERY would be for extracting an object or array, not a scalar property. Microsoft also notes that persisted computed columns can improve access speed for JSON-derived values.

The index should then include:

INCLUDE (LogId, LogDateTime, [log])

That is the right covering strategy because the report filters by severity but returns LogId, LogDateTime, and log. Microsoft’s guidance on included columns explains that nonkey included columns let a nonclustered index cover more queries and reduce extra lookups to the base table.

So the completed code is:

ALTER TABLE WebSite.Logs

ADD severity AS JSON_VALUE([log], ' $.severity ' ) PERSISTED;

GO

CREATE INDEX ix_severity

ON WebSite.Logs(severity)

INCLUDE (LogId, LogDateTime, [log]);

GO

The correct sequence is:

git fetch origin

git merge origin/main

gh pr create

This is the right workflow because the script starts on the local feature branch:

git checkout feature/db1-add-staticdata

To update that local feature branch with the latest changes from main, you first fetch the latest remote refs with git fetch origin , then merge the updated remote main branch into the current feature branch with git merge origin/main . After the feature branch is up to date, the correct GitHub CLI command to open the pull request is gh pr create . GitHub’s CLI documentation shows that gh pr create is the command used to create a pull request, and supports flags such as --title, --body, --head, --base, --repo, and --web, which match the script shown in the question.

The other commands are not the best fit here:

git checkout main would move you off the feature branch, which is not what you want before merging main into the feature branch.

git pull origin main could update from remote main, but the script pattern here clearly separates fetching and then merging.

gh pr merge merges an existing pull request, not create one.

gh pr ready marks a draft PR as ready for review, but does not create the PR.